|
HEZEKIAH (Heb. for " [my] strength is [of] Yah ") , in the See also: Bible son of See also: Ahaz, one of the greatest of the See also: kings of See also: Judah
.
He flourished at the end of the 8th and beginning of the 7th century B.C., when See also: Palestine passed through one of the most eventful periods of its See also: history
.
There is much that is uncertain in his reign, and with the exception of the See also: great crisis of 701 B.C. its chronology has not been unanimously fixed
.
Whether he came to the See also: throne before or after the fall of See also: Samaria (722–721 B.C.) is disputed,' nor is it clear what share Judah took in the See also: Assyrian conflicts down to 701.2 Shortly before this date the whole of western See also: Asia was in a ferment; See also: Sargon had died and Sennacherib had come to the throne (in 705); vassal kings plotted to recover their independence and Assyrian puppets were removed by their opponents
.
Judah was in touch with a general rising in S.W
.
Palestine, in which Ekron, See also: Lachish, See also: Ascalon (Ashkelon) and other towns of the See also: Philistines were supported by the kings of Musri and Meluhha.3 Sennacherib completely routed them at Eltekeh (a Danite city), and thence turned against Hezekiah, who had been in See also: league with Ekron and had imprisoned its See also: king Padi, an Assyrian vassal
.
In this invasion of Judah the Assyrian claims entire success; 46 towns of Judah were captured, 200,150 men and many herds of cattle were carried off among the spoil, and Jerusalem itself was closely invested
.
Hezekiah was imprisoned like a
See also: bird in a cage "4—to quote Sennacherib, and the Urbi (Arabian?) troops in Jerusalem laid down their arms
.
See also: Thirty talents of gold, eight See also: hundred of See also: silver, precious stones, couches and seats of ivory—" all kinds of valuable treasure ",—the ladies of the See also: court, male and See also: female attendants (perhaps " singers ") were carried away to See also: Nineveh
.
Here the Assyrian record ends somewhat abruptly, for, in the meanwhile, Babylonia had again revolted (700 B.C.) and Sennacherib's presence was urgently needed nearer home
.
At what precise See also: period the Babylonian Merodach (i.e
.
See also: Marduk)-Baladan sent his See also: embassy to Hezekiah is disputed
.
Although ostensibly to congratulate the king upon his recovery from a sickness, it was really sent in the hope of enlisting his support, and the excessive courtesy and complaisance with which it was received suggest that it found a ready ally in Judah (2 Kings xx . 12 sqq.; Isa. xxxix.) . Merodach-Baladan was overthrown by Sargon in 710 B.C., but succeeded in making a fresh revolt some years later (704–703 B.C.), and opinion is much divided whether his embassy was to secure the friendship of the ' See W . R .See also: Smith, Prophets of Israel,' 415 sqq.;
.
O
.
C
.
See also: White
See also: house, See also: Isaiah, pp
.
20 sqq., 372 ; J
.
Skinner, Kings, p
.
43 seq
.
; T
.
K . See also: Cheyne, Ency
.
Bib. col
.
2058, n
.
1, and references
.
2 The chief See also: dates are: 72o, defeat of a coalition (Hamath, Gaza and Musri) at Karlpr in See also: north See also: Syria and Raphia (S
.
Palestine) ; 715, a rising of Musri and Arabian tribes; 713-711, revolt and capture of Ashdod (cp
.
Is. xx.)
.
That Judah was invaded on this latter occasion is not improbable
.
' Meluhha is held by many critics to be N.W
.
See also: Arabia; the See also: identification of Musri is uncertain, see below
.
* The phrase was a favourite one of See also: Rib-Addi, king of Gebal (Byblus), in the 15th century B.c
.
; Tell-el-Amarna Letters (ed . Knudtzon), Nos . 74, 79, &c . See also: Jeremiah (v
.
27) uses the simile in a different way
.
For a discussion of Sennacherib's record, see Wilke, Jesaja u
.
See also: Assur (See also: Leipzig, 1905), pp
.
97 sqq
.
(1641)
.
See A
.
W
.
