Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:GENEALOGY (from the Gr. yivos, See also:family, and Vryos, theory) , a See also:pedigree or See also:list of ancestors, or 'the study of See also:family See also:history . 1 . Biblical Genealogies.—The aims and methods of See also:ancient genealogists require to be carefully considered before the value of the numerous ancestral lists in the See also:Bible can be properly estimated . Many of the old " genealogies," like those of See also:Greece, have arisen from the See also:desire to explain the origin of the various See also:groups which they include . See also:Information See also:relating to the sub-See also:division of tribes, their relation to each other, the intermingling of populations and the like are thus frequently represented in the See also:form of genealogies . The " sons " of a " See also:father " often stand merely for the branches of a family as they existed at some one See also:period, and since in course of See also:time tribal relations would vary, lists which have originated at different periods will See also:present discrepancies . It is obvious that many of the Biblical names are nothing more than personifications of nations, tribes, towns, &c., which are grouped together to convey some See also:idea of. the See also:bond by which they were believed to be connected . For the personification of a See also:people or tribe, cp . Gen. xxxiv.30 (" See also:Jacob said . . . I am a few men "), Josh. xvii . 14 (" the See also:children of See also:Joseph said .
.
.
I am a numerous people "), Ex. xiv
.
25 (" See also:Egypt said, let me flee "), Jos. ix
.
7, I Sam. v. to, &c.; see G
.
B
.
See also: Num. xx . 14, Deut. ii . 4, Am. i . 1 t), and since See also:Esau (See also:Edom) was See also:born before Jacob (Israel) it would appear that the Edomites were held to be the older nation . The See also:union of two clans is expressed as a See also:marriage, or the wife is the territory which is dominated by the See also:husband (tribe) ; see See also:CALEB . If the woman is not of See also:noble See also:blood, but is a handmaiden or concubine, her children are naturally not upon the same footing as those of the wife; consequently the descendants of Ishmael, the son of Hagar Sarah's maid), are inferior to See also:Isaac and his descendants, whilst the children of Keturah (" See also:incense "), See also:Abraham's concubine, are still See also:lower—from the Israelite point of view . This application of the terms of relationship is characteristic of the Semites . The " father " of the See also:Rechabites is their See also:head or founder (cf . 1 Sam. x . 12: " who is their father?"), and a See also:common bond, which is not necessarily See also:physical, unites all " sons," whether they are " sons of the prophets (members of prophetic guilds) or " sons of Belial " (worthless men) . The interpretation of ethnological or statistical genealogies may easily be pushed too far . Every See also:case has to be judged upon 574 its own merits, and due See also:allowance must be made both for the ambition of the weaker to claim or to strengthen an See also:alliance with the stronger, and for the not unnatural desire of clans or individuals to magnify the greatness of their ancestry . The first step must always be the careful comparison of related lists in See also:order to test the consistency of the tradition . Next, these must be critically studied in the See also:light of all available See also:historical material, though indeed such See also:evidence is not necessarily conclusive . Finally, (a) See also:literary See also:criticism must be employed to determine if possible the See also:dates of such lists, since obviously a contemporary See also:register is more trustworthy than one which is centuries later; (b) a See also:critical estimate of the See also:character of the names and of their use in various periods of Old Testament history is of importance in estimating the antiquity of the list'—for examine, many of the names in See also:Chronicles attributed to the time of See also:David are indubitably exilic or See also:post-exilic; and (c) principles of See also:ordinary historical See also:probability are as necessary here as in dealing with the genealogies of other ancient peoples, and See also:attention must be paid to such features as fluctuation in the number of links, See also:representation of theories inconsistent with the growth of See also:national See also:life, schemes of relationship not in accordance with sociological conditions, &c . The Biblical genealogies commence with " the generations of the See also:heaven and See also:earth," and by a See also:process of elimination pass from See also:Adam and See also:Eve by successive steps to Jacob and to his sons (the tribes), and finally to the subdivisions of each tribe (cp . Chron. i.