Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ENGLISH See also:LANGUAGE . In its See also:historical sense, the name See also:English is now conveniently used to comprehend the See also:language of the English See also:people from their See also:settlement in See also:Britain to the See also:present See also:day, the various stages through which it has passed being distinguished as Old, See also:Middle, and New or See also:Modern English . In See also:works yet See also:recent, and even in some still current, the See also:term is confined to the third, or at most extended' to the second and third of these stages, since the language assumed in the See also:main the vocabulary and grammatical forms which it now presents, the See also:oldest or inflected See also:stage being treated as a See also:separate language, under the See also:title of Anglo-Saxon, while the transition See also:period which connects the two has been called Semi-Saxon . This view had the See also:justification that, looked upon by themselves, either as vehicles of thought or as See also:objects of study and See also:analysis, Old English or Anglo-Saxon and Modern English are, for all See also:practical ends, distinct See also:languages,—as much so, for example, as Latin and See also:Spanish . No amount of familiarity with Modern English, including its See also:local dialects, would enable the student to read Anglo-Saxon, three-fourths of the vocabulary of which have perished and been reconstructed within 900 years; i nor would a knowledge even of these lost words give him the See also:power, since the grammatical See also:system, alike in See also:accidence and syntax, would be entirely See also:strange to him . Indeed, it is probable that a modern Englishman would acquire the power of See also:reading and See also:writing See also:French in less See also:time than it would cost him to attain to the same proficiency in Old English; so that if the test of distinct languages be their degree of practical difference from each other, it cannot be denied that " Anglo-Saxon " is a distinct language from Modern English . But when we view the subject historically, recognizing the fact that living speech is subject to continuous See also:change in certain definite directions, determined by the constitution and circumstances of mankind, as an See also:evolution or development of which we can trace the steps, and that, owing to the abundance of written materials, this evolution appears so See also:gradual in English that we can nowhere draw distinct lines separating its successive stages, we recognize these stages as merely temporary phases of an individual whole, and speak of the English language as used alike by See also:Cynewulf, by See also:Chaucer; by See also:Shakespeare and by See also:Tennyson ? It must not be forgotten, however, that in this wide sense the English language includes, not only the See also:literary or courtly forms of speech used at successive periods, but also the popular and, it may be, altogether unwritten dialects that exist by their See also:side . Only on this basis, indeed, can we speak of Old, Middle and Modern English as the same language, since in actual fact the precise See also:dialect which is now the cultivated language, or " See also:Standard English," is not the descendant of that dialect which was the cultivated language or "Englisc " of See also:Alfred, but of a See also:sister dialect then sunk in See also:comparative obscurity,—even as the See also:direct descendant of Alfred's Englisc is now to be found in the non-literary rustic speech of See also:Wiltshire and See also:Somersetshire . Causes which, linguistically i A careful examination of several Ietters of See also:Bosworth's Anglo-Saxon See also:dictionary gives in 2000 words (including derivatives and compounds, but excluding orthographic variants) 535 which still exist as modern English words . 2 The practical convenience of having one name for what was the same thing in various stages of development is not affected by the See also:probability that (E . A .
See also:Freeman notwithstanding) Engle and Englisc were, at an See also:early period, not applied to the whole of the inhabitants of See also:Teutonic Britain, but only to a See also:part of them
.
The dialects of Engle and Seaxan were alike old forms of what was afterwards English speech, and so, viewed in relation to it, Old English, whatever their contemporary names might be
.
considered, are See also:external and accidental, have shifted the See also:political and intellectual centre of See also:England, and along with it transferred literary and See also:official patronage from one See also:form of English to another ; if the centre of See also:influence had happened to be fixed at See also:York or on the See also:banks of the Forth, both would probably have been neglected for a third
.
The English language, thus defined, is not " native " to Britain, that is, it was not found there at the See also:dawn of See also:history, but was introduced by See also:foreign immigrants at a date many centuries later
.
At the See also:Roman See also:Conquest of the See also:island the languages spoken by the natives belonged all (so far as is known) to the See also:Celtic See also:branch of the Indo-See also:European or Indio-Germanic See also:family, modern forms of which still survive in See also:Wales, See also:Ireland, the Scottish See also:Highlands, Isle of See also:Man and See also:Brittany, while one has at no distant date become See also:extinct in See also:Cornwall (see See also:CELT: Language)
.
Brythonic dialects, allied to Welsh and Cornish, were apparently spokeq over the greater part of Britain, as far See also:north as the firths of Forth and See also:Clyde; beyond these estuaries and in the isles to the See also:west, including Ireland and Man, Goidelic dialects, akin to Irish and Scottish Gaelic, prevailed
.
The See also:long occupation of See also:south Britain by the See also:Romans (A.D
.
43–400—a period, it must not be forgotten, equal to that from the See also:Reformation to the present day, or nearly as long as the whole duration of modern English—familiarized the provincial inhabitants with Latin, which was probably the See also:ordinary speech of the towns
.