See also: Ward, History of
See also: English Dram
.
Lit. ii.' 550 seq . (1899) ; the same author's Introduction to A woman killed with kindness (" See also: Temple Dramatists," 1897) ; J
.
A
.
See also: Symonds in the Introduction to See also: Thomas Heywood in the " Mermaid " series (new issue, 1903)
.
ycutaful Hezekiah at his succession or is to be associated with the later widespread attempt to remove the Assyrian yoke.'
The brief account of the Assyrian invasion, Hezekiah's sub-
See also: mission, and the payment of tribute in 2 Kings xviii
.
14-16, supplements the Assyrian record by the statement that Sennacherib besieged Lachish, a fact which is confirmed by a bas-See also: relief (now in the See also: British Museum) depicting the king in the See also: act of besieging that See also: town.' This thoroughly See also: historical fragment is followed by two narratives which tell how the king sent an official from Lachish to demand the submission of Hezekiah and conclude with the unexpected deliverance of Jerusalem
.
Both these stories appear to belong to a biography of Isaiah, and, like the similar See also: biographies of Elijah and Elisha, are open to the suspicion that historical facts have been subordinated to idealize the See also: work of the See also: prophet
.
See KINGS, BOOKS OF
.
The narratives are (a) 2 Kings xviii
.
13, 17–Rix
.
8; cf
.
Isa. See also: xxxvi. i–xxxvii
.
8, and (b) xix . 9b-35; cp . Isa. See also: xxxvii
.
9-36 (2 Chron. xxxii
.
9 sqq. is based on both), and Jerusalem's deliverance is attributed to a certain rumour (xix
.
7), to the advance of Tirhakah, king of Ethiopia (v
.
9), and to a remarkable pestilence (v.35) which finds an See also: echo in a famous See also: story related, not without some confusion of essential facts, by See also: Herodotus (ii
.
141; cf
.
See also: Josephus Antiq. x. i
.
5).3 It is difficult to decide whether xix
.
9a belongs to the first or second of these narratives; and whether the " rumour " refers to the approach of Tirhakah, or rather to the serious troubles which had arisen in Babylonia
.
It is equally difficult to determine whether Tirhakah actually appeared on the scene in 701, and the precise application of the See also: term Mugri (See also: Mizraim) is much debated
.
Unless the two narratives are duplicates of the same event, it may be urged that Sennacherib's attack upon Arabia (apparently about 689) involved an invasion of Judah, by which See also: time See also: Egypt was in a position to be of material assistance (cf
.
Isa. See also: xxx
.
1-5, xxxi
.
1-3?)
.
This theory of a second See also: campaign (first suggested by See also: Sir See also: Henry
See also: Rawlinson) has been contested, although it is pointed out that Sennacherib at all events did not invade Egypt, and that 2 Kings xix
.
24 (Isa. xxxvii
.
25) can only refer to his successor
.
The allusion to the See also: murder of Sennacherib (xix
.
36 sq.)4 points to the See also: year 68i, but it is uncertain to which of the above narratives it belongs
.
On the whole, the question must be See also: left open, and with it both the problem of the extension of the name Musri and Mizraim outside Egypt in the Assyrian and See also: Hebrew records of this period and the true historical background of a number of the Isaianic prophecies
.
It is quite possible that later events which belong to the time of the See also: Egyptian supremacy and the See also: wars of Esarhaddon have been confused with the history of Sennacherib's invasion
.
It is not certain whether Hezekiah's conflict with the Philistines as far as Gaza or his preparations to secure for Jerusalem a See also: good See also: water supply (xviii
.
8, xx . 20; 2 Chron. xxxii . 30; Ecclus. xlviii . 17 sq.)' should precede or follow the events which have been discussed . On the other See also: hand, the reforms which the compiler of the See also: book has attributed to the early See also: part of the reign were doubtless much later (2 Kings xviii. i-8)
.
Not the fall of Samaria, but the crisis of 701, is the earliest date that could safely be chosen, and the extent of these reforms must not be overestimated
.
