|
FORUM ( See also: Roman antiquity, any open place used, like the See also: Greek ayopa, for the transaction of See also: mercantile, judicial or See also: political business, some-times merely as a See also: promenade
.
It was level, rectangular in See also: form, surrounded by porticoes, basilicas, courts of See also: law and other public buildings
.
In the See also: laws of the Twelve Tables the word is used of the See also: vestibule of a See also: tomb (See also: Cicero, De legibus, ii
.
24); in a Roman See also: camp the forum was an open place immediately beside the praetorium; and the See also: term was no doubt originally applied generally to the space in front of any public See also: building or gateway
.
In See also: Rome (q.v.) itself, however, during the See also: period of the early See also: history, forum was almost a proper name, denoting the flat and formerly marshy space between the Palatine and Capitoline hills (also called Forum Romanum), which probably even during the See also: regal period afforded the accommodation necessary for such public meetings as could not be held within the See also: area Capitolina
.
In early times the Forum Romanum was used for athletic See also: games, and over the porticoes were galleries for spectators; there were also shops of various kinds
.
But with the growth of the city and the increase of provincial business, more than one forum became necessary, and under the See also: empire a considerable number of civilia (judicial) and venalia (mercantile) fora came into existence
.
In addition to the Forum Romanum, the Fora of Caesar and See also: Augustus belonged to the former class; the Forum boarium (cattle), holitorium (See also: vegetable), piscarium (See also: fish), pistorium (See also: bread), vinarium (See also: wine), to the latter
.
The Fora of See also: Nerva (also called transitorium or pervium, because a See also: main road led through it to the Forum Romanum), Trajan, and See also: Vespasian, although partly intended to facilitate the course of public729
business, were chiefly erected to embellish the city
.
The construction of See also: separate markets was not, however, necessarily the See also: rule in the provincial fora; thus, in See also: Pompeii, at the See also: north-See also: east end of the forum, there was a macellum (market), and shops for provisions and possibly See also: money changers, and on the east See also: side a building supposed to have been the clothworkers' See also: exchange, and at See also: Timgad in North See also: Africa (a military colony founded under Trajan) the whole of the See also: south side of the forum was occupied by shops
.
The forum was usually paved, and although on festal occasions chariots were probably driven through, it was not a thoroughfare and was enclosed by See also: gates at the entrances, of which traces have been found at Pompeii
.
When the sites for new towns were being selected, that for the forum was in the centre, and the two main streets crossed one another close to but not through it
.
At Timgad the main streets are some 5 or 6 ft. See also: lower than the forum
.
The word forum frequently appears in the names of Roman market towns; as, for example, in Forum Appii, Forum Julii (See also: Frejus), Forum Livii (Forli), Forum Sempronii (See also: Fossombrone)
.
These fora were distinguished from See also: mere vici by the possession of a municipal organization, which, however, was less See also: complete than that of a prefecture
.
In legal phraseology, which distinguishes the forum commune from the forum privilegiatum, and the forum generale from .the forum speciale, the word is practically See also: equivalent to " See also: court " or " jurisdiction."
For the fora at Rome, see See also: Roma: Archaeology, and See also: works quoted
.
|
|
|
[back] FORTY |
[next] FORUM APPII |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.