Online Encyclopedia

EDWARD V

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V08, Page 996 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:
EDWARD V  . (1470-1483), king of England, was the elder son of
See also:
Edward IV. by his wife Elizabeth Woodville, and was born, during his
See also:
father's temporary exile, in the sanctuary of Westminster Abbey on the 2nd of November 1470 . In
See also:
June 1471 he was created prince of Wales . When Edward IV. died in
See also:
April 1483 a struggle for power took place between the young king's paternal
See also:
uncle, Richard, duke of Gloucester, who had been appointed as his
See also:
guardian by Edward IV., and his maternal uncle, Richard Woodville,
See also:
Earl Rivers . Gloucester obtained possession of the king's person, and, having arrested Rivers and some of his supporters, assumed the
See also:
crown himself after a very slight and feigned reluctance, on the ground that the
See also:
marriage of Edward and Elizabeth Woodville was invalid, and consequently its issue was illegitimate . At this time Edward and his
See also:
brother Richard, duke of York, were living in the Tower of
See also:
London . Shortly after-wards a
See also:
movement was organized to
See also:
free them from captivity, and then it became known that they were already dead; but, though it was the general conviction that they had been murdered, it was twenty years before the manner of this deed was discovered . According to the narrative of
See also:
Sir Thomas More, Sir Robert Brackenbury, the constable of the Tower, refused to obey Richard's command to put the young princes to
See also:
death; but he complied with a warrant ordering him to give up his keys for one
See also:
night to Sir James Tyrell, who had arranged for the assassination . Two men, Miles
See also:
Forest and John Dighton, then smothered the youths under pillows while they were asleep . The
See also:
murder was committed most probably in August or September 1483 . Horace Walpole has attempted to cast doubts upon the murder of the princes, and Sir C . R .

Markham has argued that the deed was committed by order of Henry VII . Both these views, however, have been traversed by James Gairdner, and there seems little doubt that Sir Thomas More's story is substantially correct . See RICHARD III.; and in addition, Sir Thomas More,
See also:
History of Richard III., edited by J . R . Lumby (Cambridge, 1883) ; Horace Walpole, Historic Doubts on the
See also:
Life and Reign of Richard III . (London, i768); J . Gairdner, Richard III . (Cambridge, 1898); J . Gairdner and C . R . Markham in the
See also:
English
See also:
Historical Review, vol. vi . (London, 1891) ; Sir C .

R . Markham, Richard III . (1907) .

End of Article: EDWARD V
[back]
EDWARD STANLEY
[next]
EDWARD VI

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.