Online Encyclopedia

MISSOURI COMPROMISE

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V18, Page 615 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:
MISSOURI COMPROMISE  , an agreement (182o) between the
See also:
pro-
See also:
slavery and anti-slavery factions in the
See also:
United States, involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the public territories . A
See also:
bill to enable the
See also:
people of
See also:
Missouri to form a state government preliminary to
See also:
admission into the Union came before the House of Representatives in Committee of the Whole, on the 13th of
See also:
February 1819 . An amendment offered by James Tallmadge (1778–1853) of New York, which provided that the further introduction of slaves into Missouri should be forbidden, and that all children of slave parents born in the state after its admission should be
See also:
free at the age of twenty-five, was adopted by the committee and incorporated in the Bill as finally passed (Feb . 17) by the house . The Senate refused to concur in the amendment and the whole measure was lost . During the following session (1819–182o), the house passed a similar bill with an amendment introduced on the 26th of
See also:
January 1820 by John W . Taylor (1784–1854) of New York making the admission of the state conditional upon its adoption of a constitution prohibiting slavery . In the meantime the question had been complicated by the admission in December of
See also:
Alabama, a slave state (the number of slave and free states now becoming equal), and by the passage through the house (
See also:
Jan . 3, 1820) of a bill to admit Maine, a free state . The Senate decided to connect the two
See also:
measures, and passed a bill for the admission of Maine with an amendment enabling the people of Missouri to form a state constitution . Before the bill was returned to the house a second amendment was adopted on the motion of J . B .

Thomas (1777–1850) of
See also:
Illinois, excluding slavery from the "
See also:
Louisiana
See also:
Purchase " north of 36° 30' (the
See also:
southern boundary of Missouri), except within the limits of the proposed state of Missouri . The House of Representatives refused to accept this and a
See also:
conference committee was appointed . There was now a controversy between the two houses not only 1861 Hamilton R . Gamble (appointed by state convention; died in office), provisional governor Willard P . Hall (Lieut.- governor by same power, acting provisional governor) Thomas C . Fletcher . Joseph W . McClurg . B . Gratz Brown .. . Silas Woodson Charles H . Hardin John S .

Phelps Thomas T . Crittenden John S . Marmaduke (died in office) . . Albert P . Morehouse (acting governor) David R . Francis . . . . William J . Stone . . . . Lon V . Stephens .

.

Alexander M . Dockerey . Joseph W . Folk . . . Herbert S . Hadley . . on the slavery issue, but also on the
See also:
parliamentary question of the inclusion of Maine and Missouri within the same bill . The committee recommended the enactment of two
See also:
laws, one for the admission of Maine, the other an enabling act for Missouri without any restrictions on slavery but including the Thomas amendment . This was agreed to by both houses, and the measures were passed, and were signed by President Monroe respectively on the 3rd and on the 6th of March 1820 . When the question of the final admission of Missouri came up during the session of 182o-1821 the struggle was revived over a clause in the new constitution (1820) requiring the exclusion of free negroes and mulattoes from the state . Through the influence of Henry Clay an act of admission was finally passed, to come into operation as soon as the state legislature would
See also:
pledge itself not to pass any legislation to enforce this clause .

This is sometimes known as the second Missouri

Compromise . These disputes, involving as they did the question of the relative powers of Congress and the states, tended to turn the Democratic-Republicans, who were becoming nationalized, back again toward their old state
See also:
sovereignty principles—to prepare the way for the Jacksonian-Democratic Party . On the other hand, the old Federalist nationalistic element was soon to emerge first as
See also:
National Republicans, then as Whigs, and finally as Republicans . On the constitutional side the Compromise of 182o was important as the first precedent for the congressional exclusion of slavery from public territory acquired since the adoption of the Constitution, and also as a clear recognition that Congress has no right to impose upon a state asking for admission into the Union conditions which do not apply to those states already in the Union . The compromise was specifically repealed by the Kansas-
See also:
Nebraska Bill of 1854 . See J . A . Woodburn, " The
See also:
Historical Significance of the Missouri Compromise " in the
See also:
Annual Report of the
See also:
American Historical Association for 1893 (Washington, D.C.) ; Dixon,
See also:
History of the Missouri Compromise (
See also:
Cincinnati, 1899) ; Schouler's and McMaster's Histories of the United States . (W . R .

End of Article: MISSOURI COMPROMISE
[back]
MISSOURI
[next]
MISSOURI RIVER

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.