See also:FERDINAND See also:HITZIG (1807-1875)
, See also:German biblical critic, was See also:born at Hauingen, See also:Baden, where his See also:father was a pastor, on the 23rd of See also:June 1807
.
He studied See also:theology at See also:Heidelberg under H
.
E
.
G
.
See also:Paulus, at See also:Halle under Wilhelm Gesenius and at See also:Gottingen under See also:Ewald
.
Returning to Heidelberg he became Privatdozent in theology in 1829, and in 1831 published his Begriff der Kritik am See also:- ALLEN, BOG OF
- ALLEN, ETHAN (1739–1789)
- ALLEN, GRANT CHARLES GRANT BLAIRFINDIEI, (1848–1899)
- ALLEN, JAMES LANE (1850– )
- ALLEN, JOHN (1476–1534)
- ALLEN, or ALLEYN, THOMAS (1542-1632)
- ALLEN, WILLIAM (1532-1594)
- ALLEN, WILLIAM FRANCIS (183o-1889)
Allen Testamente praktisch ervrtert, a study of Old Testament See also:criticism in which he explained the See also:critical principles of the grammatico-See also:historical school, and his See also:Des Propheten See also:Jonas Orakel uber See also:Moab, an exposition of the 15th and 16th chapters of the See also:book of See also:Isaiah attributed by him to the See also:prophet See also:Jonah mentioned in 2 See also:Kings xiv
.
25
.
In 1833 he was called to the university of See also:Zurich as See also:professor ordinarius of theology
.
His next See also:work was a commentary on Isaiah with a See also:translation (Ubersetzung u
.
Auslegung des Propheten Jesajas), which he dedicated to Heinrich Ewald, and which See also:Hermann See also:Hupfeld (1796–1866), well known as a commentator on the See also:Psalms (1855-1861), pronounced to be his best exegetical work
.
At Zurich he laboured for a See also:period of twenty-eight years, during which, besides commentaries on The Psalms (1835–1836; 2nd ed.; 1863–1865), The See also:Minor Prophets (1838; 3rd ed., 1863), See also:Jeremiah (184r; 2nd ed., 1866), See also:Ezekiel (1847), See also:Daniel (185o), See also:Ecclesiastes (1847), See also:Canticles (1855), and See also:Proverbs (1858), he published a monograph, Uber Johannes Markus u. See also:seine Schriften (1843), in which he maintained the See also:chronological priority of the second See also:gospel, and sought to prove that the See also:Apocalypse was written by the same author
.
He also published various treatisesof archaeological See also:interest, of which the most important are See also:Die Erfindung des Alphabets (184o), Urgeschichte u
.
Mythologie der Philistder (1845), and Die Grabschrift des Eschmunezar(1855)
.
After the See also:death of See also:Friedrich Umbreit (1795–1860), one of the founders of the well-known Studien and Kritiken, he was called in 1861 to succeed him as professor of theology at Heidelberg
.
Here he wrote his Geschichte des Volkes See also:Israel (1869-187o), in two parts, extending respectively to the end of the See also:Persian domination and to the fall of Masada, A.D
.
72, as well as a work on the Pauline epistles, Zur Kritik Paulinischer Briefe (187o), on the Moabite See also:- STONE
- STONE (0. Eng. shin; the word is common to Teutonic languages, cf. Ger. Stein, Du. steen, Dan. and Swed. sten; the root is also seen in Gr. aria, pebble)
- STONE, CHARLES POMEROY (1824-1887)
- STONE, EDWARD JAMES (1831-1897)
- STONE, FRANK (1800-1859)
- STONE, GEORGE (1708—1764)
- STONE, LUCY [BLACKWELL] (1818-1893)
- STONE, MARCUS (184o— )
- STONE, NICHOLAS (1586-1647)
Stone, Die Inschrift des Mescha (187o), and on See also:Assyrian, Sprache u
.
Sprachen Assyriens (1871), besides revising the commentary on See also:Job by See also:Ludwig Hirzel (1802-1841), which was first published in 1839
.
He was also a contributor to the Monatsschrift des wissenschaftlichen Vereins in Zurich, the Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenlandischen Gesellschaft, the Theologische Studien u
.
Kritiken, Eduard See also:Zeller's Theologische Jahrbucher, and Adolf See also:Hilgenfeld's Zeitschrift See also:fur wissenschaftliche Theologie
.
See also:Hitzig died at Heidelberg on the 22nd of See also:January 1875
.
As a See also:Hebrew philologist he holds high See also:rank; and as a constructive critic he is remarkable for acuteness and sagacity
.
As a historian, however, some of his speculations have been considered fanciful
.
" He places the See also:cradle of the
.
Israelites in the See also:south of See also:Arabia, and, like many other critics, makes the historical times begin only with See also:Moses " (F
.
Lichtenberger, See also:History of German Theology, p
.
569)
.
His lectures on biblical theology (Vorlesungen iiber biblische Theologie u. messianische Weissagungen) were published in 188o after his death, along with a portrait and See also:biographical See also:sketch byy his See also:- PUPIL (Lat. pupillus, orphan, minor, dim. of pupus, boy, allied to puer, from root pm- or peu-, to beget, cf. "pupa," Lat. for " doll," the name given to the stage intervening between the larval and imaginal stages in certain insects)
pupil, J
.
J
.
Kneucker (b
.
1840), professor of theology at Heidelberg
.
See Heinrich See also:Steiner, See also:Ferdinand Hitzig (1882); and Adolf Kamphausen's See also:article in See also:Herzog-Hauck's Realencyklopddie
.
HIUNG-NU, HIONG-NU, HEUNG-NU, a See also:people who about the end of the 3rd See also:century B.C. formed, according to See also:Chinese records, a powerful See also:empire from the See also:Great See also:Wall of See also:China to the See also:Caspian
.
Their ethnical See also:affinities have been much discussed; but it is most probable that they were of the See also:Turki stock, as were the See also:Huns, their later western representatives
.
They are the first See also:Turkish people mentioned by the Chinese
.
A theory which seems plausible is that which assumes them to have been a heterogenous collection of Mongol, Tungus, Turki and perhaps even Finnish hordes under a Mongol military See also:caste, though the Mongolo-Tungus See also:element probably predominated
.
Towards the See also:close of the 1st century of the See also:Christian era the Hiung-nu empire See also:broke up
.
Their subsequent history is obscure
.
Some of them seem to have gone westward and settled on the Ural See also:river
.
These, de Guiques suggests, were the ancestors of the Huns, and many ethnologists hold that the Hiung-nu were the ancestors of the See also:modern See also:Turks
.
See See also:Journal Anthropological See also:Institute for 1874; See also:Sir H
.
H
.
Howorth, History of the See also:Mongols (1876–188o) ; 6th See also:Congress of Orientalists, See also:Leiden, 1883 (Actes, See also:part iv. pp
.
177-195) ; de Guiques, Histoire generale des Huns, des Turcs, des Mongoles, et des autres Zartares occidentaux (1756–1758)
.
End of Article: