Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
JOHANNES SCOTUS See also:ERIGENA (c. 800-c. 877)
, See also:medieval philosopher and theologian
.
His real name was Johannes Scotus (Scottus) or See also:
Bale quotes the See also:story that he travelled in See also:Greece, See also:Italy and See also:Gaul, and studied
not only Greek, but also Arabic and Chaldaean
.
Since, however, Bale describes him as " ex patricio genitore natus," it is a reason-able inference (so R
.
L
.
See also:Poole) that Bale confused him with one John, the son of Patricius, a Spaniard, who tells much the same story of his own travels
.
The knowledge of Greek displayed in Erigena's See also:works is not such as to compel us to conclude that he had actually visited Greece
.
That he had a competent acquaintance with Greek is See also:manifest from his See also:translations of Dionysius the Areopagite and of Maximus, from the manner in which he refers to See also:Aristotle, and from his evident familiarity with Neoplatonist writers and the fathers of the early See also:
The king having asked, " Quid distat inter sottum et Scottum
?
" Erigena replied, " See also:Mensa tantum."
The first of the works known to have been written by Erigena during this See also:period was a See also:treatise on the See also:eucharist, which has not come down to us (by some it has been identified with a treatise by See also:Ratramnus, De corpore et sanguine Domini)
.
In it he seems to have advanced the See also:doctrine that the eucharist was merely symbolical or commemorative, an See also:opinion for which See also:Berengarius was at a later date censured and condemned
.
As a See also:part of his See also:penance Berengarius is said to have been compelled to See also:burn publicly Erigena's treatise
.
So far as we can learn, however, Erigena's orthodoxy was not at the See also:time suspected, and a few years later he was selected by See also:Hincmar, See also:archbishop of See also:Reims, to defend the doctrine of See also:liberty of will against the extreme predestinarianism of the See also:
See also:Pope See also:Nicholas I. was offended that the work had not been submitted for approval before being given to the See also:world, and ordered Charles to send Erigena to See also:Rome, or at least to dismiss him from his court
.
There is no evidence, however, that this See also:order was attended to
.
The latter part of his life is involved in See also:total obscurity
.
The story that in 882 he was invited to See also:Oxford by See also:Alfred the See also:Great, that he laboured there for many years, became See also: Omnis enim auctoritas, quae vera ratione non approbatur, infirma videtur esse . Vera autem ratio, quum virtutibus suis rata atque immutabilis munitur, nullius auctoritatis adstipulatione roborari indiget " (De divisione naturae, 71) . F . D . See also:Maurice, the only historian of See also:note who declines to ascribe a rationalizing tendency to Erigena, obscures the question by the manner in which he states it . He asks his readers, after weighing the evidence advanced, to determine " whether he (Erigena) used his philosophy to explain away his theology, or to bring out what he conceived to be the fullest meaning of it." These alternatives seem to be wrongly put . " Explaining away theology " is something wholly See also:foreign to the philosophy of that age; and even if we accept the alternative that Erigena endeavours speculatively to bring out the full meaning of theology, we are by no means driven to the conclusion that he was primarily or principally a theologian . He does not start with the datum of theology as the completed See also:body of truth, requiring only elucidation and See also:interpretation; his fundamental thought is that of the universe, nature, TO crap, or See also:God, as the ultimate unity which works itself out into the rational system of the world . See also:Man and all that concerns man are but parts of this system, and are to be explained by reference to it; for ex-planation or understanding of a thing is determination of its See also:place in the universal or all . Religion or See also:revelation is one See also:element or See also:factor in the divine See also:process, a stage or phase of the ultimate rational life . The highest See also:faculty of man, reason, intellectus, intellectualis visio, is that which is not content with the individual or partial, but grasps the whole and thereby comprehends the parts . In this highest effort of reason, which is indeed God thinking in man, thought and being are at one, the opposition of being and thought is overcome . When Erigena starts with such propositions, it is clearly impossible to understand his position and work if we insist on regarding him as a scholastic, accepting the dogmas of the church as ultimate data, and endeavouring only to See also:present them in due order and defend them by See also:argument . - Erigena's great work, De divisione naturae, which was condemned by a council at See also:Sens, by See also:Honorius III . (1225), who described it as " swarming with See also:worms of heretical perversity," and by See also:Gregory XIII. in 1585, is arranged in five books . The See also:form of exposition is that of See also:dialogue; the method of reasoning is the syllogistic . The leading thoughts are the following . Natura is the name for the universal, the totality of all things, containing in itself being and non-being . It is the unity of which all See also:special phenomena are manifestations . But of this nature,there are four distinct classes (1) that which creates and is not created; (2) that which is created and creates; (3) that which is created and does not create; (4) that which neither is created nor creates . The first is God as the ground or origin of all things, the last is God as the final end or See also:goal of all things, that into which the world of created things ultimately returns . The second and third together compose the created universe, which is the manifestation of God, God in processu, Theophania . Thus we distinguish in the divine system beginning, middle and end; but these three are in essence one—the difference is only the consequence of our finite comprehension . We are compelled to envisage this eternal process under the form of time, to apply temporal distinctions to that which is extra- or supra-temporal . The universe of created things, as we have seen, is twofold :—first, that which is created and creates—the primordial ideas, archetypes, immutable relations, divine acts of will, according to which individual things are formed; second, that which is created and does not create, the world of individuals, the effects of the primordial causes, without which the causes have no true being . Created things have no individual or self-See also:independent existence; they are only in God; and each thing is a manifestation of the divine, theophania, divina apparitio . God alone, the uncreated creator of all, has true being . He is the true universal, all-containing and incomprehensible . The See also:lower cannot comprehend the higher, and therefore we must say that the existence of God is above being, above essence; God is above goodness, above See also:wisdom, above truth . No finite predicates can be applied to him; his mode of being cannot be determined by any See also:category . True theology is negative . Nevertheless the world, as the theophania, the revelation of God, enables us so far to under-stand the divine essence . We recognize his being in the being of all things, his wisdom in their orderly arrangement, his life in their See also:constant See also:motion . Thus God is for us a Trinity—the See also:Father as substance or being (o(lo-ia), the Son as wisdom (SbvayLs), the Spirit as life (h4pyeca) . These three are realized in the universe—the Father as the system of things, the Son as the word, i.e. the 'See also:realm of ideas, the Spirit as the life or moving force which introduces individuality and which ultimately draws back all things into the divine unity . In man, as the noblest of created things, the Trinity is seen most perfectly reflected; intellectus (vows), ratio (abyos) and sensus (&See also:avoca) make up the threefold See also:thread of his being . Not in man alone, however, but in all things, God is to be regarded as realizing himself, as becoming incarnate . The See also:infinite essence of God, which may indeed be described as nihilum (nothing) is that from which all is created, from which all proceeds or emanates . The first procession or See also:emanation, as above indicated, is the realm of ideas in the Platonic sense, the word or wisdom of God . These ideas compose a whole or inseparable unity, but we are able in a dim way to think of them as a system logically arranged . Thus the highest See also:idea is that of goodness; things are, only if they are See also:good; being without well-being is naught . Essence participates in goodness—that which is good has being, and is therefore to be regarded as a See also:species of good . Life, again, is a species of essence, wisdom a species of life, and so on, always descending from genus to species in a rigorous logical See also:fashion . The ideas are the eternal causes, which, under the moving See also:influence of the spirit, manifest themselves in their effects, the individual created things . Manifestation, however, is part of the being or essence of the causes, that is to say, if we interpret the expression, God of See also:necessity manifests himself in the world and is not without the world . Further, as the causes are eternal, timeless, so creation is eternal, timeless . The See also:Mosaic See also:account, then, is to be looked upon merely as a mode in which is faintly shadowed forth what is above finite comprehension . It is altogether allegorical, and requires to be interpreted . See also:Paradise and the Fall have no See also:local or temporal being . Man was originally sinless and without distinction of See also:sex . Only after the introduction of See also:sin did man lose his spiritual body, and acquire the See also:animal nature with its distinction of sex . Woman is the impersonation of man's sensuous and fallen nature; on the final return to the divine unity, distinction of sex will vanish, and the spiritual body will be regained . The most remarkable and at the same time the most obscure portion of the work is that in which the final return to God is handled . Naturally sin is a necessary preliminary to this redemption, and Erigena has the greatest difficulty in accounting for the fact of sin . If God is true being, then sin can have no substantive existence; it cannot be said that God knows of sin, for to God knowing and being are one . In the universe of things, as a universe, there can be no sin; there must be perfect See also:harmony . Sin, in fact, results from the will of the individual who falsely represents something as od which is not so . This misdirected will is punished by finding See also:Mat the See also:objects after which it thirsts are in truth vanity and emptiness . See also:Hell is not to be regarded as having local existence; it is the inner See also:state of the sinful will . As the See also:object of See also:punishment is not the will or the individual himself, but the misdirection of the will, so the result of punishment is the final See also:purification and redemption of all .
Even the devils shall be saved
.
All, however, are not saved at once; the stages of the return to the final unity, corresponding to the stages in the creative process, are numerous, and are passed through slowly
.
The ultimate goal is deificatio, theosis or resumption into the divine being, when the individual soul is raised to a full knowledge of God, and where knowing and being are one
.
After all have been restored to the divine unity, there is no further creation
.
The ultimate unity is that which neither is created nor creates
.
EDIT1oNS.—There is a See also:complete edition of Erigena's works in J
.
P
.
See also:Migne's Patrologiae cursus completus (vol. cxxii.), edited by H
.
J
.
Floss (Paris, 1853)
.
The De divina praedestinatione was published in See also:
Maio (ed
.
J
.
Cozza, Rome, 1871)
.
Of the De divisione naturae, See also:editions
See also:ERINNA
have been published by See also: See also:Rand (1906) . Monographs on Erigena's life and works are numerous; see St Rene See also:Taillandier, Scot Erigene et la philosophie scholastique (1843) ; T . Christlieb, Leben u . Lehre See also:des Johannes Scotus Erigena(See also:Gotha,1860) ; J . N . See also:Huber, Johannes Scotus Erigena(See also:Munich, 1861); W . Kaulich, Das speculative System des Johannes Scotus Erigena (See also:Prague, 186o) ; A . Stockl, De Joh . Scoto Erigena (1867) ; L . Noack, Uber Leben and Schriften des Joh . Scotus Erigena: die Wissenschaft and Bildung seiner Zeit (See also:Leipzig, 1876) ; R . L . Poole, Medieval Thought (1884), and See also:article in See also:Dictionary of See also:National See also:Biography; T . Wotschke, See also:Fichte and Erigena (See also:Halle, 1896) ; M . Baumgartner in Wetzer and Welte's Kirchenlexikon, x . (1897) ; Alice See also:Gardner's Studies in John the Scot (1900) ; J . Draseke, Joh . Scotus Erigena and See also:seine Gewahrsmanner (Leipzig, 1902) ; S . M . See also:Deutsch in See also:Herzog-Hauck's Realencyklopadie See also:fur protestantische Theologie, xviii . (1906); J . E . See also:Sandys, Hist. of Classical Scholarship (1906), pp . 491-495 . See also the general works on scholastic philosophy, especially Haureau, Stockl and Kaulich . An admirable resume is given by F . D . Maurice, Medieval Phil. pp . 45-79 . (R . AD.; J . M . |
|
|
[back] ERIE |
[next] ERIGONE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.