Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

MUNICIPIUM (Lat. munus, a duty or pri...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V19, Page 9 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

MUNICIPIUM (See also:Lat. munus, a See also:duty or See also:privilege, capere, to take)  , in See also:ancient See also:Rome, the See also:term applied primarily to a status, a certain relation between individuals or communities and the See also:Roman See also:state; subsequently and in See also:ordinary usage to a community, See also:standing in such a relation to Rome . Whether the name signifies the taking up of burdens or the See also:acceptance of privileges is a disputed point . But as ancient authorities are unanimous in giving munus in this connexion the sense of " See also:duty " or " service," it is probable that the See also:chief feature of See also:municipality was the performance of certain services to Rome.' This view is confirmed by all that we know about the towns to which the name was applied in republican times . The status had its origin in the conferment of citizenship upon See also:Tusculum in 381 B.C . (See also:Livy vi . 26; cf . Cie. See also:pro See also:Plane . 8, 19), and was widely extended in the See also:settlement made by Rome at the See also:close of the Latin See also:War in 338 B.C . (see ROME, See also:History) . See also:Italian towns were then divided into three classes: (T) Coloniae civium Romanorum, whose members had all the rights of See also:citizen-See also:ship; (2) municipia, which received partial citizenship; (3) feeder-See also:aloe civitates (including the so. called Latin colonies), which remained entirely See also:separate from Rome, and stood in relations with her which were separately arranged by her for each state by treaty (feedus) . The municipia stood in very different degrees of dependence on Rome . Some, such as Fundi (Livy viii .

14; cf. ibid . 19), enjoyed a See also:

local self-See also:government only limited in the See also:matter of See also:jurisdiction; others, such as See also:Anagnia (Livy ix . 43 See also:Festus, de verb. sign/ ficatione, s.v . " See also:municipium," p . 127, ed . See also:Muller), were governed directly from Rome . But they all had certain features in See also:common . Their citizens were called upon to pay the same dues and perform the same service in the legions as full Roman citizens, but were deprived of the chief privileges of citizenship, those of voting in the See also:Comitia (See also:jus suffragii), and of holding Roman magistracies (jus honorum) . It would also appear from Festus (op. cit. s.v. praefectura, p . 233) that jurisdiction was entrusted in every municipium to praefecti juri dicundo sent out from Rome to represent the See also:Praetor Urbanus ? The conferment of municipality can therefore hardly have been regarded as other than an imposing of burdens, even in the See also:case of those cities which retained See also:control of their own affairs . But after the close of the second Punic War, when Rome had become the chief See also:power, not only in See also:Italy, but in all the neighbouring lands See also:round the Mediterranean, we can trace a growing tendency among the Italian cities to regard citizenship of this See also:great state as a See also:privilege, and to claim See also:complete citizenship as a See also:reward of their services in helping to build up the Roman power .

During the 2nd See also:

century B.C. the jus suffragii and jus honorum were conferred upon numerous municipia (Livy xxxviii . 36, 37), whose citizens were then enrolled in the Roman tribes . They can have exercised their public rights but seldom, owing to their distance from Rome; but the consulships of C . See also:Marius, ' For a contrary view, however, see See also:Marquardt, Rom . Staatsverw . I. p . 26, n . 2 (2nd ed., See also:Leipzig, 1881), and authorities there cited . ' For a different view see See also:Willems, See also:Droit public remain, p . 381 (See also:Louvain, 1874)•MUNICIPIUM 7 a municeps of Arpinum (between 107 and Too B.C.), and the strength of the support given to Tiberius See also:Gracchus in the See also:assembly by the voters from Italian towns (133 B.C.) show what an important See also:influence the members of these municipia could occasionally exercise over Roman politics . The cities thus privileged, however, though receiving complete Rcman citizen ship, were not, as the See also:logic of public See also:law might seem to demand, incorporated in Rome, but continued to exist as See also:independent See also:urban See also:units; and this See also:anomaly survived in the municipal See also:system which was See also:developed, on the basis of these grants of citizen-ship, after the Social War . That system recognized the municeps. as at once a citizen of a self-governing See also:city community, and a member of the city of Rome, his dual capacity being illustrated by his right of voting both in the See also:election of Roman magistrates and in the election of magistrates for his cwn See also:town .

