NULLIFICATION
, the See also:process of making null or of no effect (See also:Lat. nullus, none)
.
In See also:United States See also:history the See also:term is applied to the process by which a See also:state either (a) in fact suspended, or (b) claimed a constitutional right of suspending, the operation of a federal See also:law within its own territory
.
The See also:doctrine of nullification as a constitutional theory was probably never held by a See also:majority of the states or of the See also:American See also:people at any one See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time, though before 186o most of the states asserted or practised it
.
The belief in nullification was based on the theory that the See also:union of the states was a voluntary one, each member retaining its See also:sovereignty, though for purposes of convenience delegating certain See also:powers of See also:government to an See also:agent—the federal government
.
The powers of this agent were strictly limited by the Constitution, and should it transcend these powers the states must interpose to protect their rights
.
This view held that the Supreme See also:Court created by the Constitution was not a proper tribunal to decide causes arising beyond the Constitution or See also:relating to the nature of the Union, but that its See also:jurisdiction was limited to cases arising under the Constitu tion
.
If the Federal government usurped a right belonging to the state, the latter, being a sovereignty, must See also:judge for itself
.
As later perfected by See also:John C
.
See also:Calhoun (q.v.), the theory of I remarkable discoveries to the skilful excavations of Dr Schulten
nullification required a practice as follows
.
A state aggrieved by a law of the Federal See also:congress might, in constituent See also:convention, suspend the operation of the objectionable law, and See also:report its See also:action to the other states
.
If three-fourths of them should decide that the law in question was not unconstitutional, then in effect it became ratified (see United States Constitution, See also:art. v.)
.
The dissatisfied state must then submit or must draw out of the union by the See also:act of See also:secession (see SECESSION, and CONFEDERATE STATES)
.
This theory of the right of nullification was considered by those who held it to be in See also:accord with the principles laid down in the Constitution
.
It must be distinguished from secession, which was considered a See also:sovereign right, one above the Constitution; yet nullification presumed the sovereignty of the state
.
The earliest assertions of the doctrine of nullification are found in the See also:Kentucky and See also:Virginia Resolutions of 1798-1799, written respectively by See also:- THOMAS
- THOMAS (c. 1654-1720)
- THOMAS (d. 110o)
- THOMAS, ARTHUR GORING (1850-1892)
- THOMAS, CHARLES LOUIS AMBROISE (1811-1896)
- THOMAS, GEORGE (c. 1756-1802)
- THOMAS, GEORGE HENRY (1816-187o)
- THOMAS, ISAIAH (1749-1831)
- THOMAS, PIERRE (1634-1698)
- THOMAS, SIDNEY GILCHRIST (1850-1885)
- THOMAS, ST
- THOMAS, THEODORE (1835-1905)
- THOMAS, WILLIAM (d. 1554)
Thomas See also:Jefferson and See also:- JAMES
- JAMES (Gr. 'IlrKw,l3or, the Heb. Ya`akob or Jacob)
- JAMES (JAMES FRANCIS EDWARD STUART) (1688-1766)
- JAMES, 2ND EARL OF DOUGLAS AND MAR(c. 1358–1388)
- JAMES, DAVID (1839-1893)
- JAMES, EPISTLE OF
- JAMES, GEORGE PAYNE RAINSFOP
- JAMES, HENRY (1843— )
- JAMES, JOHN ANGELL (1785-1859)
- JAMES, THOMAS (c. 1573–1629)
- JAMES, WILLIAM (1842–1910)
- JAMES, WILLIAM (d. 1827)
James See also:Madison in protest against the See also:Alien and See also:Sedition Acts of Congress
.
Nullification was first practised in 1809 by See also:Pennsylvania, the See also:governor ordering out the state troops to resist the See also:execution of a See also:decree of a Federal court
.
In the New See also:England states, 1809-1815, the United States See also:laws relating to See also:embargo, non-intercourse and See also:army enlistments were nullified by state action
.
From 1825-1829 the state of See also:Georgia forcibly prevented the execution of Federal laws and court decrees relating to the See also:Indians within her See also:borders and in See also:Alabama, 1832-1835, there was a similar nullification
.
The only example of nullification in which theory and practice coincided was the nullification in 1832 by See also:South Carolina of the Federal See also:tariff laws
.
In this the state acted upon the theory outlined above which was perfected by Calhoun
.
In the last See also:decade before the See also:Civil See also:War fourteen of the See also:Northern states in the so-called " See also:Personal See also:Liberty laws " n lllified the Federal statutes relating to slaves and See also:slavery by making it a See also:crime for their citizens to obey these laws and by setting the state See also:administration against the Federal officials
.
Since the Reconstruction the See also:Southern states have in practice effected a nullification of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution providing for See also:negro See also:suffrage
.
See John C
.
Calhoun, See also:Works, vols. i. and vi
.
(New See also:York, 1853-1855) ; D
.
F
.
See also:Houston, See also:Critical Study of Nullification in South Carolina (New York, 1897) ; C
.
W
.
Loring, Nullification and Secession (New York, 1893) ; E
.
P
.
See also:Powell, Nullification and Secession in the United States (New York, 1897) ; and U
.
B
.
See also:Phillips, Georgia and States Rights (See also:Washington, 1902)
.
(W
.
L
.
End of Article: