Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:EPITAPH (Gr. it oa¢See also:cos, sc. X/yos, from bri, upon, and ra¢os, a See also:tomb) , strictly, an inscription upon a See also:tomb, though by a natural See also:extension of usage the name is applied to anything written ostensibly for that purpose whether actually inscribed upon a tomb or not . When the word was introduced into See also:English in the 14th See also:century it took the See also:form epitaphy, as well as epitaphe, which latter word is used both by See also:Gower and See also:Lydgate . Many of the best-known epitaphs, both See also:ancient and See also:modern, are merely See also:literary memorials, and find no See also:place on sepulchral monuments . Sometimes the intention of the writer to have his See also:production placed upon the See also:grave of the See also:person he has commemorated may have been frustrated, sometimes it may never have existed; what he has written is still entitled to be called an See also:epitaph if it be suitable for the purpose, whether the purpose has been carried out or not . The most obvious See also:external See also:condition that suitability for mural inscription imposes is one of rigid See also:limitation as to length . An epitaph cannot in the nature of things extend to the proportions that may be required in an See also:elegy . The See also:desire to perpetuate the memory of the dead being natural to See also:man, the practice of placing epitaphs upon their See also:graves has been See also:common among all nations and in all ages . And the similarity, amounting sometimes almost to identity, of thought and expression that often exists between epitaphs written more than two thousand years ago and epitaphs written only yesterday is as striking an See also:evidence as literature affords of the See also:close kinship of human nature under the most varying conditions where the same See also:primary elemental feelings are stirred . The grief and See also:hope of the See also:Roman See also:mother as expressed in the touching lines " Lagge fill bene quiescas; Mater tua rogat te, Ut me ad te recipias: Vale!" find their See also:echo in similar See also:inscriptions in many a modern See also:cemetery . Probably the earliest epitaphial inscriptions that have come down to us are those of the ancient Egyptians, written, as their mode of sepulture necessitated, upon the sarcophagi and coffins . Those that have been deciphered are all very much in the same form, commencing with a See also:prayer to a deity; generally See also:Osiris or See also:Anubis, on behalf of the deceased, whose name, descent and See also:office are usually specified . There is, however, no See also:attempt to delineate individual See also:character, and the feelings of the survivors are not expressed otherwise than in the fact of a prayer being offered . Ancient See also:Greek epitaphs, unlike the See also:Egyptian, are of See also:great literary See also:interest, deep and often See also:tender in feeling, See also:rich and varied in expression, and generally epigrammatic in form . They are written usually in elegiac See also:verse, though many of the later EPITAPH 703 epitaphs are in See also:prose . Among the gems of the Greek See also:anthology See also:familiar to English readers through See also:translations are the epitaphs upon those who had fallen in See also:battle . There are several ascribed to See also:Simonides on the heroes of See also:Thermopylae, of which the most celebrated is the See also:epigram " Go tell the Spartans, See also:thou that passest by, That here, obedient to their See also:laws, we See also:lie . 'y' A hymn of Simonides on the same subject contains some lines of great beauty in praise of those who were buried at Thermopylae, and these may be regarded as forming a literary epitaph . In See also:Sparta epitaphs were inscribed only upon the graves of those who had been especially distinguished in See also:war; in See also:Athens they were applied more indiscriminately . They generally contained the name, the descent, the See also:demise, and some See also:account of the See also:life of the person commemorated . It must be remembered, however, that many of the so-called Greek epitaphs are merely literary memorials not. intended for monumental inscription, and that in these freer See also:scope is naturally given to See also:general reflections, while less See also:attention is paid to See also:biographical details . Many of them, even some of the monumental, do not contain any See also:personal name, as in the one ascribed to See also:Plato " I am a shipwrecked sailor's tomb ; a See also:peasant's there doth stand : Thus the same See also:world of Hades lies beneath both See also:sea and See also:land." Others again are so entirely of the nature of general reflections upon See also:death that they contain no indication of the particular See also:case that called them forth . It may be questioned, indeed, whether several of this character quoted in See also:ordinary collections are epitaphs at all, in the sense of being intended for a particular occasion . Roman epitaphs, in contrast to those of the Greeks, contained, as a See also:rule, nothing beyond a See also:record of facts . The inscriptions on the urns, of which numerous specimens are to be found in the See also:British Museum, See also:present but little variation .
