Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:
On the demand of the college he resigned his fellowship at Oxford, and mainly at least supported himself by See also:writing, contributing largely to See also:Fraser's See also:Magazine and the Westminster See also:Review
.
The excellence of his See also:style was soon generally re-cognized
.
The first two volumes of his See also:History of See also:England from the Fall of See also:Wolsey to the Defeat of the See also:Spanish See also:Armada appeared in 1856, and the See also:work was completed in 187o
.
As an historian he is chiefly remarkable for See also:literary excellence, for the See also:art with which he represents his conception of the past
.
He condemns a scientific treatment of history and disregards its See also:philosophy
.
He held that its See also:office was simply to See also:record human actions and that it should be written as a See also:drama
.
Accordingly he gives prominence to the See also:personal See also:element in history
.
His presentations of See also:character and motives, whether truthful or not, are undeniably See also:fine; but his See also:doctrine that there should be " no theorizing " about history tended to narrow his survey, and consequently he sometimes, as in his remarks on the See also:foreign policy of See also:
A strong See also:anti-clerical prejudice is See also:manifest in his See also:historical work generally, and is doubtless the result of the change in his views on Church matters and his See also:abandonment of the clerical profession
.
Carlyle's influence on him may be traced both in his admiration for strong rulers and strong See also:government, which led him to write as though tyranny and brutality were excusable, and in his See also:independent treatment of character
.
His rehabilitation of Henry VIII. was a useful protest against the See also:idea that the See also: Notwithstanding its defects, Froude's History is a See also:great achievement; it presents an important and powerful See also:account of the Reformation period in England, and See also:lays before us a picture of the past magnificently conceived, and painted in See also:colours which will never lose their freshness and beauty . As with Froude's work generally, its literary merit is remarkable; it is a well-balanced and orderly narrative, coherent in See also:design and symmetrical in See also:execution . Though it is perhaps needlessly See also:long, the See also:thread of the See also:story is never lost amid a See also:crowd of details; every incident is made subordinate to the general idea, appears in its appropriate See also:place, and contributes its See also:share to the perfection of the whole . The excellence of its See also:form is matched by the beauty of its style, for Fronde was a master of English See also:prose . The most notable characteristic of his style is its graceful simplicity; it is never affected or laboured; his sentences are short and easy, and follow one another naturally . He is always lucid . He was never in doubt as to his own meaning, and never at a loss for the most appropriate words in which to See also:express it . See also:Simple as his See also:language is, it is dignified and worthy of its subject . Nowhere perhaps does his style appear to more See also:advantage than in his four series of essays entitled Short Studies on Great Subjects(1867—1882), for it is seen there unfettered by the obligations of narrative . Yet his narrative is admirably told . For the most part flowing easily along, it rises on See also:fit occasions to splendour, picturesque beauty or pathos . Few more brilliant pieces of historical writing exist than his description of the See also:coronation procession of See also:Anne See also:Boleyn through the streets of See also:London, few more full of picturesque See also:power than that in which he relates how the See also:spire of St See also:Paul's was struck by See also:lightning; and to have once read is to remember for ever the touching and stately words in which he compares the monks of the London See also:Charterhouse preparing for See also:death with the Spartans at See also:Thermopylae . Proofs of his power in the sustained narration of stirring events are abundant; his treatment of the See also:Pilgrimage of See also:Grace, of the See also:sea fight at St Helens and the repulse of the See also:French invasion, and of the See also:murder of See also:Rizzio, are among the most conspicuous examples of it . Nor is he less successful when recording pathetic events, for his stories of certain martyrdoms, and of the execution of See also:Mary See also:queen of Scots, are told with exquisite feeling and in language of well-restrained emotion . And his characters are alive . We may not always agree with his See also:portraiture, but the men and See also:women whom he saw exist for us See also:instinct with the life with which he endows them and animated by the motives which he attributes to them . His successes must be set against his failures . At the least he wrote a great history, one which can never be disregarded by future writers on his period, be their opinions what they may; which attracts and delights a multitude of readers, and is a splendid example of literary form and grace in historical See also:composition . The merits of his work met with full recognition . Each See also:instalment of his History, in See also:common with almost everything which he wrote, was widely read, and in spite of some adverse criticisms was received with eager See also:applause . In 1868 he was elected See also:rector of St See also:Andrews University, defeating Disraeli by a See also:majority of fourteen . He was warmly welcomed in the See also:United States, which he visited in 1872, but the lectures on Ireland which he delivered there caused much dissatisfaction . On the death of his adversary Freeman in 1892, he was appointed, on the recommendation of See also:Lord See also:Salisbury, to succeed him as regius See also:professor of See also:modern history at Oxford . Except to a few Oxford men, who considered that historical scholarship should have been held to be a necessary qualification for the office, his See also:appointment gave general See also:satisfaction . His lectures on See also:Erasmus and other 16th-See also:century subjects were largely attended . With some See also:allowance for the purpose for which they were originally written, they See also:present much the same characteristics as his earlier historical books . His See also:health gave way in the summer of 1894, and he died on the loth of See also:October . His long life was full of literary work . Besides his labours as an author, he was for fourteen years editor of Fraser's Magazine . He was one of Carlyle's literary executors, and brought some See also:sharp See also:criticism upon himself by See also:publishing Carlyle's Reminiscences and the Memorials of Jane Welsh Carlyle, for they exhibited the domestic life and character of his old friend in an unpleasant See also:light . Carlyle had given the See also:manuscripts to him, telling him that he might publish them if he thought it well to do so, and at the See also:close of his life agreed to their publication . Fronde therefore declared that in giving them to the See also:world he was carrying out his friend's wish by enabling him to make a See also:posthumous See also:confession of his faults . Besides publishing these manuscripts he wrote a Life of Carlyle . His earlier study of Irish history afforded him suggestions for a historical novel entitled Time Two Chiefs of Dunboy (1889) . In spite of one or two stirring scenes it is a tedious book, and its personages are little more than See also:machines for the enunciation of the author's opinions and sentiments . Though Froude had some intimate See also:friends he was generally reserved .
When he cared to please, his See also:manners and conversation were charming
.
Those who knew him well formed a high estimate of his ability in See also:practical affairs
.
In 1874 Lord See also:Carnarvon, then colonial secretary, sent Froude to See also:South See also:Africa to See also:report on the best means of promoting a See also:confederation of its colonies and states, and in 1875 he was again sent to the Cape as a member of a proposed See also:conference to further confederation
.
Froude's speeches in South Africa were rather injudicious, and his See also:mission was a failure (see SOUTH AFRICA: History)
.
He was twice married
.
His first wife, adaughter of Pascoe Grenfell and See also:sister of Mrs See also: |
|
|
[back] OCTAVIUS BROOKS FROTHINGHAM (1822-1895) |
[next] LAEVULOSE FRUCTOSE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.