See also:Gildas, writing nearly a See also:century and a See also:half after the renunciation of See also:Honorius in 410, addressed the See also:British princes in that language;' and the linguistic history of Britain might have been not different from that of See also:Gaul, See also:Spain and the other provinces of the Western See also:Empire, in which a local type of Latin, giving See also:birth to a neo-Latinic language, finally superseded the native See also:tongue except in remote and mountainous districts,' had not the course of events been entirely changed by the Teutonic conquests of the 5th and 6th centuries
.
The Angles, See also:Saxons, and their See also:allies came of the Teutonic stock, and spoke a tongue belonging to the Teutonic or Germanic branch of the Indo-Germanic (Indo-European) family, the same See also:race and form of speech being represented in modern times by the people and languages of See also: Among those whose Aryan descent is generally recognized as beyond dispute are the Teutons, to whom the Angles and Saxons belonged . The Teutonic or Germanic people, after dwelling together in a See also:body, appear to have scattered in various directions, their language gradually breaking up into three main See also:groups, which can be already clearly distinguished in the 4th century A.D., North Germanic or Scandinavian, West Germanic or See also:Low and High See also:German, and See also:East Germanic, of which the only important representative is See also:Gothic . Gothic, often called Mbeso-Gothic, was the language of a people of the Teutonic stock, who, passing down the See also:Danube, invaded the See also:borders of the Empire, and obtained settlements in the See also:province of See also:Moesia, where their language was committed to writing in the 4th century; its literary remains are of See also:peculiar value as the oldest specimens, by several centuries, of Germanic speech . The dialects of the invaders of Britain belonged to the West Germanic branch, and within this to the Low German See also:group, represented at the present 1 The works of Gildas in the original Latin were edited by Mr See also:Stevenson for the English Historical Society . There is an English See also:translation in Six Old English See also:Chronicles in See also:Bohn's Antiquarian library . ' ' As to the continued existence of Latin in Britain, see further in Rhys's Lectures on Welsh See also:Philology, pp . 226-227; also Dogatschar, Lautlehre d, gr., See also:lat. u. roman . Lehnworte See also:im Altengl . (See also:Strassburg, [888).day by Dutch, Frisian, and the various "See also:Platt-See also:Deutsch" dialects of North Germany . At the dawn of history the fore-fathers of the English appear to have been dwelling between and about the estuaries and See also:lower courses of the See also:Rhine and the See also:Weser, and the adjacent coasts and isles; at the present day the most English or See also:Angli-form dialects of the European See also:continent are held to be those of the North Frisian islands of See also:Amrum and See also:Sylt, on the west See also:coast of See also:Schleswig . It is well known that the greater part of the See also:ancient See also:Friesland has been swept away by the encroachments of the North See also:Sea, and the disjecta membra of the Frisian race, pressed by the sea in front and more powerful nationalities behind, are found only in isolated fragments from the Zuider Zee to the coasts of Denmark . Many See also:Frisians accompanied the Angles and Saxons to Britain, and Old English was in many respects more closely connected with Old Frisian than with any other Low German dialect . Of the Geatas, Eotas or " kites," who, according to See also:Bede, occupied See also:Kent and the Isle of See also:Wight, and formed a third tribe along with the Angles and Saxons, it is difficult to speak linguistically . The speech of Kent certainly formed a distinct dialect in both the Old English and the Middle English periods, but it has tended to be assimilated more and more to neighbouring See also:southern dialects, and is at the present day identical with that of See also:Sussex, one of the old Saxon kingdoms . Whether the speech of the Isle of Wight ever showed the same characteristic See also:differences as that of Kent cannot now be ascertained, but its modern dialect differs in no respect from that of See also:Hampshire, and shows no See also:special connexion with that of Kent . It is at least entirely doubtful whether Bede's Geatas came from See also:Jutland; on linguistic grounds we should expect that they occupied a See also:district lying not to the north of the Angles, but between these and the old Saxons . The "earliest specimens of the language of the Germanic invaders of Britain that exist point to three well-marked dialect groups: the Anglian (in which a further distinction may be made between the Northumbrian and the Mercian, or South-Humbrian); the Saxon, generally called West-Saxon from the almost See also:total lack of See also:sources outside the West-Saxon domain; and the Kentish . The Kentish and West-Saxon are sometimes, especially in later times, grouped together as southern dialects as opposed to midland and See also:northern . These three groups were distinguished from each other by characteristic points of phonology and inflection . Speaking generally, the Anglian dialects may be distinguished by the See also:absence of certain normal West-Saxon vowel-changes, and the presence of others not found in West-Saxon, and also by a strong tendency to confuse and simplify inflections, in all which points, moreover, Northumbrian tended to deviate more widely than Mercian . Kentish, on the other See also:hand, occupied a position intermediate between Anglian and West-Saxon, early Kentish approaching more nearly to Mercian, owing perhaps to early historical connexion between the two, and See also:late Kentish tending to conform to West-Saxon characteristics, while retaining several points in See also:common with Anglian . Though we cannot be certain that these dialectal divergences date from a period previous to the occupation of Britain, such See also:evidence as can be deduced points to the existence of differences already on the continent, the three dialects corresponding in all likelihood to Bede's three tribes, the Angles, Saxons and Geatas . As it was amongst the Engle or Angles of See also:Northumbria that literary culture first appeared, and as an See also:Angle or Englisc dialect was the first to be used for See also:vernacular literature, Englisc came eventually to be a See also:general name for all forms of the vernacular as opposed to Latin, &c.; and even when the West-Saxon of Alfred became in its turn the literary or classical form of speech, it was still called Englisc or English . The origin of the name A ngul-Seaxan(Anglo-Saxons) has been disputed, some maintaining that it means a See also:union of Angles and Saxons, others (with better See also:foundation) that it meant English Saxons, or Saxons of England or of the See also:Angel-cynn as distinguished from Saxons of the Continent (see New English Dictionary, s.v.) .
