Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
MYTHOLOGY
(Gr. pvOo7'.oyia, the See also:science which examines µ118o', myths or legends of See also:cosmogony and of gods and heroes
.
Mythology is also used as a See also:term for these legends themselves
.
Thus when we speak of " the mythology of See also:Greece " we mean the whole See also:body of See also:Greek divine and heroic and cosmogonic legends
.
When we speak of the" science of mythology " we refer to the various attempts which have been made to explain these See also:ancient narratives
.
Very See also:early indeed in the See also:history of human thought men awoke to the consciousness that their religious stories were much in want of explanation
.
The myths of civilized peoples, as of Greeks and the See also:Aryans of See also:India, contain two elements, the rational and what to See also:modern minds seems the irrational
.
The rational myths are those which represent the gods as beautiful and See also:wise beings
.
The See also:Artemis of the Odyssey " taking her pastime in the See also:chase of boars and See also:swift See also:deer, while with her the See also:wild See also:wood-See also:nymphs disport them, and high over them all she rears her brow, and is easily to be known where all are See also:fair," is a perfectly rational mythic See also:representation of a divine being
.
We feel, even now, that the conception of a " See also:queen and huntress, chaste and fair," the See also:lady See also:warden of the woodlands, is a beautiful and natural See also:fancy which requires no explanation
.
On the other See also:hand, the Artemis of See also:Arcadia, who is confused with the nymph See also:Callisto, who, again, is said to have become a she-See also:bear, and later a See also:star, and the Brauronian Artemis, whose See also:maiden ministers danced a bear-See also:dance, are goddesses whose See also:legend seems unnatural, and is See also:felt to need explanation
.
Or, again, there is nothing not explicable and natural in the conception of the Olympian See also:Zeus as represented by the See also:great See also:chryselephantine statue of Zeus at See also:Olympia, or in the Homeric conception of Zeus as a See also:god who " turns everywhere his shining eyes " and beholds all things
.
But the Zeus whose See also:grave was shown in See also:Crete, or the Zeus who played See also:Demeter an obscene See also:trick by the aid of a See also:ram, or the Zeus who, in the shape of a See also:swan, became the See also:father of See also:Castor and See also:Pollux, or the Zeus who was merely a rough See also:
It is this irrational and unnatural See also:element—as Max See also: Here we see the religiousview of Cagn, the Bushman god . But in the mythological See also:account of Cagn given by Qing he appears as a See also:kind of grass-hopper, supernaturally endowed, the See also:hero of a most absurd See also:cycle of senseless adventures . Even religion is affected by these irrational notions, and the gods of savages and of many civilized peoples are worshipped with cruel, obscene, and irrational See also:rites . But, on the whole, the religious sentiment strives to transcend the mythical conceptions of the gods, and is shocked and puzzled by the mythical narratives . As soon as this sense of perplexity is felt by poets, by priests, or by most men in an See also:age of nascent See also:criticism, explanations of what is most crude and absurd in the myths are put forward . -Men ask themselves why their gods are worshipped in the form of beasts, birds, and fishes; why their gods are said to have prosecuted their amours in bestial shapes; why they are represented as lustful and passionate—thieves, robbers, murderers and adulterers . The answers to these questions sometimes become myths themselves . Thus both the Mangaians and the Egyptians have been puzzled by their own gods in the form of beasts . The Egyptians invented an explanation—itself a myth—that in some moment of danger the gods concealed themselves from their foes in the shapes of animals.' The Mangaians, according to W . W . Gill, hold that " the heavenly See also:family had taken up their See also:abode in these birds, fishes, and See also:reptiles."2 A See also:people so curious and refined as the Greeks were certain to be greatly perplexed by even such comparatively pure mythical narratives as they found in Homer, still more by the coarser legends of See also:Hesiod, and above all by the ancient See also:local myths preserved by local priesthoods . Thus, in the 6th. See also:century before See also:Christ, See also:Xenophanes of See also:Colophon severely blamed the poets for their unbecoming legends, and boldly called certain myths " the fables of men of old." 3 Theagenes of Rhegium (520 B.C.?), according to the scholiast on Iliad, xx . 67,4 was the author of a very ancient See also:system of mythology . Admitting that the See also:fable of the See also:battle of the gods was " unbecoming," if literally understood, Theagenes represented it as an allegorical account of the See also:war of the elements . See also:Apollo, Helios, and See also:Hephaestus were See also:fire, Hera was See also:air, See also:Poseidon was See also:water, Artemis was the See also:moon, Kai -See also:ea Xoora oµoiw . Or, by another system, the names of the gods represented moral and intellectual qualities . Heraclitus, too, disposed of the myth of the bondage of Hera as allegorical See also:philosophy . See also:Socrates, in the Cratylus of See also:Plato, expounds " a philosophy which came to him all in an instant," an explanation of the divine beings based on crude philological analyses of their names . See also:Metrodorus, rivalling some See also:recent flights of conjecture, resolved not only the gods but even heroes like See also:Agamemnon, See also:Hector and See also:Achilles " into elemental combinations and See also:physical agencies." 5 See also:Euripides makes See also:Pentheus (but he was notoriously impious) advance a " rationalistic " theory of the See also:story that See also:Dionysus was stitched up in the thigh of Zeus . When See also:Christianity became powerful the See also:heathen philosophers evaded its See also:satire by making more and more use of the allegorical and non-natural system of explanation . That method has two faults . First (as See also:Arnobius and See also:Eusebius reminded their heathen opponents), the allegorical explanations are purely arbitrary, depend upon the fancy of their author, and are all equally plausible and equally unsupported by See also:evidence .8 Secondly, there is no See also:proof at all that, in the distant age when the myths were See also:developed, men entertained the moral notions and physical philosophies which are supposed to be " wrapped up, " as See also:Cicero says, " in impious fables." Another system of explanation is that associated with the name of Euemerus (316 B.c.) . According to this author, the myths are history in disguise . All the gods were once men, whose real feats have been decorated and distorted by later fancy . This view suited Lactantius, St See also:Augustine and other early See also:Christian writers ' See also:Plutarch, Dc Iside et Osiride . 2 Myths and Songs from the See also:South Pacific, p . 35 (1876) . 3 Xenoph . Fr. i . 42 . 4 See also:Dindorf's ed., iv . 231 . 5 See also:Grote, Hist. of Greece, (ed . 1869) i . 404 . 6 Cf . See also:Lobeck, Aglaophamus, i . 151-152, on allegorical interprets• ton of myths in the mysteries . very well . They were pleased to believe that Euemerus " by See also:historical See also:research had ascertained that the gods were once but mortal men." Precisely the same convenient See also:line was taken by Sahagun in his account of Mexican religious myths . As there can be no doubt that the ghosts of dead men have been worshipped in many lands, and as the gods of many faiths are tricked out with attributes derived from ancestor-worship, the system of Euemerus retains some measure of plausibility . While we need not believe with Euemerus and with See also:Herbert See also:Spencer that the god of Greece or the god of the See also:Hottentots was once a See also:man, we cannot deny that the myths of both these gods have passed through and been coloured by the imaginations of men who practised the worship of real ancestors . For example, the Cretans showed the See also:tomb of Zeus, and the Phocians (See also:Pausanias x . 5) daily poured See also:blood of victims into the tomb of a hero; obviously by way of feeding his See also:ghost . The Hottentots show many tombs of their god, Tsui-Goab, and tell tales about his See also:death; they also pray regularly for aid at the tombs of their own parents.' We may therefore say that, while it is rather absurd to believe that Zeus and Tsui-Goab were o.nce real men, yet their myths are such as would be developed by people accustomed, among other forms of religion, to the worship of dead men . Very probably portions of the legends of real men have been attracted into the mythic accounts of gods of another See also:character, and this is the element of truth at the bottom of Euemerism . Later Explanations of Mythology.—The ancient systems of explaining what needed explanation in myths were, then, physical, ethical, religious and historical . One student, like Theagenes, would see a physical philosophy underlying Homeric legends .
Another, like See also:Porphyry, would imagine that the meaning was partly moral, partly of a dark theosophic and religious character
.
Another would detect moral See also:allegory alone, and See also:Aristotle expresses the See also:opinion that the myths were the 'inventions of legislators " to persuade the many, and to be used in support of See also:law " (Met. xi
.
8, 1q)
.
A See also:fourth, like Euemerus, would get rid of the supernatural element altogether, and find only an imaginative rendering of actual history
.
When Christians approached the problem of heathen mythology, they sometimes held, with St Augustine, a form of the See also:doctrine of Euemerus.2 In other words, they regarded Zeus, See also:Aphrodite and the See also:rest as real persons, diabolical not divine
.
