|
See also: English philosopher and satirist, was See also: born at Dordrecht, where his See also: father practised as a physician
.
On leaving the See also: Erasmus school at See also: Rotterdam he gave proof of his ability by an Oratio scholastica de medicina (1685), and at See also: Leiden University in 1689 he maintained a thesis De brutorum operationibus, in which he advocated the Cartesian theory of See also: automatism among animals
.
In 1691 he took his medical degree, pronouncing an " inaugural disputation," De chylosi vitiata
.
Afterwards he came to See also: England " to learn the language," and succeeded so remarkably that many refused to believe he was a foreigner
.
As a physician he seems to have done little, and lived poorly on a pension given him by some Dutch merchants and See also: money which he earned from distillers for advocating the use of See also: spirits
.
His conversational abilities won him the friendship of See also: Lord Macclesfield (chief See also: justice 1710—1718) who introduced him to See also: Addison, described by Mandeville as " a See also: parson in a tye-wig." He died in See also: January (19th or 21st)
1733/4 at See also: Hackney
.
or the an
The See also: work by which he is known is the See also: Fable of the Bees, published first in 1705 under the title of The Grumbling Hive, or Knaves Turn'd Honest (two See also: hundred doggerel couplets)
.
In 1714 it was republished anonymously with Remarks and An Enquiry into the Origin of Moral Virtue
.
In 1723 a later edition appeared, including An Essay on Charity and Charity See also: Schools, and A See also: Search into the Nature of Society
.
The See also: book was primarily written as a See also: political satire on the See also: state of England in 1705, when the Tories were accusing See also: Marlborough and the See also: ministry of advocating the 'French War for See also: personal reasons
.
The edition of 1723 was presented as a nuisance by the See also: Grand See also: Jury of Middlesex, was denounced in the See also: London Journal by " See also: Theophilus See also: Philo-Britannus," and attacked by many writers, notably by Archibald See also: Campbell (1691-1756) in his Aretelogia (published as his own by
See also: Alexander Innes in 1728; afterwards by Campbell, under his own name, in 1733, as Enquiry into the
See also: Original of Moral Virtue)
.
The Fable was reprinted in 1729, a ninth edition appeared in 1755, and it has often been reprinted in more See also: recent times
.
See also: Berkeley attacked it in the second See also: dialogue of the See also: Alciphron (1732) and See also: John
See also: Brown criticized him in his Essay upon
See also: Shaftesbury's Characteristics (1751)
.
Mandeville's philosophy gave See also: great offence at the See also: time, and has always been stigmatized as false, cynical and degrading
.
His See also: main thesis is that the actions of men cannot be divided into See also: lower and higher
.
The higher See also: life of See also: man is merely a fiction introduced by philosophers and rulers to simplify See also: government and the relations of society
.
In fact, virtue (which he defined as " every performance by which man, contrary to the impulse of nature, should endeavour the benefit of others, or the See also: conquest of his own passions, out of a rational ambition of being See also: good ") is actually detrimental to the state in its commercial and intellectual progress, for it is the vices (i.e. the self-regarding actions of men) which alone, by means of inventions and the circulation of capital in connexion with luxurious living, stimulate society into See also: action and progress
.
In the Fable he shows a society possessed of all the virtues " blest with content and honesty," falling into apathy and utterly paralyzed
.
The See also: absence of self-love (cf
.
See also: Hobbes) is the See also: death of progress
.
The so-called higher virtues are See also: mere See also: hypocrisy, and arise from the selfish See also: desire to be See also: superior to the brutes
.
" The moral virtues are the political offspring which flattery begot upon See also: pride." Similarly he arrives at the great paradox that " private vices are public benefits." But his best work and that in which he approximates most nearly to See also: modern views is his account of the origin of society
.
His a priori theories should be compared with Maine's See also: historical inquiries (See also: Ancient See also: Law, c
.
V.)
.
He endeavours to show that all social See also: laws are the crystallized results of selfish aggrandizement and protective alliances among the weak
.
Denying any See also: form of moral sense or See also: conscience, he regards all the social virtues as evolved from the See also: instinct for self-preservation, the give-and-take arrangements between the partners in a defensive and offensive See also: alliance, and the feelings of pride and vanity artificially fed by politicians, as an antidote to dissension and See also: chaos
.
Mandeville's ironical paradoxes are interesting mainly as a See also: criticism of the " amiable " idealism of Shaftesbury, and in comparison with the serious egoistic systems of Hobbes and Helvetius
.
It is mere See also: prejudice to deny that Mandeville had considerable philosophic insight; at the same time he was mainly negative or critical, and, as he himself said, he was writing for " the entertainment of See also: people of knowledge and See also: education." He may be said to have cleared the ground for the coming See also: utilitarianism
.
\Voxxs.—Typhon: a Burlesque Poem (1704) ; See also: Aesop Dress'd, or a Collection of Fables writ in See also: Familiar Verse (1704); The Planter's Charity (1704) ; The Virgin Unmasked (1709, 1724, 1731, 1742), a work in which. the coarser See also: side of his nature is prominent; See also: Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Passions (17II, 1715, 1730) admired by See also: Johnson (Mandeville here protests against merely speculative therapeutics, and advances fanciful theories of his own about animal spirits in connexion with " stomachic ferment ": he shows a know-ledge of
See also: Locke's methods, and an admiration for Sydenham) ; See also: Free Thoughts on See also: Religion (1720); A See also: Conference about Whoring (1725) ; An Enquiry into the Causes of the Frequent Executions at See also: Tyburn (1725) ; The Origin of Honour and the Usefulness of See also: Christianity in War (1732)
.
Other See also: works attributed, wrongly, to him are
A Modest Defence of Public Stews (1724); The See also: World Unmasked (1736) and Zoologia medicinalis hibernica (1744)
.
See See also: Hill's
See also: Boswell, iii
.
291–293 ; L
.
See also: Stephen's English Thought in the Eighteenth Century; A
.
Bain's Moral Science (593–598); Windelband's See also: History of See also: Ethics (Eng. trans
.
Tufts) ; J
.
M
.
See also: Robertson, See also: Pioneer Humanists (1907); P
.
|
|
|
[back] CAREL VAN MANDER (1548-1606) |
[next] GEOFFREY DE MANDEVILLE (d. 1144) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.