Online Encyclopedia

BENJAMIN HOADLY (1676-1761)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V13, Page 542 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

BENJAMIN HOADLY (1676-1761)  ,
See also:
English divine, was born at Westerham, Kent, on the 14th of November 1676 . In 1691 he entered Catharine Hall, Cambridge, where he graduated M.A. and was for two years tutor, after which he held from 1701 to 1711 the lectureship of St Mildred in the Poultry, and along with it from 17o4 the rectory of St Peter-le-Poer,
See also:
London . His first important appearance as a controversialist was against Edmund Calamy " the younger "in reference to conformity (1703-1707), and after this he came into conflict with Francis Atterbury, first on the interpretation of certain texts and then on the whole
See also:
Anglican
See also:
doctrine of non-resistance . His
See also:
principal
See also:
treatises on this subject were the
See also:
Measures of Submission to the
See also:
Civil Magistrate and The Origin and Institution of Civil Government discussed; and his
See also:
part in the discussion was so much appreciated by the
See also:
Commons that in 1709 they presented an address to the queen praying her to " bestow some dignity in the church on Mr Hoadly for his eminent services both to church and state." The queen returned a favourable answer, but the dignity was not conferred . In 1710 he was presented by a private
See also:
patron to the rectory of
See also:
Streatham in Surrey . In 1715 he was appointed
See also:
chaplain to the king, and the same
See also:
year he obtained the bishopric of Bangor . He held the see for six years, but never visited the diocese . In 1716, in reply to George Hickes (q.v.), he published a Preservative against the Principles and Practices of
See also:
Nonjurors in Church and State, and in the following year preached before the king his famous sermon on the
See also:
Kingdom of Christ, which was immediately published by royal command . These
See also:
works were attacks on the divine authority of kings and of the clergy, but as the sermon dealt more specifically and distinctly with the power of the church, its publication caused an ecclesiastical ferment which in certain aspects has no parallel in religious
See also:
history . It was at once resolved to proceed against him in convocation, but this was prevented by the king proroguing the assembly, a step which had consequences of vital bearing on the history of the Church of England, since from that period the
See also:
great Anglican council ceased to transact business of a more than formal nature . The restrained sentiments of the council in regard to Hoadly found expression in a war of
See also:
pamphlets known as the Bangorian Controversy, which, partly from a want of clearness in the statements of Hoadly, partly from the disingenuousness of his opponents and the confusion resulting from exasperated feelings,
See also:
developed into an intricate and bewildering
See also:
maze of side discussions in which the main issues of the dispute were concealed almost beyond the possibility of
See also:
discovery . But however vague and uncertain might be the meaning of Hoadly in regard to several of the important
See also:
bearings of the questions around which he aroused discussion, he was explicit in denying the power of the Church over the conscience, and its right to determine the condition of men in relation to the favour of
See also:
God .

The most able of his opponents was

William Law; others we:e Andrew Snape, provost of
See also:
Eton, and Thomas Sherlock, dean of
See also:
Chichester . So exercised was the mind of the religious
See also:
world over the dispute that in
See also:
July 1717 as many as seventy-four pamphlets made their appearance; and at one period the crisis became so serious that the business of London was for some days virtually at a stand-still . Hoadly, being not unskilled in the
See also:
art of flattery, was translated in 1721 to the see of
See also:
Hereford, in 1723 to Salisbury and in 1734 to Winchester . He died at his palace at
See also:
Chelsea on the 17th of
See also:
April 1761 . His controversial writings are vigorous if prolix and his theological essays have little merit . He must have been a much hated man, for his latitudinarianism offended the high church party and his rationalism the other sections . He was an intimate friend of Dr
See also:
Samuel Clarke, of whom he wrote a
See also:
life . Hoadly's
See also:
brother, JON HOADLY (1678-1746), was archbishop of
See also:
Dublin from 1730 to 1742 and archbishop of
See also:
Armagh from the latter date until his
See also:
death on the 19th of July 1746 . In early life the archbishop was very intimate with Gilbert Burnet, thenbishop of Salisbury, and in later life he was a prominent figure in Irish politics . The works of Benjamin Hoadly were collected and published by his son John in 3 vols . (1773) . To the first
See also:
volume was prefixed the article "Hoadly" from the supplement to the Biographia Britannica .

See also L .

Stephen, English Thought in the 18th Century .

End of Article: BENJAMIN HOADLY (1676-1761)
[back]
HOACTZIN, or HOATZIN
[next]
SAMUEL HOAR (1778-1856)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.