Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

JEWS (Heb. Y8hudi, man of Judah; Gr. ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V15, Page 410 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

JEWS (Heb. Y8hudi, See also:man of See also:Judah; Gr. 'Iovbaiot; See also:Lat. Judaei)  , the See also:general name for the Semitic See also:people which inhabited See also:Palestine from See also:early times, and is known in various connexions as " the See also:Hebrews," " the See also:Jews," and " See also:Israel " (see §5 below) . Their See also:history may be divided into three See also:great periods: (I) That covered by the Old Testament to the See also:foundation of Judaism in the See also:Persian See also:age, (2) that of the See also:Greek and See also:Roman domination to the destruction of See also:Jerusalem, and (3) that of the Diaspora or See also:Dispersion to the See also:present See also:day . I.—OLD TESTAMENT HISTORY 1 . The See also:Land and the People.—For the first two periods the history of the Jews is mainly that of Palestine . It begins among those peoples which occupied the See also:area lying between the See also:Nile on the one See also:side and the See also:Tigris and the See also:Euphrates on the other . Surrounded by See also:ancient seats of culture in See also:Egypt and Babylonia, by the mysterious deserts of See also:Arabia, and by the See also:highlands of See also:Asia See also:Minor, Palestine, with See also:Syria on the See also:north, was the high road of See also:civilization, See also:trade and warlike enterprise, and the See also:meeting-See also:place of religions . Its small principalities were entirely dominated by the great See also:Powers, whose weakness or acquiescence alone enabled them to rise above dependence or vassalage . The land was traversed by old-established trade routes and possessed important harbours on the Gulf of `See also:Akaba and on the Mediterranean See also:coast, the latter exposing it to the See also:influence of the Levantine culture . It was " the See also:physical centre of those movements of history from which. the See also:world has grown." The portion of this See also:district abutting upon the Mediterranean may be divided into two See also:main parts:—Syria (from the See also:Taurus to See also:Hermon) and Palestine (southward to the See also:desert bordering upon Egypt) . The latter is about 150 M. from north to See also:south (the proverbial " See also:Dan to See also:Beersheba "), with a breadth varying from 25 to 8o m., i.e. about 604o sq. m . This excludes the land See also:east of the See also:Jordan, on which see PALESTINE . From See also:time to time streams of See also:migration swept into Palestine and Syria .

Semitic tribes wandered northwards from their See also:

home in Arabia to seek sustenance in its more fertile See also:fields, to See also:plunder, or to See also:escape the pressure of tribes in the See also:rear . The course leads naturally into either Palestine or Babylonia, and, following the Euphrates, See also:northern Syria is eventually reached . Tribes also moved down from the north: nomads, or offshoots from the powerful states which stretch into Asia Minor . Such frequently recurring movements introduced new See also:blood . Tribes, chiefly of See also:pastoral habits, settled down among others who were so nearly of their own type that a See also:complete amalgamation could be effected, and this without any marked modification of the general characteristics of the earlier inhabitants . It is from such a See also:fusion as this that the ancestors of the Jews were descended, and both the history and the See also:genius of this people can be properly understood only by taking into See also:account the physical features of their land and the characteristics of the Semitic races in general (see PALESTINE, SEMITIC See also:LANGUAGES) . 2 . Society and See also:Religion.—The similarity uniting the peoples of the East in respect of racial and social characteristics is accompanied by a striking similarity of See also:mental outlook which has survived to See also:modern times . Palestine, in spite of the numerous vicissitudes to which it has been subjected, has not lost its fundamental characteristics . The See also:political changes involved in the Babylonian, See also:Assyrian, See also:Egyptian or Persian conquests surely affected it as little as the subsequent waves of Greek, Roman and other See also:European invasions . Even during the temporary Hellenization in the second great See also:period the See also:character of the people as a whole was untouched by the various See also:external influences which produced so great an effect on the upper classes . When the See also:foreign civilization perished, the old culture once more came to the See also:surface .

