Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
MELETIUS OF See also:ANTIOCH (d. 381) , See also:Catholic See also:bishop and See also:saint, was See also:born at Melitene in Lesser See also:Armenia of wealthy and See also:noble parents . He first appears (c . 357) as a supporter of Acacius,bishop See also:elf Caesarea, the See also:leader of that party in the episcopate which supported the Homoean See also:formula by which the See also:emperor See also:Constantius sought to effect a See also:compromise between the Homoeusians and the Homousians . Meletius thus makes his debut as an ecclesiastic of the See also:court party, and as such became bishop of Sebaste in See also:succession to See also:Eustathius, deposed as an Homousian heretic by the See also:synod of Melitene . The See also:appointment was resented by the Homoeusian See also:clergy, and Meletius retired to Beroea . According to See also:Socrates he attended the synod of See also:Seleucia in the , autumn of 359, and then subscribed the Acacian formula . See also:Early in 36o he became bishop of See also:Antioch, in succession to Eudoxius, who had been raised to the see of See also:Constantinople . Early in the following See also:year he was in See also:exile . According to an old tradition, supported by See also:evidence See also:drawn from See also:Epiphanius and See also:Chrysostom, this was due to a See also:sermon preached before the emperor Constantius, in which he revealed Homousian views . This explanation, however, is rejected by Loofs; the sermon contains nothing inconsistent with the Acacian position favoured by the court party; on the other See also:hand, there is evidence of conflicts with the clergy, quite apart from any questions of orthodoxy, which may have led to the bishop's deposition . The successor of Meletius was Euzoeus, who had fallen with See also:Arius under the See also:ban of See also:Athanasius; and Loofs explains the subita fide.i mutajio which St See also:Jerome (See also:ann . Abr .
2376) ascribes to Meletius to the dogmatic opposition of the deposed bishop to his successor
.
In Antioch itself Meletius continued to have adherents, who held See also:separate services in the " Apostolic " See also: In spite of the See also:advice of Gregory of Nazianzus and of the Western Church, the recognition of Paulirms's See also:sole episcopate was refused, See also:Flavian being consecrated as Meletius's successor . TheEustathians, on the other hand, elected See also:Evagrius as bishop on Paulinus's death, and it was not till 415 that Flavian succeeded in re-uniting them to the Church . Meletius was a See also:holy See also:man, whose ascetic See also:life was all the more remarkable in view of his great private See also:wealth . He was also a man of learning and culture, and widely esteemed for his See also:honourable, kindly and straightforward See also:character . He is venerated as a saint and See also:confessor in both the See also:Roman Catholic and Orthodox Eastern Churches . See the See also:article G . F . Loofs in See also:Herzog-Hauck, Realencykloptidie (ed . 1897, See also:Leipzig), xii . 552, and authorities there cited . |
|
|
[back] MELETIUS OF |
[next] MELETIUS OF LYCOPOLIS (4th century) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.