|
See also: German-Swiss theologian, whose surname was Luber, See also: Lieber, or Liebler, was See also: born of poor parents on the 7th of See also: September 1524, probably at See also: Baden, See also: canton of See also: Aargau, See also: Switzerland
.
In 1540 he was studying See also: theology at See also: Basel
.
The plague of 1544 drove him to Bologna and thence to See also: Padua as student of philosophy and See also: medicine
.
In 1553 he became physician to the count of Henneberg, Saxe-See also: Meiningen, and in 1558 held the same See also: post with the elector-palatine, See also: Otto Heinrich, being at the same See also: time professor of medicine at See also: Heidelberg
.
His See also: patron's successor, See also: Frederick III., made him (1559) a privy councillor and member of the See also: church consistory
.
In theology he followed
See also: Zwingli, and at the sacramentarian conferences of Heidelberg (156o) and Maulbronn (1564) he advocated by See also: voice and See also: pen the Zwinglian See also: doctrine of the See also: Lord's Supper, replying (1565) to the See also: counter arguments of the Lutheran Johann Marbach, of Strassburg
.
He ineffectually resisted the efforts of the Calvinists, led by Caspar Olevianus, to introduce the Presbyterian polity and discipline, which were established at Heidelberg in 1570, on the Genevan See also: model
.
One of the first acts of the new church See also: system was to excommunicate See also: Erastus on a See also: charge of Socinianism, founded on his See also: correspondence with Transylvania
.
The See also: ban was not removed till 1575, Erastus declaring his See also: firm adhesion to the doctrine of the Trinity
.
His position, however, was uncomfortable, and in 158o he returned to Basel, where in 1583 he was made professor of See also: ethics
.
He died on the 31st of See also: December 1583
.
He published several pieces bearing on medicine, See also: astrology and See also: alchemy, and attacking the system of See also: Paracelsus
.
His name is permanently associated with a See also: posthumous publication, written in 1568
.
Its immediate occasion was the disputation at Heidelberg (1568) for the doctorate of theology by See also: George See also: Wither or Withers, an See also: English Puritan (subsequently archdeacon of Colchester), silenced (1565) at See also: Bury St See also: Edmunds
by Archbishop See also: Parker
.
Withers had proposed a disputation against See also: vestments, which the university would not allow; his thesis affirming the excommunicating power of the See also: presbytery was sustained
.
Hence the See also: treatise of Erastus
.
It was published (1589) by Giacomo Castelvetri, who had married his widow, with the title Explicatio gravissimae quaestionis utrum excommunicatio, quatenus religionem intelligentes et amplexantes, a sacramentorum usu, propter admissum facinus arcet, mandato nitatur divino, an excogitata sit ab hominibus
.
The See also: work bears the imprint Pesclavii (i.e
.
Poschiavo in the See also: Grisons) but was printed by See also: John Wolfe in
See also: London, where Castelvetri was staying; the name of the alleged printer is an anagram of Jacobum Castelvetrum
.
In the Stationers' See also: Register (See also: June 20, 1589) the printing is said to have been " alowed " by Archbishop See also: Whitgift
.
It consists of seventy-five Theses, followed by a Confirmatio in six books, and an appendix of letters to Erastus by See also: Bullinger and Gualther, showing that his Theses, written in 1568, had been circulated in See also: manuscript
.
An English See also: translation of the Theses, with brief See also: life of Erastus (based on Melchior See also: Adam's account), was issued in 1659, entitled The Nullity of Church Censures; it was reprinted as A Treatise of Excommunication (1682), and, as revised by Robert See also: Lee, D.D., in 1844
.
The aim of the work is to show, on Scriptural grounds, that sins of professing Christians are to be punished by
See also: civil authority, and not by withholding of sacraments on the See also: part of the See also: clergy
.
In the See also: Westminster See also: Assembly a party holding this view included See also: Selden, Lightfoot, Coleman and Whitelocke, whose speech (1645) is appended to Lee's version of the Theses; but the opposite view, after much controversy, was carried, Lightfoot alone dissenting
.
The consequent chapter of the Westminster Confession (" Of Church Censures ") was, however, not ratified by the English parliament . " Erastianism," as a by-word, is used to denote the doctrine of the supremacy of theSee also: state in ecclesiastical causes; but the problem of the relations between church and state is one on which Erastus nowhere enters
.
What is known as " Erastianism " would be better connected with the name of See also: Grotius
.
The only See also: direct reply made to the Explicatio was the Tractatus de See also: vera excommunication (1590) by See also: Theodore Beza, who found himself rather savagely attacked in the Confirmatio thesium; e.g." Apostolum et See also: Mosen adeoque Deum ipsum audes corrigere."
See A
.
Bonnard, See also: Thomas Eraste et la discipline ecclesiastique (1894); Gass, in Allgemeine deutsche Biog
.
(1877); G
.
V
.
See also: Lechler and R
.
Stahelin, in A
.
Hauck's Realencyklop. fur prot
.
Theol. u
.
Kirche (1898)
.
(A . |
|
|
[back] DESIDERIUS ERASMUS (1466–1536) |
[next] ERATOSTHENES OF ALEXANDRIA (c. 276-C. 194 B.C.) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.