Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
FIGURE OF THE See also:EARTH . The determination of the figure of the See also:earth is a problem of the highest importance in See also:astronomy, inasmuch as the See also:diameter of the earth is the unit to which all See also:celestial distances must be referred . See also:Historical . Reasoning from the See also:uniform level See also:appearance of the See also:horizon, the See also:variations in See also:altitude of the circumpolar stars as one travels towards the See also:north or See also:south, the disappearance of a See also:ship See also:standing out to See also:sea, and perhaps other phenomena, the earliest astronomers regarded the earth as a See also:sphere, and they endeavoured to ascertain its dimensions . See also:Aristotle relates that the mathematicians had found the circumference to be 400,000 stadia (about 46,000 See also:miles) . But Eratosthenes (c . 250 B.C.) appears to have been the first who entertained an accurate See also:idea of the principles on which the determination of the figure of the earth really depends, and attempted to reduce them to practice . His results were very inaccurate, but his method is the same as that which is followed at the See also:present See also:day—depending, in fact,on the comparison of a See also:line measured on the earth's See also:surface with the corresponding arc of the heavens . He observed that at Syene in Upper See also:Egypt, on the day of the summer See also:solstice, the See also:sun was exactly See also:vertical, whilst at See also:Alexandria at the same See also:season of the See also:year its See also:zenith distance was 7° 12', or one-fiftieth of the circumference of a circle . He assumed that these places were on the same See also:meridian; and, reckoning their distance apart as 5000 stadia, he inferred that the circumference of the earth was 250,000 stadia (about 29,000 miles) . A similar See also:attempt was made by See also:Posidonius, who adopted a method which differed from that of Eratosthenes only in using a See also:star instead of the sun . He obtained 240,000 stadia (about 27,600 miles) for the circumference . See also:Ptolemy in his See also:Geography assigns the length of the degree as 500 stadia . The See also:Arabs also investigated the question of the earth's magnitude . The See also:caliph Abdallah al See also:Mamun (A.D . 814), having fixed on a spot in the plains of See also:Mesopotamia, despatched one See also:company of astronomers northwards and another southwards, measuring the See also:journey by rods, until each found the altitude of the See also:pole to have changed one degree . But the result of this measurement does not appear to have been very satisfactory . From this See also:time the subject seems to have attracted no See also:attention until about 1500, when See also:Jean See also:Fernel (1497-1558), a Frenchman, measured a distance in the direction of the meridian near See also:Paris by counting the number of revolutions of the See also:wheel of a See also:carriage . His astronomical observations were made with a triangle used as a quadrant, and his resulting length of a degree was very near the truth . Willebrord See also:Snell' substituted a See also:chain of triangles for actual linear measurement . He measured his See also:base line on the frozen surface of the meadows near See also:Leiden, and measured the angles of his triangles, which See also:lay between See also:Alkmaar and See also:Bergen-op-Zoom, with a quadrant and semicircles . He took the precaution of ' Eratosthenes Batavus, seu de terrae ambitus See also:vera quantitate suscitatus, a Willebrordo Snellio, Lugduni-Batavorum 0617) . II comparing his See also:standard with that of the See also:French, so that his result was expressed in toises (the length of the toise is about 6.39 See also:English ft.) . The See also:work was recomputed and reobserved by P. von See also:Musschenbroek in 1729 . In 1637 an Englishman, See also:Richard See also:Norwood, published a determination of the figure of the earth in a See also:volume entitled The See also:Seaman's Practice, contayning a Fundamentall Probleme in See also:Navigation experimentally verified, namely, touching the Compasse of the Earth and Sea and the quantity of a Degree in our English See also:Measures . He observed on the 1th of See also:June 1633 the sun's meridian altitude in See also:London as 62° 1', and on the 6th of June 1635, his meridian altitude in See also:York as 590 33' . He measured the distance between these places partly with a chain and partly by pacing . By this means, through See also:compensation of errors, he arrived at 367,176 ft. for the degree—a very See also:fair result . The application of the See also:telescope to angular See also:instruments was the next important step . Jean See also:Picard was the first who in 1669, with the telescope, using such precautions as the nature of the operation requires, measured an arc of meridian . He measured with wooden rods a base line of 5663 toises, and a second or base of verification of 3902 toises; his triangulation extended from Malvoisine, near Paris, to Sourdon, near See also:Amiens . The angles of the triangles were measured with a quadrant furnished with a telescope having See also:cross-wires . The difference of See also:latitude of the terminal stations was determined by observations made with a sector on a star in See also:Cassiopeia, giving 1° 22' 55" for the See also:amplitude . The terrestrial measurement gave 78,850 toises,whenceheinferred for the length of the degree 57,060 toises . Hitherto See also:geodetic observations had been confined to the determination of the magnitude of the earth considered as a sphere, but. a See also:discovery made by Jean Richer (d . 1696) turned the attention of mathematicians to its deviation from a spherical See also:form .
This astronomer, having been sent by the See also:Academy of Sciences of Paris to the See also:island of See also:Cayenne, in South See also:America, for the purpose of investigating the amount of astronomical See also:refraction and other astronomical See also:objects, observed that his See also:clock, which had been regulated at Paris to See also:beat seconds, lost about two minutes and a See also:half daily at Cayenne, and that in See also:order to bring it to measure mean See also:solar time it was necessary to shorten the pendulum by more than a line (about , th of an in.)
.
This fact, which was scarcely credited till it had been confirmed by the subsequent observations of Varin and See also:Deshayes on the coasts of See also:Africa and America, was first explained in the third See also:book of See also:Newton's Principia, who showed that it could only be referred to a diminution of gravity arising either from a protuberance of the See also:equatorial parts of the earth and consequent increase of the distance from the centre, or from the counteracting effect of the centrifugal force
.
About the same time (1673) appeared See also:Christian See also:Huygens' De Horologio Oscillatorio, in which for the first time were found correct notions on the subject of centrifugal force
.
It does not, however, appear that they were applied to the theoretical investigation of the figure of the earth before the publication of Newton's Principia
.
In 1690 Huygens published his De Causa Gravitatis, which contains an investigation of the figure of the earth on the supposition that the attraction of every particle is towards the centre
.
Between 1684 and 1718 J. and D
.
See also:Cassini, starting from Picard's base, carried a triangulation northwards from Paris to See also:Dunkirk and southwards from Paris to Collioure
.
They measured a base of 7246 toises near See also:Perpignan, and a somewhat shorter base near Dunkirk; and from the See also:northern portion of the arc, which had an amplitude of 20 12' 9", obtained for the length of a degree 56,96o toises; while from the See also:southern portion, of which the amplitude was 6° 18' 57", they obtained 57,097 toises
.
The immediate inference from this was that, the degree diminishing with increasing latitude, theearth must be a prolate See also:spheroid
.
This conclusion was totally opposed to the theoretical investigations of Newton and Huygens, and accordingly the Academy of Sciences of Paris determined to apply a decisive test by the measurement of arcs at a See also:great distance from each other—one in the neighbourhood of the See also:equator, the other in a high latitude
.
Thus arose the celebrated expeditions of the Frenchacademicians
.
In May 1735 See also: The second party consisted of Pierre Louis See also:Moreau de See also:Maupertuis, See also:Alexis See also:Claude See also:Clairault, Charles See also:Etienne Louis See also:Camus, Pierre Charles See also:Lemonnier, and Reginaud Outhier, who reached the Gulf of See also:Bothnia in See also:July 1736; they were in some respects more fortunate than the first party, inasmuch as they completed the measurement of an arc near the polar circle of 57' amplitude and returned within sixteen months from the date of their departure . The measurement of Bouguer and De la Condamine was executed with great care, and on See also:account of the locality, as well as the manner in which all the details were conducted, it has always been regarded as a most valuable determination . The southern limit was at Tarqui, the northern at Cotchesqui . A base of 6272 toises was measured in the vicinity of See also:Quito, near the northern extremity of the arc, and a second base of 5260 toises near the southern extremity . The mountainous nature of the See also:country made the work very laborious, in some cases the difference of heights of two neighbouring stations exceeding 1 mile; and they had much trouble with their instruments, those with which they were to "determine the latitudes proving untrustworthy . But they succeeded by simultaneous observations of the same star at the two extremities of the arc in obtaining very fair results . The whole length of the arc amounted to 176,945 toises, while the diff erenceof iatitudeswas3° 7' 3" . In consequence of a misunderstanding that arose between De la Condamine and Bouguer, their operations were conducted separately, and each wrote a full account of the expedition . Bouguer's book was published in 1749; that of De la Condamine in 1751 . The toise used in this measure was afterwards regarded as the standard toise, and is always referred to as the Toise of Peru . The party of Maupertuis, though their work was quickly despatched, had also to contend with great difficulties . Not being able to make use of the small islands in the Gulf of Bothnia for the trigonometrical stations, they were forced to penetrate into the forests of See also:Lapland, commencing operations at Torneh, a See also:city situated on the mainland near the extremity of the gulf .
From this, the southern extremity of their arc, they carried a chain of triangles northward to the See also:mountain Kittis, which they selected as the northern See also:terminus
.
The latitudes were determined by observations with a sector (made by See also:George See also:Graham) of the zenith distance of a and b Draconis
.
The base line was measured on the frozen surface of the See also:river Tornea about the See also:middle of the arc; two parties measured it separately, and they differed by about 4 in
.
The result of the whole was that the difference of latitudes of the terminal stations was 57' 29" •6, and the length of the arc 55,023 toises
.
In this expedition, as well as in that to Peru, observations were made with a pendulum to determine the force of gravity; and these observations coincided with the geodetic results in proving that the earth was an oblate and not prolate spheroid
.
In 1740 was published in the Paris Memoires an account, by Cassini de Thury, of a remeasurement by himself and See also:Nicolas Louis de See also:Lacaille of the meridian of Paris
.
With a view to determine more accurately the variation of the degree along the meridian, they divided the distance from Dunkirk to Collioure into four partial arcs of about two degrees each, by observing the latitude at five stations
.
The results previously obtained by J. and D
.
Cassini were not confirmed, but, on the contrary, the length of the degree derived from these partial arcs showed on the whole an increase with an increasing latitude
.
Cassini and Iacaille also measured an arc of parallel across the mouth of the See also:Rhone
.
The difference of time of the extremities was determined by the observers at either end noting the instant of a See also:signal given by flashing See also:gunpowder at a point near the middle of the arc
.
While at the Cape of See also:Good See also:Hope in 1752, engaged in various astronomical observations, Lacaille measured an arc of meridian of 1° 13' 17", which gave him for the length of the degree 57,037
toises—an unexpected result, which has led to the remeasurement of the arc by See also:Sir See also:
Passing over the measurements made between See also:Rome and See also:Rimini and on the plains of See also:Piedmont by the See also:Jesuits Ruggiero Giuseppe See also:Boscovich and Giovanni Battista See also:Beccaria, and also the arc measured with See also:deal rods in North America by Charles See also:Mason and See also:Jeremiah See also:Dixon, we come to the commencement of the English triangulation
.
In 1783, in consequence of a See also:representation from Cassini de Thury on the advantages that would accrue from the geodetic connexion of Paris and See also:Greenwich, See also:General See also: J . D . Arago and Claude Louis Mathieu on the French . The publication in 1838 of See also:Friedrich Wilhelm See also:Bessel's Gradmessung in Ostpreussen marks an era in the See also:science of geodesy . Here we find the method of least squares applied to the calculation of a network of triangles and the reduction of the observations generally . The systematic manner in which all the observations were taken with the view of securing final results of extreme accuracy is admirable . The triangulation, which was a small one, extended about a degree and a half along the shores of the Baltic in a N.N.E. direction . The angles were observed with theodolites of 12 and 15 in. diameter, and the latitudes determined by means of the transit See also:instrument in the See also:prime vertical—a method much used in See also:Germany . (The base apparatus is described in the See also:article GEODESY.) The See also:principal triangulation of Great See also:Britain and See also:Ireland, which was commenced in 1783 under General Roy, for the more immediate purpose of connecting the observatories of Greenwich and Paris, had been gradually extended, under the successive direction of See also:Colonel E . See also:Williams, General W . Mudge, General T . F .
Colby, Colonel L
.
A
.
See also:
The See also:average number of equations in a figure is 44; the largest equation is one of 77 unknown quantities
.
The vertical See also:limb of Airy's zenith sector is read by four microscopes, and in the See also:complete observation of a star there are 10 See also:micrometer readings and 12 level readings
.
The instrument is portable; and a complete determination of latitude, affected with the mean of the See also:declination errors of two stars, is effected by two micrometer readings and four level readings
.
The observation consists in measuring with the telescope micrometer the difference of zenith distances of two stars which cross the meridian, one to the north and the other to the south of the observer at zenith distances which differ by not much more than ro' or 15', the See also:interval of the times of transit being not less than one nor more than twenty minutes
.
