Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:FALLACY (See also:Lat. fall-ax, See also:apt to mislead) , the See also:term given generally to any mistaken statement used in See also:argument; in See also:Logic, technically, an argument which violates the See also:laws of correct demonstration . An argument may be fallacious in Natter (i.e, misstatement of facts), in wording (i.e. wrong use of I 5 3 words), or in the See also:process of inference . Fallacies have, therefore, been classified as: I . Material, IL Verbal, III . Logical or Formal; II. and III. are often included under the See also:general description Logical, and in scholastic phraseology, following See also:Aristotle, are called fallacies in dictione or in voce, as opposed to material fallacies in re or extra dictionem . , I . Material.—The. See also:classification widely adopted by See also:modern logicians and based on that of Aristotle, See also:Organon (Sophistici elenchi), is as follows:—(r) See also:Fallacy of See also:Accident, i.e. arguing erroneously from a general See also:rule to a particular See also:case, without proper regard to particular conditions which vitiate the application of the general rule; e.g. if manhood See also:suffrage be the See also:law, arguing that a criminal or a lunatic must, therefore, have a See also:vote; (2) Converse Fallacy of Accident, i.e. arguing from a See also:special case to a general rule; (3) Irrelevant Conclusion, or Ignoratio Elenchi, wherein, instead of proving the fact in dispute, the arguer seeks to gain his point by diverting See also:attention to some extraneous fact (as in the legal See also:story of " No case . Abuse the See also:plaintiff's See also:attorney ") . Under this See also:head come the so-called argumentum (a) ad hominem, (b) ad populum, (c) ad baculum, (d) ad verecundiam, See also:common in See also:platform See also:oratory, in which the See also:speaker obscures the real issue by appealing to his See also:audience on the grounds of (a) purely See also:personal considerations, (b) popular sentiment, (c) fear, (d) conventional propriety . This fallacy has been illustrated by ethical or theological arguments wherein the fear of See also:punishment is subtly substituted for abstract right as the See also:sanction of moral See also:obligation . (4) "Petitio principii (begging the question) or Circulus in probando (arguing in a circle), which consists in demonstrating a conclusion by means of premises which pre-suppose that conclusion . See also:Jeremy See also:Bentham points out that this fallacy may lurk in a single word, especially in an epithet, e.g. if a measure were condemned simply on the ground that it is alleged to be " un-See also:English "; (5) Fallacy of the Consequent, really a See also:species of (3), wherein a conclusion, is See also:drawn from premises which do not really support it; (6) Fallacy of False Cause, or Non Sequitur( it does not follow "), wherein one thing is in-correctly assumed as the cause of another, as when the ancients attributed a public calamity to a meteorological phenomenon; (7) Fallacy of Many Questions (Plurium Interrogationum), wherein several questions are improperly grouped in the See also:form of one, and a See also:direct categorical See also:answer is demanded, e.g. if a prosecuting counsel asked the prisoner " What See also:time was it when you met this See also:man ?
" with the intention of eliciting the tacit See also:admission that such a See also:meeting had taken See also:place
.
II
.
Verbal Fallacies are those in which a false conclusion is obtained by improper or ambiguous use of words
.
They are generally classified as follows
.
(1) Equivocation consists in employing the same word in two or more senses, e.g. in a See also:syllogism, the See also:middle term being used in one sense in the See also:major and another in the See also:minor premise, so that in fact there are four not three terms (" All See also:fair things are See also:honourable; This woman is fair; therefore this woman is honourable," the second " fair " being in reference to complexion)•.., (2) See also:Amphibology is the result of See also:ambiguity of grammatical structure, e.g. of the position of the adverb " only " in careless writers (" Be only said that," in which See also:sentence, as experience shows, the adverb has been intended to qualify any one of the other three words)
.
(3) See also:Composition, a species of (I), which results from the confused use of collective terms (" The angles of a triangle are less than two right angles " might refer to the angles separately or added together)
.
(4) See also:Division, the converse ,of the preceding, which consists in employing the middle term distributively in the minor and collectively in the major premise
.
(5) See also:Accent, which occurs only in speaking and consists of emphasizing the wrong word in a sentence (" He is a fairly See also:good pianist," according to the emphasis on the words, may imply praise of a beginner's progress, or an See also:expert's depreciation of a popular See also:hero, or it may imply that the See also:person in question is a deplorable violinist)
.
(6) Figure of Speech, the confusion between the metaphorical and See also:ordinary uses of a word or phrase
.
(a) fallacy of Four Terms (Qualernio terminorum); (b) of Undistributed Middle; (c) of Illicit process of the major or the minor term; (d) of Negative Premises
.
Of other classifications of Fallacies in general the most famous are those of See also:Francis See also:
See also: See also See also:article Logic, and for fallacies of See also:Induction, see INDUCTION . |
|
|
[back] FALL RIVER |
[next] CLEMENT ARMAND FALLILRES (1841– ) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.