Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:MANASSEH (apparently See also:Hebrew for " he who causes to for-get," but see H. W. See also:Hogg, Encyc. Bib., s.v.); in the See also:Bible, a tribe of See also:Israel, the See also:elder but less important of the "sons" of See also:Joseph. Its seat See also:lay to the See also:north of See also:Ephraim, but its boundaries can scarce ly be defined . It merged itself with its " See also:brother " in the See also:south and with See also:Issachar, See also:Zebulun and other tribes in the See also:north (Josh. xvii . 7 sqq.) . From the latter it was separated for a See also:time by a See also:line of Canaanite cities extending from Dor to Bethshean, which apparently were not all subdued till the days of See also:David or See also:Solomon (Judg. i . 27; I Sam. xxxi. lo; 1 See also:Kings ix . 15) . Besides its western See also:settlement in the fertile glades of See also:northern See also:Samaria, See also:running out into the See also:great See also:plain, there were territories See also:east of the See also:Jordan reckoned to See also:Manasseh . See also:Gilead and See also:Bashan were said to have been taken by Machir, and a number of places of uncertain See also:identification were occupied by Nobah and Jair (Num. xxxii . 41; Judg. x . 3–5) . It seems most natural to suppose that these districts were held before the Israelites crossed over to the See also:west (cf. the tradition Num. xxi., Dent. iii.) . On the other See also:hand, in Judg. v . 14, Machir may conceivably belong to the west, and it is possible that, according to another tradition, these movements were the result of the complaint of the See also:Joseph tribes that their See also:original territory was too restricted.' In the genealogical lists, Machir, perhaps originally an See also:independent See also:branch, is the eldest son of Manasseh (Josh. xvii. b, 2); but according to later schemes he is Manasseh's only son (Num. See also:xxvi . 28–34) . Intermixture with Aramaeans is indicated in the view that he was the son of Manasseh and an Aramean concubine (I Chron. vii . 14), and this is supported by the statement that the Arameans of Geshur and Maacah (cf . 2 Sam. x . 6; Gen. xxii . 24) dwelt among the Israelites of eastern Jordan (Josh. xiii . 13) . Subsequently, at an unknown See also:period of See also:history, sixty cities were lost (r Chron. ii . 23) . The See also:story of the daughters of the Manassite Zelophehad is of See also:interest for the See also:Hebrew See also:law of See also:inheritance (Num. See also:xxvii . 1–11, See also:xxxvi.) .
'So Budde See also:Richter u
.
See also:Samuel), who recovers certain old fragments and arranges josh. xvii
.
14–18 (v
.
18 read " See also: 227) . Generally speaking, its position in the west made it See also:share the fortunes of See also:Ephraim, whilst on the east the proximity of See also:Ammonites and Moabites controlled its history; see also the articles on its See also:southern neighbours, See also:GAD and See also:REUBEN, and the_articles See also:GENEALOGY (Biblical); and Jaws: History . (S . A . |
|
|
[back] MANASSEH (7th cent. B.C.) |
[next] CONSTANTINE MANASSES |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.