Some later philosophers, especially of the 17th century, misled by the resemblance between Biblical narratives and ancient myths, came to the conclusion that the See also:Bible contains a pure, the myths a distorted, form of an See also:original See also:revelation
.
The See also:abbe Banier published a mythological compilation in which he systematically resolved all the Greek myths into See also:ordinary history.' See also:Bryant published (1774) A New System, or an See also:Analysis of Ancient Mythology, wherein an See also:Attempt is made to divest Tradition of Fable, in which he talked very learnedly of " that wonderful people, the descendants of See also:Cush," and saw everywhere symbols of the See also:ark and traces of the Noachian See also:deluge
.
See also: 113 . 2 De civ. dei., vii . 18; viii . 26 . La Mythologic et See also:les fables expliquees See also:par l'histoire (See also:Paris, 1738; 3 vols . 4t0) . * Symbolik and Mythologic der See also:alien Volker (See also:Leipzig and See also:Darmstadt, 1836-1843) . that Lafitau, a Jesuit missionary in See also:North See also:America, while inclined to take a mystical view of the secrets concealed by See also:Iroquois myths, had also pointed out the savage element surviving in Greek mythology.' Recent Mythological Systems.—Up to a very recent date students of mythology were hampered by orthodox traditions, and still more by See also:ignorance of the ancient See also:languages and of the natural history of rnan . Only recently have See also:Sanskrit and the See also:Egyptian and Babylonian languages become books not absolutely sealed . Again, the study of the See also:evolution of human institutions from the lowest savagery to See also:civilization is essentially a novel See also:branch of research, though ideas derived from an unsystematic study of See also:anthropology are at least as old as Aristotle . The new theories of mythology are based on the belief that " it is man, it is human thought and human See also:language combined, which naturally and necessarily produced the See also:strange See also:conglomerate of ancient fable."' But, while there is now universal agreement so far, modern mythologists differed essentially on one point . There was a school (with See also:internal divisions) which regarded ancient fable as almost entirely " a disease of language," that is, as the result of See also:con-fusions arising from misunderstood terms that have survived in speech after their original significance was lost . Another school (also somewhat divided against itself) believes that misunderstood language played but a very slight See also:part in the evolution of mythology, and that the irrational element in myths is merely the survival from a condition of thought which was once See also:common, if not universal, but is now found chiefly among savages, and to a certain extent among children . The former school considered that the See also:state of thought out of which myths were developed was produced by decaying language; the latter maintains that the corresponding phenomena of language were the reflection of thought . For the See also:sake of brevity we might See also:call the former the " philological " system, as it rests chiefly on the study of language, while the latter might be styled the " historical " or " anthropological " school, as it is based on the study of man in the sum of his See also:manners, ideas and institutions . The System of Max Muller.—The most distinguished and popular See also:advocate of the philological school was Max Muller, whose views may be found in his Selected Essays and Lectures on Language . The problem was to explain what he calls " the silly, savage and senseless element " in mythology (Set . See also:Ess. i . 578) . Max Muller says (speaking of the Greeks), " their poets had an instinctive aversion to every-thing excessive or monstrous, yet they would relate of their gods what would make the most savage of Red See also:Indians creep and shudder "—stories, that is, of the See also:cannibalism of Demeter, of the See also:mutilation of See also:Uranus, the cannibalism of Cronus, who swallowed his own children, and the like . " Among the lowest tribes of See also:Africa and America we hardly find anything more hideous and revolting." Max Muller refers the beginning of his system of mythology to the See also:discovery of the connexion of the Indo-See also:European or, as they are called, " See also:Aryan " languages . Celts, Germans, speakers of Sanskrit and Zend, Latins and Greeks, all prove by their languages that their See also:tongues may be traced to one family of speech . The comparison of the various words which, in different forms, are common to all Indo-European languages must inevitably throw much See also:light on the original meaning of these words . Take, for example, the name of a god, Zeus, or Athene, or any other . The word may have no intelligible meaning in Greek, but its counterpart in the allied tongues, especially in Sanskrit or Zend, may reveal the original significance of the terms . " To understand the origin and meaning of the names of the Greek gods, and to enter into the original intention of the fables told of each, we must take into account the See also:collateral evidence supplied by Latin, See also:German, Sanskrit and Zend See also:philology " (Lett. on See also:Lang., 2nd See also:series, p . 406) . A name may be intelligible in Sanskrit which has no sense in Greek . Thus Athene is a divine name without meaning in Greek, but Max Muller advances reasons for supposing that it is identical with ahana, " the See also:dawn," in Sanskrit . It is his opinion, apparently, that whatever story. is told of Athene must have originally been told of the dawn, and that we must keep this before us in attempting to understand the legends of Athene . Thus again (op. cit. p . 410), he says, " we have a right to explain all that is told of him " (See also:Agni, " fire ") " as originally meant for fire." The system is simply this: the original meaning of the names of gods must be ascertained by See also:comparative philology . The names, as a See also:rule, will be found to denote elemental phenomena . And the.silly, ' Meeurs des sauvages (Paris, 1724) . s Max Muller . Lectures on Language (1864), 2nd series, p . 410 . II savage and senseless elements in the legends of the gods will be shown to have a natural significance, as descriptions of See also:sky, storms, sunset, water, fire, dawn, See also:twilight, the See also:life of See also:earth, and other See also:celestial and terrestrial existences . Stated in the barest form, these results do not differ greatly from the conclusions of Theagenes of Rhegium, who held that " Hephaestus was fire, Hera was air, Poseidon was water, Artemis was the moon, at 'ea aoara bgoiws." But Max Muller's system is based on scientific philology, not on conjecture, and is supported by a theory of the various processes in the evolution of myths out of language . It is no longer necessary to give an elaborate analysis of this theory, because neither in its philological nor mythological See also:side has it any See also:advocates who need be reckoned with . The attempt to disengage the history of times forgotten and unknown, by means of analysis of roots and words in Aryan languages, has been unsuccessful, or has at best produced disputable results . Max Muller's system was a result of the philological theories that indicated the linguistic unity of the Indo-European or " Aryan " peoples, and was founded on an analysis of their language . But myths precisely similar in irrational and repulsive character, even in See also:minute details, to those of the Aryan races, exist among Australians, South See also:Sea Islanders, See also:Eskimo, See also:Bushmen in Africa, among See also:Solomon Islanders, Iroquois, and so forth . The facts being identical, an identical explanation should be sought, and, as the languages in which the myths exist are essentially different, an explanation founded on the Aryan language is likely to prove too narrow . Once more, even if we discover the original meaning of a god's name, it does not follow that we can explain by aid of the significance of the name the myths about the god . For nothing is more common than the attraction of a more ancient story into the legend of a later god or hero . Myths of unknown antiquity, for example, have been attracted into the legend of See also:Charlemagne, just as the bans mots of old wits are transferred to living humorists . Therefore, though we may ascertain that Zeus means " sky " and Agni " fire," we cannot assert, with Max Muller, that all the myths about Agni and Zeus were originally told of fire and sky . When these gods became popular they would inevitably inherit any current exploits of earlier heroes or gods . These exploits would therefore be explained erroneously if regarded as originally myths of sky or fire . We cannot convert Max Muller's proposition " there was nothing told of the sky that could not in some form or other be ascribed to Zeus" into " there was nothing ascribed to Zeus that had not at some See also:time or other been told of the sky." This is also, perhaps, the proper See also:place to observe that names derived from natural phenomena—sky, clouds, dawn and See also:sun—are habitually assigned by Brazilians, Ojibways, Australians and other savages to living men and See also:women . Thus the story originally told of a man or woman bearing the name " sun," " dawn," " See also:cloud," may be mixed up later with myths about the real celestial dawn, cloud or sun . For all these reasons the See also:information obtained from philological analysis of names is to be distrusted . We must also bear in mind that early men when they conceived, and savage men when they conceive, of the sun, moon, See also:wind, earth, sky and so forth, have no such ideas in their minds as we attach to these names . They think of sun, moon, wind, earth and sky as of living human beings with bodily parts and passions . Thus, even when we discover an elemental meaning in a god's name, that meaning may be all unlike what the word suggests to civilized men . A final objection is that philologists differ widely as to the true analysis and real meaning of the divine names . Max Muller, for example, connects Kronos (K See also:abyss) with y.povos, "time"; Prellerwith Kpaivw,"I fulfil," and so forth . The civilized men of the Mythopoeic age were not obliged, as Max Muller held, to believe that all phenomena were persons, because the words which denoted the phenomena had gender-terminations . On the other hand, the gender-terminations were survivals from an early See also:stage of thought in which See also:personal characteristics, including See also:sex, had been attributed to all phenomena . This condition of thought is demonstrated to be, and to have been, universal among savages, and it may notoriously be observed among children . Thus Max Muller's theory that myths are " a disease of language " seems destitute of evidence, and inconsistent with what is historically known about the relations between the language and the social, See also:political and See also:literary condition of men . Theory of Herbert Spencer.—The system of Herbert Spencer, as explained in Principles of See also:Sociology, has many points in common with that of Max Muller . Spencer attempts to account for the state of mind (the See also:foundation of myths) in which man personifies and animates all phenomena . According to his theory, too, this See also:habit of mind may be regarded as the result of degeneration, for in his view, as in Max Muller's, it is not See also:primary, but the result of misconceptions . But, while language is the chief cause of misconceptions with Max Muller, with Spencer it is only one of several forces all working to the same result . Statements which originally had a different significance are misinterpreted, he thinks, and names of human beings are also misinterpreted in such a manner that early races are gradually led to believe in the See also:personality of phenomena . He too notes " the defect in early speech "—that is, the " lack of words See also:free from implications of vitality "—as one of the causes which " favour personalization." Here, of course, we have to ask Spencer, with Max Muller, why words in early languages " implyvitality." These words must reflect the thought of the men who use them before they react upon that thought and confirm it in its misconceptions . So far Spencer seems at one with the philological school of mythologists, but he warns us that the misconstructions of language in his system are" different in kind, and the erroneous course of thought is opposite in direction." According to Spencer (and his premises, at least, are correct), the names of human beings in an early state of society are derived from incidents of the moment, and often refer to the See also:period of the See also:day or the nature of the See also:weather . We find, among Australian natives, among See also:Abipones in South America, and among Ojibways in the North, actual people named Dawn,See also:Gold See also:Flower of Day, Dark Cloud, Sun, and so forth . Spencer's See also:argument is that, given a story about real people so named, in See also:process of time and forgetfulness the See also:anecdote which was once current about a man named See also:Storm and a woman named See also:Sunshine will be transferred to the meteorological phenomena of sun and See also:tempest . Thus these purely natural agents will come to be " personalized " (Prin . See also:Soc . 392), and to be credited with purely human origin and human adventures . Another misconception would arise when men had a tradition that they came to their actual seats from this See also:mountain, or that See also:lake or See also:river, or from lands across the sea . They will See also:mistake this tradition of local origin for one of actual parentage, and will come to believe that, like certain Homeric heroes, they are the sons of a river (now personified), or of a mountain, or, like a tribe mentioned by Garcilasso de la See also:Vega, that they are descended from the sea . Once more, if their old legend told them that they came from the rising sun, they will hold, like many races, that they are actually the children of the sun . By this process of forgetfulness and misinterpretation, mountains, See also:rivers, lakes, sun and sea would receive human attributes, while men would degenerate from a more sensible condition into a belief in the personality and vitality of inanimate objects . As Spencer thinks ancestor-worship the first form of religion, and as he holds that persons with such names as sun, moon and the like became worshipped as ancestors, his theory results in the belief that nature-worship and the myths about natural phenomena—dawn, wind, sky, See also:night and the rest—are a kind of transmuted worship of ancestors and transmuted myths about real men and women .. " Partly by confounding the parentage of the See also:race with a conspicuous object marking the See also:natal region of the race, partly by literal interpretation of See also:birth names, and partly by literal interpretation of names given in eulogy " (such as Sun and See also:Bull, among the Egyptian See also:kings), and also through " implicit belief in the statements of forefathers," there has been produced belief in descent from mountains, sea, dawn, from animals which have become constellations, and from persons once on earth who now appear as sun and moon . A very common class of myths (see See also:TOTEMISM) assures us that certain See also:stocks of men are descended from beasts, or from gods in the shape of beasts . Spencer explains these by the theory that the remembered ancestor of a stock had, as savages often have, an animal name, as Bear, See also:Wolf, See also:Coyote, or what not . In time his descendants came to forget that the name was a See also:mere name, and were misled into the opinion that they were children of a real coyote, wolf or bear . This idea, once current, would naturally stimulate and diffuse the belief that such descents were possible, and that the animals are closely akin to men . The chief objection to these processes is that they require, as a necessary condition, a singular amount of memory on the one hand and of forgetfulness on the other . The lowest contemporary savages remember little or nothing of any ancestor farther back than the-grandfather . But men in Spencer's Mythopoeic age had much longer memories . On the other hand, the most ordinary savage does not misunderstand so universal a See also:custom as the See also:imposition of names See also:peculiar to animals or derived from atmospheric phenomena . He calls his own See also: |