Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

HENRY FIELDING (1707-1754)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V10, Page 327 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

HENRY See also:FIELDING (1707-1754)  , See also:English novelist and playwright, was See also:born at Sharpham See also:Park, near See also:Glastonbury, See also:Somerset, on the 22nd of See also:April 1707 . His See also:father was See also:Lieutenant See also:Edmund See also:Fielding, third son of See also:John Fielding, who was See also:canon of See also:Salisbury and fifth son of the See also:earl of See also:Desmond . The earl of Desmond belonged to the younger See also:branch of the See also:Denbigh See also:family, who, until lately, were supposed to be connected with the Habsburgs . To this claim, now discredited by the researches of Mr J . See also:Horace See also:Round (Studies in See also:Peerage, 1901, pp . 216-249), is to be attributed the famous passage in See also:Gibbon's Autobiography which predicts for Tom See also:Jones—" that exquisite picture of human See also:manners "—a diuturnity exceeding that of the See also:house of See also:Austria . See also:Henry Fielding's See also:mother was Sarah See also:Gould, daughter of See also:Sir Henry Gould, a See also:judge of the See also:king's See also:bench . It is probable that the See also:marriage was not approved by her father, since, though she remained at Sharpham Park for some See also:time after that event, his will provided that her See also:husband should have nothing to do with a See also:legacy of £3000 See also:left her in 1710 . About this date the Fieldings moved to See also:East See also:Stour in See also:Dorset . Two girls, See also:Catherine and See also:Ursula, had apparently been born at Sharpham Park; and three more, together with a son, Edmund, followed at East Stour . Sarah, the third of the daughters, born See also:November 1710, and afterwards the author of See also:David See also:Simple and other See also:works, survived her See also:brother . Fielding's See also:education up to his mother's See also:death, which took See also:place in April 1718 at East Stour, seems to have been entrusted to a neighbouring clergyman, Mr See also:Oliver of Motcombe, in whom tradition traces the uncouth lineaments of " See also:Parson Trulliber in See also:Joseph See also:Andrews .

But he must have contrived, nevertheless, to prepare his See also:

pupil for See also:Eton, to which place Fielding went about this date, probably as an oppidan . Little is known of his school-days . There is no See also:record of his name in the See also:college lists; but, if we may believe his first biographer, See also:Arthur See also:Murphy, by no means an unimpeachable authority, he left uncommonly versed in the See also:Greek authors, and an See also:early See also:master of the Latin See also:classics,"—a statement which should perhaps be qualified by his own words to Sir See also:Robert See also:Walpole in 1730: " Tuscan and See also:French are in my See also:head ; Latin I write, and Greek—I read." But he certainly made See also:friends among his class-See also:fellows—some of whom continued friends for See also:life . Winnington and Hanbury-See also:Williams were among these . The See also:chief, however, and the most faithful, was See also:George, afterwards Sir George, and later See also:Baron See also:Lyttelton of Frankley . When Fielding left Eton is unknown . But in November 1725 we hear of him definitely in what seems like a characteristic escapade . He was staying at Lyme (in See also:company with a trusty See also:retainer, ready to " See also:beat, maim or kill " in his See also:young master's behalf), and apparently See also:bent on carrying off, if necessary°by force, a See also:local heiress, See also:Miss Sarah See also:Andrew, whose fluttered guardians promptly hurried her away, and married her to some one else (See also:Athenaeum, 2nd See also:June 1883) . Her baffled admirer consoled himself by translating See also:part of See also:Juvenal's See also:sixth See also:satire into See also:verse as " all the Revenge taken by an injured See also:Lover." After this he must have lived the usual life of a young See also:man about See also:town, and probably at this date improved the acquaintance of his second See also:cousin, See also:Lady See also:Mary Wortley See also:Montagu, to whom he in-scribed his first See also:comedy, Love in Several Masques, produced at See also:Drury See also:Lane in See also:February 1728 . The moment was not particularly favourable, since it succeeded See also:Cibber's Provok'd Husband, and was contemporary with See also:Gay's popular See also:Beggar's See also:Opera . Almost immediately afterwards (See also:March 16th) Fielding entered himself as " See also:Stud . Lit." at See also:Leiden University .

He was still there in February 1729 . But he had apparently left before the See also:

annual See also:registration of February 1730, when his name is absent from the books (See also:Macmillan's See also:Magazine, April 1907); and in See also:January 1730 he brought out a second comedy at the newly-opened See also:theatre in See also:Goodman's See also:Fields . Like its predecessor, the See also:Temple Beast was an See also:essay in the vein of See also:Congreve and See also:Wycherley, though, in a measure, an advance on Love in Several Masques . With the Temple Beau Fielding's dramatic career definitely begins . His father had married again; and his Leiden career had been interrupted for lack of funds . Nominally, he was entitled to an See also:allowance of £too a See also:year; but this (he was accustomed to say) "any See also:body might pay that would." Young; handsome, ardent and fond of See also:pleasure, he began that career as a See also:hand-to-mouth playwright around which so much See also:legend has gathered—and gathers . Having—in his own words—no choice but to be a See also:hackney coachman or a hackney writer, he See also:chose the See also:pen; and his inclinations, as well as his opportunities, led him to the See also:stage . From 1730 to 1736 he rapidly brought out a large number of pieces, most of which had merit enough to secure their being acted, but not sufficient to See also:earn a lasting reputation for their author . His chief successes, from a See also:critical point of view, the Author's See also:Farce (1730) and Tom Thumb (1730, 1731), were burlesques; and he also was fortunate in two See also:translations from See also:Moliere, the See also:Mock See also:Doctor (1732) and the See also:Miser (1733) . Of the See also:rest (with one or two exceptions, to be mentioned presently) the names need only be recorded . They are The See also:Coffee-House Politician, a comedy (173o); The See also:Letter Writers, a farce (1731); The See also:Grub-See also:Street Opera, a See also:burlesque (1731); The Lottery, a farce (1732); The See also:Modern Husband, a comedy (1732); The Covent See also:Garden Tragedy, a burlesque (1732); The Old Debauchees, a comedy (1732); See also:Deborah; or, a Wife for you all, an after-piece (1733) ; The Intriguing Chambermaid (from See also:Regnard), a two-See also:act comedy (1734) ; and See also:Don Quixote in See also:England, a comedy, which had been partly sketched at Leiden . Don Quixote was produced in 1734, and the See also:list of plays may be here interrupted by an event of which the date has only recently been ascertained, namely, Fielding's first marriage .

This took place on the 28th of November 1734 at St Mary, Charlcombe, near See also:

Bath (Macmillan's Magazine, April 1907), the lady being a Salisbury beauty, Miss See also:Charlotte See also:Cradock, of whom he had been an admirer, if not a suitor, as far back as 1930 . This is a fact which should be taken into See also:consideration in estimating the exact Bohemianism of his See also:London life, for there is no doubt that he was devotedly attached to her . After a fresh farce entitled An Old Man taught See also:Wisdom, and the See also:comparative failure of a new comedy, The Universal Gallant, both produced early in 1735, he seems for a time to have retired with his See also:bride, who came into £1500, to his old See also:home at East Stour . Around this rural seclusion fiction has freely accreted . He is supposed to have lived for three years on the footing of a typical 18th-See also:century See also:country See also:gentleman; to have kept a See also:pack of hounds; to have put his servants into impossible yellow liveries; and generally, by profuse hospitality and reckless See also:expenditure, to have made rapid See also:duck and See also:drake of Mrs Fielding's modest legacy . Something of this is demonstrably false; much, grossly exaggerated . In any See also:case, he was in London as See also:late as February 1735 (the date of the " See also:Preface " to The Universal Gallant); and early in March 1736 he was back again managing the Haymarket theatre with a so-called "See also:Great See also:Mogul's Company of English Comedians." Upon this new enterprise See also:fortune, at the outset, seemed to smile . The first piece (produced on the 5th of March) was Pasquin, a Dramatick Satire on the Times (a piece akin in its See also:plan to See also:Buckingham's See also:Rehearsal), which contained, in addition to much admirable burlesque, a See also:good See also:deal of very See also:direct See also:criticism of the shameless See also:political corruption of the Walpole era . Its success was unmistakable; and when, after bringing out the remarkable Fatal Curiosity of George See also:Lillo, its author followed up Pasquin by the See also:Historical See also:Register for the Year 1736, of which the effrontery was even more daring than that of its predecessor, the See also:ministry began to bethink themselves that matters were going too far . How they actually effected their See also:object is obscure: but grounds were speedily concocted for the Licensing Act of 1737, which restricted the number of theatres, rendered the See also:lord See also:chamberlain's See also:licence an indispensable preliminary to stage See also:representation, and—in a word—effectually put an end to Fielding's career as a dramatist . Whether, had that career been prolonged to its maturity, the result would have enriched the theatrical repertoire with a new See also:species of burlesque, or reinforced it with fresh See also:variations on the " wit-traps " of Wycherley and Congreve, is one of those inquiries that are more See also:academic than. profitable . What may be affirmed is, that Fielding's plays, as we have them, exhibit abundant invention and ingenuity; that they are full of See also:humour and high See also:spirits; that, though they may have been hastily written, they were by no means thoughtlessly constructed; and that, in composing them, their author attentively considered either managerial hints, or the conditions of the See also:market .

Against this, one must set the fact that they are often immodest; and that, whatever their See also:

intrinsic merit, they have failed to See also:rival in permanent popularity the See also:work of inferior men . Fielding's own conclusion was, " that he left off See also:writing for the stage, when he ought to have begun "—which can only mean that he himself regarded his plays as the outcome of See also:imitation rather than experience . They probably taught him how to construct Tom Jones; but whether he could ever have written a comedy at the level of that novel, can only be established by a comparison which it is impossible to make, namely, a comparison with Tom Jones of a comedy written at the same See also:age, and in similar circumstances . Tumble-Down See also:Dick; or, Phaeton in the Suds, See also:Eurydice and Eurydice hissed are the names of three occasional pieces which belong to the last months of Fielding's career as a Haymarket manager . By this date he was See also:thirty, with a wife and daughter . As a means of support, he reverted to the profession of his maternal grandfather; and, in November 1737, he entered the See also:Middle Temple, being described in the books of the society as " of East Stour in Dorset." That he set himself strenuously to master his new profession, is admitted; ,though it is unlikely that he had entirely discarded the irregular habits which had grown upon him in his irresponsible bachelorhood . He also did a good deal. of See also:literary work, the best known of which is contained in the See also:Champion, a " See also:News-See also:Journal " of the Spectator type undertaken. with See also:James See also:Ralph, whose poem of " See also:Night " is made notorious in the Dunciad . That the Champion was not without merit is undoubted; but the essay-type was for the moment out-worn, and neither Fielding nor his coadjutor could lend it fresh vitality . Fielding contributed papers from the 15th of November 1739 to the 19th of June 1740 . On the loth of June he was called to the See also:bar, and occupied See also:chambers in See also:Pump See also:Court . It is further related that, in the diligent pursuit of his calling, he travelled the Western See also:Circuit, and attended the See also:Wiltshire sessions . Although, with the Champion, he professed, for the time, to have relinquished periodical literature, he still wrote at intervals, a fact which, taken in connexion with his past reputation as an effective satirist, probably led to his being " unjustly censured " for much that he never produced .

But he certainly wrote a poem " Of True Greatness " (1741); a first See also:

book of a burlesque epic, the Vernoniad, prompted by See also:Vernon's expedition of 1739; a See also:vision called the Opposition, and, perhaps, a political See also:sermon entitled the Crisis (1741) . Another piece, now known to have been attributed to him by his contemporaries (Hist . See also:MSS . See also:Comm., Rept . 12, App . Pt. ix., p . 204), is the pamphlet entitled An See also:Apology for the Life of Mrs Shamela Andrews, a See also:clever but coarse attack upon the prurient See also:side of See also:Richardson's Pamela, which had been issued in 1740, and was at the height of its popularity . Shamela followed early in 1741 . Richardson, who was well acquainted with Fielding's four sisters, at that date his neighbours at See also:Hammersmith, confidently attributed it to Fielding (Corr . 1804, iv . 286, and unpublished letter at See also:South See also:Kensington) ; and there are suggestive points of See also:internal See also:evidence (such as the transformation of Pamela's "Mr B." into "Ma Booby ") which tend to connect it with the future Joseph Andrews . Fielding, however, never acknowledged it, or referred to it; and a great deal has been laid to his See also:charge that he never deserved (" Preface " to Miscellanies, 1743) .

