|
See also: term used specially in philosophy and See also: theology for a composite See also: system of thought made up of views borrowed from various other systems
.
Where the characteristic doctrines of a philosophy are not thus merely adopted, but are the modified products of a blending of the systems from which it takes its rise, the philosophy is. not properly eclectic
.
See also: Eclecticism always tends to spring up See also: rafter a See also: period of vigorous constructive See also: speculation, especially in the later stages of a controversy between thinkers of pre-eminent ability
.
Their respective followers, and more especially cultured laymen, lacking the capacity for See also: original See also: work, seeking for a solution in some kind of compromise, and possibly failing to grasp the essentials of the controversy, take See also: refuge in acombination of those elements in the opposing systems which seem to, afford a See also: sound See also: practical theory
.
Since these combinations have often been as illogical as facile, " eclecticism " has generally acquired a somewhat contemptuous significance
.
At the same See also: time, the essence of eclecticism is the refusal to follow blindly one set of formulae and conventions, coupled with a determinatignto recognize and select from all See also: sources those elements which are See also: good or true in the abstract, or in practical affairs most useful ad hoc
.
Theoretically, therefore, eclecticism is a perfectly sound method, and the contemptuous significance which the word has acquired is due partly to the fact that many eclectics have been intellectual trimmers, sceptics or dilettanti, and partly, to See also: mere partisanship
.
On the other See also: hand, eclecticism in the sphere of abstract thought is open to this See also: main objection that, in so far as every philosophic system is, at least in theory, an integral whole, the combination of principles from hostile theories must result in an incoherent patchwork
.
Thus it might be argued that there can be no logical combination of elements from Christian See also: ethics, with its divine sanction, and purely intuitional or evolutionary ethical theories, where the sanction is essentially different in quality
.
It is in practical affairs that the eclectic or undogmatic spirit is most valuable, and also least dangerous
.
In the 2nd century B.C. a remarkable tendency toward eclecticism began to manifest itself
.
The longing to arrive at the one explanation of all things, which had inspired the older philosophers, became less earnest; the belief, indeed, that any such explanation was attainable began to fail
.
Thus men cameto. adopt from all systems the doctrines which best pleased them . In Panaetius we find one of the earliest examples of the modification of Stoicism by the eclectic spirit; about the same time the same spirit displayed itself among the Peripatetics . InSee also: Rome philosophy, never became more than a secondary pursuit; naturally, therefore, the See also: Roman thinkers were for the most See also: part eclectic
.
Of this tendency See also: Cicero is the most striking See also: illustration —his philosophical See also: works consisting of an aggregation, with little or no blending, of doctrines borrowed from Stoicism, Peripateticism, and the scepticism of the See also: Middle See also: Academy
.
In the last stage of See also: Greek philosophy the eclectic spirit produced remarkable results outside the philosophies of those properly called eclectics
.
Thinkers See also: chose their doctrines from many sources—from the venerated teaching of See also: Aristotle and See also: Plato, from that of the Pythagoreans and of the See also: Stoics, from the old Greek See also: mythology, and from the Jewish and other See also: Oriental systems
.
Yet it must be observed that See also: Neoplatonism, See also: Gnosticism, and the other systems which are grouped under the name Alexandrian, were not truly eclectic, consisting, as they did, not of a mere syncretism of Greek and Oriental thought, but of a mutual modification of the two
.
It is true that several of the Neoplatonists professed to accept all the teaching both of Plato and of Aristotle, whereas, in fact, they arbitrarily, interpreted Aristotle so as to make him agree with Plato, and Plato so as to make his teachings consistent with the Oriental doctrines which they had adopted, in the same manner ' as the schoolmen attempted to reconcile Aristotle with the doctrines of the See also: church
.
Among the early Christians,
See also: Clement of Alexandria, See also: Origen and See also: Synesius were eclectics in philosophy
.
The eclectics of See also: modern philosophy are too numerous to name
.
Of See also: Italian philosophers the eclectics See also: form a large proportion
.
Among the See also: German we may mention See also: Wolf and his followers, as well as Mendelssohn, J
.
A . See also: Eberhard, See also: Ernst Platner, and to some extent .Schelling, whom, however, it would be incorrect to describe as merely an eclectic
.
In the first place, his speculations were largely original; and in the second place, it is not so much that his views of any time were borrowed from a number of philosophers, as that his thinking was influenced first by one philosopher, then by another
.
In the 19th century the term " eclectic " came to he applied specially to a number of French philosophers who differed considerably from one another
.
Of these the earliest were See also: Pierre See also: Paul Royer-Collard, who was mainly a follower of See also: Thomas
See also: Reid, and Maine de Biran; but the name is still more appropriately given to the school of which the most distinguished members are Victor See also: Cousin, See also: Theodore Jouffroy, J
.
P
.
See also: Damiron, See also: Barthelemy St Hilaire, C
.
F
.
M. de Remusat, Adolphe See also: Garnier and Ravaisson-Mollien
.
Cousin, whose views varied considerably at different periods of his See also: life, not only adopted freely what pleased him in the doctrines of Pierre Laromiguiere, Royer-Collard and Maine de Biran, of See also: Kant, Schelling and Hegel, and of the See also: ancient philosophies, but expressly maintained that the eclectic is the only method now open to the philosopher, whose See also: function thus resolves itself into critical selection and nothing more
.
" Each system," he asserted, " is not false, but incomplete, and in reuniting all imcomplete systems, we should have a See also: complete philosophy, adequate to the totality of consciousness." This assumes that every philosophical truth is already contained somewhere in the existing systems
.
If, however, as it would surely be rash to deny, there still remains philosophical truth undiscovered; but discoverable by human intelligence, it is evident that eclecticism is not the only philosophy
.
Eclecticism gained See also: great popularity, and, partly owing to Cousin's position as See also: minister of public instruction, became the authorized system in the chief seats of learning in See also: France, where it has given a most remarkable impulse to the study of the See also: history of philosophy
.
|
|
|
[back] ECKMUHL, or EGGMVRL |
[next] ECLIPSE (Gr. €uheo,tis, falling out of place, fai... |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.