–ix . I) . According to this theory every Israelite could trace back his descent to Jacob, the common father of the whole nation (Josh. vii . 17 seq., i Sam. x . 21) . Such a See also:scheme, however, is full of See also:manifest improbabilities . It demands that every tribe and every See also:clan should have been a homogeneous See also:group which had preserved its unity from the earliest times, that family records extending back for several centuries were in existence, and that such a tribe as See also:Simeon was able to maintain its See also:independence in spite of the tradition that it lost its See also:autonomy in very See also:early times (Gen. xlix . '7) . The whole conception of the unity of the tribes cannot be referred to a date previous to the time of David, and in the older writings a David or a See also:Jeroboam was sufficiently described as the son of See also:Jesse or of Nebat . The genealogical zeal as represented in the Old Testament is chiefly of later growth, and the exceptions are due to See also:interpolation (Josh. vii . 118, contrast v . 24), or to the desire to modify or qualify an older See also:notice . This, in the case of See also:Saul (I Sam. ix . I), has led to textual corruption; a list of such a length as his should have reached back to one of the " sons " of See also:Benjamin (cf. e.g . Gen. xlvi . 21),-else it were purposeless . The genealogies, too, are often inconsistent amongst themselves and in See also:contradiction to their See also:object . They show, for example, that the See also:population of See also:southern See also:Judah, so far from being " Israelite " was See also:half-Edomite (see JUDAH), and several of the clans in this See also:district See also:bear names which indicate their See also:original See also:affinity with See also:Midian or Edom . Moreover, there was a See also:free intermixture of races, and many cities had a Canaanite (i.e. pre-Israelite) population which must have been gradually absorbed by the Israelites (cf . Judg. i.) . That spirit of religious exclusiveness which marked later Judaism did not become prominent before the Deuteronomic See also:reformation (see See also:DEUTERONOMY), and it is under its See also:influence that the writings begin to emphasize the importance of maintaining the purity of Israelite blood, although by this time the See also:fusion was See also:complete (see Judg. iii . 6) and for See also:practical purposes a distinction between Canaanites and Israelites within the See also:borders of See also:Palestine could scarcely be discerned . Many of the genealogical data are intricate . Thus, the' interpretation of Gen. xxxiv. is particularly obscure (see See also:LEVITES ad fin.; SIMEDN) . As regards the sons of Jacob, it is difficult to explain their division among the four wives of Jacob; viz . (a) the sons of . Leah are See also:Reuben, Simeon, See also:Levi and Judah (S . Palestine), See also:Issachar and See also:Zebulun (in the See also:north), and Dinah (associated with See also:Shechem) (b) of Leah's maid Zilpah, See also:Gad and See also:Asher (E. and N . Palestine); (c) of See also:Rachel, Joseph (See also:Manasseh and See also:Ephraim, i.e. central Palestine) and Benjamin; (d) of Rachel's maid Bilhah, See also:Dan and See also:Naphtali ' G . B . Gray's See also:Hebrew Proper Names (1896), with his See also:article in the . Expositor (See also:Sept . 1897), pp . 173-190, should be consulted for the application and range of Hebrew names in O.T. genealogies and lists.(N . Palestine) . It has been urged that (b) and (d) stood upon a lower footing than the See also:rest, or were of later origin; or that Bilhah points to an old clan associated with Reuben (Gen. See also:xxxv . 22) or Edom (Bilhan, Gen. See also:xxxvi . 27), whilst Zilpah represents an Aramaean See also:strain . Tradition may have combined distinct schemes, and the belief that the wives were Aramaean at least coincides with the circumstance that Aramaean elements predominated in certain of the twelve tribes . The number " twelve " is artificial and can be obtained only by counting Manasseh and Ephraim as one or by omitting Levi, and a careful study of Old Testament history makes it extremely difficult to recover the tribes as historical See also:units . See, on these points, the articles on the several tribes, B . See also:Luther, Zeit. d. See also:allies/ . Wissens . (1901), pp .
I sqq.; G
.
B
.
Gray, Expositor (See also: 1-3) . The desire to prove the continuity of the See also:race, gnforced by the experience of the See also:exile, gave the impetus to genealogical zeal, and many of the extant lists proceed from this See also:age when the true historical See also:succession of names was a memory of the past . This applies with See also:special force to the lists in Chronicles which present finished schemes of the Levitical divisions by the See also:side of earlier attempts, with consequent confusion and contradiction . Thus the immediate ancestors of Ethan appear in the time of See also:Hezekiah (2 Chron. See also:xxix . 12), but he with Asaiah and Heman are contemporaries of David, and their genealogies from Levi down-wards contain a very unequal number of links (I Chron. vi.) . By another application of genealogical method the See also:account of the institution of priests and Levites by David (I Chron. See also:xxiv.) presents many names which belong solely to post-exilic days, thus suggesting that the See also:scribes desired to show that the See also:honourable families of their time were not unknown centuries previously . Everywhere we find the results of much skill and labour, often in accordance with definite theories, but a thorough investigation reveals their weakness and often quite incidentally furnishes valuable evidence of another nature . The intricate Levitical genealogies betray the result of successive genealogists who sought to give effect to the development of the hierarchal See also:system (see LEvITEs) . The See also:climax is reached when all Levites are traced back to Gershon, Kehath and 1\ilerari, to which are ascribed respectively See also:Asaph, Heman and Ethan (or Jeduthun) . The last two were not originally I.evites in the later accepted sense of the See also:term (see I See also:Kings iv . 31) . To Kehath is reckoned an important subdivision descended from Korah, but in 2 Chron. xx . 19 the two are distinct groups, and Korah's name is that of an Edomite clan (Gen. xxxvi . 5, 14, 18) related to Caleb, and thus included among the descendants of Judah (1 Chron. ii . 43) . Cases of See also:adjustment, re-See also:distribution and " Levitizing " of individuals are frequent . There are traces of varying divisions both of the singers (Neh. xi . 17) and of the Levites (Num. See also:xxvi . 58; Ezr. ii . 40, iii . 9; I Chron. xv . 5-1o, xxiii.), and it is noteworthy that in the case of the latter we have mention of such families as Hebroni (Hebronite), Libni (from Libnah) —ethnics of See also:South Judaean towns . In fact, a significant number of Levitical names find their See also:analogy in the lists of names belonging to Judah, Simeon and even Edom, or are closely connected with the family of See also:Moses; e.g . Mushi (i.e . Mosaite),Gershon and Eleazar(cp . Gershom and Eliezer, sons of Moses) . The Levites bear a class-name, and the genealogies show that many of them were connected with the See also:minor clans and families of South Palestine which included among them Moses and his See also:kin . Hence, it is not unnatural that Obed-edom, for example, obviously a southerner, should have been reckoned later as a Levite, and the work ascribed by the chronicler's history to the closing years of David's life may be influenced by the tradition that it was through him these mixed populations first attained importance . See further DAVID; See also:JEWS; LEVITES . In the time of Joseph'us every See also:priest was supposed to be able to prove his descent, and perhaps from the time of Ezra down-wards lists were carefully kept . But when See also:Anna is called an Asherite (See also:Luke ii . 36), or See also:Paul a Benjamite (Rom. xi . 1), family tradition was probably the See also:sole support to the claim, although the tribal feeling had not become entirely See also:extinct . The genealogies of Jesus prefixed to two of the gospels are intended to prove that He was a son of David . But not that alone, for in Matt. i. he is traced back to Abraham the father of the Jews, whilst in Luke iii . He, as the second Adam, is traced back to the first See also:man .
The two lists are hopelessly inconsistent; not because one of them follows the See also:line of See also:Mary, but because they represent See also:independent attempts
.
That in See also:Matthew is characteristically arranged in
three See also:series of fourteen generations each through the kings of Judah, whilst Luke's passes through an almost unknown son of
David; in spite of this, however, both converge in the See also:person of Zerubbabel
.
See further, A
.
C
.
See also:Hervey, Genealogies of Our See also:Lord; H. von See also:Soden, Ency
.
Bib. ii. See also:col
.
1666 sqq.; B
.
W
.
See also:
F
.
M'Lennan's Studies (2nd see., ch. ix., " fabricated genealogies ") ; S
.
A
.
See also:Cook, Ency
.
Bib. ii. col
.
1657 sqq
.
(with references) ; W
.
R
.
See also: See also:Greek and See also:Roman Genealogies.—A passing reference only is needed to the intricate genealogies of gods and sons of gods which form so conspicuous a feature in classical literature.' In every one of the numerous states into which ancient Greece was divided there were aristocratic families, whose genealogies as a See also:rule went back to prehistoric times, their first ancestor being some See also:hero of divine descent, from whom, or from some distinguished younger ancestor, they derived their names . Many of these families were, as families, undoubtedly of See also:great antiquity even at the beginning of the historical period; and in several instances they continued to maintain a conspicuous and See also:separate existence for centuries . The See also:element of family See also:pride is prominent in the See also:poetry of the Megarian Theognis; and in an inscription belonging to the and See also:century B.C. the recipient of certain honours from the community of See also:Gythium is represented as the See also:thirty-ninth in See also:direct descent from the Dioscuri and the See also:forty-first from Heracles . Even in See also:Athens, See also:long after the constitution had become thoroughly democratic, some of the clans continued to be known as See also:Eupatridae (of noble family); and See also:Alcibiades, for example, as a member of the phratria of the Eurysacidae, traced his origin through many generations to Eurysaces, who was represented as having been the first of the Aeacidae to See also:settle in See also:Attica . The Corinthian Bacchiadae traced their descent back to Heracles, but took their name from Bacchis, a younger ancestor . It is very doubtful, however, whether such pedigrees as this were very seriously put forward by those who claimed them; and it is certain that, almost along the whole line, they were unsupported by evidence ? We have the authority of See also:Pollux (viii . 111) for stating that the Athenian 7EVrt, of which there were thirty in each Oparpia, were organized without any exclusive regard being had to blood-relationship; they were constantly receiving accessions from without; and the public written registers of births, adoptions and the like do not appear to have been pre-served with such care as would have made it possible to verify a pedigree for any considerable portion even of the strictly historical period.' The great antiquity of the early Roman (patrician) gentes, who universally traced themselves hack to illustrious ancestors, is indisputable; and the rigid exclusiveness with which each pre-served its hereditates gcntiliciae or sacra gentilicia is sufficiently illustrated by the fact that towards the See also:close of the See also:republic there were not more than fifty patrician families (See also:Dion . See also:Halle. i . 85) . Yet even in these it is obvious that, owing to the frequency of resort to the well-recognized practice of See also:adoption, while there was every See also:guarantee for the historical identity of the family, there was none (documents apart) for the See also:personal See also:genealogy of the individual . There is no evidence that sufficient records of ' On the subject generally see articles " Genos " and " Gens," by A . H . Greenidge, in Smith's See also:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (3rd ed., 1890), where the See also:chief authorities are given . 2 The fondness of See also:Euripides for genealogies is ridiculed by See also:Aristophanes (Acharnians, 47) . ' All the earlier Greek historians appear to have constructed their narratives on assumed genealogical bases . The four books of Hecataeus of See also:Miletus dealt respectively with the traditions about See also:Deucalion, about Heracles and the See also:Heraclidae, about the early settlements in See also:Peloponnesus, and about those in See also:Asia Minor; he further made a pedigree for himself, in which his sixteenth ancestor was a See also:god . The See also:works of See also:Hellanicus of See also:Lesbos See also:bore titles (Jevicaauovema and the like) which sufficiently explain their nature; his See also:disciple, Damastes of Sigeum, was the author of genealogical histories of Trojan heroes; See also:Apollodorus of Athens made use of three books of Peveaaoyuca by Acusilaus of See also:Argos; Pherecydes of Leros also wrote . -yeveaXo-ytac . See J . A . F . See also:Topffer, Attische Genealogic 8889); alo J . H .
See also:Schubart, Quaestt. geneal. historicae (1832);
.
Marcksoheffel, De genealogica Graecorum poesi (184o).pedigree were kept during the earlier centuries of the Roman See also:commonwealth, although the leading houses See also:drew up genealogical tables, and their family pedigree was painted on the walls of the entrance See also:
But the famous suit of See also:Scrope against
.
Grosvenor will illustrate the See also:late See also:appearance of private genealogies in See also:England
.
