|
See also: history of See also: India and See also: Persia in the 5th and 6th centuries, and was known to the See also: Byzantine writers, who See also: call them 'Ec OaXiroy EbOa'yfroe, Ne4BaXirot or 'A/36eXot
.
The last of these is an See also: independent attempt to render the See also: original name, which was probably
There were originally 77, but 5 have perished
.
' Inter-tribal feuds during the See also: period of the See also: monarchy may underlie the events mentioned in i See also: Kings xvi
.
9 sq., 21 sq.; 2 Kings xv
.
IC, I4
.
something like Aptal or Haptal, but the initial N of the third is believed to be a clerical error
.
They were also called Aeu,coL 0uvvoc or Xoiivot, See also: White (that is
See also: fair-skinned) See also: Huns
.
In Arabic and Persian they are known as Haital and in Armenian as Haithal, Idal or Hepthal
.
The See also: Chinese name Yetha seems an attempt to represent the same See also: sound
.
In India they were called Hunas
.
Ephthalite is the usual orthography, but Hephthalite is perhaps more correct
.
Our earliest information about theSee also: Ephthalites comes from the Chinese See also: chronicles, in which it is stated that they were originally a tribe of the See also: great Yue-Chi (q.v.), living to the See also: north of the Great See also: Wall, and in subjection to the Jwen-Jwen, as were also the See also: Turks at one See also: time
.
Their original name was Hoa or Hoa-See also: tun; subsequently they styled themselves Ye-tha-i-li-to after the name of their royal See also: family, or more briefly Ye-tha
.
Before the 5th century A.D. they began to move westwards, for about 420 we find them in Transoxiana, and for the next 130 years they were a menace to Persia, which they continually and successfully invaded, though they never held it as a See also: conquest
.
The Sassanid See also: king, Bahram V., fought several
See also: campaigns with them and succeeded in keeping them at See also: bay, but they defeated and killed Peroz (Firuz), A.D
.
484
.
His son See also: Kavadh I
.
(Kobad), being driven out of Persia, took See also: refuge with the Ephthalites, and recovered his See also: throne with the assistance of their khan, whose daughter he had married, but subsequently he engaged in prolonged hostilities with them
.
The Persians were not quit of the Ephthalites until 557 when See also: Chosroes Anushirwan destroyed their power with the assistance of the Turks, who now make their first appearance in western See also: Asia
.
The Huns who invaded India appear to have belonged to the same stock as those who molested Persia
.
The headquarters of the See also: horde were at See also: Bamian and at See also: Balkh, and from these points they raided See also: south-See also: east and south-west
.
Skandagupta repelled an invasion in 455, but the defeat of the Persians in 484 probably stimulated their activity, and at the end of the 5th century their chief Toromana penetrated to See also: Malwa in central India and succeeded in holding it for some time
.
His son Mihiragula (c
.
510–54o) made Sakala in the See also: Punjab his'See also: Indian capital, but the cruelty of his See also: rule provoked the Indian princes to See also: form a confederation and revolt against him about 528
.
He was not, however, killed, but took refuge in See also: Kashmir, where after a few years he seized the throne and then attacked the neighbouring See also: kingdom of Gandhara, perpetrating terrible massacres
.
About a See also: year after this he died (c
.
540), and shortly afterwards the Ephthalites collapsed under the attacks of the Turks
.
They do not appear to have mpved on to another sphere, as these nomadic tribes often did when defeated, and were probably gradually absorbed in the surrounding populations
.
Their See also: political power perhaps continued in the Gurjara See also: empire, which at one time extended to See also: Bengal in the east and the See also: Nerbudda in the south, and continued in a diminished form until A.D
.
1040
.
These Gurjaras appear to have entered India in connexion with the Hunnish invasions
.
Our knowledge of the Indian Hunas is chiefly derived from coins, from a few inscriptions distributed from the Punjab to central India, and from the account of the Chinese See also: pilgrim Hsuan Tsang, who visited the country just a century after the See also: death of Mihiragula
.
The See also: Greek See also: monk
See also: Cosmas Indicopleustes, who visited India about 530, describes the ruler of the country, whom he calls Gollas, as a White Hun king, who exacted an oppressive tribute with the help of a large army of cavalry and war elephants
.
Gollas no doubt represents the last See also: part of the name Mihiragula or Mihirakula
.
The accounts of the Ephthalites, especially those of the Indian lianas, dwell on their ferocity and cruelty
.
They are represented as delighting in massacres and torture, and it is said that popular tradition in India still retains theSee also: story that Mihiragula used to amuse himself by See also: rolling elephants down a precipice and watching their agonies
.
Their invasions shook Indian society and institutions to the See also: foundations, but, unlike the earlier Kushans, they do not seem to have introduced new ideas into India or have acted as other than a destructive force, although they may perhapshave kept up some communication between India and Persia
.
The first part of Mihiragula seems to be the name of the Persian deity Mithra, but his See also: patron deity was See also: Siva, and he See also: left behind him the reputation of a ferocious persecutor of See also: Buddhism
.
Many of his coins bear the See also: Nandi bull (Siva's emblem), and the king's name is preceded by the title See also: saki (shah), which had previously been used by the Kushan dynasty
.
Toramana's coins are found plentifully in Kashmir, which, therefore, probably formed part of the Rana dominions before Mihiragula's time, so that when he fled there after his defeat he was taking refuge, if not with his own subjects, at least with a kindred clan
.
Greek writers give a more flattering account of the Ephthalites, which may perhaps be due to the fact that they were useful to the East See also: Roman empire as enemies of Persia and also not dangerously near
.
See also: Procopius says that they were far more civilized than the Huns of See also: Attila, and the See also: Turkish ambassador who was received by See also: Justin is said to have described them as acrrucoi, which may merely mean that they lived in the cities which they conquered
.
The Chinese writers say that their customs were like those of the Turks; that they had no cities, lived in felt tents, were ignorant of writing and practised polyandry
.
Nothing whatever is known of their language, but some scholars explain the names Toramana and Jauvla as Turkish
.
For the possible connexion between the Ephthalites and the See also: European Huns see Hums
.
The Chinese statement that the Hoa or Ye-tha were a section of the great Yue-Chi, and that their customs resembled those of the Turks (Tu-Kiue), is probably correct, but does not amount to much, for the relationship did not prevent them from fighting with the Yue-Chi and Turks, and means little more than that they belonged to the warlike and energetic section of central Asian nomads, which is in any See also: case certain
.
They appear to have been more ferocious and less assimilative than the other conquering tribes
.
This may, how-ever, be due to the fact that their contact with See also: civilization was so See also: short; the Yue-Chi .and Turks had had some commerce with more advanced races before they played any part in political history, but the Ephthalites appear as raw barbarians, and were annihilated as a nation in little more than a See also: hundred years
.
Like the Yue-Chi they have probably contributed to form some of the See also: physical types of the Indian population, and it is noticeable that polyandry is a recognized institution among many Himalayan tribes, and is also said to be practised secretly by the See also: Jats and other races of the plains
.
Among original authorities may be consulted Procopius, Menander See also: Protector, Cosmas Indicopleustes (trans
.
McCrindle, See also: Hakluyt Society, 1897), the Kashmir See also: chronicle Rajatarangini (trans
.
Stein, 1900, and Yuan Chwang)
.
See also A
.
Stein, White Huns and Kindred Tribes (1905); O
.
Franke, Beitrage aus chinesischen Quellen sur Kenntnis der Tiirkvolker and Skythen (1904); Ujfalvy, Memoire sur See also: les Huns Blancs (1898) ; Drouin, Memoire sur les Huns Ephthalites (1895) ; and various articles by Vincent See also: Smith, Specht, Drouin, and E
.
H
.
See also: Parker in the Journal of the Royal See also: Asiatic Society, Journal asiatique, Revue numismatique, Asiatic Quarterly, &c
.
(C
.
EL.)
$PI, the French architectural See also: term for a See also: light finial, generally of See also: metal, but sometimes of terra-cotta, forming the termination of a See also: spire or the angle of a roof
.
|
|
|
[back] EPHRAIM |
[next] EPIC POETRY |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.