The advantages are that, with simplicity in the construction of the instrument and facility in the manipulation, refraction is eliminated (or nearly so, as the stars are generally selected within 25° of the zenith), and there is no large divided circle
.
The telescope, which is counterpoised on one side of the vertical See also:axis, has a small circle for finding, and there is also a small See also:horizontal circle
.
This instrument is universally used in See also:American geodesy
.
The principal work containing the methods and results of these operations was published in 1858 with the See also:title " See also:Ordnance Trigonometrical Survey of Great Britain and Ireland
.
Account of the observations and calculations of the principal triangulation and of the figure, dimensions and mean specific gravity of the earth as derived therefrom
.
See also:Drawn up by Captain See also:
.
.
See also:Col
.
Sir Henry James."
Extensive operations for See also:surveying See also:India and determining the figure of the earth were commenced in 1800
.
Colonel W
.
Lambton started the great meridian arc at Punnae in latitude 8° 9', and, following generally the methods of the English survey, he carried his triangulation as far north as 20° 30'
.
The work was continued by Sir George (then Captain) See also:Everest, who carried it to the latitude of 29° 30'
.
Two ,admirable volumes by Sir George Everest, published in 1830 and in 1847, give the details of this undertaking
.
The survey was afterwards prosecuted by Colonel T
.
T
.
See also: The survey is detailed in eighteen volumes, published at See also:Dehra Dun, and entitled Account of the Operations of the Great Trigonometrical Survey of India . Of these the first nine were published under the direction of Colonel Walker; and the See also:remainder by Colonels Strahan and St G . C . See also:Gore, See also:Major S . G . Burrard and others . Vol. i., 187o, treats of the base lines; vol. ii., 1879, See also:history and general descriptions of the principal triangulation and of its reduction; vol. v., 1879, pendulum operations (Captains T . P . Basevi and W . T . Heaviside); vols. xi., 189o, and xviii., 1906, latitudes; vols. ix., 1883, x., 1887, xv., 1893, longitudes; vol. xvii., 1901, the Indo-See also:European See also:longitude-arcs from See also:Karachi to Greenwich . The other volumes contain the triangulations . In 186o Friedrich Georg Wilhelm See also:Struve published his Arc du meridien de 25° 20' entre le See also:Danube et la Mer Glaciale mesure depuis 1816 jusqu'en 1855 . The latitudes of the thirteen astronomical stations of this arc were determined partly with vertical circles and partly by means of the transit instrument in the prime vertical . The triangulation, a great part of which, however, is a See also:simple chain of triangles, is reduced by the method of least squares, and the probable errors of the resulting distances of See also:parallels is given; the probable error of the whole arc in length is 6.2 toises . Ten base lines were measured . The sum of the lengths of the ten measured bases is 29,863 toises, so that the average length of a base line is 19,100 ft . The azimuths were observed at fourteen stations . In high latitudes the determination of the meridian is a See also:matter of great difficulty; nevertheless the azimuths at all the northern stations were successfully determined,—the probable error of the result at Fuglenaes being t o" '53• Before proceeding with the See also:modern developments of geodetic measurements and their application to the figure of the earth, we must discuss the " See also:mechanical theory," which is indispensable for a full understanding of the subject . Mechanical Theory . Newton, by applying his theory of See also:gravitation, combined with the so-called centrifugal force, to the earth, and assuming that an oblate See also:ellipsoid of rotation is a form of See also:equilibrium for a homogeneous fluid rotating with uniform angular velocity, obtained the ratio of the axes 229 : 230, and the See also:law of variation of gravity on the surface . A few years later Huygens published an investigation of the figure of the earth, supposing the attraction of every particle to be towards the centre of the earth, obtaining as a result that the proportion of the axes should be 578 : 579 . In 1740 See also:Colin See also:Maclaurin, in his De causa physica fluxus et refluxus maxis, demonstrated that the oblate ellipsoid of revolution is a figure which satisfies the conditions of equilibrium in the See also:case of a revolving homogeneous fluid mass, whose particles attract one another according to the law of the inverse square of the distance; he gave the equation connecting the See also:ellipticity with the proportion of the centrifugal force at the equator to gravity, and determined the attraction on a particle situated anywhere on the surface of such a See also:body . In 1743 Clairault published his Theorie de la figure de