In 1385 See also:Sir See also:Richard Scrope, lord. of See also:Bolton, displaying his banner in the See also:host that invaded See also:Scotland, found that his arms of a See also:golden See also:bend in a See also:blue See also: (1887), p . 442 . ' At the funeral of See also:Drusus the images of Aeneas, of the See also:Alban kings, of See also:Romulus, of the See also:Sabine nobles, of Attus Clausus, and of " the rest of the Claudians " were exhibited (Tac . See also:Ann. iv . 9) . e The Roman stemmata had, as will be seen afterwards, great See also:interest for the older modern genealogists . Reference may be made to J . Glandorp's Descriptio gentis Antoniae (1557); to the Descriptio gentis Juliae (1576) of the same author; and to J . Hiibner's Genealogische Tabellen . See also G . A . Ruperti's Tabulae genealogicae sive stemmata nobiliss. gent . Rom . (1794) . (X.) generations . The exact line of his descent was sought only when it was demanded for a plea in the king's courts to support his See also:title to his lands . From the first the work of the genealogist in England had that taint of inaccuracy tempered with See also:forgery from which it has not yet been cleansed . The medieval kings, like the Welsh gentry of later ages, traced their lines to the See also:household of See also:Eden See also:garden, while lesser men, even as early as the 14th century, eagerly asserted their descent from a See also:companion of the Conqueror . Yet beside these false imaginations we find the law courts, whose business was often a clash of pedigrees, dealing with genealogies centuries long which, constructed as it would seem from worthy evidences, will often bear the test of modern criticism . Genealogies in great plenty are found in See also:manuscripts and printed volumes from the 16th century onward . Remarkable among these are the descents recorded in the Visitation Books of the heralds, who, armed with commissions from the crown, the first of which was issued in ao See also:Hen . VIII., perambulated the See also:English counties, viewing arms and registering pedigrees . The notes in their register books range from the See also:simple See also:registration of a man's name and arms to entries of pedigrees many generations long . To the heralds these visitations were rare opportunities of obtaining fees from the visited, .and the value of the pedigrees registered is notably unequal .
Although it has always been the boast of the See also:College of Arms that Visitation records may be produced as evidence in the law courts, few of these officially recorded genealogies are wholly trustworthy
.
Many of the See also:officers of arms who recorded them were, even by the testimony of their comrades, of indifferent character, and even when the visiting See also:herald was an honourable man and an industrious he had little time to spare for the investigation of any single genealogy
.
Deeds and evidences in private hands may have been hastily examined in some instances—indeed, a herald's See also:summons 'invites their See also:production—and monuments were often viewed in the churches, but for the most See also:part men's memories and the hearsay of the See also:country-side made the backbone of the pedigree
.
The further the pedigree is carried beyond the memory of living men the less trustworthy does it become
.
The See also:principal visitations took place in the reigns of See also:
Much raw material of genealogy has been made available for all by the publication of See also:parish registers, marriage-See also:licence allegations, monumental See also:inscriptions and the like, and above all by the See also:mass of evidences contained in the volumes issued by the Public See also:Record Office
.
Within a small space it is impossible to set forth in detail the methods by which an English genealogy may be traced
.
But those who are setting out upon the task may be warned at the outset to avoid guesswork based upon the possession of a surname which may be shared by a dozen families between whom is no tie of kinship
.
A man whose family name is See also:Howard may be presumed to descend from an ancestor for whom Howard was a personal name: it may not be presumed that this ancestor was he in whom the dukes of Norfolk have their origin
.
A genealogy should not be allowed to stray from facts which can be supported by evidence
.
A man may know that his See also:grand-father was See also: When these have been exhausted the records of legal proceedings, and notably those of the court of See also:chancery, may be searched . Few English households have been able in the past to avoid an appeal to the chancery court, and the See also:bill and See also:answer of a chancery See also:plaintiff and See also:defendant will often tell the See also:story of a family See also:quarrel in which a See also:score of kinsfolk are involved, and the pleadings may contain the material for a family See also:tree of many branching generations . See also:Coram Rege and De Banco rolls may even, in the course of a dispute over a knight's See also:fee or a See also:manor carry a pedigree to the See also:Conquest of England, although such See also:good See also:fortune can hardly be expected by the searcher out of an undistinguished line . In proving a genealogy it must be remembered that in the descent of an estate in See also:land must be sought the best evidence for a pedigree . At the present time the study of genealogy grows rapidly in English estimation . It is no less popular in See also:America, where See also:societies and private persons have of late years published a vast number of genealogies, many of which combine the results of laborious research in See also:American records with extravagant and unfounded claims concerning the See also:European origin of the families dealt with . A family with the surname of See also:Cuthbert has been known to See also:hail St Cuthbert of Lindisfarne as its progenitor, and one surnamed Eberhardt has incorporated in its pedigree such See also:German princes of old times as were found to have Eberhardt for a See also:Christian name . !e Genealogy in modern France has, with a few honourable exceptions, fallen into the hands of the popular pedigree-makers, whose concern is to gratify the vanity of their employers . See also:Italy likewise has not yet shaken off the influence of those venal genealogists who, three See also:hundred years ago, sold pedigrees cheaply to all comers . But much laborious genealogical inquiry had been made in See also:Germany since the days of See also:Hubner, and even in See also:Russia there has been some See also:attempt to apply modern See also:standards of criticism to the chronicles of the swarming descendants of the blood of Rurik . In no way is the See also:gap made by the Dark Ages between ancient and modern history more marked than by the fact that no European family makes a serious claim to See also:bridge it with its genealogy . The unsupported claim of the Roman house of See also:Massimo to a descent from See also:Fabius See also:Maximus is respectable beside such legends as that which made See also:Levis-Mirepoix head of the priestly tribe of Levi, but even the boast of such remote ancestry has now become rare . The ancient See also:sovereign houses of See also:Europe are, for the most part, content to attach themselves to some ancestor who, when the mist that followed the fall of the Western empire begins to lift, is seen rallying with his See also:sword some group of spearmen . AurxoRrrIEs.—Genealogical works have been published in such abundance that the See also:bibliographies of the subject are already substantial volumes . Amongst the earlier books from the See also:press may be noted Benvenuto de See also:San Georgio's Montisferrati marchionum et principum regiae propagium successionumque series (1515); Pingonius's Arbor gentilitiae Sabaudiae Saxoniaeque domus (1521); See also:Gebweiler's See also:Epitome regii ac vetustissimi onus Caroli V. et Ferdinandi I., omniumque archiducum Austriae et comitum Habsburgiensium (1527); See also:Meyer's work on the See also:counts of See also:Flanders (1531), and Du Boulay's genealogies of the dukes of See also:Lorraine (1547) . Later in the same century Reineck of Helmstadt put forth many works having a wider genealogical See also:scope, and we may cite Henninges's Genealogiae Saxonicae (1587) and Theatrum genealogicum (1598), and Reusner's See also:Opus genealogicum catholicum (1589–1592) . For the politically in-convenient falseness of See also:Francois de Rosieres' Stemmata Lotharingiae ac Barri ducum (158o), wherein the dukes of Lorraine were deduced from the line of See also:Charlemagne, the author was sent to the See also:Bastille by the See also:parlement of See also:Paris and his book suppressed . . The 17th century saw the production in England of Dugdale's great Baronage (1675–1676), a work which still holds a respectable place by See also:reason of its See also:citation of authorities, and of See also:Sandford's history of the royal house . In the same century See also:Andre See also:Duchesne, the historian of the Montmorencys, See also:Pierre d'See also:Hozier, the chronicler of the house of La Rochefoucauld, Rittershusius, Imhoff, Spener, Lohmeier and many others contribute to the See also:body of See also:continental genealogies . Pierre de Guibours, known as Pere See also:Anselme de Ste See also:Marie, published in 1674 the first edition of his magnificent Histoire genealogique de la maison royale de France, See also:des pairs, grands officiers de la couronne et de la maison du See also:roy et des anciens barons du royaume . Of this encyclopaedic work a third and complete edition appeared in 1726–1733 . A modern edition under the editor-See also:ship of M . Potier de Courcy began to be issued in 1873, but remains incomplete . Among 18th-century work Johann Hubner's Bibliotheca genealogica (1729) and Genealogische Tabellen (1725–1733), with Lenzen's commentary on the latter work (c . 1756), may be signalized, with Gatterer's Handbuch der Genealogie (1761) and his Abriss der Genealogie (1788), the latter an early See also:manual on the See also:science of genealogy . Hergott's Genealogia diplomatica augustae geniis Habsburgicae (1737) is the imperial genealogy compiled by the See also:emperor's own historiographer . Modern peerages in England may be said to date from that of Arthur See also:Collins, whose one-See also:volume first edition was published in 1709 . The fifth edition appeared in 1778, in eight volumes, to be republished in 1812 by Sir See also:Egerton See also:Brydges, the " Baptist See also:Hatton " of Disraeli's novel, who corrected many legendary pedigrees, besides inserting his own forged descent from a common ancestor with the dukes of See also:Chandos . From this work and from the Irish peerage of See also:Lodge (as re-edited by Archdall) most of the later peerages have quarried their material . With these may be named the baronetages of See also:Wotton and Betham . Of modern popular peerages and See also:baronet-ages that of See also:Burke has been published since 1822 in many See also:editions and now appears yearly . Most important for the historian are the Complete Peerage of G . E . C[ockayne] (2nd ed., 1910), and the Complete Baronetage of the same author . The Peerage of Scotland (1769) of Sir Robert See also:Douglas of Glenbervie came to a second edition in 1813, edited by J . P .
See also:Wood, and the whole work has been revised and re-edited by Sir James See also:Balfour Paul (1904, &c.)
.
Of the popular manuals of English untitled families, Burke's Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Commoners (1833–1838) is now brought up to date from time to time and reissued as the Landed Gentry
.
Lists of pedigrees in English printed works are supplied by See also:Marshall's Genealogist's See also:Guide (1903), while pedigrees in the See also:manuscript collections of the See also:British Museum are indexed in the list of R
.
See also:Sims (1849)
.
Valuable genealogical material .will be found in such See also:periodicals as the Genealogist, the Herald and Genealogist, the Topographer and Genealogist, Collectanea topographica et genealogica, Miscellanea genealogica et heraldica and the Ancestor
.
In Germany the Deutscher See also:Herold is the See also:organ of the See also:Berlin Heraldic and Genealogical Society
.
The Nederlandsche Leeuw is a similar publication in the See also:Low Countries
.
Modern criticism of the older genealogical methods will be found in J
.
H
.
Round's Peerage and Pedigree, 2 vols
.
(See also:London, 1910), and in other volumes by the same author
.
The Harleian Society has published many volumes of the Herald's Visitations; and the British Record Society's publications, supplying a See also: The See also:Victoria History of the Counties of England XI..19GENERAL 577 includes genealogies of the ancient English county families still among the land-owning classes . English pedigrees of the age before the Conquest are collected in W . G . Searle's Anglo-Saxon Bishops, Kings and Nobles (1899) . Genealogical dictionaries of noble See also:French families include See also:Victor de See also:Saint Allais's Nobiliaire universel (21 vols., 1872–1897) and Aubert de la Chenaye-Desbois' Dictionnaire de la noblesse (15 vols., 1863-1876) . A sumptuous work on the genealogy and See also:heraldry of the ancient duchy of See also:Savoy by See also:Count Amedee de Foras began to appear in 1863 . See also:Spain has See also:Lopez de See also:Haro's Nobiliario genealogico de los reyes y titulos de Espana . Italy has the Teatro araldico of Tettoni and Saladini (1841–1848), Litti's Famiglie celebri and an Annuario della nobilitd . Such annuals are now published more or less intermittently in many European countries . See also:Finland has a Ridderscap och Adels Kalender, See also:Belgium the Annuaire de la noblesse, the Dutch See also:Netherlands an Adelsboek, See also:Denmark the Adels-Garbog and Russia the Annuaire of Ermerin . But chief of all such publications is the ancient Almanach de See also:Gotha, containing the modern kinship of royal and princely houses, and now accompanied by volumes dealing with the houses of German and See also:Austrian counts and barons, and with houses ennobled in modern times by patent . A useful modern reference book for students of history is Stokvis's See also:Manuel d'histoire et de genealogie de tous See also:les etats du globe (1888-1893) . The best manual for the English genealogist is See also:Walter See also:Rye's Records and Record Searching (1897), while an See also:ill-arranged but valuable bibliography of English and See also:foreign works on the subject is that of See also:George Gatfield (1892) . (O . |
|
|
[back] GENEALOGICAL TABLE OF THE HOUSE OF SAVOY |
[next] GIOVANNI BUONAVENTURA GENELLI (1798 -- 1868) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.