Phoenix-squares

But whatever may be decided in regard to the authorship of Shamela, it is quite possible that it prompted the more memorable Joseph Andrews, which made its See also:

appearance in February 1742, and concerning which there is no question . Professing, on his See also:title-See also:page, to imitate Cervantes, Fielding set out to See also:cover Pamela with Homeric ridicule by transferring the heroine's embarrassments to a See also:hero, supposed to be her brother . Allied to this purpose was a See also:collateral attack upon the slipshod Apology of the playwright See also:Colley Cibber, with whom, for obscure reasons, Fielding had See also:long been at See also:war . But the avowed object of the book See also:fell speedily into the background as its author warmed to his theme . His secondary speedily became his See also:primary characters, and Lady Booby and Joseph Andrews do not See also:interest us now as much as Mrs Slipslop and Parson See also:Adams—the latter an invention that ranges in literature with See also:Sterne's " See also:Uncle Toby " and See also:Goldsmith's " See also:Vicar." Yet more than these and others equally admirable in their round veracity, is the writer's penetrating outlook upon the frailties and failures of human nature . By the time he had reached his second See also:volume, he had convinced himself that he had inaugurated a new See also:fashion of fiction; and in a " Preface " of exceptional ability, he announced his See also:discovery . Postulating that the epic might be " comic " or " tragic," See also:prose or verse, he claimed to have achieved what he termed the " Comic Epos in Prose," of which the See also:action was " ludicrous " rather than " See also:sublime," and the personages selected from society at large, rather than the restricted ranks of conventional high life . His plan, it will be observed, was happily adapted to his gifts of humour, satire, and above all, See also:irony . That it was matured when it began may perhaps be doubted, but it was certainly matured when it ended . Indeed, except for the See also:plot, which, in his See also:picaresque first See also:idea, had not preceded the conception, Joseph Andrews has all the characteristics of Tom Jones, even (in part) to the initial chapters . Joseph Andrews had considerable success, and the exact sum paid for it by Andrew See also:Millar, the publisher, according to the See also:assignment now at South Kensington, was £183 :11s., one of the witnesses being the author's friend, See also:William Young, popularly supposed to be the See also:original of Parson Adams . It was with Young that Fielding undertook what, with exception of " a very small See also:share " in the farce of Miss See also:Lucy in Town (1742), constituted his next work, a See also:translation of the See also:Plutus of See also:Aristophanes, which never seems to have justified any similar experiments .

Another of his See also:

minor works was a Vindication of the See also:Dowager Duchess of See also:Marlborough (1742), then much before the public by See also:reason of the See also:Account of her Life which she had recently put forth . Later in the same year, See also:Garrick applied to Fielding for a See also:play; and a very early effort, The See also:Wedding See also:Day, was hastily patched together, and produced at Drury Lane in February 1743 with no great success . It was, however, included in Fielding's next important publication, the three volumes of Miscellanies issued by subscription in the succeeding April . These also comprised some early poems, some essays, a Lucianic fragment entitled a See also:Journey from this See also:World to' the Next,-and, last but not least, occupying the entire final volume, the remark-able performance entitled the See also:History of the Life of the late Mr See also:Jonathan See also:Wild the Great . It is probable that, in its See also:composition, Jonathan Wild preceded Joseph Andrews . At all events it seems unlikely that Fielding would have followed up a success in a new See also:line by an effort so entirely different in See also:character . Taking for his ostensible hero a well-known thief-taker, who had been hanged in 1725, he proceeds to illustrate, by a mock-heroic account of his progress to See also:Tyburn, the See also:general proposition that greatness without goodness is no better than badness . He will not go so far as to say that all " Human Nature is Newgate with the See also:Mask on "; but he evidently regards the description as fairly applicable to a good many so-called great See also:people . Irony (and especially Irony neat) is not a popular See also:form of See also:rhetoric; and the remorseless pertinacity with which Fielding pursues his demonstration is to many readers discomforting and even distasteful . Yet—in spite of See also:Scott—Jonathan Wild has its softer pages; and as a purely intellectual conception it is not surpassed by any of the author's works . His actual See also:biography, both before and after Jonathan Wild,is obscure . There are evidences that he laboured diligently at his profession; there are also evidences of sickness and embarrassment .

He had become early a See also:

martyr to the malady of his century—See also:gout, and the uncertainties of a See also:precarious livelihood told grievously upon his beautiful wife, who eventually died of See also:fever in his arms, leaving him for the time so stunned and bewildered by grief that his friends feared for his reason . For some years his published productions were unimportant . He wrote " Prefaces " to the David Simple of his See also:sister Sarah in 2744 and 1747; and, in 1745–1746 and 1747–1748, produced two See also:newspapers in the ministerial interest, the True Patriot and the Jacobite's Journal, both of which are connected with, or derive from, the See also:rebellion of 1745, and were doubtless, when they ceased, the pretext of a See also:pension from the public service See also:money (Journal of a Voyage to See also:Lisbon, " Introduction ") . In November 1747 he married his wife's maid, Mary See also:Daniel, at St Bene't's, See also: