Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
NATURALISM
.
" Nature " is a See also:term of very uncertain extent, and the " natural " has accordingly several antitheses, often more or less conflicting, and only to be learnt from the context in which they occur
.
Thus, though See also:Man and the See also:World are often opposed as respectively subject and See also:object, yet the word nature is applied to both: hence Naturalism is used in both a subjective and an See also:objective sense
.
In the subjective sense the natural, as the See also:original or essential, is opposed to what is acquired, artificial, conventional or accidental
.
On this opposition the See also:casuistry and paradoxes of the See also:Sophists largely turned; it determined also, at least negatively, the conduct of the See also:Cynics in their contempt for the customary duties and decencies; and it led the See also:Stoics to seek See also:positive rules of See also:life in " conformity to nature." This deference for the " natural " generally, and distrust of traditional systems of thought and even of traditional institutions, has played a large See also:part in See also:modern See also:philosophy, especially See also:British philosophy
.
It was perhaps the inevitable outcome of the reaction, which began with the See also:Renaissance, against the See also:medieval domination of See also:mere authority
.
" L'homme qui medite est un See also:animal deprave," said See also:
From the See also:Cambridge Platonists, from Locke and See also: . . may be so extensive, as that the whole See also:Christian See also:dispensation may to them appear natural, i.e. analogous or conformable to God's dealings with other parts of His creation; as natural as the visible known course of things appears to us." 7 The See also:antithesis of natural to spiritual (or ideal) has mainly determined the use of the term Naturalism in the See also:present See also:day.$ But current naturalism is not to be called See also:materialism, though these terms are often used synonymously, as by See also:Hegel, See also:Ueberweg and other historians of philosophy; nor yet See also:pan-See also:theism, if by that is meant the See also:immanence of all things in one God . We know only material phenomena, it is said; matter is an abstract conception simply, not a substantial reality . It is therefore meaningless to describe mind as its effect . Moreover, mind also is but an abstract conception; and here again all our knowledge is confined to the phenomenal . To identify the two classes of phenomena is, however, impossible, and indeed absurd; nevertheless we find a See also:constant concomitance of psychosis and neurosis; and the more sensationalist and associationist our psychology, the easier it becomes to correlate the 3 Cf . See also:Sidgwick, See also:History of Ethics (1886), p . 181 . ' Cf . W . R . Sorley, The Ethics of Naturalism (1885), pp . 16 sqq .
'Cf
.
W
.
R
.
See also:Scott, See also:Francis Hutcheson; his Life, Teaching and Position in Philosophy (1900), pp
.
121, 265 seq
.
2 See See also:RATIONALISM; Kant, See also:Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft, Hartenstein's edition, vi
.
253; and See also:Lechler, Geschichte des Englischen Deismus (1841), pp
.
454 sqq
.
' See also:Analogy, part i. See also:chap. i. end
.
Cf. also J
.
S
.
See also: § 2, and Essays on Religion . 2In See also:aesthetics we find Naturalism used in a cognate sense: the Flemish painters, such writers as See also:Flaubert or See also:Zola, for example, being called naturalistic or realistic, in contrast to the See also:Italian painters or writers like See also:George See also:Sand or the Brontes . psychical and the See also:physical as but " two aspects " of one and the same fact . It is therefore simplest and sufficient to assume an underlying, albeit unknown, unity connecting the two . A See also:monism—so far neutral, neither materialistic nor spiritualistic—is thus a characteristic of the prevailing naturalism . But when the question arises, how best to systematize experience as a whole, it is contended that we must begin from the physical See also:side . Here we have precise conceptions, quantitative exactness and thoroughgoing continuity; every thought that has ever stirred the See also:hearts of men, not less than every See also:breeze that has ever rippled the See also:face of the deep, has meant a perfectly definite re-See also:distribution of matter and motion . To the See also:mechanical principles of this redistribution an ultimate See also:analysis brings us down; and—beginning from these—the nebular See also:hypothesis and the theory of natural selection will enable us to explain all subsequent See also:synthesis.' Life and mind now clearly take a secondary place; the cosmical mechanism determines them, while they are powerless to modify it . The spiritual becomes the " epiphenomenal," a merely incidental See also:phosphorescence, so to say, that regularly accompanies physical processes of a certain type and complexity . (See also PSYCHOLOGY.) This See also:absolute naturalism, as we may See also:call it, the union, that is, of psychological and cosmological. naturalism, is in fact a See also:species of See also:Fatalism, as Kant indeed entitled it ? It is the logical outcome of a sensationalist psychology, and of the epistemology which this entails . As See also:long as association of ideas (or sensory residua) is held to explain See also:judgment and See also:conscience, so long may naturalism stand .
The naturalistic work of chief See also:account at the present day is E
.
See also:Haeckel's See also:Die Weltratsel, gemeinverstdndliche Studien fiber monistische Philosophie (5th ed., 1900), of which an English See also:translation has appeared
.
Effective refutations will be found in the See also:works of two of Haeckel's colleagues, O
.
Liebmann, Zur Analysis der Wirklichkeil (3rd ed., 1900) ; R
.
See also:Eucken, Die Einheit des Geisteslebens in Bewusstsein and That der Menschheit (1888, Eng. trans.); Der Kampf um einen geistigen Lebensinhalt (1898)
.
See also A
.
J
.
See also:Balfour, See also:Foundations of Belief (8th ed., 19or); J
.
See also: |
|
|
[back] NATURAL PROTECTION AGAINST |
[next] NATURALIZATION |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.