Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:EUSEBIUS [OF CAESAREA] (c. 260-c. 340)
, ecclesiastical historian, who called himself See also:Eusebius Pamphili, because of his devotion to his friend and teacher See also:Pamphilus, was See also:born probably in See also:Palestine between A.D
.
260 and 265, and died as See also:bishop of Caesarea in the See also:year 339 or 340
.
We know little of his youth beyond the fact that he became associated at an See also:early See also:day with Pamphilus, See also:presbyter of the See also: 33), the first See also:book of which survives in the La See also:tin of See also:Rufinus (printed in See also:Routh's Reliquiae sacrae, iv . 339 sq., and in Lommatzsch's edition of Origen's See also:Works, See also:xxiv. p . 293 sq.) . After the See also:death of Pamphilus Eusebius withdrew to See also:Tyre, andlater, while the Diocletian persecution was still raging, went to See also:Egypt, where he seems to have been imprisoned, but soon released . He became bishop of Caesarea between 313 and 315, and remained such until his death . The patriarchate of See also:Antioch was offered him in 331, but declined (Vita Constantini, iii . 59 sq.) . Eusebius was a very important figure in the church of his day . He was not a See also:great theologian nor a profound thinker, but he was the most learned See also:man of his See also:age, and stood high in favour with the See also:emperor See also:Constantine . At the See also:council of See also:Nicaea in 325 he took a prominent See also:part, occupying a seat at the emperor's right See also:hand, and being appointed to deliver the panegyrical oration in his See also:honour . He was the See also:leader of the large See also:middle party of Moderates at the council, and submitted the first draft of the creed which was afterwards adopted with important changes and additions . In the beginning he was the most influential man See also:present, but was finally forced to yield to the Alexandrian party, and to,See also:vote for a creed which completely repudiated the position of the Arians, with whom he had himself been hitherto more in sympathy than with the Alexandrians .
He was placed in a difficult See also:predicament by the See also:action of the council, and his See also:letter to the Caesarean church explaining his conduct is exceedingly interesting and instructive (see See also:Socrates, Hist
.
Eccl. i
.
8, and cf
.
See also:McGiffert's See also:translation of Eusebius' Church See also:History, p
.
15 sq.)
.
To understand his conduct, it is necessary to look briefly at his theological position
.
By many he has been called an Arian, by many his orthodoxy has been defended
.
The truth is, three stages are to be distinguished in his theological development
.
The first preceded the outbreak of the Arian controversy, when, as might be expected in a follower of Origen, his See also:interest was See also:anti-Sabellian and his emphasis chiefly upon the sub-ordination of the Son of See also:God
.
In his works written during this See also:period (for instance, the Praeparatio evangelica and Demonstratio evangelica), as in the works of Origen himself and other ante-Nicene fathers, expressions occur looking in the direction of Arianism, and others looking in the opposite direction
.
The second See also:stage began with the outbreak of the controversy in 318, and continued until the Nicene Council
.
During this period he took the See also:side of See also:Arius in the dispute with See also: It was natural that he should take this side, for in his traditional fear of Sabellianism, in which he was one with the followers of Origen in See also:general, he found it difficult to approve the position of Alexander, who seemed to be doing away altogether with the subordination of the Son . And, moreover, he believed that Alexander was misrepresenting the teaching of Arius and doing him great injustice (cf. his letters to Alexander and Euphration preserved in the proceedings of the second council of Nicaea, See also:Act. vi. tom . 5: see Mansi's Concilia, xiii . 316 sq.; See also:English translation in McGiffert, op. cit. p . 70) . Meanwhile at the council of Nicaea he seems to have discovered that the Alexandrians were right in claiming that Arius was carrying his subordinationism so far as to deny all real divinity to See also:Christ . To this length Eusebius himself was unwilling to go, and so, convinced that he had misunderstood Arius, and that the teaching of the latter was imperilling the historic belief in the divinity of Christ, he gave his support to the opposition,and voted for the Nicene Creed, in which the teachings of the Arians were repudiated . From this time on he was a supporter of Nicene orthodoxy over against Arianism (cf., e.g., his Contra Marcellum, De ecclesiastica theologia, and Theophania) . But he never See also:felt in sympathy with the extreme views of the Athanasian party, for they seemed to him to savour of Sabellianism, which always remained his See also:chief dread (cf. his two works against See also:Marcellus of See also:Ancyra) . His See also:personal See also:friends, moreover, were principally among the Arians, and he was more closely identified with them than with the supporters of See also:Athanasius . But he was always a man of See also:peace, and while commonly counted one of the opponents of Athanasius, he did not take a See also:place of leadership among them as his position and See also:standing would have justified him in doing, and Athanasius never spoke of him with bitterness as he did of other prominent men in the party . (For a See also:fuller description of the development of Eusebius' Christology and of his attitude throughout the Arian controversy, see McGiffert, op. cit. p .
11 sq.)
