Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

CASSIUS LONGINUS (c. A.D. 213-273)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V16, Page 982 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

CASSIUS See also:LONGINUS (c. A.D. 213-273)  , See also:Greek rhetorician and philosophical critic, surnamed PHILOLOGUS . The origin of his See also:gentile name See also:Cassius is unknown; it can only be conjectured that he adopted it from a See also:Roman See also:patron . He was perhaps a native of Emesa (Horns) in See also:Syria, the birthplace of his See also:uncle See also:Fronto the rhetorician . He studied at See also:Alexandria under See also:Origen the See also:heathen, and taught for See also:thirty years at See also:Athens, one of his pupils being the Neoplatonist See also:Porphyry . See also:Longinus did not embrace the new speculations then being See also:developed by See also:Plotinus, but continued a Platonist of the old type . He upheld, in opposition to Plotinus, the See also:doctrine that the Platonic ideas existed outside the divine Noun (See also:tin E w roIu vol.) Usbiorryce ru v0'nrE~ : see F . Uberweg, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, 9th ed., 1903, 1 . § 72) . Plotinus, after See also:reading his See also:treatise Heist cipXwv (On First Principles), remarked that Longinus might be a See also:scholar (¢t)ebXoyos), but that he was no philosopher (c/ A6004os) . The reputation which Longinus acquired by his learning was immense; he is described by Porphyry as " the first of critics," and by See also:Eunapius as " a living library and a walking museum " or See also:encyclopaedia . During a visit to the See also:East he became teacher in Greek, and subsequently See also:chief counsellor in See also:state affairs, to See also:Zenobia, See also:queen of See also:Palmyra . It was by his See also:advice that she endeavoured to regain her See also:independence; See also:Aurelian, however, crushed the See also:attempt, and while Zenobia was led See also:captive to See also:Rome to See also:grace Aurelian's See also:triumph, Longinus paid the forfeit of his See also:life .

Longinus was the author of a large number of See also:

works, nearly all of which have perished . Among those mentioned by Suldas are Quaestiones Homericae, An Homerus fuerit philosophes, Problemata Homeri et solutiones, Atticorum vocabulorum editiones duae; the most important of his philological works, chX6Aoyot 6µtAiat (Philological Discourses) consisting of at least 21 books, is omitted . A considerable fragment of the HEpi riXovs (De finibus, On the Chief End) is preserved in the Life of Plotinus by Porphyry (§ 20) . Under his name there are also extant Prolegomena to the Encheiridion of See also:Hephaestion on See also:metre (printed in R . See also:Westphal, Scriptores Metrici Graeci, i . 1866) and the fragment of a treatise on See also:rhetoric (L . Spengel, Rhetores Graeci, i. pp . 299-320), inserted in the See also:middle of a similar treatise by See also:Apsines . It gives brief See also:practical hints on invention, arrangement, See also:style, memory and other things useful to the student . Some important excerpts iKr&v Aoyyivov (Spengel, i . 325-328) may possibly be from the 4uX6Aoyot 6µtAiat . It is as the reputed author of the well-known and remarkable See also:work nspi i4ovs (generally, but inadequately, rendered On the See also:Sublime) that Longinus is best known .

See also:

Modern scholars, however, with few exceptions, are agreed that it cannot with any certainty be ascribed to him, and that the question of authorship cannot be determined (see Introduction to See also:Roberts's edition) . The following are the chief arguments against Longinus . (1) The treatise is not mentioned by any classical author, nor in any lists of the works attributed to him . (2) The See also:evidence of the See also:MSS. shows that doubts existed even in See also:early times . In the most important (No . 2036 in the See also:Paris Library, loth See also:century) the heading is AwvvoLou $ Aoyylvov, thus giving an alternative author See also:Dionysius; in the Laurentian MS. at See also:Florence the See also:title has dvwvbµov, implying that the author was unknown . The ascription in the Paris MS. led to the addition of Dionysius to the name of the reputed author—Dionysius Cassius Longinus, accounted for by the supposition that his early name was Dionysius, Cassius Longinus being subsequently adopted from a Roman patron whose client he had beeen . (3) The See also:absence of any reference to the famous writers on rhetoric of the See also:age of the Antonines, such as See also:Hermogenes and See also:Alexander son of See also:Numenius . (4) The opening sentences show that the IIspl i,'ovs was written with a view of correcting the faults of style and method in a treatise by See also:Caecilius (q.v.) of Calacte on the same subject . As Caecilius flourished during the reign of See also:Augustus, it is hardly likely that his work would have been selected for purposes of See also:criticism in the 3rd century . (5) See also:General considerations of style and See also:language and of the point of view from which the work is written . In favour of Longinus: (1) The traditional ascription, which held its ground, unchallengal till the beginning of the_i8th century .

Phoenix-squares

(2) The philosophical colouring of the first See also:

chapter and the numerous quotations from Pfato are- in accordance with what is known of his philosophical opinions . (3) The treatise is the See also:kind of work to be expected from one who was. styled " the first of critics." (4) The Ammonius referred to (xiii . 3) is supposed to be Ammonius Saccas (c . 175-242), but it appears from the Venetian scholia to the Iliad that there was an earlier Ammonius (fl. c . 140 B.c.), a See also:pupil and successor of See also:Aristarchus at Alexandria, who, judging from the context, is no doubt the writer in question . The reference is therefore an See also:argument against Longinus . The work is dedicated to a certain See also:Terentianus, of whom nothing is known (see Roberts's edition, p . 18) . The alternative author Dionysius of the MSS. has been variously identified with the rhetorician and historian Dionysius of See also:Halicarnassus, the Atticist Aelius Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Dionysius See also:Atticus of See also:Pergamum, Dionysius of See also:Miletus . Other suggested. claimants to the authorship are See also:Plutarch (L . Vaucher in Etudes critiques sur le traite du sublime (See also:Geneva, 1894) and Aelius See also:Theon of Alexandria (W . See also:Christ), the author of a work on the Arrangement of .

Speech . But it seems most probable that the author was an unknown writer who flourished in the 1st century soon after Caecilius and before Hermogenes . Wil'amowitz-Mollendorff gives his date as about A.D . 40 . The rendering On the Sublime implies more than is intended by the Greek IIEpi iy'ou; (" impressiveness in style," See also:

Jebb) . Nothing abnormal, such as is associated with the word " sublime," is the subject of discussion; it is rather a treatise on style . According to the author's own-See also:definitions, '' Sublimity is a certain distinction and excellence in expression," " sublimity consists in See also:elevation," " sublimity is the See also:echo (or expression) of a See also:great soul " (see See also:note in Roberts) . The treatise is especially valuable for the numerous quotations from classical authors, above all, for the preservation of the famous fragment of See also:Sappho, the See also:ode to Anactoria, beginning OQ.iYETQ.L tLOL KfJYOS LOOS BEOLULV, imitated by See also:Catullus (li.) Ad Lesbiam, Ille mi See also:par esse deo,videtur." Its See also:main See also:object is to point out the essential elements of an impressive style which, avoiding all tumidity, puerility, affectation and See also:bad See also:taste, finds its See also:inspiration in grandeur of thought and intensity of feeling, and its expression in See also:nobility of diction and in skilfully ordered See also:composition " (See also:Sandys) . A full bibliography of the subject will be found in the edition by W . R . Roberts (See also:Cambridge, 2nd ed., .1907), containing an Introduction, See also:Analysis, See also:Translation and Appendices (textual, linguistic, See also:literary and See also:bibliographical), to which may be added F . See also:Marx, Wiener Studien, xx .

(1898), and F . Kaibel, See also:

Hermes, xxxiv . (1899), who respectively See also:advocate and reject the claims of Longinus to the authorship; J . E . Sandys, See also:History of Classical Scholarship.(2nd ed., 1906), pp . 288, 338, should also be consulted . The number of See also:translations in all the See also:languages of See also:Europe is,large, including the famous one by Boileau, which made the work favourite See also:text-See also:book of the bellelettristic critics of the 18th century . A text and translation was published by A . O . Prickard (1907-1908) .

End of Article: CASSIUS LONGINUS (c. A.D. 213-273)
[back]
PIETRO LONGHI (1702-1762)
[next]
LONGITUDE (from Lat. longitudo, " length ")

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.