la terre, which contains a remarkable theorem (" ClairauIt's Theorem "), establishing a relation between the ellipticity of the earth and the variation of gravity from the equator to the poles . Assuming that the earth is composed of concentric ellipsoidal strata having a See also:common axis of rotation, each stratum homogeneous in itself, but the ellipticities and densities of the successive strata varying according to any law, and that the superficial stratum has the same form as if it were fluid, he proved that See also:gig g+e=2 , where g, g' are the amounts of gravity at the equator and at the pole respectively, e the ellipticity of the meridian (or "flattening "), and m the ratio of the centrifugal force at the equator to g . He also proved that the increase of gravity in proceeding from the equator to the poles is as the square of the sine of the latitude . This, taken with the former theorem, gives the means of deter-See also:mining the earth's ellipticity from observation of the relative force of gravity at any two places . P . S . See also:Laplace, who devoted much attention to the subject, remarks on Clairault's work that " the importance of all his results and the elegance with which they are presented See also:place this work amongst the most beautiful of mathematical productions " (See also:Isaac See also:Todhunter's History of the Mathematical Theories of Attraction and the Figure of the Earth, vol. i. p . 229) . The problem of the figure of the earth treated as a question of See also:mechanics or See also:hydrostatics is one of great difficulty, and it would be quite impracticable but for the circumstance that the surface differs but little from a sphere . In order to See also:express the forces at any point of the body arising from the attraction of its particles, the form of the surface is required, but this form is the very one which it is the See also:object of the investigation to discover; hence the complexity of the subject, and even with all the present resources of mathematicians only a partial and imperfect solution can be obtained . We may here briefly indicate the line of reasoning by which some of the most important results may be obtained . If X, Y, Z be the components parallel to three rectangular axes of the forces acting on a particle of a fluid mass at the point x, y, z, then, p being the pressure there, and p the See also:density, dp = p(Xdx+Ydy+Zdz) ; and for equilibrium the necessary conditions are, that p(Xdx+ Ydy+Zdz) be a complete See also:differential, and at the See also:free surface Xdx+ Ydy+Zdz=o . This equation implies that the resultant of the forces is normal to the surface at every point, and in a homogeneous fluid it is obviously the differential equation of all surfaces of equal pressure . If the fluid be heterogeneous then it is to be remarked that for forces of attraction according to the See also:ordinary law of gravitation, if X, Y, Z be the components of the attraction of a mass whose potential is V, then Xdx+Ydy+Zdz = dz dx+dy dy+ dz dz, which is a complete differential . And in the case of a fluid rotating with uniform velocity, in which the so-called centrifugal force enters as a force acting on each particle proportional to its distance from the axis of rotation, the corresponding part of Xdx+Ydy+Zdz is obviously a complete differential . Therefore for the forces with which we are now concerned Xdx+Ydy+Zdz =dU, where U is some See also:function of x, y, z, and it is necessary for equilibrium that dp=pdU be a complete differential; that is, p must be a function of U or a function of p, and so also p a function of U . So that dU=o is the differential equation of surfaces of equal pressure and density . We may now show that a homogeneous fluid mass in the form of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution having a uniform velocity of rotation can be in equilibrium . It may be proved that the attraction of the ellipsoid x2+y2+z2(1+E2) =c2(i+E2) upon a particle P of its mass at x, y, z has for components X=—Ax, Y=—Ay, Z=—Cz, 2 ( ,3 ) A = 2irk p tan-le —E2 C =4wk2p ( 1 E2 E2— 1 Eg tan s) , and k2 the See also:constant of attraction . Besides the attraction of the mass of the ellipsoid, the centrifugal force at P has for components +xw2, +yw2, o; then the condition of fluid equilibrium is (A —See also:w2)xdx+(A — w2)ydy+Czdz =o, which by integration gives (A — w2) (x2+y2) +Cz2 = constant . This is the equation of an ellipsoid of rotation, and therefore the equilibrium is possible . The equation coincides with that of the surface of the fluid mass if we make Aw2C/(1+E2), 2irk2p 3E2 E2tan 1E—E, In the case of the earth, which is nearly spherical, we obtain by expanding the expression for w2 in See also:powers of E2, rejecting the higher powers, and remarking that the ellipticity e =E2, w2/2 irk2p = 4E2/ 15 =8e/15 . Now if m be the ratio of the centrifugal force to the intensity of gravity at the equator, and a=c(1+e), then m= See also: |