Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

THOMAS HILL GREEN (1836-1882)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V12, Page 536 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

THOMAS See also:HILL See also:GREEN (1836-1882)  , See also:English philosopher, the most typical English representative of the school of thought called Neo-Kantian, or Neo-Hegelian, was See also:born on the 7th of See also:April 1836 at Birkin, a See also:village in the See also:West See also:Riding of See also:Yorkshire, of which his See also:father was See also:rector . On the paternal See also:side he was descended from See also:Oliver See also:Cromwell, whose honest, sturdy See also:independence of See also:character he seemed to have inherited . His See also:education was conducted entirely at See also:home until, at the See also:age of fourteen, he entered See also:Rugby, where he remained five years . In 1855 he became an undergraduate member of Balliol See also:College, See also:Oxford, of which society he was, in 186o, elected See also:fellow . His See also:life, hence-forth, was devoted to teaching (mainly philosophical) in the university—first as college See also:tutor, afterwards, from 1878 until his See also:death (at Oxford on the 26th of See also:March 1882) as See also:Whyte's See also:Professor of Moral See also:Philosophy . The lectures he delivered as professor See also:form the substance of his two most important See also:works, viz. the Prolegomena to See also:Ethics and the Lectures on the Principles of See also:Political See also:Obligation, which contain the whole of his See also:positive constructive teaching . These works were not published until after his death, but See also:Green's views were previously known indirectly through the Introduction to the See also:standard edition of See also:Hume's works by Green and T . H . See also:Grose (d . 1906), fellow of See also:Queen's College, in which the See also:doctrine of the " English " or " empirical " philosophy was exhaustively examined . Hume's See also:empiricism, combined with a belief in biological See also:evolution (derived from See also:Herbert See also:Spencer), was the See also:chief feature in English thought during the third See also:quarter of the 19th See also:century . Green represents primarily the reaction against doctrines which, when carried out to their logical conclusion, not only " rendered all philosophy futile," but were fatal to See also:practical life .

By reducing the human mind to a See also:

series of unrelated atomic sensations, this teaching destroyed the possibility of knowledge, and further, by representing See also:man as a " being who is simply the result of natural forces," it made conduct, or any theory of conduct, unmeaning; for life in any human, intelligible sense implies a See also:personal self which (I) knows what to do, (2) has See also:power to do it . Green was thus driven, not theoretically, but as a practical See also:necessity, to raise again the whole question of man in relation to nature . When (he held) we have discovered what man in him-self is, and what his relation to his environment, we shall then know his See also:function—what he is fitted to do . In the See also:light of this knowledge we shall be able to formulate the moral See also:code, which, See also:ill turn, will serve as a criterion of actual civic and social institutions . These form, naturally and necessarily, the See also:objective expression of moral ideas, and it is in some civic or social whole that the moral ideal must finally take See also:concrete shape . To ask " What is man?" is to ask "What is experience ?" for experience means that of which I am conscious . The facts of consciousness are the only facts which, to begin with, we are justified in asserting to exist . On the other See also:hand, they are valid See also:evidence for whatever is necessary to their own explanation, i.e. for whatever is logically involved in them . Now the most striking characteristic of man, that in fact which marks him specially, as contrasted with other animals, is self-consciousness . The simplest See also:mental See also:act into which we can analyse the operations of the human mind—the act of sense-See also:perception—is never merely a See also:change, See also:physical or psychical, but is the consciousness of a change . Human experience consists, not of processes in an See also:animal organism, but of these processes recognized as such . That which we perceive is from the outset an apprehended fact—that is to say, it cannot be analysed into isolated elements (so-called sensations) which, as such, are not constituents of consciousness at all, but exists from the first as a See also:synthesis of relations in a consciousness which keeps distinct the " self " and the various elements of the " See also:object," though holding all together in the unity of the act of perception .

In other words, the whole mental structure we See also:

call knowledge consists, in its simplest equally withits most complex constituents, of the "See also:work of the mind." See also:Locke and Hume held that the work of the mind was eo ipso unreal because it was " made by " man and not " given to " man . It thus represented a subjective creation, not an objective fact . But this consequence follows only upon the See also:assumption that the work of the mind is arbitrary, an assumption shown to be unjustified by the results of exact See also:science, with the distinction. universally recognized, which such science draws between truth and falsehood, between the real and " See also:mere ideas." This (obviously valid) distinction logically involves the consequence that the object, or content, of knowledge, viz. reality, is an intelligible ideal reality, a See also:system of thought relations, a spiritual cosmos . How is the existence of this ideal whole to be accounted for ? Only by the existence of some " principle which renders all relations possible and is itself determined by none of them "; an eternal self-consciousness which knows in whole what we know in See also:part . To See also:God the See also:world is, to man the world becomes . Human experience is God gradually made See also:manifest . - Carrying on the same See also:analytical method into the See also:special See also:department of moral philosophy, Green held that ethics applies to the See also:peculiar conditions of social life that investigation into man's nature which See also:metaphysics began . The See also:faculty employed in this further investigation is no " See also:separate moral faculty," but that same See also:reason which is the source of all our knowledge—ethical and other . Self-reflection gradually reveals to us human capacity, human function, with, consequently, human responsibility . It brings out into clear consciousness certain potentialities in the realization of which man's true See also:good must consist . As the result of this See also:analysis, combined with an investigation into the surroundings man lives in, a " content "—a moral code—becomes gradually evolved .

