Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

KNIGHTHOOD

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V15, Page 860 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

KNIGHTHOOD  and See also:

CHIVALRY . These two words, which are nearly but not quite synonymous, designate a single subject of inquiry, which presents itself under three different although connected and in a measure intermingled aspects . It may be regarded in the first See also:place as a mode or variety of feudal See also:tenure, in the second place as a See also:personal attribute or dignity, and in the third place as a See also:scheme of See also:manners or social arrangements . The first of these aspects is discussed under the headings See also:FEu-DALISM and See also:KNIGHT SERVICE: we are concerned here only with the second and third . For the more important religious as distinguished from the military orders of knighthood or chivalry the reader is referred to the headings ST See also:JOHN OF See also:JERUSALEM, KNIGHTS OF; See also:TEUTONIC KNIGHTS; and See also:TEMPLARS . " The growth of knighthood " (writes See also:Stubbs) " is a subject on which the greatest obscurity prevails ": and, though J . H . See also:Round has done much to explain the introduction of the See also:system into See also:England,' its actual origin on the See also:continent of See also:Europe is still obscure in many of its most important details . The words knight and knighthood are merely the See also:modern forms of the Anglo-Saxon or Old See also:English cniht and cnihthdd . Of these 1 Feudal England, pp . 225 sqq . KNIGHTHOOD 851 the See also:primary signification of the first was a boy or youth, and of the second that See also:period of See also:life which intervenes between See also:child-See also:hood and manhood .

But some See also:

time before the See also:middle of the 12th See also:century they had acquired the meaning they still retain of the See also:French See also:chevalier and chevalerie . In a secondary sense cniht meant a servant or attendant answering to the See also:German Knecht, and in the Anglo-Saxon Gospels a See also:disciple is described as a leorning cniht . In a See also:tertiary sense the word appears to have been occasionally employed as See also:equivalent to the Latin See also:miles—usually translated by See also:thegn—which in the earlier middle ages was used as the designation of the domestic as well as of the See also:martial See also:officers or retainers of sovereigns and princes or See also:great See also:person-ages.' See also:Sharon See also:Turner suggests that cniht from meaning an attendant simply may have come to mean more especially a military attendant, and that in this sense it may have gradually superseded the word thegn.' But the word thegn itself, that is, when it was used as the description of an attendant of the See also:king, appears to have meant more especially a military attendant . As Stubbs says " the thegn seems to be primarily the See also:warrior gesith "—the gesithas forming the chosen See also:band of companions (comites) of the German chiefs (principes) noticed by See also:Tacitus—" he is probably the gesith who had a particular military See also:duty in his See also:master's service "; and he adds that from the reign of See also:Athelstan " the gesith is lost sight of except very occasionally, the more important class having become thegns, and the lesser sort sinking into the See also:rank of See also:mere servants of the king."' It is See also:pretty clear, therefore, that the word cniht could never have superseded the word thegn in the sense of a military attendant, at all events of the king . But besides the king, the ealdormen, bishops and king's thegns themselves had their thegns, and to these it is more than probable that the name of cniht was applied . Around the Anglo-Saxon magnates were collected a See also:crowd of retainers and dependants of all ranks and conditions; and there is See also:evidence enough to show that among them were some called cnihtas who were not always the humblest or least considerable of their number.' The testimony of Domesday also establishes the existence in the reign of See also:Edward the See also:Confessor of what Stubbs describes as a " large class " of landholders who had commended themselves to some See also:lord, and he regards it as doubtful whether their tenure had not already assumed a really feudal See also:character . But in any event it is See also:manifest that their See also:condition was in many respects similar to that of a vast number of unquestionably feudal and military tenants who made their See also:appearance after the See also:Norman See also:Conquest . If consequently the former were called cnihtas under the Anglo-Saxon regime, it seems sufficiently probable that the appellation should have been continued to the latter—practically their successors—under the Anglo-Norman regime . And if the designation of knights was first applied to the military tenants of the earls, bishops and barons—who although they held their lands of See also:mesne lords owed their services to the king—the See also:extension of that designation to the whole See also:body of military tenants need not have been a very violent or prolonged See also:process . Assuming, however, that knight was originally used to describe the military See also:tenant of a See also:noble person, as cniht had sometimes been used to describe the thegn of a noble person, it would, to begin with, have defined rather his social status than the nature of his services . But those whom the English called knights 'the See also:Normans called chevaliers, by which See also:term the nature of their services was defined, while their social status was See also:left out of See also:consideration . And at first chevalier in its See also:general and honorary signification seems to have been rendered not by knight but by rider, as may be inferred from the Anglo-Saxon See also:Chronicle, wherein it is recorded under the See also:year 1o85 that See also:William the Conqueror "dubbade his sunu Henric to ridere."' But, as E .

