Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

WILLIAM OF OCCAM (d. c. 1349)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V19, Page 966 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

WILLIAM OF See also:OCCAM (d. c. 1349)  , See also:English schoolman, known as See also:Doctor invincibilis and Venerabilis inceptor, was See also:born in the See also:village of Ockham, See also:Surrey, towards the end of the 13th See also:century . Unattested tradition says that the See also:Franciscans persuaded him while yet a boy to enter their See also:order, sent him to Merton See also:College, See also:Oxford (see G . C . Brodrick, Memorials of Merton College, p . 194), and to See also:Paris, where he was first the See also:pupil, afterwards the successful See also:rival, of See also:Duns Scotus . He probably See also:left See also:France about 1314, and there are obscure traces of his presence in See also:Germany, in See also:Italy, and in See also:England during the following seven years . It has generally been held that in 1322 he appeared as the provincial of England at the celebrated See also:assembly of the Franciscan order at See also:Perugia, and that there he headed the revolt of the Franciscans against Rene See also:John XXIL; but, according to Little (English See also:Historical Revi,av, vi . 747), the provincial See also:minister on this occasion was See also:William of See also:Nottingham . Probably, however, See also:Occam was See also:present at the assembly . His See also:share in this revolt resulted in his imprisonment, on the See also:charge of See also:heresy, for seventeen See also:weeks in the dungeons of the papal See also:palace at See also:Avignon . He and his companions —See also:Michael of See also:Cesena, See also:general of the order, and Bonagratiamanaged to See also:escape, and found their way to See also:Munich, where they aided See also:Louis IV. or V . (q.v.) of See also:Bavaria in his See also:long contest with the papal See also:curia .

It was for Occam's share in this controversy that he was best known in his lifetime . Michael of Cesena died in 1342, and Occam, who had received from him the See also:

official See also:seal of the order, was recognized as general by his party . The date of his See also:death and the See also:place of his See also:burial are both uncertain . He probably died at Munich in 1349 . William of Occam was the most prominent intellectual See also:leader in an See also:age which witnessed the disintegration of the old scholastic See also:realism, the rise of the theological See also:scepticism of the later See also:middle ages, the See also:great contest between See also:pope and See also:emperor which laid the See also:foundations of See also:modern theories of See also:government, and the See also:quarrel between the See also:Roman curia and the Franciscans which showed the long-concealed antagonism between the theories of See also:Hildebrand and See also:Francis of See also:Assisi; and he shared in all these movements . The See also:common See also:account of his philosophical position, that he reintroduced See also:nominalism, which had been in decadence since the days of See also:Roscellinus and See also:Abelard, by teaching that universals were only flatus vocis, is scarcely correct . The expression is nowhere found in his writings . He revived nominalism by See also:collecting and uniting isolated opinions upon the meaning of universals into a compact See also:system, and popularized his views by associating them with the logical principles which were in his See also:day commonly taught in the See also:universities . He linked the doctrines of nominalism on to the principles of the See also:logic of See also:Psellus, which had been introduced into the See also:West in the Summulae of See also:Peter of See also:Spain, and made them intelligible to common under-standings . The fundamental principles of his system (see See also:SCHOLASTICISM) are that " Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem " (" Occam's See also:Razor "), that nouns, like algebraical symbols, are merely denotative terms whose meaning is conventionally agreed upon (suppositio), and that the destructive effect of these principles in theological matters does not in any way destroy faith (see the Centilogium Theologicum, See also:Lyons, 1495, and Tractatus de See also:Sacramento Altaris) . In the See also:Opus nonaginta dierum (1330) (written in reply to John XXII.'s libellus against Michael of Cesena), and in its successors, the Tractatus de dogmatibus Johannis XXII. papae (1333—1334), the Compendium errorum Johannis XXII. papae (1335—1338) and in the Defensorium contra errores Johannis XXII. papae (1335—1339), Occam only incidentally expounds his views as a publicist; the books are mainly, some of them entirely, theological, but they served the purpose of the emperor and of his party, because they cut at the See also:root of the spiritual as well as of the temporal. supremacy of the pope . In his See also:writing Super potestate summi pontccis octo quaestionum decisiones (1339—1342) Occam attacks the temporal supremacy of the pope, insists on the See also:independence of kingly authority, which he maintains is as much an See also:ordinance of See also:God as is spiritual See also:rule, and discusses what is meant by the See also:state .

His views on the independence of See also:

civil rule were even more decidedly expressed in the Tractatus de jurisdictione imperatoris in causis matrimonialibus, in which, in spite of the See also:medieval See also:idea that See also:matrimony is a See also:sacrament, he demands that it belongs to the civil See also:power to decide cases of See also:affinity and to state the prohibited degrees . By 1343 there was in circulation his great See also:work the Dialogus (see Goldast ii . 398-957), in which he attempted to present his views in a See also:complete See also:summary . It consists of three parts . The first is the De fautoribus hereticorum, and deals with the pope as arbiter in the See also:matter of heresy . The second See also:part is the refutation of the doctrines of John XXII . (see above See also:treatises) . The third was to be in nine sections, of which the first and second sections alone remain to us . It is probable that the Opus nonaginta dierum and the Compendium errorum were intended to See also:form part of the work . His last work, De Electione Caroli IV., restates his opinions upon temporal authority and adds little that is new . In all his writings against Pope John XXII . (q.v.), Occam inveighs against the pope's opinions and decisions on the value of the See also:life of poverty .

The Compendium errorum selects four papal constitutions which involved a See also:

declaration against evangelical poverty, and insists th t they are full of heresy . Occam was a sincere Franciscan, and believed with his See also:master that salvation was won through rigid See also:imitation of Jesus in His poverty and obedience, and up to his days it had always been possible for Franciscans to follow the rules of their founder within his order . John XXII., however, condemned the See also:doctrine and excommunicated its supporters, some of whom were so convinced of the See also:necessity of evangelical poverty for a truly See also:Christian life that they denounced the pope when he refused them leave to practise it as See also:Antichrist . After Occam's days the opinions of Francis prevailed in many quarters, but the genuine Franciscans had no place within the See also:church . They were See also:Fraticelli, Beghards, See also:Lollards or other confraternities unrecognized by the church and in steady opposition to her government . Beside the theological and See also:political See also:works above quoted, Occamwrote Summa Logices (Paris, 1488, Oxford, 1675) commentaries on See also:Porphyry's Isagoge, on the Categoriae, De Inter pretatione and Elenchi of See also:Aristotle . These latter were printed in 1496 at See also:Bologna, and entitled Expositio Aurea super totam artemveterem; Quaestiones in quattuor libros sententiarum (Lyons, 1495) . There is no See also:good monograph on Occam . For an account of his logic, see Prantl, Geschichte der Logik (1855—187o) ; for his See also:philosophy, see Stoekl, Geschichte der Philosophie See also:des Mittelalters (1864—1866), vol. ii., for his publicist writings, see Riezler, See also:Die lilerarischen Widersacher der Pei pste zur Zeit See also:Ludwig des Baiers (1874) . See also T . M See also:Lindsay's See also:article on " Occam and his connexion with the See also:Reformation," in the Brit . Quart .

See also:

Review (See also:July, 1872) . Among See also:ancient documents consult Denifle and See also:Chatelain's Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, vol. ii. pt. i . (Paris, 1887) ; See also:Wadding's Annales Minorum (ed . See also:Fonseca, vols . 7 and 8, See also:Rome, 1733) . For a See also:list of Occam's works, see Little's See also:Grey Friars, pp . 225-234 . (T . M .

End of Article: WILLIAM OF OCCAM (d. c. 1349)
[back]
OCARINA
[next]
OCCASIONALISM (Lat. occasio, an event)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.