|
MARY FITTON (c. 1578-1647) , identified by some writers with the " dark lady " ofSee also: Shakespeare's sonnets, was the daughter of See also: Sir See also: Edward Fitton of Gawsworth, See also: Cheshire, and was baptized on the 24th of See also: June 1578
.
Her elder See also: sister, See also: Anne, married See also: John
See also: Newdigate in 1587, in her fourteenth See also: year
.
About 1595 Mary Fitton became maid of honour to See also: Queen See also: Elizabeth
.
Her
See also: father recommended her to the care of Sir See also: William
See also: Knollys, See also: comptroller of the queen's See also: household, who promised to defend the " innocent lamb " from the " wolfish cruelty and See also: fox-like subtlety of the tame beasts of this place." Sir William was fifty and already married, but he soon became suitor to Mary Fitton, in hope of the speedy See also: death of the actual Lady Knollys, and appears to have received considerable encouragement
.
There is no hint in her authenticated biography that she was acquainted with Shakespeare
.
William See also: Kemp, who was a clown in Shakespeare's See also: company, dedicated his Nine Daies Wonder to See also: Mistress Anne (perhaps an error for Mary) Fitton, " Maid of Honour to Elizabeth"; and there is a sonnet addressed to her in an See also: anonymous See also: volume, A Woman's Woorth defended against all the Men in the See also: World (1599)
.
In 1600 Mary Fitton led a dance in See also: court festivities at which William See also: Herbert, later See also: earl of Pembroke, is known to have been See also: present; and shortly afterwards she became his mistress
.
In See also: February 16os Pembroke was sent to the See also: Fleet in connexion with this affair, but Mary Fitton, whose See also: child died soon after its See also: birth, appears to have simply been dismissed from court
.
Mary Fitton seems to have gone to her sister, Lady
Newdigate, at Arbury
.
A second See also: scandal has been fixed on Mary Fitton by See also: George See also: Ormerod, author of See also: History of Cheshire, in a MS. quoted by Mr
.
T
.
Tyler (See also: Academy, 27th See also: Sept
.
1884) . Ormerod asserted, on the strength of the See also: MSS. of Sir See also: Peter Leycester, that she had two illegitimate daughters by Sir See also: Richard Leveson, the friend and correspondent of her sister Anne
.
He also gives the name of her first See also: husband as Captain Logher, and her second as Captain Polwhele, by whom she had a son and daughter
.
Polwhele died in 1609 or 161o, about three years after his See also: marriage
.
But Ormerod was mistaken in the See also: order of Mary Fitton's husbands, for her second husband, Logher, died in 1636
.
Her own will, which was proved in 1647, gives her name as " Mary Lougher." In Gawsworth See also: church there is a painted monument of the Fittons, in which Anne and Mary are represented kneeling behind their
See also: mother
.
It is stated that from what remains of the colouring Mary was a dark woman, which is of course essential to her See also: identification with the lady of the sonnets, but in the portraits at Arbury described by Lady Newdigate-Newdegate in her Gossip from a Mvniment See also: Room (1897) she has See also: brown hair and
See also: grey eyes
.
The identity of the Arbury portrait with Mary Fitton was challenged by Mr Tyler and by Dr Furnivall
.
For an answer to their remarks see an appendix by C
.
G
.
O
.
Bridgeman in the and edition of Lady Newdigate-Newdegate's See also: book
.
The See also: suggestion that Mary Fitton should be regarded as the false mistress of Shakespeare's sonnets rests on a very thin chain of reasoning, and by no means follows on the acceptance of the theory that William Herbert was the addressee of the sonnets, though it of course fails with the rejection of that supposition
.
Mr William See also: Archer (Fortnightly Review, See also: December 1897) found some support for Mary Fitton's identification with the " dark lady " in the fact that Sir William Knollys was also her suitor, thus numbering three " See also: Wills " among her admirers
.
This supplies a definite interpretation, whether right or wrong, to the initial lines of Sonnet 135:
" Whoever See also: bath her wish, thou hast thy ' Will,'
And ' Will ' to See also: boot, and ' Will ' in overplus." Arguments in favour of her adoption into the Shakespeare circle will be found in Mr See also: Thomas Tyler's Shakespeare's Sonnets (189o, pp
.
73-92), and in the same writer's Herbert-Fitton Theory of Shakespeare's Sonnets (1898)
.
|
|
|
[back] RUDOLF FITTIG (1835– ) |
[next] WILLIAM HENRY FITTON (1780-1861) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.