Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

PHILIP MASSINGER (1583-1640)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V17, Page 869 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

PHILIP See also:MASSINGER (1583-1640)  , See also:English dramatist, son of See also:Arthur See also:Massinger or Messanger, was baptized at St See also:Thomas's, See also:Salisbury, on the 24th of See also:November 1583 . He apparently belonged to an old Salisbury See also:family, for the name occurs in the See also:city records as See also:early as 1415 . He is described in his matriculation entry at St See also:Alban See also:Hall, See also:Oxford (1602), as the son of a See also:gentleman . His See also:father, who had also been educated at St Alban Hall, was a member of See also:parliament, and was attached to the See also:house-hold of See also:Henry See also:Herbert, 2nd See also:earl of See also:Pembroke, who recommended him in 1587 for the See also:office of examiner in the See also:court of the See also:marches . The 3rd earl of Pembroke, the See also:William Herbert whose name has been connected with See also:Shakespeare's sonnets, succeeded to the See also:title in 16or . It has been suggested that he supported the poet at Oxford, but the significant omission of any reference to himin any of Massinger's prefaces points to the contrary . Massinger See also:left Oxford without a degree in 16o6 . His father had died in 1603, and he was perhaps dependent on his own exertions . The lack of a degree and the want of patronage from See also:Lord Pembroke may both be explained on the supposition that he had become a See also:Roman See also:Catholic . On leaving the university he went to See also:London to make his living as a dramatist, but his name cannot be de-finitely affixed to any See also:play until fifteen years later, when The Virgin See also:Martyr (ent. at Stationers' Hall, Dec . 7, 1621) appeared as the See also:work of Massinger and See also:Dekker . During these years he worked in collaboration with other dramatists .

A See also:

joint See also:letter, from Nathaniel See also:Field, See also:Robert Daborne and See also:Philip Massinger, to Philip See also:Henslowe, begs for an immediate See also:loan of five pounds to See also:release them from their " unfortunate extremitie," the See also:money to be taken from the See also:balance due for the " play of Mr See also:Fletcher's and ours." A second document shows that Massinger and Daborne owed Henslowe 3 on the 4th of See also:July 1615 . The earlier See also:note probably See also:dates from 1613, and from this See also:time Massinger apparently worked regularly with See also:John Fletcher, although in See also:editions of See also:Beaumont and Fletcher's See also:works his co-operation is usually unrecognized . See also:Sir See also:Aston Cokayne, Massinger's See also:constant friend and See also:patron, refers in explicit terms to this collaboration in a See also:sonnet addressed to See also:Humphrey Moseley on the publication of his See also:folio edition of Beaumont and Fletcher (Small Poems of See also:Divers Sorts, 1658), and in an See also:epitaph on the two poets he says: " Plays they did write together, were See also:great See also:friends, And now one See also:grave includes them in their ends." After Philip Henslowe's See also:death in 1616 Massinger and Fletcher began to write for the See also:King's Men . Between 1623 and 1626 Massinger produced unaided for the See also:Lady See also:Elizabeth's Men then playing at the See also:Cockpit three pieces, The Parliament of Love, The Bondman and The Renegado . With the exception of these plays and The Great See also:Duke of See also:Florence, produced in 1627 by the See also:Queen's servants, Massinger continued to write regularly for the King's Men until his death . The See also:tone of the dedications of his later plays affords See also:evidence of his continued poverty . Thus in the See also:preface to The Maid of See also:Honour (1632) he wrote, addressing Sir See also:Francis Foljambe and Sir Thomas Bland: " I had not to this time subsisted, but that I was supported by your frequent courtesies and favours." The See also:prologue to The See also:Guardian (licensed 1633) refers to two unsuccessful plays and two years of silence, when the author feared he had lost the popular favour . S . R . See also:Gardiner, in an See also:essay on " The See also:Political See also:Element in Massinger " (Contemp . See also:Review, Aug . 1876), maintained that Massinger's dramas are before all else political, that the events of his See also:day were as openly criticized in his plays as current politics are in the cartoons of See also:Punch .

It is probable that this break in his See also:

production was owing to his See also:free handling of public matters . In 1631 Sir Henry Herbert, the See also:master of the See also:revels, refused to license an unnamed play by Massinger because of " dangerous See also:matter as the deposing of See also:Sebastian, King of See also:Portugal," calculated presumably to endanger See also:good relations between See also:England and See also:Spain . There is little doubt that this was the same piece as Believe as You See also:List, in which time and See also:place are changed, See also:Antiochus being substituted for Sebastian, and See also:Rome for Spain . In the prologue Massinger ironically apologizes for his See also:ignorance of See also:history, and professes that his accuracy is at See also:fault if his picture comes near " a See also:late and sad example." The obvious " late and sad example " of a wandering See also:prince could be no other than See also:Charles I.'s See also:brother-in-See also:law, the elector See also:palatine . An allusion to the same subject may be traced in The Maid of Honour . In another play by Massinger, not extant, Charles I. is reported to have himself struck out a passage put into the mouth of See also:Don Pedro, king of Spain, as " too insolent." The poet seems to have adhered closely to the politics of his patron, Philip Herbert, earl of See also:Montgomery, and afterwards 4th earl of Pembroke, who had leanings to See also:democracy and was a See also:personal enemy of the duke of See also:Buckingham . In The Bondman, dealing with the history of See also:Timoleon, Buckingham is satirized as Gisco . The servility towards. the See also:Crown displayed in Beaumont and Fletcher's plays reflected the See also:temper of the court of See also:James I . The attitude of Massinger's heroes and heroines towards See also:kings is very different . Camiola's remarks on the limitations of the royal See also:prerogative (Maid of Honour, See also:act 1v. sc. v.) could hardly be acceptable at court . Massinger died suddenly at his house near the Globe See also:theatre, and was buried in the See also:churchyard of St Saviour's, See also:Southwark, on the 18th of See also:March 164o . In the entry in the See also:parish See also:register he is described as a " stranger," which, however, implies nothing more than that he belonged to another parish .

The supposition that Massinger was a Roman Catholic rests upon three of his plays, The Virgin Martyr (licensed 1620), The Renegado (licensed 1624) and The Maid of Honour (c . 1621) . The religious sentiment is certainly such as would obviously best See also:

appeal to an See also:audience sympathetic to Roman Catholic See also:doctrine . The Virgin Martyr, in which Dekker probably had a large See also:share, is really a See also:miracle play, dealing with the martyrdom of Dorothea in the time of See also:Diocletian, and the supernatural element is freely used . Little stress can be laid on this performance as elucidating Massinger's views . It is not entirely his work, and the See also:story is early See also:Christian, not Roman Catholic . In The Renegado, however, the See also:action is dominated by the beneficent See also:influence of a Jesuit See also:priest, Francisco, and the doctrine of baptismal regeneration is enforced . In The Maid of Honour a complicated situation is solved by the decision of the heroine, Camiola, to take the See also:veil . For this she is held up " to all posterity a See also:fair example for See also:noble maids to imitate." Among all Massinger's heroines Camiola is distinguished by genuine purity and heroism . His plays have generally an obvious moral intention . He sets himself to work out a See also:series of ethical problems through a See also:succession of ingenious and effective plots . In the See also:art of construction he has, indeed, few rivals .

But the virtue of his heroes and heroines is rather morbid than natural, and often singularly divorced from See also:

common-sense . His dramatis personae are in See also:general types rather than living persons, and their actions do not appear to See also:spring inevitably from their characters, but rather from the exigencies of the See also:plot . The heroes are too good, and the villains too wicked to be quite convincing . Moreover their respective goodness and villainy are too often represented as extraneous to themselves . This defect of characterization shows that English See also:drama had already begun to decline . It seems doubtful whether Massinger was ever a popular playwright, for the best qualities of his plays would appeal rather to politicians and moralists than to the See also:ordinary playgoer . He contributed, however, at least one great and popular See also:character to the English See also:stage . Sir See also:Giles Overreach, in A New Way to Pay Old Debts, is a sort of commercial See also:Richard III., a See also:compound of the See also:lion and the See also:fox, and the See also:part provides many opportunities for a great actor . He made another considerable contribution to the See also:comedy of See also:manners in The City Madam . In Massinger's own See also:judgment The Roman Actor was " the most perfect See also:birth of his See also:Minerva." It is a study of the See also:tyrant See also:Domitian, and of the results of despotic See also:rule on the See also:despot himself and his court . Other favourable examples of his grave and restrained art are The Duke of See also:Milan, The Bondman and The Great Duke of Florence . Massinger was a student and follower of Shakespeare .

The See also:

form of his See also:verse, especially in the number of run-on lines, approximates in some respects to Shakespeare's later manner . He is rhetorical and picturesque, but rarely rises to extraordinary felicity . His verse is never mean, but it sometimes comes perilously near to See also:prose, and in dealing with passionate situations it lacks See also:fire and directness . The plays attributed to Massinger alone are: The Duke of Milan, a Tragedy (c . 1618, pr . 1623 and 1638) ; The Unnatural Combat, a Tragedy (c . 1619, pr . 1639); The Bondman, an Antient Storie (licensed 1623, pr . 1624) ; The Renegado, a Tragaecomedie (lic . 1624, pr . 1630); The Parliament of Love (See also:lie . 1624; ascribed, no doubt erroneously, in the Stationers' Register, 166o, to W .

Phoenix-squares

See also:

Rowley; first printed by See also:Gifford from an imperfect MS. in 1805); A New Way to Pay Old Debts, a Comoedie (c . 1625, pr . 1632); The Roman Actor . A Tragaedie (See also:tic . 1626, pr . 1629) ; The Maid of Honour (dating perhaps from 1621, pr . 1632) ; The Picture, a Tragecomedie (lic . 1629, pr . 1630) ; The Great Duke of Florence, a Comicall Historie (lie . 1627, pr . 1635) ; The See also:Emperor of the See also:East, a Tragaeeomoedie (lic. and pr . 869 1631), founded on the story of See also:Theodosius the Younger; Believe as You List (rejected by the See also:censor is See also:January, but licensed in May, 1631; pr .

1848–1849 for the See also:

Percy Society) ; The City Madam, a Comedie (lie . 1632, pr . 1658), which Mr Fleay (Biog . Chron. of the Eng . Drama, i . 226), however, considers to be a rifaciamento of an older play, probably by See also:Jonson; The Guardian (lic . 1633, pr . 1655); and The Bashful See also:Lover (lic . 1636, pr . 1655) . A Very Woman, or The Prince of Tarent, licensed in 1634 as the work of Massinger alone, is generally referred to his collaboration with Fletcher . The " exquisite See also:temperance and See also:justice " of this piece are, according to See also:Swinburne, See also:foreign to Fletcher's See also:genius, and afford a striking example of Massinger's See also:artistic skill and moderation .

Twelve plays of Massinger are said to be lost, but the titles of some of these may be duplicates of those of existing plays . Five of these lost plays were See also:

MSS. used by John See also:Warburton's See also:cook for See also:pie-covers . The numerous plays in which Massinger's co-operation with John Fletcher is generally assumed are dealt with under BEAUMONT and FLETCHER . But it may be here noted that Mr R . See also:Boyle has constructed an ingenious See also:case for the joint authorship by Fletcher and Massinger of the two " Shakespearian " plays, Henry VIII. and Two Noble Kinsmen (see the New Shakspere Society's Transactions, 1884 and 1882) . Mr Boyle See also:sees the See also:touch of Massinger in the first two acts of the Second See also:Maiden's Tragedy (See also:Lansdowne MS., lie . 1611), a play with which the names of Fletcher and See also:Tourneur are also associated by different critics . The Fatall See also:Dowry, a Tragedy (c . 1619, pr . 1632), which was adapted without See also:acknowledgment by See also:Nicholas Rowe in his Fair Penitent, was written in See also:conjunction with Nathaniel Field; and The Virgin Martir, a Tragedie (lic . 1620, pr . 1621), with Thomas Dekker .

Massinger's See also:

independent works were collected by Coxeter (4 vols., 1759, revised edition with introduction by Thomas See also:Davies, 1779), by J . Monck See also:Mason (4 vols., 1779), by William Gifford (4 vols., 1805, 1813), by See also:Hartley See also:Coleridge (184o), by Lieut.-See also:Colonel Cunning-See also:ham (1867), and selections by Mr Arthur See also:Symons in the Mermaid Series (1887–1889) . Gifford's remains the See also:standard edition, and formed the basis of See also:Cunningham's See also:text . It contains " An Essay on the Dramatic Writings of Massinger " by Dr John Ferriar . Massinger has been the See also:object of a good See also:deal of See also:criticism . A metrical examination of the plays in which Massinger was concerned is given in Englische Studien (See also:Halle, v . 74, vii . 66, viii . 39, ix . 209 and x . 383), by Mr R . Boyle, who also contributed the See also:life of the poet in the See also:Dictionary of See also:National See also:Biography .

The See also:

sources of his plays are dealt with by E . Koeppel in Quellen Studien zu den Dramen See also:Chapman's, Massinger's and See also:Ford's (See also:Strassburg, 1897) . For detailed criticism, beside the introductions to the editions quoted, see A . W . See also:Ward, Hist. of Eng . Dram . Lit . (1899), iii . 1–47, and F . G . Fleay, Biog . Chron. of the Eng .

Drama (1891), under Fletcher; a general estimate of Massinger, dealing especially with his moral standpoint, is given in Sir See also:

Leslie See also:Stephen's See also:Hours in a Library (3rd series, 1879) ; Swinburne, in the Fortnightly Review (July 1889), while acknowledging the justice of Sir L . Stephen's See also:main strictures, found much to say in praise of the poet .

End of Article: PHILIP MASSINGER (1583-1640)
[back]
MASSIMO, or MASSIMI
[next]
MASSINISSA (c. 238—149 B.C.)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.