Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

LABRUM (Lat. for " lip ")

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V16, Page 31 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

LABRUM (See also:Lat. for " See also:lip ")  , the large See also:vessel of the warm See also:bath in the See also:Roman thermae . These were cut out of See also:great blocks of See also:marble and See also:granite, and have generally an overhanging See also:lip . There is one in the Vatican of See also:porphyry over 12 ft. in See also:diameter . The See also:term See also:labrum is used in See also:zoology, of a lip or lip-like See also:part; in See also:entomology it is applied specifically to the upper lip of an See also:insect, the See also:lower lip,being termed labium . LA BRUYERE, See also:JEAN DE (164 1696), See also:French essayist and moralist, was See also:born in See also:Paris on the 16th of See also:August 1645, and not, as was once the See also:common statement, at Dourdan (See also:Seine-et-See also:Oise) in 1639 . His See also:family was of the See also:middle class, and his reference to a certain See also:Geoffroy de la Bruyere, a crusader, is only a satirical See also:illustration of a method of self-ennoblement common in See also:France as in some other countries . Indeed he himself always signed the name Delabruyere in one word, thus avowing his roture . His progenitors, however, were of respectable position, and he could trace them back at least as far as his great-grandfather, who had been a strong Leaguer . La Bruyere's own See also:father was controller-See also:general of See also:finance to the Hotel de Ville . The son was educated by the Oratorians and at the university of See also:Orleans; he was called to the See also:bar, and in 1673 bought a See also:post in the See also:revenue See also:department at See also:Caen, which gave the status of noblesse and a certain income . In 1687 he sold this See also:office . His predecessor in it was a relation of See also:Bossuet, and it is thought that the transaction was the cause of La Bruyere's introduction to the great orator .

Bossuet, who from the date of his own preceptorship of the dauphin, was a See also:

kind of See also:agent-general for tutorships in the royal family. introduced him in 1684 to the See also:household of the great See also:Conde, to whose See also:grandson See also:Henri Jules de See also:Bourbon as well as to that See also:prince's girl-See also:bride Mlle de See also:Nantes, one of See also:Louis XIV.'s natural See also:children, La Bruyere became See also:tutor . The See also:rest of his See also:life was passed in the household of the prince or else at See also:court, and he seems to have profited by the inclination which all the Conde family had for the society of men of letters . Very little is known LA BRUYERE of the events of this part—or, indeed, of any part—of his life . The impression derived from the few notices of him is of a silent, observant, but somewhat awkward See also:man, resembling in See also:manners See also:Joseph See also:Addison, whose See also:master in literature La Bruyere undoubtedly was . Yet despite the numerous enemies which his See also:book raised up for him, most of these notices are favourable—notably that of See also:Saint-See also:Simon, an acute See also:judge and one bitterly prejudiced against roturiers generally . There is, however, a curious passage in a See also:letter from Boileau to See also:Racine in which he regrets that " nature has not made La Bruyere as agreeable as he would like to be." His Caracteres appeared in 1688, and at once, as See also:Nicolas de Malezieu had predicted, brought him " Bien See also:des lecteurs et bien des ennemis." At the See also:head of these were See also:Thomas See also:Corneille, See also:Fontenelle and See also:Benserade, who were See also:pretty clearly aimed at in the book, as well as innumerable other persons, men and See also:women of letters as well as of society, on whom the cap of La Bruyere's See also:fancy-portraits was fitted by See also:manuscript "keys " compiled by the scribblers of the See also:day . The friendship of Bossuet and still more the See also:protection of the Condes sufficiently defended the author, and he continued to insert fresh portraits of his contemporaries in each new edition of his book, especially in the 4th (1689) . Those, however, whom he had attacked were powerful in the See also:Academy, and numerous defeats awaited La Bruyere before he could make his way into that guarded hold . He was defeated thrice in 1691, and on one memorable occasion he had but seven votes, five of which were those of Bossuet, Boileau, Racine, See also:Pellisson and See also:Bussy-Rabutin . It was not till 1693 that he was elected, and even then an See also:epigram, which, considering his admitted insignificance in conversation, was not of the worst, haesit lateri: " Quand la Bruyere se presente Pourquoi faut it crier See also:haro ? Pour faire un nombre de quarante Ne falloit ii pas un zero ? " His unpopularity was, however, chiefly confined to the subjects of his sarcastic See also:portraiture, and to the hack writers of the See also:time, of whom he was wont to speak with a disdain only surpassed by that of See also:Pope .

His description of the Mercure galant as " immediatement au dessous de rien " is the best-remembered specimen of these unwise attacks; and would of itself See also:

account for the enmity of the editors, Fontenelle and the younger Corneille . La Bruyere's discourse of See also:admission at the Academy, one of the best of its kind, was, like his admission itself, severely criticized, especially by the partisans of the " Moderns " in the " See also:Ancient and See also:Modern " See also:quarrel . With the Caracteres, the See also:translation of See also:Theophrastus, and a few letters, most of them addressed to the prince de Conde, it completes the See also:list of his See also:literary See also:work, with the exception of a curious and much-disputed See also:posthumous See also:treatise . La Bruyere died very suddenly, and not See also:long after his admission to the Academy . He is said to have been struck with dumbness in an See also:assembly of his See also:friends, and, being carried See also:home to the Hotel de Conde, to have expired of See also:apoplexy a day or two afterwards, on the loth of May 1696 . It is not surprising that, considering the See also:recent panic about poisoning, the See also:bitter See also:personal enmities which he had excited and the See also:peculiar circumstances of his See also:death, suspicions of foul See also:play should have been entertained, but there was apparently no See also:foundation for them . Two years after his death appeared certain Dialogues sur le Quietisme, alleged to have been found among his papers in-See also:complete, and to have been completed by the editor . As these dialogues are far inferior in literary merit to La Bruyere's other See also:works, their genuineness has been denied . But the straight-forward and circumstantial account of their See also:appearance given by this editor, the See also:Abbe du See also:Pin, a man of acknowledged probity, the intimacy of La Bruyere with Bossuet, whose views in his contest with See also:Fenelon these dialogues are designed to further, and the entire See also:absence, at so See also:short a time after the alleged author's death, of the least protest on the part of his friends and representatives, seem to be decisive in their favour . Although it is permissible to doubt whether the value of the Caracteres has not been somewhat exaggerated by traditional French See also:criticism, they deserve beyond all question a high See also:place . The See also:plan of the book is thoroughly See also:original, if that term may be accorded to a novel and skilful See also:combination of existing elements . The treatise of Theophrastus may have furnished the first See also:idea, but it gave little more .

Phoenix-squares

With the ethical generalizations and social Dutch See also:

painting of his original La Bruyere combined the peculiarities of the See also:Montaigne See also:essay, of the Pensees and Maximes of which See also:Pascal and La Rochefoucauld are the masters respectively, and lastly of that peculiar 17th-See also:century product, the " portrait " or elaborate literary picture of the personal and See also:mental characteristics of an individual . The result was quite unlike anything that had been before seen, and it has not been exactly reproduced since, though the essay of Addison and See also:Steele resembles it very closely, especially in the introduction of fancy portraits . In the titles of his work, and in its extreme desultoriness, La Bruyere reminds the reader of Montaigne, but he aimed too much at sententiousness to See also:attempt even the apparent continuity of the great essayist . The short paragraphs of which his chapters consist are made up of See also:maxims proper, of criticisms literary and ethical, and above all of the celebrated sketches of individuals baptized with names taken from the plays and romances of the time . These last are the great feature of the work, and that which gave it its immediate if not its enduring popularity . They are wonderfully piquant, extraordinarily life-like in a certain sense, and must have given great See also:pleasure or more frequently exquisite See also:pain to the originals, who were in many cases unmistakable and in most recognizable . But there is something wanting in them . The criticism of See also:Charpentier, who received La Bruyere at the Academy, and who was of the opposite See also:faction, is in fact fully justified as far as it goes . La Bruyere literally " est [trop] descendu dans le particulier." He has neither, like See also:Moliere, embodied abstract peculiarities in a single life-like type, nor has he, like See also:Shakespeare, made the individual pass sub speciem aeternitatis, and serve as a type while retaining his individuality . He is a photographer rather than an artist in his portraiture . So, too, his maxims, admirably as they are expressed, and exact as their truth often is, are on a lower level than those of La Rochefoucauld . Beside the sculpturesque precision, the Roman brevity, the profoundness of ethical See also:intuition " piercing to the accepted hells beneath," of the great Frondeur, La Bruyere has the See also:air of a literary See also:petit-maitre dressing up superficial observation in the finery of esprit .

It is indeed only by comparison that he loses, but then it is by comparison that he is usually praised . His abundant wit and his personal " malice " have done much to give him his See also:

rank in French literature, but much must also be allowed to his purely literary merits . With Racine and See also:Massillon he is probably the very best writer of what is somewhat arbitrarily styled classical French . He is hardly ever incorrect—the highest merit in the eyes of a French See also:academic critic . He is always well-bred, never obscure, rarely though sometimes " See also:precious " in the turns and niceties of See also:language in which he delights to indulge, in his avowed See also:design of attracting readers by See also:form, now that, in point of See also:matter, " tout est dit." It ought to be added to his See also:credit that he was sensible of the folly of impoverishing French by ejecting old words . His See also:chapter on " See also:Les ouvrages de 1'esprit " contains much See also:good criticism, though it shows that, like most of his contemporaries except Fenelon, he was lamentably ignorant of the literature of his own See also:tongue . The See also:editions of La Bruyere, both partial and complete, have been extremely numerous . Les Caracteres de Theophraste traduits du Grec, aver les caracteres et les mccurs de ce siecle, appeared for the first time in 1688, being published by Michallet, to whose little daughter, according to tradition, La Bruyere gave the profits of the See also:hook as a See also:dowry . Two other editions, little altered, were published in the same See also:year . In the following year, and in each year until 1694, with the exception of 1693, a fresh edition appeared, and, in all these five, additions, omissions and alterations were largely made . A ninth edition, not much altered, was put forth in the year of the author's death . The Academy speech appeared in the eighth edition .

The Quietist dialogues were published in 1699; most of the letters, including those addressed to Conde, not till 1867 . In recent times numerous editions of the complete works have appeared, notably those of Walckenaer (1845), Servois (1867, in the See also:

series of Grands ecrivains de la France), Asselineau (a scholarly reprint of the last 'original edition, 1872) and finally Chassang (1876); the last is oneof the most generally useful, as the editor has collected almost every-thing of value in his predecessors . The literature of "keys " to La Bruyere is extensive and apocryphal . Almost everything that can be 'done in this direction and in that of general illustration was done by Edouard See also:Fournier in his learned and amusing Comedie de La Bruyere (1866) ; M . See also:Paul Morillot contributed a monograph on La Bruyere to the series of Grands ecrivains See also:francais in 1904 . (G .

End of Article: LABRUM (Lat. for " lip ")
[back]
LABRADORITE, or LABRADOR SPAR
[next]
LABUAN (a corruption of the Malay word labuh-an, si...

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.