Online Encyclopedia

EPHORUS (c. 400–330 B.C.)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V09, Page 678 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

EPHORUS (c. 400–330 B.C.)  , of Cyme in Aeolis, in
See also:
Asia Minor, Greek historian . Together with the historian Theopompus he was a pupil of Isocrates, in whose school he attended two courses of rhetoric . But he does not seem to have made much progress in the
See also:
art, and it is said to have been at the
See also:
suggestion of Isocrates himself that he took up
See also:
literary composition and the study of
See also:
history . The fruit of his labours was his `IrTopiaL in 29 books, the first universal history, beginning with the return of the
See also:
Heraclidae to Peloponnesus, as the first well-attested
See also:
historical event . The whole
See also:
work was edited by his son Demophilus, who added a 36th
See also:
book, containing a
See also:
summary description of the Social War and ending with the taking of Perinthus (340) by Philip of Macedon (cf . Diod . Sic. xvi . 14 with xvi . 76) . Each book was
See also:
complete in itself, and had a
See also:
separate title and preface . It is clear that Ephorus made critical use of the best authorities, and his work, highly praised and much read, was freely
See also:
drawn upon by Diodorus Siculus 1 and other compilers . Strabo (viii. p .

332) attaches much importance to his

See also:
geographical investigations, and praises him for being the first to separate the historical from the merely geographical element . Polybius (xii . 25 g) while crediting him with a knowledge of the conditions of
See also:
naval warfare, ridicules his description of the battles of
See also:
Leuctra and Mantineia as showing ignorance of the nature of
See also:
land operations . He was further to be commended for
See also:
drawing (though not always) a sharp
See also:
line of demarcation between the mythical and historical (Strabo ix. p . 423); he even recognized that a profusion of detail, though lending corroborative force to accounts of
See also:
recent events, is ground for suspicion in reports of far-distant history . His style was high-flown and artificial, as was natural considering his early training, and he frequently sacrificed truth to rhetoric effect; but, according to Dionysius of Halicarnassus, he and Theopompus were the only historical writers whose language was accurate and finished . Other
See also:
works attributed to him were: —A
See also:
Treatise on Discoveries; Respecting Good and Evil Things; On Remarkable Things in Various Countries (it is doubtful whether these were separate works, or merely extracts from the Histories) ; A Treatise on my Country, on the history and antiquities of Cyme, and an essay On Style, his only rhetorical work, which is occasionally mentioned by the rhetorician Theon . Nothing is known of his
See also:
life, except the statement in Plutarch that he declined to visit the court of Alexander the
See also:
Great . Fragments in C . W . Muller, Fragmenta historicorum Graecorum, i., with critical introduction on the life and writings of Ephorus; see J . A .

Klugmann, De Ephoro historico (186o) ; C . A . Volquardsen, Untersuchungen fiber

die Quellen der griechischen and sicilischen Geschichten bei Diodor. xi.-xvi . (1868) ; and specially J . B . Bury, Ancient Greek Historians (1909); E . Schwartz, in Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyc. s.v.; and article
See also:
GREECE: History: Ancient Authorities .

End of Article: EPHORUS (c. 400–330 B.C.)
[back]
EPHOR (Gr. i4opos)
[next]
EPHRAEM SYRUS (Ephraim the Syrian)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.