Its modern use is mainly due to the little See also:band of scholars who in the 16th and 17th centuries turned their See also:attention to the long-forgotten language of Alfred and PElfric,, which, as it differed so greatly from
the English of their own day, they found it convenient to distinguish by a name which was applied to themselves by those who spoke it.1 To these scholars " Anglo-Saxon " and English " were separated by a gulf which it was reserved for later See also:scholar-See also:ship to See also:bridge across, and show the historical continuity of the English of all ages
.
As already hinted, the English language, in the wide sense, presents three main stages of development—Old, Middle and Modern—distinguished by their inflectional characteristics
.
The latter can be best summarized in the words of Dr See also: As to the Old Transition see further below . The OLD ENGLISH or Anglo-Saxon tongue, as introduced into Britain, was highly inflectional, though its inflections at the date when it becomes known to us were not so full as those of the earlier Gothic, and considerably less so than those of See also:Greek and Latin during their classical periods . They corresponded more closely to those of modern literary German, though both in nouns and verbs the forms were more numerous and distinct; for example, the German guten answers to three Old English forms,—gbdne, godum, Wan; guter to two—gOdre, Odra; liebten to two,—lufodon and lufeden . Nouns had four cases, Nominative, See also:Accusative (only sometimes distinct), Genitive, 1 tEthelstan in 934 calls himself in a See also:charter " Ongol-Saxna cyning and Brytaenwalda eallaes thyses iglandes "; Eadred in 956 is " Angul-seaxna cyning and casere totius Britanniae," and the name is of frequent occurrence in documents written inLatin . These facts ought to be remembered in the See also:interest of the scholars of the 17th century, who have been blamed for the use of the term Anglo-Saxon, as if they had invented it . By Anglo-Saxon " language they meant the language of the people who sometimes at least called themselves " Anglo-Saxons." Even now the name is practically useful, when we are dealing with the subject per se, as is Old English, on the other hand, when we are treating it historically or in connexion with English as a whole . ' Transactions of the Philological Society (1873-1874), p . 620; new and much enlarged edition, 1888 . See also:Dative, the latter used also with prepositions to See also:express locative, instrumental, and most See also:ablative relations; of a distinct instrumental See also:case only vestiges occur . There were several declensions of nouns, the main division being that known in Germanic languages generally as strong and weak,—a distinction also extending to adjectives in such See also:wise that every See also:adjective assumed either the strong or the weak inflection as determined by associated grammatical forms . The first and second See also:personal pronouns possessed a'dual number =we two, ye two; the third See also:person had a See also:complete declension of the See also:stem he, instead of being made up as now of the three stems seen in he, she, they . The verb distinguished the subjunctive from the indicative See also:mood, but had only two inflected tenses, present and past (more accurately, that of• incomplete and that of completed or " perfect " See also:action)—the former also used for the future, the latter for all the shades of past time .
The See also:order of the See also:sentence corresponded generally to that of German
.
Thus from See also:
Among these are named broc (a See also:badger), brat (breeches), cliat (clout), See also:pal (See also:pool), and a few words See also:relating to the employment of See also: Among the literary remains of the Old English may be mentioned the epic poem of Beowulf, the original See also:nucleus of which has been supposed to date to See also:heathen and even See also:continental times, though we now possess it only in a later form; the poetical works of Cynewulf; those formerly ascribed to Cmdmon; several works of Alfred, two of which, his translation of Orosius and of The See also:Pastoral Care of St See also:Gregory, are contemporary specimens of his Ianguage; the Old English or Anglo-Saxon See also:Chronicle; the theological works of 1Elfric (including See also:translations of the See also:Pentateuch and the gospels) and of See also:Wulfstan; and many works both in prose and See also:verse, of which the authors are unknown . The earliest specimens, the See also:inscriptions on the Ruthwell and Bewcastle crosses, are in a Runic See also:character; but the letters used in the See also:manuscripts generally are a British variety of the Roman See also:alphabet which the Anglo-Saxons found in the island, and which was also used by the Welsh and Irish 1 Several of the Roman letters had in Britain developed forms, and retained or acquired values, unlike those used on the continent, in particular See also:Spa nr Z 1 See on this Rhys, Lectures on Welsh Philology, v.,F'(d f g r s t) . The letters q ands were not used, q being represented by cw, and k was a rare alternative to c; u or v was only a vowel, the consonantal power of v being represented as in Welsh by f . The See also:Runes called See also: |