Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:HEDONISM (Gr. i bovit, See also:pleasure, from ?) (s, sweet, pleasant) , in See also:ethics, a See also:general See also:term for all theories of conduct in which the criterion is See also:pleasure of one See also:kind or another . Hedonistic theories of conduct have been held from the earliest times, though they have been by no means of the same See also:character . Moreover, See also:hedonism has, especially by its critics, been very much misrepresented owing mainly to two See also:simple misconceptions, In the first See also:place hedonism may confine itself to the view that, as a See also:matter of observed fact, all men do in practice make pleasure the criterion of See also:action, or it may go further and assert that men ought to seek pleasure as the See also:sole human See also:good . The former statement takes no view as to whether or not there is any See also:absolute good: it merely denies that men aim at anything more than pleasure . The latter statement admits an ideal, summum bonum—namely, pleasure . The second confusion is the tacit See also:assumption that the pleasure of the hedonist is necessarily or characteristically of a purely See also:physical kind; this assumption is in the See also:case of some hedonistic theories a pure perversion of the facts . Practically all hedonists have argued that what are known as the " See also:lower " pleasures are not only ephemeral in themselves but also productive of so See also:great an amount of consequent See also:pain that the See also:wise See also:man cannot regard them as truly pleasurable; the sane hedonist will, therefore, seek those so-called " higher " pleasures which are at once more lasting and less likely to be discounted by consequent pain . It should be observed, however, that this choice of pleasures by a hedonist is conditioned not by "moral " (absolute) but by prudential (relative) considerations . The earliest and the most extreme type of hedonism is that of the Cyrenaic School as stated by See also:Aristippus, who argued that the only good for man is the sentient pleasure of the moment . Since (following See also:Protagoras) knowledge is solely of momentary sensations, it is useless to try, as See also:Socrates recommended, to make calculations as to future pleasures, and to See also:balance See also:present enjoyment with disagreeable consequences . The true See also:art of See also:life is to See also:crowd as much enjoyment as possible into every moment . This extreme or " pure " hedonism regarded as a definite philosophic theory practically died with the See also:Cyrenaics, though the same spirit has frequently found expression in See also:ancient and See also:modern, especially poetical, literature .
The confusion already alluded to between " pure " and " rational " hedonism is nowhere more clearly exemplified than in the misconceptions which have arisen as to the See also:doctrine of
the Epicureans
.
To identify Epicureanism with Cyrenaicism is a See also:complete misunderstanding
.
It is true that pleasure is the summum bonum of See also:Epicurus, but his conception of that pleasure is profoundly modified by the Socratic doctrine of prudence and the See also:eudaemonism of See also:Aristotle
.
The true hedonist will aim at a life of enduring rational happiness; pleasure is the end of life, but true pleasure can be obtained only under the guidance of See also:reason
.
Self-See also:control in the choice of pleasures with a view to reducing pain to a minimum is indispensable
.
" Of all this, the beginning, and the greatest good, is prudence." The negative See also:side of Epicurean hedonism was See also:developed to such an extent by some members of the school (see HEGESIAS) that the ideal life is held to be rather indifference to pain than See also:positive enjoyment
.
This pessimistic attitude is far removed from the positive hedonism of Aristippus
.
Between the hedonism of the ancients and that of modern philosophers there lies a great gulf
.
Practically speaking ancient hedonism advocated the happiness of the individual: the modern hedonism of See also:Hume, See also:Bentham and See also: One of the most important contributions to the discussion is that of See also:Sir See also:Leslie See also:Stephen (See also:Science of Ethics), who elaborated a theory of the " social organism " in relation to the individual . The end of the evolution See also:process is the See also:production of a " social See also:tissue " which will be " vitally efficient." Instead, therefore, of the criterion of " the greatest happiness of the greatest number," Stephen has that of the " See also:health of the organism." Life is not " a See also:series of detached acts, in each of which a man can calculate the sum of happiness or misery attainable by different courses." Each action must be regarded as directly bearing upon the structure of society . A See also:criticism of the various hedonistic theories will be found in the See also:article ErHIcs (ad fin.) . See also, beside See also:works quoted under CYRENAICS, EPICURUS, &c., and the general histories of See also:philosophy, J . S . See also:Mackenzie, See also:Manual of Ethics (3rd ed., 1897); J . H . Muirhead, Elements of Ethics (1892); J . See also:Watson, Hedonistic Theories (1895), J . See also:Martineau, Types of Ethical Theory (2nd ed., 1886) ; F . H . See also:Bradley . Ethical Studies (1876); H . See also:Sidgwick, Methods of Ethics (6th ed., 1901); Jas . See also:Seth, Ethical Principles (3rd ed., 1898); other works quoted under ETHICS . |
|
|
[back] HEDON |
[next] HEEL |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.