|
See also: patron deity of the city of See also: Babylon, who, when Babylon permanently became the See also: political centre of the See also: united states of the See also: Euphrates valley under Khammurabi (c
.
2250 B.C.), See also: rose to the position of the See also: head of the Babylonian See also: pantheon
.
His See also: original character was that of a solar deity, and he personifies more specifically the See also: sun of the spring-See also: time who conquers the storms of the winter season
.
He was thus fitted to become the See also: god who triumphs over See also: chaos that reigned in the beginning of time
.
This earlier See also: Marduk, however, was effaced by the reflex of the political development through which the Euphrates valley passed and which led to imbuing him with traits belonging to gods who at an earlier See also: period were recognized as the heads of the pantheon
.
There are more particularly two gods—Ea and Bel—whose See also: powers and attributes pass over to Marduk
.
In the See also: case of Ea the transfer proceeds pacifically and without involving the effacement of the older god
.
Marduk is viewed as the son of Ea
.
The See also: father voluntarily recognizes the superiority of the son and hands over to him the control of humanity
.
This association of Marduk and Ea, while indicating primarily the passing of the supremacy once enjoyed by See also: Eridu to Babylon as a religious and political centre, may also reflect an early dependence of Babylon upon Eridu, not necessarily of a political character but, in view of the spread of culture in the Euphrates valley from the See also: south to the See also: north, the recognition of Eridu as the older centre on the See also: part of the younger one
.
At all events, traces of a cult of Marduk at Eridu are to be noted in the religious literature, and the most reasonable explanation for the existence of a god Marduk in Eridu is to assume that Babylon in this way paid its homage to the old See also: settlement at the head of the Persian Gulf
.
While the relationship between Ea (q.v.) and Marduk is thus marked by harmony and an amicable abdication on the part of the father in favour of his son, Marduk's absorption of the power and prerogatives of See also: Bel of See also: Nippur was at the expense of the latter's See also: prestige
.
After the days of Khammurabi, the cult of Marduk eclipses that of Bel (q.v.), and although during the five centuries of Cassite control in Babylonia (c . 1750-1200 B.C.), Nippur and the cult of the older Bel enjoy a period of See also: renaissance, when the reaction ensued it marked the definite and permanent See also: triumph of Marduk over Bel until the end of the Babylonian See also: empire
.
The only serious 'See also: rival to Marduk after 1200 B.C. is See also: Assur (q.v.) in See also: Assyria
.
In the south Marduk reigns supreme, and his supremacy is indicated most significantly by making him the Bel, " the See also: lord," See also: par excellence
.
The old myths in which Bel of Nippur was celebrated as the See also: hero were transformed by the priests of Babylon in the See also: interest 2The name Mordecai denotes "belonging to Maduk."
of the Marduk cult with the chief role assigned to their favourite
.
The See also: hymns once sung in the See also: temple of Bel were re-edited and adapted to the cult of Babylon
.
In this See also: process the older Bel was deliberately set aside, and the See also: climax was reached when the See also: conquest of the See also: monster Tiamat, symbolizing the chaos prevailing in primeval days, was ascribed to Marduk instead of, as in the older See also: form of the epic, to Bel
.
With this stroke Marduk became the creator of the See also: world, including mankind—again setting aside the far older claims of Bel to this distinction
.
Besides absorbing the prerogatives of Ea and Bel, Marduk was also imbued with the attributes of other of the See also: great gods, such as See also: Adad, See also: Shamash, See also: Nergal and See also: Ninib, so that, more particularly as we approach the days of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, the impression is created that Marduk was the only real deity recognized, and that the other gods were merely the various forms under which he manifested himself
.
So far as one can speak of a monotheistic tendency in Babylonia it connects itself with this conception that was gradually crystallized in regard to the old solar deity of Babylon
.
The See also: history of the city of Babylon can now be traced back to the days of See also: Sargon of Agade (before 3000 B.C.) who appears to have given the city its name
.
There is every reason to assume, therefore, that the cult of Marduk existed already at this early period, though it must always be See also: borne in mind that, until the days of Khammurabi, his jurisdiction was limited to the city of which he was the patron and that he was viewed solely as a solar deity
.
On monuments and cylinders he is represented as armed with the weapon with which he despatched the monster Tiamat . At times this monster is also depicted lying vanquished at his feet, and occasionally the monster with the See also: lance or the lance alone is reproduced instead of the god himself
.
In the astral-theological See also: system, Marduk is identified with the See also: planet See also: Jupiter
.
As the creator of the world, the New See also: Year's festival, known as Zagmuk and celebrated at the time of the vernal equinox, was sacred to him
.
The festival, which lasted for eleven days, symbolized the new See also: birth of nature—a See also: reproduction therefore of the creation of the world
.
The arbiter of all fates, Marduk, was pictured as holding an See also: assembly of the gods during the New Year's festival for the purpose of deciding the See also: lot of each individual for the year to come
.
The epic reciting his wonderful deed in despatching the monster Tiamat and in establishing See also: law and See also: order in the world in the place of chaos was recited in his temple at Babylon known as E-Saggila, " the lofty See also: house," and there are some reasons for believing that the recital was accompanied by a dramatical See also: representation of the epic
.
The meaning of the name Marduk is unknown
.
By a See also: species of word-See also: play the name was interpreted as " the son of the chamber," with reference perhaps to the sacred chamber of See also: fate in which he sat in See also: judgment on the New Year's festival
.
Ideographically he is represented by two signs signifying " See also: child of the See also: day " (or " of the sun ") which is a distinct allusion to his original solar character
.
Other ideographic signs describe him as the " strong and universal ruler." The name of his See also: consort was Sarpanit, i.e. the shining or brilliant one—again an allusion to Marduk's solar- traits—and this name was playfully See also: twisted by the Babylonian priests to mean°" the seed-producing" (as though compounded of zer, seed, and banit, producing, which was regarded as an appropriate appellation for the See also: female counterpart of the creator of mankind and of See also: life in general
.
The punning etymology betrays the evident See also: desire of the priests to see in Marduk's consort a form or manifestation of the great See also: mother-goddess See also: Ishtar (q.v.), just as in Assyria Ishtar frequently appears as the consort of the chief god of Assyria, known as Assur (q.v.)
.
(M . |
|
|
[back] MARDIN |
[next] MARE |
"The name of [Marduk's] consort was Sarpanit, [Zerpanitum] i.e. the shining or brilliant one—again an allusion to Marduk's solar- traits—and this name was playfully twisted by the Babylonian priests to mean seed-producing" (as though compounded of zer, seed, and banit, producing), which was regarded as an appropriate appellation for the female counterpart of the creator of mankind and of life in general." It's taken me 6 hours to verify this. I have verified it.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.