Hence it is possible, by a comprehensive See also:

comparative study of Eastern peoples, in both ancient and modern times, to supplement and illustrate within certain limits our See also:direct knowledge of the early Jewish people, and thus to understand more clearly those characteristics which were See also:peculiar to them, in relation to those which they shared with other See also:Oriental peoples . Even before See also:authentic history begins, the elements of religion and society had already crystallized into a solid coherent structure which was to persist without essential modification . Religion was inseparable from See also:ordinary See also:life, and, like that of all peoples who are dependent on the fruits of the See also:earth, was a nature-See also:worship . The tie between deities and worshippers was regarded as physical and entailed mutual obligations . The study of the See also:clan-See also:group as an organization is as instructive here as in other fields . The members of each group lived on terms of equality, the families forming a society of worship the See also:rites of which were conducted by the See also:head . Such See also:groups (each with its See also:local deity) would combine for definite purposes under the impulse of external needs, but owing to inevitable See also:internal jealousies and the incessant feuds among a people averse from discipline and authority, the unions were not necessarily lasting . The elders of these groups possessed some influence, and tended to See also:form an See also:aristocracy, which took the See also:lead in social life, although their authority generally depended merely upon See also:custom . Individual leaders in times of stress acquired a recognized supremacy, and, once a tribe outstripped the See also:rest, the opportunities for continued advance gave further See also:scope to their authority . " The interminable feuds of tribes, conducted on the theory of blood-revenge, . . . can seldom be durably healed without the intervention of a third party who is called in as arbiter, and in this way an impartial and See also:wise See also:power acquires of See also:necessity a great and beneficent influence over all around it " (W . R .

See also:

Smith) . In time, notwithstanding a certain inherent See also:individualism and impatience of See also:control, veritable despotisms arose in the Semitic world, although such organizations were invariably liable to sudden collapse as the old forms of life See also:broke down with changing conditions.' 3 . Early History.2—Already in the 15th See also:century B.C . Palestine was inhabited by a settled people whose See also:language, thought and religion were not radically different several See also:hundred years later . Small native princes ruled as vassals of Egypt which, after expelling the See also:Hyksos from its See also:borders, had entered upon a See also:series of conquests as far as the Euphrates . Some centuries previously, however, Babylonia had laid claim to the western states, and the Babylonian (i.e . Assyrian) script and language were now used, not merely in the See also:diplomatic See also:correspondence between Egypt and Asia, but also for matters of private and everyday life among the Palestinian princes themselves . To what extent specific Babylonian influence showed itself in other directions is not completely known . See also:Canaan (Palestine and the south Phoenician coast land) and Amor (See also:Lebanon district and beyond) were under the See also:constant supervision of Egypt, and Egyptian officials journeyed See also:round to collect See also:tribute, to attend to complaints, and to assure themselves of the See also:allegiance of the vassals . The Amarna tablets and those more recently found at Taannek (bibl . Taanach), together with the contemporary archaeological See also:evidence (from See also:Lachish, See also:Gezer, Megiddo, See also:Jericho, &c.), represent advanced conditions of life and culture, the precise See also:chronological limits of which cannot be determined with certainty . This age, with its See also:regular maritime intercourse between the See also:Aegean settlements, See also:Phoenicia and the See also:Delta, and with lines of caravans connecting Babylonia, North Syria, Arabia and Egypt, presents a remarkable picture of life and activity, in the centre of which lies Palestine, with here and there Egyptian colonies and some traces of Egyptian cults .

The history of this, the " Amarna " age, reveals a See also:

state of anarchy in Palestine for which the weakness of Egypt and the downward pressure of north Syrian On the homogeneity of the See also:population, see further, W . R . Smith, Religion of the Semites (2nd ed., chaps. i.–iii.) ; T . See also:Noldeke, Sketches from Eastern History, pp . 1—20 (on " Some Characteristics of the Semitic See also:Race ") ; and especially E . See also:Meyer, Gesch. d . Altertums (2nd ed., i . § § 330, sqq.) . For the relation between the See also:geographical characteristics and the political history, see G . A . Smith, See also:Historical See also:Geography of the See also:Holy Land . 2 For See also:fuller See also:information on this See also:section see PALESTINE: History, and the related portions of BABYLONIA AND See also:ASSYRIA, EGYPT, See also:HITTITES, SYRIA.peoples were responsible .

Subdivided into a number of little local principalities, Palestine was suffering both from internal intrigues and from the designs of this northern power . It is now that we find the restless IHabiru, a name which is commonly identified with that of the " Hebrews " ('ibrim) . They offer themselves where necessary to either party, and some at least perhaps belonged to the settled population . The growing prominence of the new northern group of " Hittite " states continued to occupy the energies of Egypt, and when again we have more external See also:

light upon Palestinian history, the Hittites (q.v.) are found strongly entrenched in the land . But by the end of the first See also:quarter of the 13th century B.C . Egypt had recovered its See also:province (precise boundary uncertain), leaving its rivals in See also:possession of Syria . Towards the See also:close of the 13th century the Egyptian See also:king Merneptah (Mineptah) records a successful See also:campaign in Palestine, and alludes to the defeat of Canaan, See also:Ascalon, Gezer, Yenuam (in Lebanon) and (the people or tribe) Israel.3 Bodies of aliens from the Levantine coast had previously threatened Egypt and Syria, and at the beginning of the 12th century they formed a See also:coalition on land and See also:sea which taxed all the resources of See also:Rameses III . In the Purasati, apparently the most influential of these peoples, may be recognized the origin of the name " See also:Philistine." The Hittite power became weaker, and the invaders, in spite of defeat, appear to have succeeded in maintaining themselves on the sea coast . External history, however, is very fragmentary just at the age when its evidence would be most welcome . For a time the See also:fate of Syria and See also:Pales-tine seems to have been no longer controlled by the great powers . When the See also:curtain rises again we enter upon the historical traditions of the Old Testament . 4 .

Biblical History.—For the rest of the first period the Old Testament forms the main source . It contains in fact the history itself in two forms: (a) from the creation of See also:

man to the fall of See also:Judah (See also:Genesis–2 See also:Kings), which is supplemented and continued further—(b) to the foundation of Judaism in the 5th century B.C . (See also:ChroniclesSee also:Ezra-See also:Nehemiah) . In the light of contemporary monuments, archaeological evidence, the progress of scientific knowledge and the recognized methods of modern historical See also:criticism, the See also:representation of the origin of mankind and of the history of the Jews in the Old Testament can no longer be implicitly accepted . Written by an Oriental people and clothed in an Oriental See also:dress, the Old Testament does not contain See also:objective records, but subjective history written and incorporated for specific purposes . Like many Oriental See also:works it is a compilation, as may be illustrated from a comparison of Chronicles with See also:Samuel–Kings, and the representation of the past in the light of the present (as exemplified in Chronicles) is a frequently recur-See also:ring phenomenon . The See also:critical examination of the nature and growth of this compilation has removed much that had formerly caused insuperable difficulties and had quite unnecessarily been made an integral or a relevant See also:part of See also:practical religion . On the other See also:hand, criticism has given a deeper meaning to the Old Testament history, and has brought into See also:relief the central truths which really are vital; it may be said to have replaced a divine account of man by man's account of the divine . Scholars are now almost unanimously agreed that the internal features are best explained by the See also:Graf-See also:Wellhausen See also:hypothesis . This involves the view that the historical traditions are mainly due to two characteristic though very complicated recensions, one under the influence of the teaching of See also:Deuteronomy (See also:Joshua to Kings, see § 20), the other, of a more priestly character (akin to See also:Leviticus), of somewhat later date (Genesis to Joshua, with traces in See also:Judges to Kings, see § 23) . There are, of course, numerous problems See also:relating to the nature, limits and See also:dates of the two recensions, of the incorporated See also:sources, and of other sources (whether early or See also:late) of See also:independent origin; and here there is naturally See also:room for much divergence of See also:opinion . Older material (often of composite origin) has been used, not so much for the purpose of providing historical information, as with the See also:object of showing the religious significance of past history; Or land Israel, W .

Spiegelberg, Orient . Lit . Zeit. xi . (19o8), cols . 403–405 . and the series Joshua-Kings is actually included among the " prophets " in Jewish reckoning (see See also:

MIDRASH) . In general, one may often observe that freedom which is characteristic of early and unscientific historians . Thus one may See also:note the reshaping of older material to agree with later thought, the See also:building up of past periods from the records of other periods, and a frequent loss of See also:perspective . The historical traditions are to be supplemented by the great See also:body of prophetic, legal and poetic literature. which reveal contemporary conditions in various internal See also:literary, theological or sociological features . The investigation of their true historical background and of the trustworthiness of their external setting (e.g. titles of See also:psalms, dates and headings of prophecies) involves a criticism of the historical traditions themselves, and thus the two See also:major classes of material must be constantly examined both separately and in their bearing on one another . In a word, the study of biblical history, which is dependent in the first instance upon the written sources, demands constant See also:attention to the See also:text (which has had an interesting history) and to the literary features; and it requires a sympathetic acquaintance with Oriental life and thought, both ancient and modern, an appreciation of the necessity of employing the methods of scientific See also:research, and (from the theological side) a reasoned estimate of the dependence of individual religious convictions upon the See also:letter of the Old Testament.' In view of the numerous articles in this See also:work dealing with biblical subjects,' the present See also:sketch is limited to the outlines of the traditional history; the religious aspect in its bearing upon biblical See also:theology (which is closely See also:bound up with the traditions) is handled separately under See also:HEBREW RELIGION . The related literature is enormous (see the See also:bibliographies to the See also:special articles) ; it is indexed annually in Orientalische Bibliographie (See also:Berlin), and is usefully summarized in the Theologische Jahresbericht (Berlin) .

On the development of the study of biblical history see C . A . See also:

Briggs, Study of Holy Scripture (1899), especially ch. xx . The first scientific historical work was by H . See also:Ewald, Gesch. d . Volkes Israel (1843; 3rd ed., 1864–1868; Eng. trans., 1869–1883), popularized by See also:Arthur See also:Penrhyn See also:Stanley in his Hirt. of the Jewish See also:Church (1863–1879) . The works of J . Wellhausen (especially Prolegomena to the Hist. of Israel, Eng. trans., 1885, also the brilliant See also:article " Israel " in the 9th ed. of the Ency . Brit., 1879) were See also:epoch-making; his position was interpreted to See also:English readers by W . See also:Robertson Smith (Old Test. in Jewish Church, 1881, 2nd ed., 1892; Prophets of Israel, 1882, 2nd ed. by T . K . See also:Cheyne, 1902) .

The historical (and related) works of T . K . Cheyne, H . See also:

Graetz, H . Guthe, F . C . See also:Kent, A . Kittel, W . H . Kosters, A . See also:Kuenen, C . Piepenbring, and especially B .

See also:

Stade, al-though varying greatly in standpoint, are among the most valuable by See also:recent scholars; H . P . Smith's Old Test . Hest . (" See also:International Theological Library," See also:Edinburgh, 1903) is in many respects the most serviceable and complete study; a modern and more critical " Ewald " is a desideratum . For the works of numerous other scholars who have furthered Old Testament research in the past it must suffice to refer to the annotated See also:list by J . M . P . Smith, Books for D.T . Study (See also:Chicago, 1908) . For the external history, E . See also:Schrader, See also:Cuneiform Inscr. and the Old Testament (Eng. trans. by O .

C . Whitehouse, 1885–1888) is still helpful ; among the less technical works are J . F . McCurdy, History, Prophecy and the Monuments; B . See also:

Paton, Syria and Palestine (1902); G . See also:Maspero, Hist. ancienne (6th ed., 1904) ; A . Jeremias, Alte Test. See also:im Lichte d . See also:Allen Orients (2nd ed., 1906); and especially Altoriental . Texte u . Bilder zum Allen Test., ed. by H . Gressman, with A . Ungnad and H .

See also:

Ranke (1909) . The most complete is that of Ed . Meyer, Gesch. d . Alterthums (2nd ed., 1907 sqq.) . That of Jeremias follows upon the lines of H . Winckler, whose works depart from the some-what narrow limits of purely " Israelite " histories, emphasize the necessity of observing the characteristics of Oriental thought and policy, and are invaluable for discriminating students . Winckler's own views are condensed in the 3rd edition—a re-See also:writing—of Schrader's work (Keilinschr. u. d . Alte Testament, 1903), and, with an instructive account of the history of " ancient nearer Asia," in H . F . Helmolt's World's History, iii . 1–252 (1903) . All modern i It is useful to compare the critical study of the See also:Koran (q.v.), where, however, the investigation of its various " revelations " is simpler than that of the biblical " prophecies " on account of the greater See also:wealth of independent historical tradition .

See also G . B . See also:

Gray, Contemporary See also:Review (See also:July 1907) ; A . A . Bevan, See also:Cambridge Biblical Essays (ed . Swete, 1909), pp . 1–19 . 2 See primarily See also:BIBLE: Old Testament; the articles on the See also:con-tents and literary structure of the several books; the various See also:biographical, topographical and ethnical articles, and the See also:separate treatment of the more important subjects (e.g . See also:LEVITES, See also:PROPHET, See also:SACRIFICE).histories of any value are necessarily compromises between the biblical traditions and the results of recent investigation, and those studies which appear to depart most widely from the biblical or canonical representation often do greater See also:justice to the evidence as a whole than the slighter or more conservative and apologetic reconstructions.' Scientific biblical historical study, nevertheless, is still in a relatively backward See also:condition; and although the labours of scholars since Ewald constitute a distinct epoch, the trend of research points to the recognition of the fact that the purely subjective literary material requires a more historical treatment in the light of our increasing knowledge of external and internal conditions in the oid Oriental world . But an inductive and deductive treatment, both comprehensive and in due proportion, does not as yet (1910) exist, and awaits fuller external evidence.' 5 . Traditions of Origin.—The Old Testament preserves the remains of an extensive literature, representing different stand-points, which passed through several hands before it reached its present form . Surrounded by ancient civilizations where writing had See also:long been known, and enjoying, as excavation has proved, a considerable amount of material culture, Palestine could look back upon a lengthy and stirring history which, however, has rarely See also:left its See also:mark upon our records .

Whatever ancient sources may have been accessible, whatever trustworthy traditions were in circulation, and whatever a knowledge of the ancient Oriental world might lead one to expect, one is naturally restricted in the first instance to those undated records which have survived in the form which the last editors gave to them . The critical investigation of these records is the indispensable prelude to all serious biblical study, and hasty or sweeping deductions from monumental or archaeological evidence, or versions compiled promiscuously from materials of distinct origin, are alike hazardous . A glimpse at Palestine in the latter See also:

half of the second See also:millennium B.C . (§ 3) prepares us for busy scenes and active intercourse, but it is not a history of this See also:kind which the biblical historians themselves transmit . At an age when—on literary-critical grounds—the Old Testament writings were assuming their present form, it was possible to See also:divide the immediately preceding centuries into three distinct periods . (a) The first, that of the two See also:rival kingdoms: Israel (See also:Ephraim or See also:Samaria) in the northern half of Palestine, and Judah in the south . Then (b) the former lost its See also:independence towards the close of the 8th century B.C., when a number of its inhabitants were carried away; and the latter shared the fate of See also:exile at the beginning of the 6th, but succeeded in making a fresh reconstruction some fifty or sixty years later . Finally (c), in the so-called " See also:post-exilic " period, religion and life were reorganized under the influence of a new spirit; relations with Samaria were broken off, and Judaism took its definite character, perhaps about the See also:middle or close of the 5th century . Throughout these vicissitudes there were important political and religious changes which render the study of the composite sources a work of unique difficulty . In addition to this it should be noticed that the See also:term " See also:Jew " (originally Yehudi), in spite of its wider application, means properly " man of Judah," i.e. of that small district which, with Jerusalem as its See also:capital, became the centre of Judaism . The favourite name " Israel " with all its religious and See also:national associations is some-what ambiguous in an historical sketch, since, although it is used as opposed to Judah (a), it ultimately came to designate the true See also:nucleus of the worshippers of the national See also:god .Yahweh as op-posed to the See also:Samaritans, the later inhabitants of Israelite territory (c) . A more general term is " Hebrew " (see HEBREW LANGUAGE), which, whether originally identical with the I,Iabiru or not (§ 3), is used in contrast to foreigners, and this non-committal ethnic On the bearing of external evidence upon the internal biblical records, see especially S .

R . See also:

Driver's See also:essay in See also:Hogarth's Authority and See also:Archaeology; cf. also A . A . Bevan, Critical Review (1897), p . 406 sqq., 1898, pp . 131 sqq.); G . B . Gray, Expositor, May 1898; W . G . Jordan, Bib . Grit. and Modern Thought (1909), pp . 42 sqq .

For the sections which follow the present writer may be permitted to refer to his See also:

introductory contributions in the Expositor (See also:June, 1906; " The Criticism of the O.T.") ; the Jewish Quarterly Review (July 1905–See also:January 1907 = Critical Notes on O.T . History, especially sections vii.–ix.); July and See also:October 1907, See also:April 1908; Amer . Journ . Theol . (July 1909, ' See also:Simeon and See also:Levi: the Problem of the Old Testament ") ; and Swete's Cambridge Bib . Essays, pp . 54–89 (" The Present See also:Stage of O.T . Research ") . deserves preference where precise distinction is unnecessary or impossible . The traditions which prevailed among the Hebrews concerning their origin belong to a time when Judah and Israel were regarded as a unit . Twelve divisions or tribes, of which Judah was one, held together by a traditional sentiment, were traced back to the sons of See also:Jacob (otherwise known as Israel), the son of See also:Isaac and See also:grandson of See also:Abraham . Their names vary in origin and probably also in point of age, and where they represent fixed territorial limits, the districts so described were in some cases certainly peopled by groups of non-Israelite ancestry .

But as tribal names they invited explanation, and of the many characteristic traditions which were doubtless current a number have been preserved, though not in any very early dress . Close relationship was recognized with the Aramaeans, with See also:

Edom, See also:Moab and See also:Ammon . This is characteristically expressed when See also:Esau, the ancestor of Edom, is represented as the See also:brother of Jacob, or when Moab and Ammon are the See also:children of See also:Lot, Abraham's See also:nephew (see See also:GENEALOGY: Biblical) . Abraham, it was believed, came from See also:Hassan (Carrhae), primarily from Babylonia, and Jacob re-enters from See also:Gilead in the north-east with his Aramaean wives and concubines and their families (See also:Benjamin excepted) . It is on this occasion that Jacob's name is changed to Israel . These traditions of migration and kinship are in them-selves entirely credible, but the detailed accounts of the ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as given in Genesis, are inherently doubtful as regards both the internal conditions, which the (late) chronological See also:scheme ascribes to the first half of the second millennium B.C., and the general circumstances of the life of these strangers in a foreign land . From a variety of independent reasons one is forced to conclude that, whatever historical elements they may contain, the stories of this remote past represent the form which tradition had taken in a very much later age . Opinion is at variance regarding the patriarchal narratives as a whole . To deny their historical character is to reject them as trustworthy accounts of the age to which they are ascribed, and even those scholars who claim that they are essentially historical already go so far as to concede idealization and the possibility or See also:probability of later revision . The failure to apprehend historical method has often led to the fallacious See also:argument that the See also:trust-worthiness of individual features justifies our accepting the whole, or that the elimination of unhistorical elements will leave an historical residuum . Here and frequently elsewhere in biblical history it is necessary to allow that a genuine historical tradition may be clothed in an unhistorical dress, but since many diverse motives are often concentrated upon one narrative (e.g . Gen. xxxii .

22-32, xxxiv., xxxviii.), the work of internal historical criticism (in view of the scantiness of the evidence) can rarely claim finality . The patriarchal narratives themselves belong to the popular stock of tradition of which only a portion has been preserved . Many of the elements See also: