Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
NUMA See also:DENIS FUSTEL DE COULANGES (1830–1889); See also:French historian, was See also:born in See also:Paris on the 18th of See also: 262, vol. i. he gave an See also:extract from the See also:correspondence between See also:Oberlin and Bodmann (now preserved in the See also:Paris Nat . Library), from which it would appear that See also:Peter Schoffer was the son-in-See also:law, not of Johann Fust, but of a See also:brother of his, See also:Conrad Fust . Of the latter, owever, no other trace has been found, and he is no doubt a fiction of F . J . Bodmann, who, partly basing himself on the " Conrad " (Henlif, or Henckis) mentioned above, added the See also:rest to gratify Oberlin (see Wyss in Quartalbldtter See also:des hist . Vereins fiir Hessen, . 1879, p . 17).theories . When he revised the book in 1875, his modifications were very slight, and it is conceivable that, had he recast it, as he often expressed the See also:desire to do in the last years of his See also:life, he would not have abandoned any part of his fundamental thesis . The See also:work is now largely superseded . Fustel de Coulanges was the most conscientious of men, the most systematic and uncompromising of historians . Appointed to a lectureship at the Ecole Normale Superieure in February 187o, to a professorship at the Paris faculty of letters in 1875, and to the See also:chair of See also:medieval history created for him at the See also:Sorbonne in 1878, he applied himself to the study of the political institutions of See also:ancient See also:France . The invasion of France by the German armies during the See also:war of 187o–71 attracted his See also:attention to the Germanic invasions under the Roman See also:Empire . Pursuing the theory of J . B . See also:Dubos, but singularly transforming it, he maintained that those invasions were not marked by the violent and destructive character usually attributed to them; that the penetration of the German barbarians into See also:Gaul was a slow See also:process; that the Germans submitted to the imperial See also:administration; that the political institutions of theMerovingians had their origins in the Roman See also:laws at least as much as, if not more than, in German usages; and, consequently, that there was no See also:conquest of Gaul by the Germans . This thesis he sustained brilliantly in his Histoire des institutions politiques de l'ancienne France, the first volume of which appeared in 1874 . It was the author's original intention to See also:complete this work in four volumes, but as the first volume was keenly attacked in See also:Germany as well as in France, Fustel was forced in self-See also:defence to recast the book entirely . With admirable conscientiousness he re-examined all the texts and wrote a number of See also:dissertations, of which,, though several (e.g. those on the Germanic See also:mark and on the See also:allodium and beneffcium) were See also:models of learning and sagacity, all were dominated by his general idea and characterized by a See also:total disregard for the results of such historical disciplines as See also:diplomatic . From this crucible issued an entirely new work, less well arranged than the original, but richar in facts and See also:critical comments . The first volume was See also:expanded into three volumes, La Gaule romaine (1891), L'Invasion germanique et la fin de l'empire(1891)and La Monarchie franque(1888), followed by three other volumes, L'Alleu et le domaine rural See also:pendant l'epoque merovingienne (1889), Les Origines du systeme feodal: le See also:benefice et le patronat . . . (189o) and Les Transformations de la royaute pendant l'epoque carolingienne (1892) . Thus, in six volumes, he had carried the work no farther than the Carolingian See also:period . The result of this enormous labour, albeit worthy of a See also:great historian, clearly showed that the author lacked all sense of historical proportion . He was a diligent seeker after the truth, and was perfectly sincere when he informed a critic of the exact number of " truths " he had discovered, and when he remarked to one of his pupils a few days before his See also:death, " Rest assured that what I have written in my book is the truth." Such superb self-confidence can accomplish much, and it undoubtedly helped to See also:form Fustel's See also:talent and to give to his style that admirable concision which subjugates even when it fails to convince; but a student instinctively distrusts an historian who settles the most controverted problems with such impassioned assurance . The dissertations not embodied in his great work were collected by himself and (after his death) by his See also:pupil, Camille Jullian, and published as volumes of miscellanies: Recherches sur quelques problemes d'histoire (1885), dealing with the Roman colonate, the See also:land See also:system in See also:Normandy; the Germanic mark, and the judiciary organization in the See also:kingdom of the See also:Franks; Nouvelles recherches sur quelques problemes d'histoire (1891); and Questions historiques (1893), which contains his See also:paper on Chios and his thesis on See also:Polybius . His life was devoted almost entirely to his teaching and his books . In 1875 he was elected member of the See also:Academic des Sciences Morales, and in 188o reluctantly accepted the See also:post of director of the Ecole Normale . Without intervening personally in French politics, he took a keen See also:interest in the questions of administration and social reorganization arising from the fall of the imperialist regime and the disasters of the war . He wished the institutions of the See also:present to approximate more closely to those of the past, and devised for the new French constitution a See also:body of reforms which reflected the opinions he had formed upon the See also:democracy at Rome and in ancient France . But these were dreams which did not hold him See also:long, and he would have been scandalized had he known that his name was subsequently used as the See also:emblem of a political and religious party . He died at Massy (See also:Seine-et-See also:Oise) on the 12th of See also:September 1889 . Through-out his historical career—at the Ecole Normale and the Sorbonne and in his lectures delivered to the empress See also:Eugenie—his sole aim was to ascertain the truth, and in the defence of truth his polemics against what he imagined to be the See also:blindness and insincerity of his critics sometimes assumed a character of harshness and injustice . But, in France at least, these critics were the first to render See also:justice to his learning, his talents and his disinterestedness . See See also:Paul See also:Guiraud, Fustel de Coulanges (1896) ; H. d'See also:Arbois de Jubainville, Deux Manieres d'ecrire l'histoire: critique de See also:Bossuet, d'Augustin See also:Thierry et de Fustel de Coulanges (1896); and See also:Gabriel See also:Monod, Portraits et souvenirs (1897) . (C . |
|
|
[back] JOHANN FUST ( ?-1466) |
[next] FUSTIAN |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.