The letters D.M.orD.M.S
.
(Diis Manibus or Diis Manibus Sacrum) are followed by the name of the person whose ashes are enclosed, his See also:age at death, and sometimes one or two other particulars
.
The inscription closes with the name of the person who caused the See also:urn to be made, and his relationship to the deceased
.
It is a curious See also:illustration of the survival of traces of an old faith after it has been formally discarded to find that the letters D.M. are not uncommon on the See also:Christian inscriptions in the catacombs
.
It has been suggested that in this case they mean Deo Maximo and not Diis Manibus, but the explanation would be quite untenable, even if there were not many other undeniable instances of the survival of See also:pagan superstitions in the thought and life of the See also:early Christians
.
In these very See also:catacomb inscriptions there are many illustrations to be found, apart from the use of the letters D.M., of the See also:union of See also:heathen with Christian sentiment, (see See also:Maitland's See also:
Specimens are to be seen in various antiquarian museums throughout
the See also:country; some of the inscriptions are given in See also:Bruce's Roman See also:Wall, and the seventh See also:volume of the Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum edited by See also:Hubner, containing the British inscriptions, is a valuable repertory for the earlier Roman epitaphs in Britain
.
The earliest, of course, are commemorative of soldiers, belonging to the legions of occupation, but the Roman form was afterwards adopted for native Britons
.
See also:Long after the Roman form was discarded, the Latin See also:language continued to be used, especially for inscriptions of a more public character, as being from its supposed permanence the most suitable See also:medium of communication to distant ages
.
It is only, in fact, within See also:recent years that Latin has become unusual, and the more natural practice has been adopted of See also:writing the epitaphs of distinguished men in the language of the country in which they lived
.
While Latin was the See also:chief if not the See also:sole literary language, it was, as a See also:matter of course, almost exclusively used for epitaphial inscriptions
.
The comparatively few English epitaphs that remain of the uth and 12th centuries are all in Latin
.
They are generally confined to a See also:mere statement of the name and See also:rank of the deceased following the words " Hic jacet." Two noteworthy exceptions to this general brevity are, however, to be found in most of the collections
.
One is the epitaph to Gundrada, daughter of the Conqueror (d
.
1085), which still exists at See also:Lewes, though in an imperfect See also:state, two of the lines having been lost; another is that to See also:
Mention may be made of those to See also:Robert, the 3rd earl of See also:Oxford (d
.
1221), as given in See also:Weever, to See also:
We learn from See also:Nash that at the close of the 16th century it had become a See also:trade to See also:supply epitaphs in English verse
.
There is one on the See also:dowager countess of See also:Pembroke (d
.
1621), remarkable for its successful use of a somewhat daring See also:hyperbole
.
It was written by William See also: Even to the learned Latin is no longer the language of daily thought and life as it was at the period of the Reformation, and the great See also:body of those who may fairly claim to be called the well-educated classes can only read it with difficulty, if at all . It seems, there-fore, little less than absurd, for the sake of a stability which is itself in great See also:part delusive, to write epitaphs in a language unintelligible to the vast majority of those for whose See also:information presumably they are intended . Though a stickler for Latin, Dr Johnson wrote some very beautiful English epitaphs, as, for example, the following on See also:Philips, a musician: " Philips, whose See also:touch harmonious could remove The pangs of guilty See also:power or hapless love; See also:Rest here, distressed by poverty no more, Here find that See also:calm thou gav'st so oft before; See also:Sleep undisturbed within this peaceful See also:shrine Till angels See also:wake thee with a See also:note like thine!" In classifying epitaphs various principles of See also:division may be adopted . Arranged according to See also:nationality they indicate distinctions of See also:race less clearly perhaps than any other form of literature does,—and this obviously because when under the influence of the deepest feeling men think and speak very much in the same way whatever be their country . At the same time the influence of nationality may to some extent be traced in epitaphs . The characteristics of the French See also:style, its See also:grace, clearness, wit and epigrammatic point, are all recognizable in French epitaphs . In the 16th century those of See also:Etienne See also:Pasquier were universally admired . Instances such as " La premiere au rendez-See also:vous," inscribed on the grave of a mother, See also:Piron's epitaph, written for himself after his rejection by the French See also:Academy " Ci-git Piron, qui ne fut rien, Pas meme academicien and one by a relieved See also:husband, to be seen at Pere la See also:Chaise " Ci-git ma femme . Ah ! qu'elle est bien Pour son repos et pour le mien " might be multiplied indefinitely . One can hardly look through a collection of English epitaphs without being struck with the fact that these represent a greater variety of intellectual and emotional states than those of any other nation, ranging through every style of thought from the See also:sublime to the See also:commonplace, every See also:mood of feeling from the most delicate and touching to the coarse and even brutal . Few subordinate illustrations of the complex nature of the English nationality are more striking . Epitaphs are sometimes classified according to their authorship and sometimes according to their subject, but neither division is so intetesting as that which arranges them according to their characteristic features .
What has just been said of English epitaphs is, of course, more true of epitaphs generally
.
They exemplify every variety of sentiment and See also:taste, from lofty pathos and dignified eulogy to coarse buffoonery and the vilest scurrility
.
The extent to which the humorous and even the See also:low comic See also:element prevails among them is a noteworthy circumstance
.
It is curious that the most See also:solemn of all subjects should have been frequently treated, intentionally or unintentionally, in a style so ludicrous that a collection of epitaphs is generally one of the most amusing books that can be picked up
.
In this as in other cases, too, it is to be observed that the unintended See also:humour is generally of a much more entertaining kind than that which has been deliberately perpetrated
.
See Weever, Ancient Funerall Monuments (1631, 1661, See also:Tooke's edit., 1767) ; Philippe Labbe, See also:Thesaurus epitaphiorum (See also:Paris, 1666) ; Theatrum funebre extructum a Dodone Richea seu Ottone Aicher (1675) ; See also:Hackett, Select and Remarkable Epitaphs (1757) ; de See also:Laplace, E`pitaphes serieuses, badines, satiriques et burlesques (3 vols., Paris, 1782) ; Pulleyn, See also:Churchyard Gleanings (c
.
183o); L
.
Lewysohn, Sechzig Epitaphien von Grabsteinen d. israelit
.
Friedhofes zu, See also:Worms (1855); Pettigrew, See also:Chronicles of the Tombs (1857); S
.
Tissington, Epitaphs (1857); See also:Robinson, Epitaphs from Cemeteries in See also:London, See also:Edinburgh, &c
.
(1859) ; le Blant, Inscriptions chretiennes de la Gaule anterieures au VIIP siecle (1856, 1865) ; Blommaert, Galliard, &c., Inscriptions funeraires et monumentales de la pray. de Flandre Orient (See also:Ghent, 1857, 186o); Inscriptions fun. et moll. de la prov. d'Anvers (See also:Antwerp, 1857–1860) ; Chwolson, Achtzehn hebraische Grabschriften aus der Krim (1859) ; J
.
See also: J . Loaring, See also:Quaint, Curious, and Elegant Epitaphs (1872) ; J . R . Kippax, Churchyard Literature, a Choice Collection of See also:American Epitaphs (See also:Chicago, 1876) ; also the poet William See also:Wordsworth's Essay on Epitaphs . |
|
|
[back] EPISTYLIS (C. G. Ehrenberg) |
[next] EPITHALAMIUM (Gr. hirl, at or upon, and BhXayos, a ... |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.