|
IDEA (Gr. Ibia, connected with i&eiv, to see; cf. See also: term used both popularly and in philosophical terminology with the general sense of " See also: mental picture." To have no idea how a thing happened is to be without a mental picture of an occurrence
.
In this general sense it is synonymous with concept (q.v.) in its popular usage
.
In philosophy the term " idea " is See also: common to all See also: languages and periods, but there is scarcely any term which has been used with so many different shades of meaning
.
See also: Plato used it in the sphere of See also: metaphysics for the eternally existing reality, th( archetype, of which the See also: objects of sense are more or less imperfect copies
.
Chairs may be of different forms, sizes, See also: colours and so forth, but " laid up in the mind of See also: God " there is the one permanent idea or type, of which the many See also: physical chairs are derived with various degrees of imperfection
.
From this See also: doctrine it follows that these ideas are the See also: sole reality (see further IDEALISM) ; in opposition to it are the empirical thinkers of all See also: time who find reality in particular physical objects (see See also: HYLozoISM, EMPIRICISM, &c.)
.
In striking contrast to Plato's use is that of See also: John
See also: Locke, who defines " idea "- as " whatever is the See also: object of understanding when a See also: man thinks " (Essay on the Human Understanding (I.), vi
.
8)
.
Here the term is applied not to the mental See also: process, but to anything whether physical or intellectual which is the object of it
.
Hume differs from Locke by limiting " idea " to the more or less vague mental reconstructions of perceptions, the perceptual process being described as an " impression." See also: Wundt widens the term to include " conscious See also: representation of some object or process of the See also: external See also: world." In so doing he includes not only ideas of memory and See also: imagination, but also perceptual processes, whereas other psychologists confine the term to the first two See also: groups
.
G
.
F
.
Stout and J . M . Baldwin, in theSee also: Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, i
.
498, define " idea " as " the See also: reproduction with a more or less adequate image, of an object not actually See also: present to the senses." They point out that an idea
and a perception are by various authorities contrasted in various or in any of the newer forms which seek for the ultimate essence ways
.
" Difference in degree of intensity," " See also: comparative of both mind and See also: matter in some unknown force or energy which, See also: absence of bodily See also: movement on the See also: part of the subject," " corn- while in itself it is neither, yet contains the potentiality of both. parative dependence on mental activity," are suggested by It is true that in some See also: modern developments of idealism the psychologists as characteristic of an idea as compared with a ultimate reality is conceived of in an impersonal way, but it is perception. usually added that this ultimate or absolute being is not some-
It should be observed that an idea, in the narrower and thing See also: lower but higher than self-conscious See also: personality, including generally accepted sense of a mental reproduction, is frequently it as a more fully See also: developed See also: form may be said to include a more composite
.
That is, as in the example given above of the idea elementary
.
of chair, a See also: great many objects, differing materially in detail, 2
.
Origin and Development of Idealism.—In its self-conscious all See also: call a single idea
.
When a man, for example, has obtained form idealism is a modern doctrine
.
In it the self or subject an idea of chairs in general by comparison with which he can may be said to have come to its rights
.
This was possible in say " This is a chair, that is a See also: stool," he has what is known any See also: complete sense only after the introspective movement as an " abstract idea " distinct from the reproduction in his represented by the See also: middle ages had done its See also: work, and the mind of any particular chair (see See also: ABSTRACTION)
.
Furthermore thought of the individual mind and will as possessed of relative a complex idea may not have any corresponding physical independence had worked itself out into some degree of clearness. object, though its particular constituent elements may severally In this respect See also: Descartes' dictum—cogito ergo sum—may be be the reproductions of actual perceptions
.
Thus the idea of said to have struck the keynote of modern philosophy, and all a centaur is a complex mental picture composed of the subsequent See also: speculation to have been merely a prolonged corn-ideas of man and See also: horse, that of a mermaid of a woman and a mentary upon it
.
While in its completer form it is thus a
See also: fish. doctrine distinctive of modern times, idealism has its roots far
See PSYCHOLOGY. back in the See also: history of thought
.
|
|
|
[back] 1ST STAFFORD HENRY NORTHCOTE IDDESLEIGH |
[next] IDEALISM (from Gr. i5Ea, archetype or model, throug... |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.