Eusebius was one of the most voluminous writers of antiquity, and his labours covered almost every See also: The reasons leading to the great undertaking, in which Eusebius "had no predecessors, were in part See also:historical, in part apologetic . He believed that he was living at the beginning of a new age, and he felt that it was a fitting time, when the old See also:order of things was passing away, to put on See also:record for the benefit of posterity the great events which had occurred during the generations that were past . He thus wrote, as any historian might, for the See also:information and instruction of his readers, and yet he had all the time an apologetic purpose, to exhibit to the See also:world the history of See also:Christianity as a See also:proof of its divine origin and efficacy . His See also:plan is stated at the very beginning of the work: " It is my purpose to write an See also:account of the successions of the See also:holy Apostles as well as of the times which have elapsed from the day of our Saviour to our own; to relate how many and important events are said to have occurred in the history of the church; and to mention those who have governed and presided over the church in the most prominent parishes, and those who in each See also:generation have, proclaimed the divine word either orally or in writing . It is my purpose also to give the names and number and times of those who through love of innovation have run into the greatest errors, and proclaiming themselves discoverers of knowledge, falsely so called, have like fierce wolves unmercifully devastated the See also:flock of Christ . It is my intention, moreover, to recount the misfortunes which immediately came on the whole Jewish nation in consequence of their plots against our Saviour, and to record the ways and times in which the divine word has been attacked by the Gentiles, and to describe the character of those who at various periods have contended for it in the See also:face of See also:blood and tortures, as well as the confessions which have been made in our own day, and the gracious and kindly succour which our Saviour has accorded them all." The value of the work does not See also:lie in its See also:literary merit, but in the See also:wealth of the materials which it furnishes for a knowledge of the early church . Many prominent figures of the first three centuries are known to us only from its pages . Many fragments, priceless on account of the See also:light which they See also:shed upon movements of far-reaching consequence, have been preserved in it alone . Eusebius often fails to appreciate the significance of the events which he records; in many cases he draws unwarranted conclusions from the given premises; he sometimes misinterprets his documents and misunderstands men and movements; but usually he presents us with the material upon which to form our own judgment, and if we differ with him we must at the same time thank him for the data that enable us independently to reach other results . But the work is not merely a See also:thesaurus, it is a history in a true sense, and it has an See also:intrinsic value of its own, See also:independent of its quotations from other works . Eusebius possessed extensive See also:sources of knowledge no longer accessible to us . The number of books referred to as read is enormous . He also had See also:access to the archives of See also:state, and gathered from them information beyond the reach of most . But the value of his work is due, not simply to the sources employed, but also to the use made of them . Upon this See also:matter there has been, it is true, some diversity of See also:opinion among See also:modern scholars, but it is now generally admitted, and can be abundantly shown, that he was not only diligent in gathering material, but also far more thorough-going than most writers of antiquity in discriminating between trustworthy and untrustworthy reports, See also:frank in acknowledging his See also:ignorance, scrupulous in indicating his authorities in"doubtful cases, less credulous than most of his contemporaries, and unfailingly honest . His See also:principal faults are his carelessness and inaccuracy in matters of See also:chronology, his lack of See also:artistic skill in the presentation of his material, his desultory method of treatment, and his failure to look below the See also:surface and grasp the real significance and vital connexion of events . He commonly regards an occurrence as sufficiently accounted for when it is ascribed to the activity of God or of Satan . But in spite of its defects the Church History is a monumental work, which need only be compared with its continuations by Socrates, See also:Sozomen, See also:Theodoret, Rufinus and others, to be appreciated at its true See also:worth . In addition to the Church History we have from Eusebius' See also:pen a See also:Chronicle in two books (c . 303; later continued down to 325), the first containing an See also:epitome of universal history, the second See also:chronological tables exhibiting in' parallel columns the royal See also:succession in different nations, and accompanied by notes marking the See also:dates of historical events . A revised edition of the second book with a continuation down to his own day was published in Latin by St See also:Jerome, and this, together with some fragments of the See also:original See also:Greek, was our only source for a knowledge of the Chronicle until the See also:discovery of an Armenian version of the whole work, which was published by Aucher in 1818 (Latin translation in Schoene's edition), and of two See also:Syriac versions published in Latin translation respectively in 1866 (by Roediger in Schoene's edition) and in 1884 (by Siegfried and Gelzer) . Other historical works still extant are the Martyrs of Palestine and the Life of Constantine . The former is an account of martyrdoms occurring in Palestine during the years 303 to 310, of most of which Eusebius himself was an See also:eye-See also:witness . The work exists in a longer and a shorter recension, the former in a Syriac version (published with English translation by See also:Cureton, 1861), the latter in the original Greek attached to the Church History in most See also:MSS .
(printed with the History in the various See also:editions)
.
The Life of Constantine, in four books, published after the death of the emperor, which occurred in 337, Is a See also:panegyric rather than a sober history, but contains much valuable material
.
Of Eusebius' apologetic works we still have the Contra Hierodem, Praeparatio evangelica, Demonstratio evangelica, and Theophania
.
The first is a reply to a lost work against the Christians written by See also:Hierocles, a See also:Roman See also:governor and contemporary of Eusebius
.
