FINE
, a word which in all its senses goes back to the See also:Lat. finire, to bring to an end (finis)
.
Thus in the See also:common adjectival meanings of elegant, thin, subtle, excellent, reduced in See also:size, &c., it is in origin See also:equivalent to " finished." In the various substantival meanings in See also:law, with which this See also:article deals, the common See also:idea underlying them is an end or final See also:settlement of a See also:matter
.
A fine, in the See also:ordinary sense, is a pecuniary See also:penalty inflicted for the less serious offences
.
Fines are necessarily discretionary as to amount; but a maximum is generally fixed when the penalty is imposed by See also:statute
.
And it is an old constitutional See also:maxim that fines must not be unreasonable
.
In Magna Carta, c
.
111, it is ordained " See also:Liber homo non amercietur See also:pro parvo delicto nisi secundum modum ipsius delicti, et pro magoo delicto secundum magnitudinem delicti."
The See also:term is also applied to payments made to the See also:lord of a See also:manor on the See also:alienation of See also:land held according to the See also:custom of the manor, to payments made by a lessee on a renewal of a See also:lease, and to other similar payments
.
Fine also denotes a fictitious suit at law, which played the See also:part of a See also:conveyance of landed See also:property
.
" A fine," says See also:Blackstone, " may be described to be an amicable See also:composition or agreement of a suit, either actual or fictitious, by leave of the See also:- KING
- KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. kiinic, kiinec, kiinc, Mod. Ger. Konig, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung)
- KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1ST BARON (1669-1734)
- KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888)
- KING, CLARENCE (1842–1901)
- KING, EDWARD (1612–1637)
- KING, EDWARD (1829–1910)
- KING, HENRY (1591-1669)
- KING, RUFUS (1755–1827)
- KING, THOMAS (1730–1805)
- KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729)
- KING, WILLIAM (1663–1712)
king or his justices, whereby the lands in question become or are acknowledged to be the right of one of the parties
.
In its See also:original it was founded on an actual suit commenced at law for the recovery of the See also:possession of land or other hereditaments; and the possession thus gained by such composition was found to be so sure and effectual that fictitious actions were and continue to be every See also:day commenced for the See also:sake of obtaining the same See also:security." See also:Freehold estates could thus be transferred from one See also:person to another without the formal delivery of possession which was generally necessary to a See also:feoffment
.
This is one of the See also:oldest devices of the law
.
A statute of 18 See also:Edward I. describes it as the most See also:solemn and satisfactory of securities, and gives a See also:reason for its name—" Qui quidem finis sic vocatur, eo quod finis et consummatio omnium placitorum esse debet, et hac de causa providebatur." The See also:action was supposed to be founded on a See also:breach of See also:covenant: the See also:defendant, owning himself in the wrong,' makes overtures of See also:compromise, which are authorized by the licentia concordandi; then followed the See also:concord, or the compromise itself
.
These, then were the essential parts of the performance, which became efficient as soon as they were See also:complete; the formal parts were the notes, or abstract of the proceedings, and the See also:foot of the fine, which recited the final agreement
.
Fines were said to be of four kinds, according to the purpose they had in view, as, for instance, to convey lands in pursuance of a covenant, to See also:- GRANT (from A.-Fr. graunter, O. Fr. greanter for creanter, popular Lat. creantare, for credentare, to entrust, Lat. credere, to believe, trust)
- GRANT, ANNE (1755-1838)
- GRANT, CHARLES (1746-1823)
- GRANT, GEORGE MONRO (1835–1902)
- GRANT, JAMES (1822–1887)
- GRANT, JAMES AUGUSTUS (1827–1892)
- GRANT, ROBERT (1814-1892)
- GRANT, SIR ALEXANDER
- GRANT, SIR FRANCIS (1803-1878)
- GRANT, SIR JAMES HOPE (1808–1895)
- GRANT, SIR PATRICK (1804-1895)
- GRANT, U
- GRANT, ULYSSES SIMPSON (1822-1885)
grant revisionary See also:interest only, &c
.
In addition to the formal See also:record of the proceedings, various statutes required other solemnities to be observed, the See also:great See also:object of which was to give publicity to the transaction
.
Thus by statutes of See also:Richard III. and See also:- HENRY
- HENRY (1129-1195)
- HENRY (c. 1108-1139)
- HENRY (c. 1174–1216)
- HENRY (Fr. Henri; Span. Enrique; Ger. Heinrich; Mid. H. Ger. Heinrich and Heimrich; O.H.G. Haimi- or Heimirih, i.e. " prince, or chief of the house," from O.H.G. heim, the Eng. home, and rih, Goth. reiks; compare Lat. rex " king "—" rich," therefore " mig
- HENRY, EDWARD LAMSON (1841– )
- HENRY, JAMES (1798-1876)
- HENRY, JOSEPH (1797-1878)
- HENRY, MATTHEW (1662-1714)
- HENRY, PATRICK (1736–1799)
- HENRY, PRINCE OF BATTENBERG (1858-1896)
- HENRY, ROBERT (1718-1790)
- HENRY, VICTOR (1850– )
- HENRY, WILLIAM (1795-1836)
Henry VII. the fine had to be openly read and proclaimed in See also:court no less than sixteen times
.
A statute of See also:Elizabeth required a See also:list of fines to be exposed in the court of common pleas and at assizes
.
The reason for these formalities was the high and important nature of the conveyance, which, according to the See also:act of Edward I. above mentioned, " precludes not only those which are parties and privies to the
' Hence called cognizor; the other party, the purchaser, is the cognizee.fine and their heirs, but all other persons in the See also:world who are of full See also:age, out of See also:prison, of See also:sound memory, and within the four seas, the day of the fine levied, unless they put in their claim on the foot of the fine within a See also:year and a day." This barring by non-claim was abolished in the reign of Edward III., but restored with an See also:extension of the See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time to five years in the reign of Henry VII
.
The effect of this statute, intentional according to Blackstone, unintended and brought about by judicial construction according to others, was that a See also:tenant-in-tail could See also:bar his issue by a fine
.
A statute of Henry VIII. expressly declares this to be the law
.
Fines, along with the kindred fiction of recoveries, were abolished by the Fines and Recoveries Act 1833, which substituted a See also:deed enrolled in the court of See also:chancery
.
Fines are so generally associated in legal phraseology with recoveries that it may not be inconvenient to describe the latter in the See also:present See also:place
.
A recovery was employed as a means for evading the strict law of See also:entail
.
The purchaser or alienee brought an action against the tenant-in-tail, alleging that he had no legal See also:title to the land
.
The tenant-in-tail brought a third person into court, declaring that he had warranted his title, and praying that he might be ordered to defend the action
.
This person was called the vouchee, and he, after having appeared to defend the action, takes himself out of the way
.
See also:Judgment for the lands is given in favour of the See also:plaintiff; and judgment to recover lands of equal value from the vouchee was given to the defendant, the tenant-in-tail
.
In real action, such lands when recovered would have fallen under the settlement of entail; but in the fictitious recovery the vouchee was a See also:man of See also:straw, and nothing was really recovered from him, while the lands of the tenant-in-tail were effectually conveyed to the successful plaintiff
.
A recovery differed from a fine, as to See also:form, in being an action carried through to the end, while a fine was settled by compromise, and as to effect, by barring all reversions and remainders in estates tail, while a fine barred the issue only of the tenant
.
End of Article: