|
MARC MONTALEMBERT REN$, See also: MARQUIS DE (1714-1800), French military engineer and writer, was See also: born at Angouleeme on the 16th of See also: July 1714, and entered the French Army in 1732
.
He fought in the War of the See also: Polish Succession on the Rhine (1733–34), and in the War of the See also: Austrian Succession made the See also: campaigns of 1742 in Bohemia and See also: Italy
.
In the years preceding the Seven Years' War, Montalembert (who had become an associate member of the Academie See also: des Sciences in 1747) devoted his energies to the See also: art of fortification, to which See also: Vauban's Traite de l'attaque attracted him, and founded the See also: arsenal at Ruelle, near his birthplace
.
On the outbreak of war he became French See also: commissioner with the allied army of Sweden, with the See also: rank of brigadier-general
.
He constructed the See also: field fortifications of
See also: Anklam and See also: Stralsund
.
In 1761 he was promoted marechal de See also: camp, and began the See also: works on which his fame rests
.
Montalembert's fortress has been aptly described by an See also: English author as an " immense battery." The intricacies of trace by which Vauban and Cormontaigne sought to minimize the power of the attack, are abandoned in favour of a See also: simple tenaille See also: plan so arranged that the defenders can bring an overwhelming fire to bear on the works of the besieger
.
Montalembert, who him-self See also: drew his idea from the practice of See also: Swedish and Prussian See also: engineers, furnished the See also: German constructors of the early 19th century with the means of designing entrenched camps suitable to See also: modern conditions of warfare
.
The " polygonal " method of fortification is the See also: direct outcome of Montalembert's systems
.
In his own country the caste-spirit of the engineer corps was roused to defend Vauban, and though Montalembert was allowed to construct some successful works at See also: Aix and See also: Oleron, he was forbidden to publish his method, and given but little opportunity for actual See also: building
.
After fifteen years of secrecy he published in See also: Paris (1776–1778) the first edition of La Fortification perpendiculaire
.
At the See also: time of the Revolution he surrendered a pension, which had been granted him for the loss of an See also: eye, although he was deeply in See also: debt, particularly on account of his Ruelle foundry, on which 6000 livres were due to him from the See also: state, which he never received
.
Persuaded by his wife, he joined in the emigration of the noblesse, and for a time lived inSee also: England
.
All his possessions were thereupon sequestrated by the republican See also: government
.
He very soon returned, divorced his wife, and married again
.
He obtained the annulment of the See also: sequestration
.
See also: Carnot often called him into consultation on military affairs, and, in 1792, promoted him general of division
.
Proposed as a member of the Institut in 1797, he withdrew his candidature in favour of General See also: Bonaparte
.
He died at Paris on the 29th of See also: March 1800
.
His wife,
See also: Marie Josephine de Comarieu, was the
hostess of one of the best-known salons of See also: Louis XVI.'s time
.
She wrote two novels of merit, Elise Dumesnil (1798) and Horace (1822)
.
She died in 1832
.
Besides his masterpiece, he wrote L'Art defensive superieure a l'offensif (1793; in reply to attacks made upon his earliest
See also: work, La Fortification per pendiculaire, of which in later See also: editions it forms See also: part); Memoire historique sur le fonte des canons (Paris, 1758), and other works on the same subject; Correspondance pendant la guerre de 1757–1760 (See also: London, 1777) ; Rotation des boulets (Acad., 1755) and Relations du siege de S
.
See also: Jean d'See also: Acre (Paris, 1789)
.
He also wrote See also: short stories and verse, as well as comedies
.
He also modelled a See also: complete course of Fortification (92 See also: models), which he offered to the Committee of Public Safety
.
His bust was sculptured by Bonvallet
.
Montalembert's position in the See also: history of fortification may be summed up as a realization of his own wish to do for the defence what Vauban had done for the attack
.
It was the inability of his contemporaries to see that Vauban's strength See also: lay in his See also: parallels and batteries and not in his bastions that vitiated their methods, and it was Montalembert's appreciation of this fact which made him the See also: father of modern fortification
.
See Tripier, La Fortification deduite de son histoire (Paris, 1866)
.
|
|
|
[back] CHARLES FORBES RENE DE MONTALEMBERT (1810-1870) |
[next] MONTALIVET |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.