|
GASTON See also: theology in the university of See also: Geneva from 1894 to 1906
.
An Alsatian by See also: birth, he belonged mainly to French See also: Switzerland, where he spent most of his See also: life
.
He may best be described as continuing the spirit of Vinet (q.v.) amid the See also: mental conditions marking the end of the 19th century
.
Like Vinet, he derived his philosophy of See also: religion from a peculiarly deep experience of the Gospel of Christ as meeting the demands of the moral consciousness; but he See also: developed even further than Vinet the psychological analysis of See also: conscience and the method of verifying every See also: doctrine by See also: direct reference to spiritual experience
.
Both made much of moral individuality or See also: personality as the See also: crown and criterion of reality, believing that its correlation with See also: Christianity, both historically and philosophically, was most intimate
.
But while Vinet laid most stress on the liberty from human authority essential to the moral consciousness, the changed needs of the age caused See also: Frommel to develop rather the aspect of See also: man's dependence as a moral being upon See also: God's spiritual initiative, " the conditional nature of his liberty." " Liberty is not the See also: primary, but the secondary characteristic " of See also: con-science; " before being See also: free, it is the subject of See also: obligation." On this depends its objectivity as a real See also: revelation of the Divine Will
.
Thus he claimed that a deeper analysis carried one beyond the human subjectivity of even See also: Kant's categorical imperative, since consciousness of obligation was " une experience imposee sous le mode de 1'absolu." By his use of imposee Frommel emphasized the priority of man's sense of obligation to his consciousness either of self or of God
.
Here he appealed to the current psychology of the subconscious for confirmation of his analysis, by which he claimed to transcend See also: mere intellectualism
.
In his language on this fundamental point he was perhaps too jealous of admitting an ideal See also: element as implicit in the feeling of obligation
.
Still he did well in insisting on priority to self-conscious thought as a mark of metaphysical objectivity in the See also: case of moral, no less than of See also: physical experience
.
Further, he found in the Christian revelation the same characteristics as belonged to the universal revelation involved in conscience, viz
.
God's See also: sovereign initiative and his living See also: action in See also: history
.
From this standpoint he argued against a purely psychological type of religion (agnosticisme religieux; as he termed it)—a tendency to which he saw even in A . See also: Sabatier and the symbolofideisme of the See also: Paris School—as giving up a real and unifying faith
.
His influence on men, especially the student class, was greatly enhanced by the religious force and charm of his personality
.
Finally, like Vinet, he was a man of letters and a penetrating critic of men and systems
.
|
|
|
[back] EUGENE FROMENTIN (1820-1876) |
[next] THE FRONDE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.