Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ISAEUS (c.42o B.C.-C. 350 B.c.) , See also:Attic orator, the See also:chronological limits of whose extant See also:work fall between the years 390 and 353 B.C., is described in the Plutarchic See also:life as a Chalcidian; by Suidas, whom See also:Dionysius follows, as an Athenian . The accounts have been reconciled by supposing that his See also:family sprang from the See also:settlement (ic)o povx1a) of Athenian citizens among whom the lands of the Chalcidian hippobutae (knights) had been divided about 509 B.C . In 411 B.C . See also:Euboea (except Oreos) revolted from See also:Athens; and it would not have been See also:strange if residents of Athenian origin had then migrated from the hostile See also:island to See also:Attica . Such a connexion with Euboea would explain the non-Athenian name See also:Diagoras which is See also:borne by the See also:father of See also:Isaeus, while the latter is said to have been " an Athenian by descent" ('ABrlvaios TO 7ivos) . So far as we know, Isaeus took no See also:part in the public affairs of Athens . " I cannot tell," says Dionysius, " what were the politics of Isaeus—or whether he had any politics at all." Those words strikingly attest the profound See also:change which was passing over the life of the See also:Greek cities . It would have been scarcely possible, fifty years earlier, that an eminent Athenian with the See also:powers of Isaeus should have failed to leave on See also:record some See also:proof of his See also:interest in the See also:political concerns of Athens or of See also:Greece . But now, with the decline of See also:personal devotion to the See also:state, the life of an active See also:citizen had ceased to have any necessary contact with political affairs . Already we are at the beginning of that transition which is to See also:lead from the old life of Hellenic citizenship to that See also:Hellenism whose See also:children are citizens of the See also:world . Isaeus (who was See also:born probably about 420 B.C.) is believed to have been an See also:early See also:pupil of Isocrates, and he certainly Was a student of See also:Lysias . A passage of See also:Photius has been understood as meaning that personal relations had existed between Isaeus and See also:Plato, but this view appears erroneous.' The profession of Isaeus was that of which See also:Antiphon had been the first representative at Athens—that of a Xoyoypadios, who composed speeches which his clients were to deliver in the See also:law-courts . But, while Antiphon had written such speeches chiefly (as Lysias frequently) for public causes, it was with private causes that Isaeus was almost exclusively concerned . The fact marks the progressive subdivision of labour in his calling, and the extent to which the smaller interests of private life now absorbed the See also:attention of the citizen . The most interesting recorded event in the career of Isaeus is one which belongs to its See also:middle See also:period—his connexion with See also:Demosthenes . Born in 384 B.C., Demosthenes attained his civic See also:majority in 366 . At this See also:time he had already resolved to ' See further See also:Jebb's Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeus, (ii . 264) . prosecute the fraudulent guardians who had stripped him of his patrimony . In prospect of such a legal contest, he could have found no better ally than Isaeus . That the See also:young Demosthenes actually resorted to his aid is beyond See also:reason-able doubt . But the pseudo-See also:Plutarch embellishes the See also:story after his See also:fashion . He says that Demosthenes, on coming of See also:age, took Isaeus into his See also:house, and studied with him for four years —paying him the sum of Io,000 drachmas (about 400), on See also:condition that Isaeus should withdraw from a school of See also:rhetoric which he had opened, and devote himself wholly to his new pupil . The real Plutarch gives us a more sober and a more probable version . He simply states that Demosthenes " employed Isaeus as his See also:master in rhetoric, though Isocrates was then teaching, either (as some say) because he could not pay Isocrates the prescribed See also:fee of ten minae, or because he preferred the See also:style of Isaeus for his purpose, as being vigorous and astute" (Spaow pion Kai 7ravovupyov) . It may be observed that, except by the pseudo-Plutarch, a school of Isaeus is not mentioned, for a See also:notice in Plutarch need mean no more than that he had written a See also:text-See also:book, or that his speeches were read in See also:schools; nor is any other pupil named . As to Demosthenes, his own speeches against Aphobus and Onetor (363–362 B.c.) afford the best possible See also:gauge of the sense and the measure in which he was the See also:disciple of Isaeus; the intercourse between them can scarcely have been either very See also:close or very See also:long . The date at which Isaeus died can only be conjectured from his work; it may be placed about 350 B.C . Isaeus has a See also:double claim on the student of Greek literature . He is the first Greek writer who comes before us as a consummate master of strict forensic controversy . He also holds a most important See also:place in the See also:general development of See also:practical See also:oratory, and therefore in the See also:history of Attic See also:prose . Antiphon marks the beginning of that development, Demosthenes its consummation . Between them stand Lysias and Isaeus . The open, even ostentatious, See also:art of Antiphon had been austere and rigid . The concealed art of Lysias had charmed and persuaded by a versatile semblance of natural See also:grace and simplicity . Isaeus brings us to a final See also:stage of transition, in which the gilts distinctive of Lysias were to be fused into a perfect See also:harmony with that masterly art which receives its most powerful expression in Demosthenes . Here, then, are the two See also:cardinal points by which the place of Isaeus must be determined . We must consider, first, his relation to Lysias; secondly, his relation to Demosthenes . A comparison of Isaeus and Lysias must set out from the distinction between choice of words (XiEls) and mode of putting words together (ebvOeats) . In choice of words, diction, Lysias and Isaeus are closely alike . Both are clear, pure, See also:simple, concise; both have the See also:stamp of persuasive plainness (&cPiXsis), and both combine it with graphic See also:power (EVapysta) . In mode of putting words together, See also:composition, there is, however a striking difference . Lysias threw off the stiff restraints of the earlier periodic style, with its wooden monotony; he is too fond indeed of See also:antithesis always to avoid a rigid effect; but, on the whole, his style is easy, flexible and various; above all, its subtle art usually succeeds to appearing natural . Now this is just what the art of Isaeus does not achieve . With less love of antithesis than Lysias, and with a diction almost equally pure and See also:plain, he yet habitually conveys the impression of conscious and confident art . Hence he is least effective in adapting his style to those characters in which Lysias peculiarly excelled—the ingenuous youth, the homely and See also:peace-loving citizen . On the other See also:hand, his more open and vigorous art does not interfere with his moral persuasiveness where there is See also:scope for reasoned remonstrance, for keen See also:argument or for powerful denunciation . Passing from the formal to the real See also:side of his work, from diction and composition to the treatment of subject-See also:matter, we find the divergence wider still .
Lysias usually adheres to a simple four-See also:fold See also:division—proem, narrative, proof, See also:epilogue
.
Isaeus frequently interweaves the narrative with the proof
?
He shows the most dexterous ingenuity in adapting his manifold See also:tactics to the See also:case in hand, and often " out-generals " (KaTauTpaTrfys?) his adversary by some novel and daring disposition of his forces
.
Lysias, again, usually contents himself with a merely rhetorical or sketchy. proof ; Isaeus aims at strict logical demonstration, worked out through all its steps
.
As
1 Plat
.
De glor
.
Athen. p
.
350 C, where he mentions robs 'Ieo-Kparels sal 'Avrt¢wvras Kai 'Ieaious among Tabs iv See also:rais exoXais ra p EipaKia 7rpoSLSaUKODTe.S
.
s Here he was probably influenced by the teaching of Isocrates
.
The forensic speech of Isocrates known as the Aegineticus (Or. xix.), which belongs to the See also:peculiar See also:province of Isaeus, as dealing with a claim to See also:property (iiriSucaata), affords perhaps the earliest example of narrative and proof thus interwoven
.
Earlier forensic writers had kept the St iy,fats and 7rtarEls distinct, as Lysias does
.
See also:Sir See also: What, we must next ask, is the relation of Isaeus to Demosthenes ? The Greek critic who had so carefully studied both authors states his own view in broad terms when he declares that " the power of Demosthenes took its seeds and its beginnings from Isaeus ' (See also:Dion . Halic . Isaeus, 20) . A closer examination will show that within certain limits the statement may be allowed . Attic prose expression had been continuously See also:developed as an art; the true See also:link between Isaeus and Demosthenes is technical, depending on their continuity . Isaeus had made some See also:original contributions to the resources of the art ; and Demosthenes had not failed to profit by these . The composition of Demosthenes resembles that of Isaeus in blending terse and vigorous periods with passages of more lax and fluent ease, as well as in that dramatic vivacity which is given by rhetorical question and similar devices . In the versatile disposition of subject-matter, the divisions of " narrative " and " proof " being shifted and interwoven according to circumstances, Demosthenes has clearly been instructed by the example of Isaeus . Still more plainly and strikingly is this so in regard to the elaboration of systematic proof ; here Demosthenes invites See also:direct and close comparison with Isaeus by his method of See also:drawing out a See also:chain of arguments, or enforcing a proposition by strict legal argument . And, more generally, Demosthenes is the pupil of Isaeus, though here the pupil became even greater than the master, in that See also:faculty of grappling with an adversary's case point by point, in that aptitude for close and strenuous conflict which is expressed by the words a.ytbv, Evay6vlos.4 The pseudo-Plutarch, in his life of Isaeus, mentions an Art of Rhetoric and sixty-four speeches, of which fifty were accounted genuine . From a passage of Photius it appears that at least 5 the fifty speeches of recognized authenticity were extant as See also:late as A.D . 85o . Only eleven, with a large part of a twelfth, have comedown to us; but the titles of See also:forty-two 6 others are known .? The titles of the lost speeches confirm the statement of Dionysius that the speeches of Isaeus were exclusively forensic; and only three titles indicate speeches made in public causes . The See also:remainder, concerned with private causes, may be classed under six heads:—0) KXrlpocoi—cases of claim to an See also:inheritance; (2) 'e7rlKXrfptKOI—cases of claim to the hand of an heiress; (3) SialtKaeial—cases of claim of property; (4) a3roaraaf.ou—cases of claim to the ownership of a slaves (5) iyybiss—See also:action brought against a See also:surety whose See also:principal had made See also:default; (6) avrespoola (as=7rapaypa4n)—a See also:special plea; (7) Eseets—See also:appeal from one See also:jurisdiction to another . Eleven of the twelve extant speeches belong to class (I), the KX71piKoi, or claims to an inheritance . This was probably.the See also:branch of practice in which Isaeus had done his most important and most characteristic work . And, according to the See also:ancient See also:custom, this class of speeches would therefore stand first in the See also:manuscript collections of his writings . The case of Antiphon is parallel: his speeches in cases of See also:homicide (g5ovucoi) were those on which his reputation mainly depended, and stood first in the See also:manuscripts . Their exclusive preservation, like that of the speeches made by Isaeus in will-cases, is thus primarily an See also:accident of manuscript tradition, but partly also the result of the writer's special See also:prestige . Six of the twelve extant speeches are directly concerned with claims to an See also:estate; five others are connected with legal proceedings arising out of such a claim . They may be classified thus (the name given in each case being that of the See also:person whose estate is in dispute) : I . Trials of Claim to an Inheritance (StaSiKaatat) . I . Or. i., Cleonymus . Date between 36o and 353 B.C . 2 . Or. iv., Nicostratus . Date uncertain . 3 . Or. vii., See also:Apollodorus . 353 B.C . 4 . Or. viii., Ciron . 375 B.C . 5 . Or. ix., Astyphilus . 369 B.C . (c . 390, See also:Schomann) . 6 . Or. x., See also:Aristarchus . 377–371 B.C . (386-384, Schomann) . This is what Dionysius means when he says (Isaeus, 6,) that Isaeus differs from Lysias—rip See also:pit KaT' EvBbp77pa rl X yety aAMa KaT' E7rtxeiprlpa . Here the " See also:enthymeme " means a rhetorical See also:syllogism with one premiss suppressed (curtum, Juv. vi . 449) ; " epicheireme," such a syllogism stated in full . Cf . R . Volkmann, Rhetorik der Griechen and Romer, 1872, pp . 153 f . ' See also:Cleon's speech in Thuc. iii . 37, 38, See also:works out this See also:image with remarkable force; within a See also:short space we have Iuv&aews aytbvrwv rolwvSE aytavwv—aywvlerils—aywvi~EaBat—avTa}wVC~EOB4C—aywvo-BEras, . See Attic Orators, vol. i . 39; ii . 304 . 5 For the words of Photius (See also:cod . 263), robrwv Si of ra yvifalov sapruprtOivres v' KaraXEiirovrat povov, might be so rendered as to imply that, besides these fifty, others also were extant . See Att . Orat. ii . 311, See also:note 2 . 6 Forty-four are given in Thalheim's ed . 7 The second of our speeches (the Meneclean) was discovered in the Laurenti: n Library in 1785, and was edited in that See also:year by See also:Tyrwhitt . In See also:editions previous to that date, Oration i. is made to conclude with a few lines which really belong to the end of Orat. ii . (§ 47, aXa' E7rstIr) rb 7rpaypa . . . il,nt ieaa0s), and this arrangement is followed in the See also:translation of Isaeus by Sir William Jones, to whom our second oration, was, of course, then (1779) unknown . In Oration i. all that follows the words pr) 7roliheavres in § 22 was first published in 1815 by See also:Mai, from a MS. in the Ambrosian Library at See also:Milan . 14 I I . Actions for False See also:Witness (See also:Sinai 0tv5oµaprvpi&w) . 1 . Or. ii., Menecles .
354 B.C
.
2
.
Or. iii., See also:Pyrrhus
.
Date uncertain, but comparatively late
.
3
.
Or. vi., Philoctemon
.
364-363 B.C
.
IV
.
See also:Indictment of a See also:Guardian for Maltreatment of a See also: Appeal from See also:Arbitration to a Dicastery (44eocs) . Or. xii., For Euphiletus . (Incomplete.) Date uncertain . The speeches of Isaeus See also:supply valuable illustrations to the early history of testamentary law . They show us the faculty of See also:adoption, still, indeed, associated with the religious See also:motive in which it originated, as a mode of securing that the sacred See also:rites of the family shall continue to be discharged by one who can See also:call himself the son of the deceased . But practically the See also:civil aspect of adoption is, for the Athenian citizen, predominant over the religious; he adopts a son in See also:order to bestow property on a person to whom he wishes to bequeath it . The Athenian See also:system, as interpreted by Isaeus, is thus intermediate, at least in spirit, between the purely religious stand-point of the See also:Hindu and the maturer See also:form which See also:Roman testamentary law had reached before the time of See also:Cicero .l As to the form of the speeches, it is remarkable for its variety . There are three which, taken together, may be considered as best representing the diversity and range of their author's power . The fifth, with its simple but lively diction, its graceful and persuasive narrative, recalls the qualities of Lysias . The See also:eleventh, with its sustained and impetuous power, has no slight resemblance to the manner of Demosthenes . The eighth is, of all, the most characteristic, alike in narrative and in argument . Isaeus is here seen at his best . No reader who is interested in the social life of ancient Greece need find Isaeus dull . If the glimpses of Greek society which he gives us are seldom so See also:gay and picturesque as those which enliven the pages of Lysias, they are certainly not less suggestive . Here, where the innermost relations and central interests of the family are in question, we See also:touch the springs of social life; we are not merely presented with scenic details of See also:dress and See also:furniture, but are enabled in no small degree to conceive the feelings of the actors . The best manuscript of Isaeus is in the See also:British Museum,—Crippsianus A (= Burneianus 95,113th See also:century),which contains also Antiphon, See also:Andocides, See also:Lycurgus and See also:Dinarchus . The next best.is See also:Bekker's Laurentianus B (See also:Florence), of the 15th, century . Besides these, he used See also:Marcianus L (See also:Venice), saec . 14, Vratislaviensis Z saec . 142 and two very inferior See also:MSS . Ambrosianus A . 99, P (which he dismissed after Or. i.), and Ambrosianus D . 42, Q (which contains only Or. i., ii.) . See also:Schumann, in his edition of 1831, generally followed Bekker's text; he had no fresh apparatus beyond a See also:collation of a See also:Paris MS . R in part of Or. i.; but he had sifted the Aldine more carefully . See also:Baiter and Sauppe (185o) had a new collation of A, and also used a collation of Burneianus 96, M, given by See also:Dobson in vol. iv. of his edition (1828) . C . Scheibe (Teubner, 186o) made it his especial aim to See also:complete the work of his predecessors by restoring the correct Attic forms of words; thus (e.g.) he gives'i-yyba for iveyba, &Sipe, for S€Slaµev, and the like,—following the consent of the MSS., however, in such forms as the See also:accusative of proper names in -nv rather than -n, or (e.g.) the future ¢avi roµai rather than ¢avoI ai., &c., and on such doubtful points as cpparepes instead of ¢pa.See also:ropes, or EiXnOvtas instead of ELX€&Ouiat . EDI'IIONS.—Editio princeps (Aldus, Venice, 1513); in Oratores Altici, by I . Bekker (1823–1828); W . S . Dobson (1828); J . G . Baiter and See also:Hermann Sauppe (185o): separately, by G . F . Schumann, with commentary (1831); C . Scheibe (186o) (Teubner See also:series, new ed. by T . Thalheim, 1903); H . Buermann (1883); W . See also:Wyse (1904) . See also:English translation by Sir William Jones, 1779 . On Isaeus generally see Wyse's edition; R . C . Jebb, Attic Orators; F . See also:Blass, See also:Die attische Beredsamkeit (2nd ed., 1887–1893); and L . Moy, Etude sur See also:les plaidoyers d'Isee (1876) . (R . C .
|
|
|
[back] ISABNORMAL (or ISANOMALOUS) LINES |
[next] ISAIAH |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.