A . See also:

Freeman says, " no such See also:title is heard of in the earlier days of England . The thegn, the ealdorman, the king himself, fought on See also:foot; the See also:horse might See also:bear him to the See also:field, but when the fighting ' Du Cange, See also:Gloss., s.v . " Miles." a See also:History of England, iii . 12 . ' Stubbs, Constitutional History, i . 156 . ' Ibid. i . 156, 366; Turner, iii . 125-129 . 6 See also:Ingram's edition, p . 29o .

itself came he stood on his native See also:

earth to receive the onslaught of her enemies." 1 In this perhaps we may behold one of the most See also:ancient of See also:British insular prejudices, for on the Continent the importance of See also:cavalry in warfare was already abundantly understood . It was by means of their horsemen that the Austrasian See also:Franks established their superiority over their neighbours, and in time created the Western See also:Empire anew, while from the word caballarius, which occurs in the Capitularies in the reign of See also:Charlemagne, came the words for knight in all the See also:Romance See also:languages.' In See also:Germany the chevalier was called See also:Ritter, but neither rider nor chevalier prevailed against knight in England . And it was See also:long after knighthood had acquired its See also:present meaning with us that chivalry was incorporated into our See also:language . It may be remarked too in passing that in See also:official Latin, not only in England but all over Europe, the word miles held its own against both eques and caballarius . Concerning the origin of knighthood or chivalry as it existed in the middle ages—implying as it did a formal See also:assumption of Origin of and See also:initiation into the profession of arms—nothing See also:Medieval beyond more or less probable conjecture is possible . Kaighthood.The medieval knights had nothing to do in the way of derivation with the " See also:equites " of See also:Rome, the knights of King See also:Arthur's Round Table, or the Paladins of Charlemagne . But there are grounds for believing that some of the rudiments of chivalry are to be detected in See also:early Teutonic customs, and that they may have made some advance among the Franks of See also:Gaul . We know from Tacitus that the German tribes in his See also:day were wont to celebrate the See also:admission of their See also:young men into the ranks of their warriors with much circumstance and ceremony . The See also:people of the See also:district to which the See also:candidate belonged were called together; his qualifications for the privileges about to be conferred upon him were inquired into; and, if he were deemed fitted and worthy to receive them, his See also:chief, his See also:father, or one of his near kinsmen presented him with a See also:shield and a See also:lance . Again, among the Franks we find Charlemagne girding his son See also:Louis the Pious, and Louis the Pious girding his son See also:Charles the Bald with the See also:sword, when they arrived at manhood.' It seems certain here that some ceremony was observed which was deemed worthy of See also:record not for its novelty, but as a thing of recognized importance . It does not follow that a similar ceremony extended to personages less exalted than the sons of See also:kings and emperors . But if it did we must naturally suppose that it applied in the first instance to the mounted warriors who formed the most formidable portion of the warlike See also:array of the Franks .

It was among the Franks indeed, and possibly through their experiences in See also:

war with the See also:Saracens, that cavalry first acquired the pre-eminent place which it long maintained in every See also:European See also:country . In early society, where the See also:army is not a paid force but the armed nation, the cavalry must necessarily consist of the noble and wealthy, and cavalry and chivalry, as Freeman observes,' will be the same . Since then we discover in the Capitularies of Charlemagne actual mention of " caballarii " as a class of warriors, it may reasonably be concluded that formal See also:investiture with arms applied to the "caballarii " if it was a usage extending beyond the See also:sovereign and his See also:heir-apparent . " But," as See also:Hallam says, " he who fought on horseback and had been invested with See also:peculiar arms in a See also:solemn manner wanted nothing more to render him a knight; " and so he concludes, in view of the verbal identity of " chevalier " and " caballarius," that " we may refer chivalry in a general sense to the See also:age of Charlemagne." b Yet, if the " caballarii " of the Capitularies are really the pre-cursors of the later knights, it remains a difficulty that the Latin name for a knight is " miles," although " caballarius " became in various forms the See also:vernacular designation . Before it was known that the chronicle ascribed to Ingulf of Croyland is really a fiction of the 13th or 14th century, the knighting of Heward or See also:Hereward by See also:Brand, See also:abbot of See also:Burgh 1 See also:Comparative Politics, p . 94 . 2 See also:Baluze, Capitularia Regum Francorum, ii . 794, 1069 . ' Du Cange, Gloss., s.v . Arma." 4 Freeman, Comparative Politics, p . 73 . ' Hallam, Middle Ages, iii .

392.(now See also:

Peterborough), was accepted from See also:Selden to Hallam as an See also:historical fact, and knighthood was supposed, not only to have been known among the Anglo-See also:Saxons, but to Knighthood have had a distinctively religious character which in England. was contemned by the Norman invaders . The genuine evidence at our command altogether fails to support this view . When William of See also:Malmesbury describes the knighting of Athelstan by his grandfather See also:Alfred the Great, that is, his investiture " with a See also:purple garment set with gems and a Saxon sword with a See also:golden sheath," there is no hint of any religious observance . In spite of the silence of our records, Dr Stubbs thinks that kings so well acquainted with See also:foreign usages as See also:Ethelred, Canute and Edward the Confessor could hardly have failed to introduce into England the institution of chivalry then springing up in every country of Europe; and he is sup-ported in this See also:opinion by the circumstance that it is nowhere mentioned as a Norman innovation . Yet the fact that Harold received knighthood from William of See also:Normandy makes it clear either that Harold was not yet a knight, which in the See also:case of so tried a warrior would imply that " dubbing to knighthood " was not yet known in England even under Edward the Confessor, or, as Freeman thinks, that in the middle of the nth century the See also:custom had grown in Normandy into " something of a more See also:special meaning " than it See also:bore in England . Regarded as a method of military organization, the feudal system of tenures was always far better adapted to the purposes of defensive than of offensive warfare . Against invasion it furnished a permanent See also:provision both in men-at-arms and strong-holds; nor was it unsuited for the See also:campaigns of neighbouring See also:counts and barons which lasted for only a few See also:weeks, and ex-tended over only a few leagues . But when kings and kingdoms were in conflict, and distant and prolonged expeditions became necessary, it was speedily discovered that the unassisted re-See also:sources of See also:feudalism were altogether inadequate . It became therefore the manifest See also:interest of both parties that personal services should be commuted into pecuniary payments . Then there See also:grew up all over Europe a system of fining the knights who failed to See also:respond to the sovereign's See also:call or to stay their full time in the field; and in England this See also:fine See also:developed, from the reign of See also:Henry II. to that of Edward II., into a See also:regular war-tax called escuage or soilage (q.v.) . In this way funds for war were placed at the See also:free disposal of sovereigns, and, although the feudatories and their retainers still formed the most considerable portion of their armies, the conditions under which they served were altogether changed . Their military service was now far more the result of special agreement .

In the reign of Edward I., whose warlike enterprises after he was king were confined within the four seas, this alteration does not seem to have proceeded very far, and See also:

Scotland and See also:Wales were subjugated by what was in the See also:main, if not exclusively, a feudal See also:militia raised as of old by See also:writ to the earls and barons and the sheriffs.' But the armies of Edward III., Henry V. and Henry VI. during the century of intermittent war-fare between England and See also:France were recruited and sustained to a very great extent on the principle of See also:contract .? On the Continent the systematic employment of mercenaries was both an early and a See also:common practice . Besides consideration for the mutual convenience of sovereigns and their feudatories, there were other causes which materially contributed towards bringing about those changes in The the military system of Europe which were finally See also:Crusades . accomplished in the 13th and 14th centuries . During the Crusades vast armies were set on foot in which feudal rights ' Stubbs, Cons' . Hist. ii . 278; also compare See also:Grosse, Military Antiquities, i . 65, seq . There has been a general tendency to ignore the extent to which the armies of Edward III. were raised by compulsory levies even after the system of raising troops by free contract had begun . Luce (ch. vi.) points out how much England relied at this time on what would now be called See also:conscription: and his remarks are entirely See also:borne out by the See also:Norwich documents published by Mr W . See also:Hudson (Norf. and Norwich Archaeological See also:Soc. xiv . 263 sqq.), by a See also:Lynn See also:corporation document of 18th Edw .

III . (Hist . See also:

MSS . See also:Commission See also:Report XI . Appendix pt. iii. p . 189), and by See also:Smyth's Lives of the Berkeleys, i . 312, 319, 320 . and obligations had no place, and it was seen that the See also:volunteers who flocked to the See also:standards of the various commanders were not less but even more efficient in the field than the vassals they had hitherto been accustomed to See also:lead . It was thus established that pay, the love of enterprise and the prospect of See also:plunder—if we leave zeal for the sacred cause which they had espoused for the moment out of sight—were quite as useful for the purpose of enlisting troops and keeping them together as the tenure of See also:land and the solemnities of See also:homage and fealty . Moreover, the crusaders who survived the difficulties and dangers of an expedition to See also:Palestine were seasoned and experienced although frequently impoverished and landless soldiers, ready to hire themselves to the highest See also:bidder, and well See also:worth the See also:wages they received . Again, it was owing to the crusades that the See also:church took the profession of arms under her peculiar See also:protection, and thenceforward the ceremonies of initiation into it assumed a religious as well as a martial character . To distinguished soldiers of the See also:cross the honours and benefits of knighthood could hardly be refused on the ground that they Knighthood did not possess a sufficient See also:property qualification—See also:Independent of which perhaps they had denuded themselves in of Feudal- See also:order to their equipment for the See also:Holy War .

And ISf . thus the conception of knighthood as of something distinct from feudalism both as a social condition and a personal dignity arose and rapidly gained ground . It was then that the See also:

analogy was first detected between the order of knighthood and the order of priesthood, and that an actual See also:union of monachism and chivalry was effected by the See also:establishment of the religious orders of which the Knights Templars and the Knights Hospitallers were the most eminent examples . As comprehensive in their polity as the See also:Benedictines or See also:Franciscans, they gathered their members from, and soon scattered their possessions over, every country in Europe . And in their indifference to the distinctions of See also:race and See also:nationality they merely accommodated themselves to the spirit which had become characteristic of chivalry itself, already recognized, like the church, as a universal institution which knit together the whole warrior See also:caste of Christendom into one great fraternity irrespective alike of feudal subordination and territorial boundaries . Somewhat later the See also:adoption of hereditary surnames and armorial See also:bearings marked the existence of a large and noble class who either from the subdivision of fiefs or from the effects of the custom of See also:primogeniture were very insufficiently provided for . To them only two callings were generally open, that of the churchman and that of the soldier, and the latter as a See also:rule offered greater attractions than the former in antra of much See also:licence and little learning . Hence the favourite expedient for men of See also:birth, although not of See also:fortune, was to attach themselves to some See also:prince or See also:magnate in whose military service they were sure of an adequate See also:maintenance and might See also:hope for even a See also:rich See also:reward in the shape of See also:booty or of See also:ransom.' It is probably to this period, and these circumstances that we must look for at all events the rudimentary beginnings of the military as well as the religious orders of chivalry . Of the existence of any regularly constituted companionships of the first See also:kind there is no trustworthy evidence until between two and three centuries after See also:fraternities of the second kind had been organized . Soon after the greater crusading See also:societies had been formed similar orders, such as those of St See also:James of Compostella, Calatrava and See also:Alcantara, were established to fight the See also:Moors in See also:Spain instead of the Saracens in the Holy Land . But the members of these orders were not less monks than knights, their statutes embodied the rules of the See also:cloister, and they were See also:bound by the ecclesiastical vows of See also:celibacy, poverty and obedience . From a very early See also:stage in the development of chivalry, however, we meet with the singular institution of brotherhood in arms; and from it the ultimate origin if not of the religious fraternities at any See also:rate of the military See also:companion-See also:ships is usually derived ? By this institution a relation was 1 J .

B. de Lacurne de Sainte Palaye, Memoires sur l'Ancienne Chevalerie, i . 363, 364 (ed . 1781) . 2 Du Cange, Dissertation sur See also:

Joinville, xxi . ; Sainte Palaye, Memoires, i . 272 ; G . F . Beltz, Memorials of the Order of the Garter (1841,) p . )ovii.created between two or more monks by voluntary agreement, which was regarded as of far more intimacy and stringency than any which the mere See also:accident of See also:consanguinity implied . See also:Brothers in arms were supposed to be partners in all things See also:save the affections of their " See also:lady-loves." They shared in every danger and in every success, and each was expected to vindicate the See also:honour of another as promptly and zealously as his own . The See also:plot of the medieval romance of Amis and Amiles is built entirely on such a brotherhood . Their engagements usually lasted through life, but sometimes only for a specified period or during the continuance of specified circumstances, and they were always ratified by See also:oath, occasionally reduced to See also:writing in the shape of a solemn See also:bond and often sanctified by their reception of the See also:Eucharist together .

