|
BENJAMIN See also: English divine, was See also: born at Westerham, Kent, on the 14th of See also: November 1676
.
In 1691 he entered Catharine See also: Hall, Cambridge, where he graduated M.A. and was for two years tutor, after which he held from 1701 to 1711 the lectureship of St Mildred in the Poultry, and along with it from 17o4 the rectory of St
See also: Peter-le-Poer, See also: London
.
His first important appearance as a controversialist was against Edmund Calamy " the younger "in reference to conformity (1703-1707), and after this he came into conflict with See also: Francis See also: Atterbury, first on the interpretation of certain texts and then on the whole See also: Anglican See also: doctrine of non-resistance
.
His See also: principal See also: treatises on this subject were the See also: Measures of Submission to the See also: Civil Magistrate and The Origin and Institution of Civil See also: Government discussed; and his See also: part in the discussion was so much appreciated by the See also: Commons that in 1709 they presented an address to the See also: queen praying her to " bestow some dignity in the See also: church on Mr
See also: Hoadly for his eminent services both to church and See also: state." The queen returned a favourable answer, but the dignity was not conferred
.
In 1710 he was presented by a private See also: patron to the rectory of See also: Streatham in Surrey
.
In 1715 he was appointed See also: chaplain to the See also: king, and the same
See also: year he obtained the bishopric of See also: Bangor
.
He held the see for six years, but never visited the diocese
.
In 1716, in reply to See also: George See also: Hickes (q.v.), he published a Preservative against the Principles and Practices of See also: Nonjurors in Church and State, and in the following year preached before the king his famous See also: sermon on the See also: Kingdom of Christ, which was immediately published by royal command
.
These See also: works were attacks on the divine authority of See also: kings and of the See also: clergy, but as the sermon dealt more specifically and distinctly with the power of the church, its publication caused an ecclesiastical ferment which in certain aspects has no parallel in religious See also: history
.
It was at once resolved to proceed against him in convocation, but this was prevented by the king proroguing the See also: assembly, a step which had consequences of vital bearing on the history of the Church of See also: England, since from that See also: period the See also: great Anglican council ceased to transact business of a more than formal nature
.
The restrained sentiments of the council in regard to Hoadly found expression in a war of See also: pamphlets known as the Bangorian Controversy, which, partly from a want of clearness in the statements of Hoadly, partly from the disingenuousness of his opponents and the confusion resulting from exasperated feelings, See also: developed into an intricate and bewildering See also: maze of See also: side discussions in which the See also: main issues of the dispute were concealed almost beyond the possibility of See also: discovery
.
But however vague and uncertain might be the meaning of Hoadly in regard to several of the important See also: bearings of the questions around which he aroused discussion, he was explicit in denying the power of the Church over the See also: conscience, and its right to determine the condition of men in relation to the favour of See also: God
.
The most able of his opponents was See also: William
See also: Law; others we:e Andrew Snape, provost of See also: Eton, and See also: Thomas Sherlock, dean of
See also: Chichester
.
So exercised was the mind of the religious See also: world over the dispute that in See also: July 1717 as many as seventy-four pamphlets made their appearance; and at one period the crisis became so serious that the business of London was for some days virtually at a stand-still
.
Hoadly, being not unskilled in the See also: art of flattery, was translated in 1721 to the see of See also: Hereford, in 1723 to See also: Salisbury and in 1734 to Winchester
.
He died at his palace at See also: Chelsea on the 17th of See also: April 1761
.
His controversial writings are vigorous if prolix and his theological essays have little merit
.
He must have been a much hated See also: man, for his latitudinarianism offended the high church party and his rationalism the other sections
.
He was an intimate friend of Dr See also: Samuel See also: Clarke, of whom he wrote a
See also: life
.
Hoadly's See also: brother, JON HOADLY (1678-1746), was archbishop of See also: Dublin from 1730 to 1742 and archbishop of See also: Armagh from the latter date until his See also: death on the 19th of July 1746
.
In early life the archbishop was very intimate with See also: Gilbert Burnet, thenbishop of Salisbury, and in later life he was a prominent figure in Irish politics
.
The works of Benjamin Hoadly were collected and published by his son
See also: John in 3 vols
.
(1773)
.
To the first
See also: volume was prefixed the article "Hoadly" from the supplement to the Biographia Britannica
.
See also L . See also: Stephen, English Thought in the 18th Century
.
|
|
|
[back] HOACTZIN, or HOATZIN |
[next] SAMUEL HOAR (1778-1856) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.