Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

3RD EARL OF JOHN RUTHVEN GOWRIE (c. 1...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V12, Page 302 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

3RD See also:

EARL OF See also:JOHN See also:RUTHVEN See also:GOWRIE (c. 1577-1600)  , Scottish conspirator, was the second son of See also:William, 4th See also:Lord See also:Ruthven and 1st See also:earl of See also:Gowrie (cr . 1581), by his wife Dorothea, daughter of See also:Henry See also:Stewart, 2nd Lord See also:Methven . The Ruthven See also:family was of See also:ancient Scottish descent, and had owned extensive estates in the See also:time of William the See also:Lion; the Ruthven See also:peerage dated from the See also:year 1488 . The 1st earl of Gowrie ( ? 1541-1584), and his See also:father, See also:Patrick, 3rd Lord Ruthven (c . 1520-1566), had both been concerned in the See also:murder of See also:Rizzio in 1566 ; and both took an active See also:part on the See also:side of the See also:Kirk in the See also:constant intrigues and factions among the Scottish See also:nobility of the See also:period . The former had been the custodian of See also:Mary, See also:queen of Scots, during her imprisonment in See also:Loch See also:Leven, where, according to the queen, he had pestered her with amorous attentions; he had also been the See also:chief actor in the See also:plot known as the " See also:raid of Ruthven " when See also:King See also:James VI. was treacherously seized while a See also:guest at the See also:castle of Ruthven in 1582, and kept under See also:restraint for several months while the earl remained at the See also:head of the See also:government . Though pardoned for this See also:conspiracy he continued to plot against the king in See also:conjunction with the earls of See also:Mar and See also:Angus; and he was executed for high See also:treason on the 2nd of May 1584; his See also:friends complaining that the See also:confession on which he was convicted of treason was obtained by a promise of See also:pardon from the king . His eldest son, William, and earl of Gowrie, only survived till 1588, the family dignities and estates, which had been forfeited, having been restored to him in 1586 . When, therefore, See also:John Ruthven succeeded to the earldom while still a See also:child, he inherited along with his vast estates family traditions of treason and intrigue . There was also a popular belief, though without See also:foundation, that there was Tudor See also:blood in his See also:veins; and See also:Burnet afterwards asserted that Gowrie stood next in See also:succession to the See also:crown of See also:England after King James VI . Like his father and grandfather before him, the See also:young earl attached himself to the party of the reforming preachers, who procured his See also:election in 1592 as See also:provost of See also:Perth, a See also:post that was almost hereditary in the Ruthven family .

He received an excellent See also:

education at the See also:grammar school of Perth and the university of See also:Edinburgh, where he was in the summer of 1593, about the time when his See also:mother, and his See also:sister the countess of See also:Atholl, aided See also:Bothwell in forcing himself See also:sword in See also:hand into the king's bedchamber in Holyrood See also:Palace . A few months later Gowrie joined with Atholl and See also:Montrose in offering to serve Queen See also:Elizabeth, then almost openly hostile to the Scottish king; and it is probable that he had also relations with the rebellious Bothwell . Gowrie had thus been already deeply engaged in treasonable conspiracy when, in See also:August 1594, he proceeded to See also:Italy with his See also:tutor, William Rhynd, to study at the university of See also:Padua . On his way See also:home in 1599 he remained for some months at See also:Geneva with the reformer See also:Theodore See also:Beza; and at See also:Paris he made acquaintance with the See also:English See also:ambassador, who reported him to See also:Cecil as devoted to Elizabeth's service, and a nobleman " of whom there may be exceeding use made." In Paris he may also at this time have had further communication with the exiled Bothwell; in See also:London he was received with marked favour by Queen Elizabeth and her ministers . These circumstances owe their importance to the See also:light they throw on the obscurity of the celebrated " Gowrie conspiracy,"which resulted in the slaughter of the earl and his See also:brother by attendants of King James at Gowrie See also:House, Perth, a few See also:weeks after Gowrie's return to See also:Scotland in May x600 . This The event ranks among the unsolved enigmas of See also:history . Gowrle The See also:mystery is caused by the improbabilities inherent in See also:con-any of the alternative hypotheses suggested to See also:account splracy• for the unquestionable facts of the occurrence; the discrepancies in the See also:evidence produced at the time; the apparent lack of forethought or See also:plan on the part of the chief actors, whichever See also:hypothesis be adopted, as well as the thoughtless folly of their actual See also:procedure; and the insufficiency of See also:motive, whoever the guilty parties may have been . The solutions of the mystery that have been suggested are three in number: first, that Gowrie and his brother had concocted a plot to murder, or more probably to kidnap King James, and that they lured him to Gowrie House for this purpose; secondly, that James paid a surprise visit to Gowrie House with the intention, which he carried out, of slaughtering the two Ruthvens; and thirdly, that the tragedy was the outcome of an unpremeditated brawl following high words between the king and the earl, or his brother . To understand the relative probabilities of these hypotheses regard must be had to the See also:condition of Scotland in the year 1600 (see SCOTLAND: History) . Here it can only be recalled that plots to See also:capture the See also:person of the See also:sovereign for the purpose of coercing his actions were of frequent occurrence, more than one of which had been successful, and in several of which the Ruthven family had themselves taken an active part; that the relations between England and Scotland were at this time more than usually strained, and that the young earl of Gowrie was reckoned in London among the adherents of Elizabeth; that the Kirk party, being at variance with James, looked upon Gowrie as an hereditary See also:partisan of their cause, and had recently sent an See also:agent to Paris to recall him to Scotland as their See also:leader; that Gowrie was believed to be James's See also:rival for the succession to the English crown . Moreover, as regards the question of motive it is to be observed, on the one hand, that the Ruthvens believed Gowrie's father to have been treacherously done to See also:death, and his widow insulted by the king's favourite See also:minister; while, on the other, James was indebted in a large sum of See also:money to the earl of Gowrie's See also:estate, and popular See also:gossip credited either Gowrie or his brother, See also:Alexander Ruthven, with being the See also:lover of the queen . Although the evidence on these points, and on every See also:minute circumstance connected with the tragedy itself, has been exhaustively examined by historians of the Gowrie conspiracy, it cannot be asserted that the mystery has been entirely dispelled; but, while it is improbable that See also:complete certainty will ever be arrived at as to whether the See also:guilt See also:lay with James or with the Ruthven See also:brothers, the most See also:modern See also:research in the light of materials inaccessible or overlooked till the loth See also:century, points See also:pretty clearly to the conclusion that there was a genuine conspiracy by Gowrie and his brother to kidnap the king .

If this be the true See also:

solution, it follows that King James was See also:innocent of the blood of the Ruthvens; and it raises the presumption that his own account of the occurrence was, in spite of the glaring improbabilities which it involved, substantially true . The facts as related by James and other witnesses were, in outline, as follows . On the 5th of August 1600 the king See also:rose See also:early to See also:hunt in the neighbourhood of See also:Falkland Palace, about 14 M. from Perth . Just as he was setting forth in See also:company with the See also:duke of See also:Lennox, the earl of Mar, See also:Sir See also:Thomas See also:Erskine and others, he was accosted by Alexander Ruthven (known as the See also:master of Ruthven), a younger brother of the earl of Gowrie, who had ridden from Perth that See also:morning to inform the king that he had met on the previous See also:day a See also:man in See also:possession of a See also:pitcher full of See also:foreign See also:gold coins, whom he had secretly locked up in a See also:room at Gowrie House . Ruthven urged the king to ride to Perth to examine this man for himself and to take possession of the treasure . After some hesitation James gave See also:credit to the See also:story, suspecting that the possessor of the coins was one of the numerous See also:Catholic agents at that time moving about Scotland in disguise . Without giving a See also:positive reply to Alexander Ruthven, James started to hunt; but later in the morning he called Ruthven to him and said he would ride to Perth when the See also:hunting was over . Ruthven then despatched a servant, See also:Henderson, by whom he had been accompanied from Perth in the early morning, to tell Gowrie that the king was coming to Gowrie House . This messenger gave the See also:information to Gowrie about ten o'See also:clock in the morning . Meanwhile Alexander Ruthven was urging the king to lose no time, requesting him to keep the See also:matter See also:secret from his courtiers, and to bring to Gowrie House as small a See also:retinue as possible . James, with a See also:train of some fifteen persons, arrived at Gowrie House about one o'clock, Alexander Ruthven having spurred forward for a mile or so to announce the king's approach . But notwithstanding Henderson's warning some three See also:hours earlier, Gowrie had made no preparations for the king's entertainment, thus giving the impression of having been taken by surprise .

