Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:NENNIUS (fl. 796)
, a Welsh writer to whom we owe the Historia Britonum, lived and wrote in Brecknock or See also:Radnor
.
His See also:work is known to us through See also:thirty See also:manuscripts; but the earliest of these cannot be dated much earlier than the See also:year roots; and all are defaced by interpolations which give to the work so confused a See also:character that critics were See also:long disposed to treat it as an unskilful See also:forgery
.
A new turn was given to the controversy by Heinrich Zimmer, who, in his See also:Nennius vindicatus (1893), traced the See also:history of the work and, by a comparison of the manuscripts with the 11th-See also:century See also:translation of the Irish See also:scholar, Gilla Coemgim (d
.
1072), succeeded in stripping off the later accretions from the See also:original See also:nucleus of the Historia
.
Zimmer follows previous critics in rejecting the Prologus maim
.
(§§ 1, 2), the Capitula, or table of contents, and See also:part of the Mirabilia which See also:form the concluding See also:section
.
But he proves that Nennius should be regarded as the compiler of the Historia proper (§§ 7-65)
.
Zimmer's conclusions are of more See also:interest to See also:literary critics. than to historians
.
The only part of the Historia which deserves to se treated as a See also:historical document is the section known as the Genealogiae Saxonum (§§ 57-65)
.
This is merely a recension of a work which was composed about 679 by a Briton of See also:Strathclyde
.
The author's name is unknown; but he is, after See also:Gildas, our earliest authority for the facts of the See also:English See also:conquest of See also:England
.
Nennius himself gives us the See also:oldest legends See also:relating to the victories of See also: The See also:chief authorities whom Nennius followed were Gildas' De excidio Britonum, See also:Eusebius, the Vita Patricii of Murichu Maccu Machtheni, the Collectanea of Tirechan, the See also:Liber occupations (an Irish work on the See also:settlement of See also:Ireland), the Liber de See also:sex aetatibus mundi, the See also:chronicle of Prosper of See also:Aquitaine, the Liber beati Germani . The See also:sources from which he derived his notices of King Arthur (§ 56) have not been determined . See J . See also:Stevenson's edition of the Historia Britonum (English Hist . See also:Soc., 1838), based on a careful study of the See also:MSS . ; A. de la Borderie, L'Historia Britonum (See also:Paris and See also:London, 1883), which summarizes the older negative See also:criticism; H . Zimmer, Nennius vindicatus (See also:Berlin, 1893) ; T . See also:Mommsen in Neues Archie der Gesellschaft far altere deutsche Geschichtskunde, xix . 283 . (H . W . C . D.) NEO-CAESAREA, See also:SYNOD OF, a synod held shortly after that of See also:Ancyra, probably about 314 or 315 (although See also:Hefele inclines to put it somewhat later) . Its See also:principal work was the See also:adoption of fifteen disciplinary canons, which were subsequently accepted as ecumenical by the See also:Council of See also:Chalcedon, 451, and of which the most important are the following: i. degrading priests who marry after ordination; vii. forbidding a See also:priest to be See also:present at the second See also:marriage of any one; viii. refusing ordination to the See also:husband of an adulteress; xi. fixing thirty years as the See also:age below which one might not be ordained (because See also:Christ began His public See also:ministry at the age of thirty) ; xiii. according to See also:city priests the See also:precedence over See also:country priests; xiv. permitting Chorepiscopi to celebrate the sacraments; xv. requiring that there be seven deacons in every city . See Mansi ii. pp . 539-551; See also:Hardouin i. pp . 282-286; Hefele (2nd ed.) i. pp . 242-251 (Eng. trans. i. pp . 222-230) . (T . F . C.) NEOCOMIAN, in See also:geology, the name given to the lowest See also:stage of the Cretaceous See also:system . It was introduced by J . Thurmann in 1835 on See also:account of the development of these rocks at NeuclAtel (Neocomum), See also:Switzerland . It has been employed in more than one sense . In the type See also:area the rocks have been divided into two sub-stages, a See also:lower, Valanginian (from Valengin, E . See also:Desor, 1854) and an upper, Hauterivian (from Hauterive, E . See also:Renevier, 1874); there is also another See also:local sub-stage, the infra-Valanginian or Berriasian (from Berrias, H . Coquand, 1876) . These three sub-stages constitute the Neocomian in its restricted sense . A. von Koenen and other See also:German geologists extend the use of the See also:term to include the whole of the Lower Cretaceous up to the See also:top of the See also:Gault or See also:Albian . Renevier divided the Lower Cretaceous into the Neocomian See also:division, embracing the three sub-stages mentioned above, and an Urgonian division, including the Barremian, Rhodanian and See also:Aptian sub-stages . See also:Sir A . See also:Geikie (See also:Text See also:Book of Geology, 4th ed., 1903) regards " Neocomian" as synonymous with Lower Cretaceous, and he, like Renevier, closes this portion of the system at the top of the Lower See also:Green-See also:sand (Aptian) . Other See also:British geologists (A . J .
See also:Jukes-See also:
See See also:ARCHAEOLOGY ; also See also:Lord See also:Avebury, Prehistoric Times (1900) ; Sir See also: |
|
|
[back] NENAGH |
[next] NEOCORATE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.