Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

HYPOTHESIS (from Gr. inrorcOivat, to ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V14, Page 208 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

HYPOTHESIS (from Gr. inrorcOivat, to put under; cf. See also:Lat. suppositio, from sub-ponere)  , in See also:ordinary See also:language, an explanation, supposition or See also:assumption, which is put forward in the See also:absence of ascertained facts or causes . Both in ordinary See also:life and in the acquisition of scientific knowledge See also:hypothesis is all-important . A detective's See also:work consists largely in forming and testing hypothesis . If an astronomer is confronted by some phenomenon which has no obvious explanation he may postulate some set of conditions which from his See also:general knowledge of the subject would or might give rise to the phenomenon in question; he then tests his hypothesis until he discovers whether it doesor does not conflict with the facts . An example of this See also:process is that of the See also:discovery of the See also:planet See also:Neptune: certain perturbations of the See also:orbit of See also:Uranus had been observed, and it was seen that these could be explained on the hypothesis of the existence of a then unknown planet, and this hypothesis was verified by actual observation . The progress of inductive knowledge is by the formation of successive hypotheses, and it frequently happens that the demolition of one or even many hypotheses is the See also:direct road to a new and accurate hypothesis, i.e. to fresh knowledge . A hypothesis may, therefore, turn out to be entirely wrong, yet it may be of the greatest See also:practical use . The recognition of the importance of hypotheses has led to various attempts at See also:drawing up exact rules for their formation, but logicians are generally agreed that only very elementary principles can be laid down . Thus a hypothesis must contain nothing which is at variance with known facts or principles: it should not postulate conditions which cannot be verified empirically . J . S . See also:Mill (See also:Logic III. xiv .

4) laid down the principle that a hypothesis is not " genuinely scientific " if it is " destined always to remain a hypothesis ": it must " be of such a nature as to be either proved or disproved by comparison with observed facts ": in the same spirit See also:

Bacon said that in searching for causes in nature " Deum See also:semper excipimus." Mill's principle, though See also:sound in the abstract, has, except in a few cases, little practical value in determining the admissibility of hypotheses, and in practice any See also:rule which tends to discourage hypothesis is in general undesirable . The most satisfactory check on hypothesis is See also:expert knowledge in the particular See also:field of See also:research by which rigorous tests may be applied . This test is roughly of two kinds, first by the ultimate principles or presuppositions on which a particular See also:branch of knowledge rests, and second by the comparison of correlative facts . Useful See also:light is See also:shed on this distinction by See also:Lotze, who contrasts (Logic, § 273) postulates (" absolutely necessary assumptions without which the content of the observation with which we are dealing would contradict the See also:laws of our thought ") with hypotheses, which he defines as conjectures, which seek " to fill up the postulate thus abstractly stated by specifying the See also:concrete causes, forces or processes, out of which the given phenomenon really arose in this particular See also:case, while in other cases maybe the same postulate is to be satisfied by utterly different though See also:equivalent combinations of forces or active elements." Thus a hypothesis may be ruled out by principles or postulates without any reference to the concrete facts which belong to that See also:division of the subject to explain which the hypothesis is formulated . A true hypothesis, therefore, seeks not merely to connect or colligate two See also:separate facts, but to do this in the light of and subject to certain fundamental principles . Various attempts have been made to classify hypotheses and to distinguish " hypothesis " from a " theory " or a See also:mere " conjecture ": none of these have any See also:great practical importance, the See also:differences being only in degree, not in See also:kind . The See also:adjective " hypothetical " is used, in the same sense, both loosely in contradistinction to " real " or " actual," and technically in the phrases " hypothetical See also:judgment " and " hypothetical See also:syllogism." (See LOGIC and SYLLOGISM.) See Naville, La Logique de l'hypothbse (188o), and textbooks of logic, e.g. those of See also:Jevons, Bosanquet, See also:Joseph; Liebmann, Der Klimax d . Theorien .

End of Article: HYPOTHESIS (from Gr. inrorcOivat, to put under; cf. Lat. suppositio, from sub-ponere)
[back]
HYPOTHEC (Lat. hypotheca, Gr. vaoOi7Kf)
[next]
HYPOTRACHELIUM (Gr. vaorpaxi7Awv, the lower part of...

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.