The result of the Social War which See also:

broke out in 91 B.C . (see ROME: History) was the See also:establishment of a new See also:uniform municipality throughout Italy, and the obliteration of any important distinction between the three classes established after the Latin War . By the Lex Julia of 90 B.C. and the Lex Plautia Papiria of 89 B.C. every town in Italy which made application in due See also:form received the complete citizenship . The term municipium was no longer confined to a particular class of Italian towns but was adopted as a convenient name for all urban communities of Roman citizens in Italy . The organization of a municipal system, which should regulate the governments of all these towns on a uniform basis, and define their relation to the Roman government, was probably the See also:work of See also:Sulla, who certainly gave great impetus to the See also:foundation in the provinces of citizen colonies, which were the earliest municipia outside Italy, and enjoyed the same status as the Italian towns . See also:Julius See also:Caesar extended the See also:sphere of the Roman municipal system by his enfranchisement of Cisalpine See also:Gaul, and the consequent inclusion of all the towns of that region in the See also:category of municipia . He seems also to have given a more definite organization to the municipia as a whole . But, excepting those in Cisalpine Gaul, the municipal system still embraced no towns outside Italy other than the citizen colonies . See also:Augustus and his successors adopted the practice of granting to existing towns in the provinces either the full citizenship, or a partial civitas known as the jus Latii . This partial civitas does not seem to have been entirely replaced, as in Italy, by the See also:grant of full privileges to the communities possessing it, and the distinction survived for some See also:time in the provinces between coloniae, municipia See also:juris Romani, and municipia juris Latin . But the uniform system of See also:administration gradually adopted in all three classes rendered the distinction entirely unimportant, and the See also:general term municipium is used of all alike . The See also:incorporation of existing towns, hitherto non-Roman, in the uniform municipal system of the principate took See also:place mainly in the eastern See also:part of the See also:Empire, where See also:Greek See also:civilization had See also:long fostered urban See also:life .

In the See also:

west city communities rapidly sprang up under See also:direct Roman influence . The development of towns of the municipal type on the sites where legions occupied permanent quarters can be traced in several of the western provinces; and it cannot be doubted that this development became the See also:rule wherever a See also:body of Roman subjects settled down together for any purpose and permanently occupied a region . At any See also:rate by the end of the 1st century of the principate municipia are numerous in the western as well as the eastern See also:half of the Empire, and the towns are every-where centres of Roman influence . Of the See also:internal life of the municipia very little is known before the Empire . For the See also:period after Julius Caesar, however, we have two important See also:sources of See also:information . A See also:series of municipal See also:laws gives us a detailed knowledge of the constitution imposed, with slight See also:variations, on all the municipia; and a See also:host of private See also:inscriptions gives particulars of their social life . The municipal constitution of the 1st century of the principate is based upon the type of government common to See also:Greece and Rome from earliest times . The government of each town consists of magistrates, See also:senate and assembly, and is entirely independent of the Roman government except in certain cases of higher See also:civil jurisdiction, which come under the direct cognisance of the praetor urbanus at Rome . On the other See also:hand, each community is See also:bound to perform certain services to the Imperial government, such as the contribution of men and horses for military service, the See also:maintenance of the imperial See also:post through its neighbourhood, and the occasional entertainment of Roman officials or See also:billeting of soldiers . The citizens were of two classes: (r) cives, whether by See also:birth, See also:naturalization or emancipation, (2) incolae, who enjoyed a partial citizenship based on See also:domicile for a certain period . Both classes were liable to civic burdens, but the incolae had none of the privileges of citizenship except a limited right of voting . The citizens were grouped in either tribes or curiae, and accordingly the assembly sometimes See also:bore the name of Comitia Tributa, sometimes that of Comitia Curiata .

