|
See also: rule in the See also: law of evidence by which a party in litigation is prohibited from asserting or denying something, when such assertion or denial would be inconsistent with his own previous statements or conduct
.
See also: Estoppel is said to arise in three ways—(r) by record or See also: judgment, (2) by deed, and (3) by See also: matter in pais or conduct
.
(1) Where a cause of See also: action has been tried and final judgment has been pronounced, the judgment is conclusive—either party attempting to renew the litigation by a new action would be estopped by the judgment
.
" Every judgment is conclusive proof as against parties and privies, of facts directly in issue in the See also: case, actually decided by the See also: court, and appearing from the judgment itself to be the ground on which it was based."—Stephen's See also: Digest of the Law of Evidence, See also: Art
.
41
.
(2) It is one of the privileges of deeds as distinguished from See also: simple contracts that they operate by way of estoppel
.
" A See also: man shall always be estopped by his own deed, or not permitted to aver or prove anything in contradiction to what he has once so solemnly and deliberately avowed " (See also: Blackstone, 2 Corn
.
295); e.g. where a bond recited that the defendants were authorized by acts of parliament to See also: borrow See also: money, and that under such authority they had borrowed money from a certain See also: person, they were estopped from setting up as a defence that they did not in fact so borrow money, as stated by their deed
.
(3) Estoppel by conduct, or, as it is still sometimes called, estoppel by matter in pais, is the most important See also: head
.
The rule practically comes to this that, when, a person in his dealings with others has acted so as to induce them to believe a thing to be true and to See also: act on such belief, he may not in any proceeding between himself and them deny the thing to be true: e.g. a partner retiring from a See also: firm without giving See also: notice to the customers, cannot, as against a customer having no knowledge of his retirement, deny that he is a partner
.
As between landlord and See also: tenant the principle operates to prevent the denial by the tenant of the landlord's title
.
So if a person comes upon See also: land by the licence of the person in possession, he cannot deny that the licenser had a title to the possession at the See also: time the licence was given
.
Again, if a man accepts a See also: bill of See also: exchange he may not deny the signature or the capacity of the drawer
.
So a person receiving goods as baillee from another cannot deny the title of that other to the goods at the time they were entrusted to him
.
Estoppel of whatever kind is subject to one general rule, that it cannot override the law of the land; for example, a corporation would not be estopped as to acts which are ultra vires
.
See L
.
F
.
Everest and E
.
See also: Strode, The Law of Estoppel; M
.
Cababe, Principles of Estoppel
.
|
|
|
[back] ESTON |
[next] GUILLAUME ESTOUTEVILLE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.