Phoenix-squares

After a meagre repast, for which he was kept waiting an See also:

hour, James, forbidding his retainers to follow him, went with Alexander Ruthven up the See also:main See also:staircase and passed through two See also:chambers and two doors, both of which Ruthven locked behind them, into a See also:turret-room at the See also:angle of the house, with windows looking on the courtyard and the See also:street . Here James expected to find the mysterious prisoner with the foreign gold . He found instead an armed man, who, as appeared later, was none other than Gowrie's servant, Henderson . Alexander Ruthven immediately put on his See also:hat, and See also:drawing Henderson's See also:dagger, presented it to the king's See also:breast with threats of instant death if James opened a window or called for help . An allusion by Ruthven to the See also:execution of his father, the 1st earl of Gowrie, See also:drew from James a reproof of Ruthven's ingratitude for various benefits conferred on his family . Ruthven then uncovered his head, declaring that James's See also:life should be safe if he remained quiet; then, committing the king to the custody of Henderson, he See also:left the turret—ostensibly to consult Gowrie—and locked the See also:door behind him . While Ruthven was absent the king questioned Henderson, who professed See also:ignorance of any plot and of the purpose for which he had been placed in the turret; he also at James's See also:request opened one of the windows, and was about to open the other when Ruthven returned . Whether or not Alexander had seen his brother is uncertain . But Gowrie had meantime spread the See also:report below that the king had taken See also:horse and had ridden away; and the royal retinue were seeking their horses to follow him . Alexander, on re-entering the turret, attempted to bind James's hands; a struggle ensued, in the course of which the king was seen at the window by some of his followers below in the street, who also heard him cry " treason " and See also:call for help to the earl of Mar . Gowrie affected not to hear these cries, but kept asking what was the matter . Lennox, Mar and most of the other lords and gentlemen ran up the main The staircase to the king's help, but were stopped by the slaughter locked door, which they spent some time in trying of the to See also:batter down .

John See also:

Ramsay (afterwards earl of Ruthvens . See also:Holdernesse), noticing a small dark stairway leading directly to the inner chamber adjoining the turret, ran up it and found the king struggling at grips with Ruthven . Drawing his dagger, Ramsay wounded Ruthven, who was then pushed down the stairway by the king . Sir Thomas Erskine, summoned by Ramsay, now followed up the small stairs with Dr See also:Hugh See also:Herries, and these two coming upon the wounded Ruthven despatched him with their swords . Gowrie, entering the See also:court-yard with his stabler Thomas Cranstoun and seeing his brother's See also:body, rushed up the staircase after Erskine and Herries, followed by Cranstoun and others of his retainers; and in the melee Gowrie was killed . Some commotion was caused in the See also:town by the See also:noise of these proceedings; but it quickly subsided, though-the king did not deem it safe to return to Falkland for some hours . The tragedy caused intense excitement throughout Scotland, and the investigation of the circumstances was followed with much See also:interest in England also, where all the details were reported to Elizabeth's ministers . The preachers of the Kirk, whose See also:influence in Scotland was too extensive for the king to neglect,were only with the greatest difficulty persuaded to accept James's account of the occurrence, although he. voluntarily submitted himself to See also:cross-examination by one of their number . Their belief, and that of their partisans, influenced no doubt by See also:political hostility to James, was that the king had invented the story of a conspiracy by Gowrie to See also:cover his own See also:design to extirpate the Ruthven family . James gave some See also:colour to this belief, which has not been entirely abandoned, by the relent-less severity with which he pursued the two younger, and unquestionably innocent, brothers of the earl . See also:Great efforts were made by the government to prove the complicity of others in the plot . One noted and dissolute conspirator, Sir See also:Robert See also:Logan of Restalrig, was posthumously convicted of having been privy to the Gowrie conspiracy on the evidence of certain letters produced by a See also:notary, See also:George Sprot, who swore they had been written by Logan to Gowrie and others .

These letters, which are still in existence, were in fact forged by Sprot in See also:

imitation of Logan's See also:handwriting; but the researches of See also:Andrew See also:Lang have shown cause for suspecting that the most See also:im- portant of them was either copied by Sprot from a ohe sprot rgeries . genuine See also:original by Logan, or that it embodied the substance of such a See also:letter . If this be correct, it would appear that the See also:conveyance of the king to Fast Castle, Logan's impregnable fortress on the See also:coast of See also:Berwickshire, was part of the plot; and it supplies, at all events, an additional piece of evidence to prove the genuineness of the Gowrie conspiracy . Gowrie's two younger brothers, William and Patrick Ruthven, fled to England; and after the See also:accession of James to the English See also:throne William escaped abroad, but Patrick was taken and imprisoned for nineteen years in the See also:Tower of London . Released in 1622, Patrick Ruthven resided first at See also:Cambridge and after-wards in See also:Somersetshire, being granted a small See also:pension by the crown . He married Elizabeth See also:Woodford, widow of the 1st Lord Gerrard, by whom he had two sons and a daughter, Mary; the latter entered the service of Queen Henrietta Maria, and married the famous painter See also:van Dyck, who painted several portraits of her . Patrick died in poverty in a See also:cell in the King's See also:Bench in 1652, being buried as " Lord Ruthven." His son, Patrick, presented a See also:petition to See also:Oliver See also:Cromwell in 1656, in which, after reciting that the See also:parliament of Scotland in 1641 had restored his father to the See also:barony of Ruthven, he prayed that his " extreme poverty " might be relieved by the See also:bounty of the See also:Protector . See Andrew Lang, James VI. and the Gowrie Mystery (London, 1902), and the authorities there cited; Robert See also:Pitcairn, Criminal Trials in Scotland (3 vols., Edinburgh, 1833) ; See also:David Moysie, See also:Memoirs of the Affairs of Scotland, 1577–1603 (Edinburgh, 183o) ; See also:Louis A . Barbe, The Tragedy of Gowrie House (London, 1887) ; Andrew Bisset, Essays on See also:Historical Truth (London, 1871) ; David See also:Calder-See also:wood, History of the Kirk of Scotland (8 vols., Edinburgh, 1842–1849) ; P . F . See also:Tytler, History of Scotland (9 vols., Edinburgh, 1828-1843) ; John See also:Hill See also:Burton, History of Scotland (7 vols., Edinburgh, 1867–187o) . W .

A . See also:

Craigie has edited as Skotlands Rimur some Icelandic See also:ballads See also:relating to the Gowrie conspiracy . He has also printed the Danish See also:translation of the See also:official account of the conspiracy, which was published at See also:Copenhagen in i6oi . (R . J .

End of Article: 3RD EARL OF JOHN RUTHVEN GOWRIE (c. 1577-1600)
[back]
GOWRIE
[next]
GOYA

Additional information and Comments

Also, you shold note people to read Samuel Cowan's Book about the Gowrie Conspiracy, because it was written with the help of Lord Ruthven of Freeland from information taken from the Ruthven Family Papers which were rediscovered around the turn of the 1900 century and are today in the National Achives of Australia. The book makes some very good points, such as if the Ruthvens were conspiring to capture of kill the king, how did 300 of his men just suddenly show up to block the city bridge out of town. Also, if they were going to capture or kill the king, how come John the Earl was not even at home when the king got to Gowrie house, but was away from home for the day at a wedding. Also, if the king was not guilty why did he go so far as to wipe the family out, maybe so he would not have to pay back the massively large sum of money he owed the family and could not pay back, so he killed them all.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.