The second and third, taken together, are the most elaborate and important apologetic work of the early church
.
The former, in fifteen books, aims to show that the Christians are justified in accepting the sacred writings of the See also:Hebrews, and in rejecting the See also:religion and See also:philosophy of the Greeks
.
The latter, in twenty books, of which only the first ten and fragments of the fifteenth are extant, endeavours to prove from the See also:Hebrew Scriptures themselves that the Christians are right in going beyond the See also:Jews and adopting new principles and practices
.
The former is thus a preparation for the latter, and the two together constitute a defence of Christianity against all the world, See also:heathen as well as Jews
.
In grandeur of conception, comprehensiveness of treatment, and breadth of learning, this apology surpasses all other similar works of antiquity
.
The Praeparatio is also valuable because of its large number of quotations from classical literature, many ofthem otherwise unknown to us
.
The Theophania, though we have many fragments of the original Greek, is extant as a whole only in a Syriac version first published by See also: Of Eusebius' dogmatic and polemic writings, we still have two works against his contemporary, Marcellus, bishop of Ancyra, the one known as Contra Marcellum, the other as De theologia ecclesiastica . The former and briefer aims simply to expose the errors of Marcellus, whom Eusebius accuses of Sabellianism, the latter to refute them . We also have parts of a General Introduction ('H aa8bXou arocgetc'A 7s eiaayary,), which consisted of ten. books (the See also:sixth to the ninth books and a few other fragments still extant), under the title of Prophetical Extracts (IIpoOnrucai iaXcyal) . Although this formed part of a larger work it was See also:complete in itself and circulated separately . It contains prophetical passages from the Old Testament See also:relating to the See also:person and work of Christ, accompanied by explanatory notes . Of Biblical and exegetical works we have a considerable part of Eusebius' Commentaries on the See also:Psalms and on See also:Isaiah, which are monuments of learning, See also:industry and See also:critical acumen, though marred by the use of the allegorical method characteristic of the school of Origen; also a work on the names of places mentioned in Scripture, or the Onomasticon, the only one extant of a number of writings on Old Testament See also:topography; and an epitome and some fragments of a work in two parts on See also:Gospel Questions and Solutions, the first part dealing with the genealogies of Christ given in See also:Matthew and See also:Luke, the second with the apparent discrepancies between the various gospel accounts of the resurrection . Other important works which have perished wholly or in large part, and some orations and See also:minor writings still extant, it is not necessary to refer to more particularly . (See Preuschen's See also:list in See also:Harnack's Alt-christliche Litteraturgeschichte, i . 2, p . 55 sq . Preuschen gives See also:thirty-eight titles, besides orations and letters, but it is doubtful whether all of the Commentaries mentioned really existed.) Acacius, the See also:pupil of Eusebius and his successor in the see of Caesarea, wrote a life of him which is unfortunately lost . His own writings contain little See also:biographical material, but we get information from Athanasius, Philostorgius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, Jerome's De vir. See also:ill., and See also:Photius . Among the many modern accounts in church histories, histories of Christian literature, encyclopaedias, &c., may be mentioned a monograph by See also:Stein, Eusebius Bischof von Caesarea (See also:Wurzburg, 1859), meagre but useful as far as it goes; the magnificent See also:article by See also:Lightfoot in the See also:Dictionary of Christian Biograbhy; the account by McGiffert in his translation of the Church History; Erwin Preuschen's article in See also:Herzog-Hauck, Realencyklop . (3rd ed., 1898) ; the treatment of the Chronology of Eusebius writings in Harnack's Alt- christliche Litteraturgeschichte, ii . 2, p. io6 sq.; and Bardenhewer's Patrologie, p . 2260 f . The many the Athanasians that he was temporarily banished from his see as a disturber of the peace of the church . But his See also:alienation from the See also:court was of See also:short duration . He retained the confidence of the emperor's See also:sister See also:Constantia, through whose influence he was promoted to the see of See also:Nicomedia, and by her favour he was restored to his position, and speedily acquired an equal ascendancy over the emperor . He was selected to administer See also:baptism to him in his last illness . There seems no doubt that Eusebius of Nicomedia was more of a politician than a theologian . He was certainly a See also:partisan in the great controversy of his time, and is even credited (although on insufficient See also:evidence) with having used unworthy means to procure the deposition of See also:Eustathius, the " orthodox " bishop of Antioch (Theodoret 21) . His See also:rest-less ambition and love of See also:power are not to be denied . To the last he defended Arius, and at the time of the latter's sudden death, 336, it was chiefly through his menace, as representing the emperor, that the church of See also:Constantinople was thrown into anxiety as to whether the leader should be readmitted to the bosom of the church . The death of Constantine followed hard upon that of Arius; and Eusebius, who was promoted in 339 to the see of Constantinople, became the leader of the anti-Nicene party till his own death in (probably) 341 . The real activity of Eusebius and his party must be studied in connexion with the Arian controversy (see Aim's) . |
|
|
[back] EUSEBIUS OF LAODICEA |
[next] EUSEBIUS [OF EMESA] (d. c. "36o) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.