Personal good is perceived to be realizable only by making actual the conceptions thus arrived at . So See also:

long as these remain potential or ideal, they form the See also:motive of See also:action; motive consisting always in the See also:idea of some " end " or " good " which man presents to himself as an end in the attainment of which he would be satisfied, that is, in the realization of which he would find his true self . The determination to realize the self in some definite way constitutes an "act of will," which, as thus constituted, is neither arbitrary nor externally determined . For the motive which may be said to be its cause lies in the man himself, and the See also:identification of the self with such a motive is a self-determination, which is at once both rational and See also:free . The " freedom of man " is constituted, not by a supposed ability to do anything he may choose, but in the power to identify him-self with that true good which reason reveals to him as his true good . This good consists in the realization of personal character; hence the final good, i.e. the moral ideal, as a whole, can be realized only in some society of persons who, while remaining ends to themselves in the sense that their individuality is not lost but rendered more perfect, find this prefection attainable only when the separate individualities are integrated as part of a social whole . Society is as necessary to form persons as persons are to constitute society . Social See also:union is the indispensable See also:condition of the development of the special capacities of the individual members . Human self-perfection cannot be gained in See also:isolation; it is attainable only in inter-relation with fellow-citizens in the social community . The See also:law of our being, so revealed, involves in its turn civic or political duties . Moral goodness cannot be limited to, still less constituted by, the cultivation of self-regarding virtues, but consists in the See also:attempt to realize in practice that moral ideal which self-analysis has revealed to us as our ideal . From this fact arises the ground of political obligation, for the institutions of political or civic life are the concrete embodiment of moral ideas in terms of our See also:day and See also:generation .

Phoenix-squares

But, as society exists only for the proper development of persons, we have a criterion by which to test these institutions, viz. do they, or do they not, contribute to the development of moral character in the individual citizens ? It is obvious that the final moral ideal is not realized in any See also:

body of civic institutions actually existing, but the same analysis which demonstrates this deficiency points out the direction which a true development will take . Hence arises the conception of rights and duties which skould be maintained by law, as opposed to those actually maintained; with the further consequence that it may become occasionally a moral See also:duty to See also:rebel against the See also:state in the See also:interest of the state itself, that is, in See also:order better to subserve that end or function which constitutes the raison d'etre of the state . The state does not consist in any definite concrete organization formed once for all . It represents a " See also:general will " which is a See also:desire for a See also:common good . Its basis is not a coercive authority imposed upon the citizens from without, but consists in the spiritual recognition, on the part of the citizens, of that which constitutes their true nature . " Will, not force, is the basis of the state." Green's teaching was, directly and indirectly, the most potent philosophical See also:influence in See also:England during the last quarter of the 19th century, while his See also:enthusiasm for a common citizenship, and his personal example in practical municipal life, inspired much of the effort made, in the years succeeding his death, to bring, the See also:universities more into See also:touch with the See also:people, and to break down the rigour of class distinctions . Of his philosophical doctrine proper, the most striking characteristic is Integration, as opposed to Disintegration, both in thought and in reality . " That which is " is a whole, not an aggregate an organic complex of parts, not a See also:mechanical See also:mass; a " whole ' too not material but spiritual, a " world of thought-relations." On the See also:critical side this teaching is now admittedly valid against the older empiricism, and the cogency of the reasoning by which his constructive theory is supported is generally recognized . Nevertheless, Green's statement of his conclusions presents important difficulties . Even apart from the impossibility of conceiving a whole of relations which are relations and nothing else (this objection is perhaps largely verbal), no explanation is given of the fact (obvious in experience) that the spiritual entities of which the Universe is composed appear material . Certain elements See also:present themselves in feeling which seem stubbornly to resist any attempt to explain them in. terms of thought .

While, again, legitimately insisting upon See also:

personality as a fundamental constituent in any true theory of reality, the relation between human individualities and the divine See also:Person is See also:left vague and obscure; nor is it easy to see how the existence of several individualities—human or divine—in one cosmos is theoretically possible . It is at the See also:solution of these two questions that philosophy in the immediate future may be expected to work . Green's most important See also:treatise—the Prolegomena to Ethics—practically See also:complete in See also:manuscript at his death—was published in the See also:year following, under the editorship of A . C . See also:Bradley (4th ed., 1899) . Shortly afterwards R . L . See also:Nettleship's standard edition of his Works (exclusive of the Prolegomena) appeared in three volumes: vol. i. containing reprints of Green's See also:criticism of Hume, Spencer, See also:Lewes; vol. ii . Lectures on See also:Kant, on See also:Logic, on the Principles of Political Obligation; vol. iii . Miscellanies, preceded by a full Memoir by the Editor . The Principles of Political Obligation was afterwards published in separate form . A criticism of Neo-Hegelianism will be found in See also:Andrew See also:Seth (See also:Pringle See also:Pattison), Hegelianism and Personality .

See also articles in Mind (See also:

January and April 1884) by A . J . See also:Balfour and See also:Henry See also:Sidgwick, in the See also:Academy (See also:xxviii . 242 and See also:xxv . 297) by S . See also:Alexander, and in the Philosophical See also:Review (vi., 1897) by S . S . Laurie; W . H . Fairbrother, Philosophy of T . H . Green (See also:London and New See also:York, 1896); D .

G . See also:

Ritchie, The Principles of State Interference (London, 1891); H . Sidgwick, Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant (London, 1905); J . H . Muirhead, The Service of the State: Four Lectures on the Political Teaching of T . H . Green (1908); A . W . See also:Bean, English See also:Rationalism in the XIXth Century (1906), vol. ii., pp . 401 See also:foil . (W . H .

End of Article: THOMAS HILL GREEN (1836-1882)
[back]
MATTHEW GREEN (1696-1737)
[next]
VALENTINE GREEN (1739–1813)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.