They are related in terms that imply an acquaintance with the great " Deuteronomic " See also: movement (see DECTERONOMV), and are magnified further with characteristic detail by the chronicler (2 Chron. See also: xxix.-xxxi.)
.
The most remarkable was the destruction of a brazen serpent, the cult of which was traditionally traced back to the time of Moses (Num. xxi
.
9).6 This persistence of serpent-cult, and the
I For the early date (between 720 and 710), Winckler, Alitest
.
Unt
.
139 sqq., See also: Burney, Kings, 350 sq.; See also: Driver; Kuchler, &c.; for the later, Whitehouse, Isaiah, 29 sq., in agreement with See also: Schrader, See also: Wellhausen, W
.
R
.
Smith, Cheyne, M'Curdy, Paton, &c . 2 Isa . X . 28-32 may perhaps refer to this invasion . Allusions to the Assyrian oppression are found in Isa. x . 5-15, xiv . 24-27, xvii . 12-14; and toSee also: internal Judaean intrigues perhaps in Isa. xxii
.
15-18, xxix
.
15
.
For a picture of the ruins in Jerusalem, see Isa. xxii
.
9-11
.
But see further ISAIAH (Boon) . 3 See, on the story, Griffith, in D .See also: Hogarth's Authority and Archaeology, p
.
167, n
.
I
.
The house of Nisroch should probably Le that of the See also: god See also: Nusku ; see also Driver in Hogarth, op. cit. p
.
109 ; Winckler, op. cit. p
.
84
.
It is commonly believed that Hezekiah constructed the conduit of Siloam, famous for its Hebrew inscription (see INSCRIPTIONS, JERUSALEM)
.
But Isa. viii
.
6, would seem to show that the See also: pool was already in existence, and, for palaeographical details, see See also: Pal
.
E.xplor
.
Fund, Quart . Slat . (1909), pp . 289, 305 sqq . 6 The name Nehushtan (2 Kings xviii . 4, cp. nahrlsh, " serpent ") is obscure; sec the commentaries . See also: idolatry (necromancy, See also: tree-worship) which the contemporary prophets denounce, do not support the view that the apparently See also: radical reforms of Hezekiah were extensive or permanent, and Jer. See also: xxvi
.
17-19 (which suggests that See also: Micah had a greater influence than Isaiah) throws another See also: light upon the conditions during his reign
.
Hezekiah was succeeded by his son See also: MANASSEH (q.v.)
.
See further W
.
R
.
Smith, Prophets, 359-364, and HEBREW See also: RELIGION
.
According to Prov. See also: xxv
.
1, Hezekiah was a See also: patron of literature (see PROVERBS)
.
The hymn which is ascribed to the king (Isa. xxxviii
.
9-20, wanting in 2 Kings) is of See also: post-exilic origin (see Cheyne, Introd. to Isaiah, 222 sq.), but is further proof of the manner in which the Judaean king was idealized in subsequent ages, partly, perhaps, in the belief that the deliverance of Jerusalem was the See also: reward for his piety
.
For See also: special discussions, site See also: Stade, Zeits. d. alttest
.
Wissenschaft, 1886, pp
.
173 sqq
.
; Winckler, Alttest
.
Untersuch., 26 sqq
.
; Schrader, Cuneiform Inscr. and Old Test
.
(on 2 Kings, l.c.); Driver, Isaiah, his See also: Life and Times, pp
.
43-83; A
.
Jeremias, Alte Test . 304-310; Nagel, See also: Zug d
.
Sanherib gegen Jerus
.
(Leipzig, 1903, conservative); and especially Prasek, Sanherib's
Feldziige gegen Juda " (Mitteil. d. vorderasiat
.
Gesell., 1903, pp
.
113-158), K
.
Fullerton, Bibliotheca sacra, 1906, pp
.
577-634, A
.
Alt, Israel u
.
Agypten (Leipzig, 1909) ; also the bibliography to ISAIAH
.
- (S
.
A
.
|
|
|
[back] THOMAS HEYWOOD (d. c. 165o) |
[next] HIATUS (Lat. for gaping, or gap) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.