Romance and tradition speak of See also:

strange See also:rites—the mingling and even the drinking of See also:blood—as having in remote and See also:rude ages marked the inception of these martial and fraternal associations .3 But in later and less barbarous times they were generally evidenced and celebrated by a formal and reciprocal See also:exchange of weapons and See also:armour . In warfare it was customary for knights who were thus allied to appear similarly accoutred and bearing the same badges or cognisances, to the end that their enemies might not know with which of them they were in conflict, and that their See also:friends might be unable to See also:accord more See also:applause to one than to the other for his prowess in the field . It seems likely enough therefore that there should grow up bodies of knights banded together by engagements of fidelity, although free from monastic obligations; wearing a See also:uniform or See also:livery, and naming themselves after some special See also:symbol or some See also:patron See also:saint of their adoption . And such bodies placed under the command of a sovereign or See also:grand master, regulated by statutes, and enriched by ecclesiastical endowments would have been precisely what in after times such orders as the Garter in England, the Golden Fleece in See also:Burgundy, the Annunziata in See also:Savoy and the St See also:Michael and Holy See also:Ghost in France actually were.4 During the 14th and 15th centuries, as well as somewhat earlier and later, the general arrangements of a European army were always and everywhere pretty much the same.5 Under the sovereign the See also:constable and the See also:marshal 'irides of Knighthood . or marshals held the chief commands, their authority being partly See also:joint and partly several . Attendant on them were the heralds, who were the officers of their military See also:court, wherein offences committed in the See also:camp and field were tried and adjudged, and among whose duties it was to carry orders and messages, to deliver challenges and call truces, and to identify and number the wounded and the slain . The main divisions of the army were distributed under the royal and other See also:principal standards, smaller divisions under the See also:banners of some of the greater See also:nobility or of knights See also:banneret, and smaller divisions still under the pennons of knights or, as in distinction from knights banneret they came to be called, knights bachelors . All knights whether bachelors or bannerets were escorted by their squires . But the banner of the banneret always implied a more or less extensive command, while every knight was en-titled to bear a pennon and every See also:squire a pencel . All three flags were of such a See also:size as to be conveniently attached to and carried on a lance, and were emblazoned with the arms or some portion of the bearings of their owners . But while the banner was square the pennon, which resembled it in other respects, was either pointed or forked at its extremity, and the pencel, which was considerably less than the others, always terminated in a single tail or streamer.6 If indeed we look at the See also:scale of chivalric subordination from another point of view, it seems to be more properly divisible into four than into three stages, of which two may be called provisional and two final . The See also:bachelor and the banneret were both equally knights, only the one was of greater distinction and authority a Du Cange, Dissertation, xxi., and See also:Lancelot du See also:Lac, among other romances .

Anstis, See also:

Register of the Order of the Garter, i . 63 . 5 See also:Grose, Military Antiq. i . 207 seq . ; Stubbs, Const . Hist. ii . 276 seq., and iii . 278 seq . 6 Grose's Military Antiquities, ii . 256 . 15 than the other . In like manner the squire and the See also:page were both in training for knighthood, but the first had advanced further in the process than the second .

It is true that the squire was a combatant while the page was not, and that many squires voluntarily served as squires all their lives owing to the insufficiency of their fortunes to support the See also:

costs and charges of knighthood . But in the See also:ordinary course of a chivalrous See also:education the successive conditions of page and squire were passed through in boyhood and youth, and the condition of knighthood was reached in early manhood . Every feudal court and See also:castle was in fact a school of chivalry, and although princes and great personages were rarely actually pages or squires, the moral and See also:physical discipline through which they passed was not in any important particular different from that to which less exalted candidates for knighthood were subjected.' The page, or, as he was more anciently and more correctly called, the " See also:valet " or " damoiseau," commenced his service and instruction when he was between seven and eight years old, and the initial phase continued for seven or eight years longer . He acted as the See also:constant personal attendant of both his master and See also:mistress . He waited on them in their See also: