Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

JAN VAN DER MEER (1632-1675)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V18, Page 72 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

JAN See also:VAN DER See also:MEER (1632-1675)  , more often called may be traced his love of See also:lemon-yellow and of See also:blue of all shades . Vermeer of See also:Delft—not to be confounded with the See also:elder (1628- 1691) or younger (1656-1705) See also:Van der See also:Meer of See also:Haarlem, or with Van der Meer of See also:Utrecht—is one of the excellent Dutch painters about whom the Dutch biographers give us little See also:information.' Van der Meer, or Vermeer, was See also:born in Delft, and was a See also:pupil of Carel Fabritius, whose junior he was by only eight years . The See also:works by Fabritius are few, but his contemporaries speak of him as a See also:man of remarkable See also:power, and the paintings now ascertained to be from his See also:hand, and formerly ascribed to See also:Rembrandt, prove him to have been deeply imbued with the spirit and manner of that n}See also:aster . Whether Van der Meer had ever any closer relation to Rembrandt than through companionship with Fabritius remains uncertain . In 1653 he married See also:Catherine Bolenes, and in the same See also:year he entered the gild of St See also:Luke of Delft, becoming one of the heads of the gild in 1662 and again in 167o . He died at Delft in 1675, leaving a widow and eight See also:children . His circumstances cannot have been flourishing, for at his See also:death he See also:left twenty-six pictures undisposed of, and his widow had to apply to the See also:court of insolvency to be placed under a See also:curator, who was See also:Leeuwenhoek, the naturalist . For more than two centuries Van der Meer was almost completely forgotten, and his pictures were sold under the names and forged signatures of the more popular De See also:Hooch, See also:Metsu, Ter Botch, and even of Rembrandt . The See also:attention of the See also:art-See also:world was first recalled to this most See also:original painter by Thore, an exiled Frenchman, who described his then known works in Musees de la Hollande (1858-186o),, published under the assumed name of W . See also:Burger . The result of his researches, continued in his Galerie Suermondt and Galerie d'Arenberg, was afterwards given by him in a charming, though incomplete, monograph (See also:Gazette See also:des See also:beaux-arts, 1866, pp . 297, 458, 542) .

The task was prosecuted with success by Havard (See also:

Les Artistes hollandais), and by Obreen (Nederlandsche Kunstgeschiedenis, Dl. iv.), and we are now in a position to refer to Van der Meer's works . His pictures are rarely dated, but one of the most important, in the See also:Dresden See also:Gallery, bears the date 1656, and thus gives us a See also:key to his styles . With the exception of the " See also:Christ with Martha and See also:Mary " in the Coats collection at See also:Glasgow, it is perhaps the only one, hitherto recognized, that has figures of See also:life See also:size, though his authorship is claimed for several others . The Dresden picture of a " Woman and Soldier," with other two figures, is painted with remarkable power and boldness, with See also:great command over the resources of See also:colour, and with wonderful expression of life . For strength and colour it more than holds its own beside the neighbouring Rembrandts . To this See also:early See also:period of his career belong, from See also:internal See also:evidence, the "See also:Reading Girl " of the same gallery, the luminous and masterly " View of Delft " in the museum of the See also:Hague, the " See also:Milk-Woman " and the small See also:street view, both identified with the Six collection at See also:Amsterdam, the former now in the Rijksmuseum; the magnificent "The See also:Letter" also at Amsterdam, "See also:Diana and the See also:Nymphs" (formerly ascribed to Vermeer of Utrecht) at the Hague Gallery, and others . In all these we find the same brilliant See also:style and vigorous See also:work, a solid impasto, and a crisp, sparkling See also:touch . His first manner seems to have been influenced by the See also:pleiad of painters circling See also:round Rembrandt, a school which lost favour in See also:Holland in the last See also:quarter of the See also:century . During the final ten or twelve years of his life Van der Meer adopted a second manner . We now find his See also:painting smooth and thin, and his See also:colours paler and softer . Instead of masculine vigour we have refined delicacy and subtlety, but in both styles beauty of See also:tone and perfect See also:harmony are conspicuous . Through all his work This undeserved neglect seems to have fallen on him at an early period, for See also:Houbraken (Groote Schouburgh, 1718), See also:writing little more than See also:forty years after his death, does not even mention him .

The only definite information we have from a contemporary is given by Bleyswijck (Beschrijving der Stad Delft, 1687), who tells us that he was born in 1632, and that he worked with Carel Fabritius, an able See also:

disciple of Rembrandt, who lost his life by an See also:explosion of a See also:powder See also:magazine in Delft in 1654 It is to the patient researches of W . Burger (Th . Thor6), Havard, Obreen, Soutendam, and others, that we owe our knowledge of the See also:main facts of his life, discovered in the archives of his native See also:town . Of his second style typical examples are to be seen in The Coquette" of the See also:Brunswick Gallery, in the "Woman Reading" in the Van der Hoop collection now at the Rijksmuseum at Amsterdam, in the " See also:Lady at a See also:Casement " belonging to See also:Lord Powerscourt (exhibited at the Royal See also:Academy, x878) and in the " See also:Music See also:Master and Pupil " belonging to the See also:King (exhibited at the Royal Academy, 1876) . Van der Meer's See also:authentic pictures in public and private collections amount to about See also:thirty . There is but one in the Louvre, the " See also:Lace Maker "; Dresden has the two afore-mentioned, while See also:Berlin has three, all acquired in the Suermondt 'collection, and the Czernin Gallery of See also:Vienna is fortunate in possessing a See also:fine picture, believed to represent the artist in his studio . In the Arenberg Gallery at See also:Brussels there is a remark-able See also:head of a girl, See also:half the size of life, which seems to be inter-mediate between his two styles . Several of his paintings are in private See also:foreign collections . In all his work there is a singular completeness and See also:charm . His tone is usually silvery with pearly shadows, and the See also:lighting of his interiors is equal and natural . In all cases his figures seem to move in See also:light and See also:air, and in this respect he resembles greatly his See also:fellow-worker De Hooch . It is curious to read that, at one of the See also:auctions in Amsterdam about the See also:middle of the 18th century, a De Hooch is praised as being " nearly equal to the famous Van der Meer of Delft." See also Havard, Van der Meer (See also:Paris, 1888) ; Vanzype, Vermeer de Delft (Brussels, 1908), and Hofstede de See also:Groot, See also:Jan Vermeer von Delft (See also:Leipzig, 1909) .

End of Article: JAN VAN DER MEER (1632-1675)
[back]
FIELDING BRADFORD MEEK (1817—1876)
[next]
OSWALD MEER (1809–1883)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.