Phoenix-squares

The theoretical See also:

powers of these comitia were extensive both in the election of magistrates and in legislation . But the growing influence of the senate over elections on the one hand, and on the other hand the increasing reluctance of leading citizens to become candidates for See also:office (see below), gradually made popular election a See also:mere form . The senatorial recommendation of the necessary number of candidates seems to have been merely ratified in the comitia; and a See also:Spanish municipal law of the 1st century makes See also:special See also:provision for occasions on which an insufficient number of candidates are forthcoming . In Italy, however, the reality of popular elections seems to have survived to a later date . The inscriptions at See also:Pompeii, for instance, give See also:evidence of keenly contested elections in the 2nd century . The local senate, or See also:curia, always exercised an important influence on municipal politics . Its members formed the local See also:nobility, and at an See also:early date special privileges were granted by Rome to provincials who were senators in their native towns . For the See also:composition, powers, and history of the provincial senate see See also:DECURio . The magistrates were elected annually, and were six in number, forming three pairs of colleagues . The highest magistrates were the Ilviri (See also:Duoviri) juri dicundo, who had See also:charge, as their name implies, of all local jurisdiction, and presided over the assembly . Candidates for this office were required to be over 25 years of See also:age, to have held one of the See also:minor magistracies, and to possess all the qualifications required of members of the local senate (see DEcuRio): Next in dignity were the IIviri aediles, who had charge of the roads and public buildings, the See also:games and the See also:corn-See also:supply, and exercised See also:police control through-out the town . They appear to have been regarded as sub-See also:ordinate colleagues (collegae minores) of the Ilviri juri dicundo; and in some towns at least to have had the right to convene and preside over the comitia in the See also:absence of the latter .

Indeed many inscriptions speak of IVviri (Quattuorviri) consisting of two IVviri juri dicundo and two IVviri aediles; but in the See also:

majority of cases the former are regarded as distinct and See also:superior magistrates . The two quaestores, who appear to have controlled See also:finance in a large number of municipia, cannot be traced in others; and it is probable that in the municipia, as at Rome, the quaestorship was locally instituted, as need arose, to relieve the supreme magistrates of excessive business . Other municipal magistrates frequently referred to in the inscriptions are the quinquennales and praefecti . The quinquennales superseded the Ilviri or IVviri juri dicundo every five years, and differed from them only in possessing, in addition to their other powers, those exercised in Rome before the time of Sulla by the censors . Two classes of praefecti are found in the municipalities under the Empire, both of which are to be distinguished from the officials who bore that name in the municipia before the Social War . The first class consists of those praefecti who were nominated as temporary delegates by the IIviri, when through illness or compulsory absence they were unable to See also:discharge the duties of their office . The second class, referred to in inscriptions by the name of praefecti ab decuribnibus creati lege Petronia, seem to have been appointed by the local senate in case of a complete absence of higher magistrates, such as would have led in Rome to the See also:appointment of an interrex . From a social point of view the municipia of the Roman Empire may be treated under three heads: (I) as centres of local self-government, (2) as religious centres, (3) as See also:industrial centres . (I) The chief feature of the local government of the towns is the wide-spread activity of the municipal authorities in improving the general conditions of life in the town . In the municipalities, as in Rome, provision was made out of the public funds for feeding the poorest part of the See also:population, and providing a supply of corn which could be bought by ordinary citizens at a moderate See also:price . In See also:Pliny's time there existed in many towns public See also:schools controlled by the municipal authorities, concerning which Pliny remarks that they were a source of considerable disturbance in the town at the times when it was necessary to appoint teachers . He himself encouraged the establishment of another See also:kind of municipal school at See also:Como, where the leading townspeople subscribed for the maintenance of the school, and the control, including the appointment of teachers, remained in the hands of the subscribers .

Physicians seem to have been maintained in many towns at the public expense . The See also:

water-supply was also provided out of the municipal See also:budget, and controlled by magistrates appointed for the purpose . To enable it to See also:bear the expense involved in all these undertakings, the local See also:treasury was generally assisted by large benefactions, either in See also:money or in See also:works, from individual citizens; but direct See also:taxation for municipal purposes was hardly ever resorted to . The treasury was filled out of the proceeds of the landed possessions of the community, especially such fruitful sources of See also:revenue as mines and quarries, and out of import and export duties . It was occasionally subsidized by the See also:emperor on occasions of sudden and exceptional calamity . 2 . The chief feature in the religious life of the towns was the important position they occupied as centres for the cult of the emperor . Caesar-See also:worship as an organized cult developed sponta+ neously in many provincial towns during the reign of Augustus, and was fostered by him and his successors as a means of promoting in these centres of vigour and prosperity a strong See also:loyalty to Rome and the emperor, which was one of the firmest supports of the latter's power . The See also:order of Augustales, officials appointed to regulate the worship of the emperor in the towns, occupied a position of dignity and importance in provincial society . It was composed of the leading and the wealthiest men among the See also:lower classes of the population . By the organization of the order on these lines Augustus secured the See also:double See also:object of maintaining Caesar-worship in all the most vigorous centres of provincial life, and attracting to himself and his successors the special devotion of the industrial class which had its origin in the municipia of the Roman Empire, and has become the greatest See also:political force in See also:modern See also:Europe . 3 .

The development of this See also:

free industrial class is the chief feature of the municipia considered as centres of See also:industry and handicraft . The rise to power of the equestrian order in Rome during the last century of the See also:Republic had to some extent modified the old Roman principle that See also:trade and See also:commerce were beneath the dignity of the governing class; but long after the fall of the Republic the aristocratic notion survived in Rome that industry and handicrafts were only See also:fit for slaves . In the provincial towns, however, this See also:idea was rapidly disappearing in the early years of the Empire, and even in the See also:country towns of Italy the inscriptions give evidence not much later of the existence of a large and flourishing free industrial class, proud of its occupation, and bound together by a strong esprit de See also:corps . Already the members of this class show a strong tendency to bind themselves together in See also:gilds (collegia, sodalitates), and the existence of countless associations of the kind is revealed by the inscriptions . The formation of See also:societies for religious and other purposes was frequent at Rome from the earliest times in all classes of the free population . After the time of Sulla these societies were regarded by the government with suspicion, mainly on See also:account of the political uses to which they were turned, and various See also:measures were passed for their suppression in Rome and Italy . This policy was continued by the early emperors and extended to the whole Empire, but in spite of opposition the gilds in the provincial towns See also:grew and flourished . The ostensible See also:objects of nearly all such collegia of which we have any knowledge were twofold, the maintenance of the worship of some See also:god, and provision for the performance of proper funerary rights for its members . But under See also:cover of these two See also:main objects, the only two purposes for which such combinations were allowed under the Empire, associations of all kinds grew up . The organization of the gilds was based on that of the municipality . Each elected its See also:officers and treasurers at an See also:annual See also:meeting, and every five years a revision of the See also:list of members was held, corresponding to that of the senators held quinquennially by the city magistrates . It is doubtful how far these societies served to organize and improve particular See also:industries .

There is no evidence to show that any societies during the first three centuries consisted solely of workers at a single See also:

craft . But there can be little doubt that the later craft gilds were a development, through the industrial gilds of the provincial towns, of one of the most ancient features of Roman life . Remarkable See also:concord seems generally to have existed in the municipia between the various classes of the population . This is accounted for partly by the strong civic feeling which formed a, See also:bond of unity stronger than most sources of See also:friction, and partly to the general prosperity of the towns, which removed any acute discontent . The wealthy citizen seems always to have had to bear heavy See also:financial burdens, and to have enjoyed in return a dignity and an actual political preponderance which made the general See also:character of, municipal constitutions distinctly timocratic . The policy adopted by the early emperors of encouraging, within the limits of a uniform system, the See also:independence and civic patriotism of the towns, was superseded in the 3rd and 4th centuries by a deliberate effort to use the towns as See also:instruments of the imperial government, under the direct control of the emperor or , his representatives in the provinces . This policy was accompanied by a See also:gradual decay of civic feeling and municipal enterprise, which showed itself mainly in the unwillingness of the townsmen to become candidates for local magistracies, or to take up the burdens entailed in membership of the municipal senate . Popular control of the local government of the towns was ceasing to be a reality as early as the end of the 1st century of the Empire . Two centuries later local government was a mere form . And the self-governing communities of the See also:middle ages were a restoration, rather than a development, of the flourishing and independent municipalities of the age of Augustus and his immediate successors .

End of Article: MUNICIPIUM (Lat. munus, a duty or privilege, capere, to take)
[back]
MUNICIPALITY
[next]
MUNIMENT

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.