Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:ORIGEN (c. 185-c. 254)
, the most distinguished and most influential of all the theologians of the See also:ancient See also: It is true that in addressing the Christian See also:people he used different See also:language from that which he employed to the cultured; but there was no dissimulation in ORIGEN that—on the contrary, it was a requirement of his system . Orthodox theology has never, in any of the confessions, ventured beyond the circle which the mind of Origen first measured'out . It has suspected and amended its author, it has expunged his heresies; but whether it has put anything better or more tenable in their See also:place may be gravely questioned . Origen was See also:born, perhaps at See also:Alexandria, of Christian parents in the See also:year 185 or 186 . As a boy he showed See also:evidence of remark-able talents, and his father See also:Leonidas gave him an excellent See also:education . At a very See also:early See also:age, about the year 200, he listened to the lectures of Pantaenus and Clement in the catechetical school . This school, of which the origin (though assigned to Athenagoras) is unknown, was the first and for a See also:long time the only institution where Christians were instructed simultaneously in the See also:Greek sciences and the doctrines of the See also:holy Scriptures . Alexandria had been, since the days of the See also:Ptolemies, a centre for the inter-See also:change of ideas between See also:East and See also:West—between See also:Egypt, See also:Syria, See also:Greece and See also:Italy; and, as it had furnished Judaism with an Hellenic See also:philosophy, so it also brought about the See also:alliance of Christianity with Greek philosophy . See also:Asia See also:Minor and the West See also:developed the strict ecclesiastical forms by means of which the church closed her lines against heathenism, and especially against See also:heresy; in Alexandria Christian ideas were handled in a See also:free and speculative See also:fashion and worked out with the help of Greek philosophy . Till near the end of the 2nd century the See also:line between heresy and orthodoxy was less rigidly See also:drawn there than at See also:Ephesus, See also:Lyons, See also:Rome or See also:Carthage . In the year 202 a persecution arose, in which the father of Origen became a See also:martyr, and the See also:family lost their livelihood . Origen, who had distinguished himself by his intrepid zeal, was supported for a time by a See also:lady of See also:rank, but began about the same time to See also:earn his See also:bread by teaching; and in 203 he was placed, with the See also:sanction of the See also:bishop See also:Demetrius, at the See also:head of the catechetical school . Even then his attainments in the whole circle of the sciences were extraordinary . But the spirit of investigation impelled him to devote himself to the highest studies, philosophy and the exegesis of the sacred Scriptures . With indomitable perseverance he applied himself to these subjects; although himself a teacher, he regularly attended the lectures of Ammonius Saccas, and made a thorough study of the books of See also:Plato and See also:Numenius, of the See also:Stoics and the Pythagoreans . At the same time he endeavoured to acquire a knowledge of See also:Hebrew, in See also:order to be able to read the Old Testament in the See also:original . His manner of life was ascetic; the sayings of the See also:Sermon on the See also:Mount and the See also:practical See also:maxims of the Stoics were his guiding stars . Four oboli a See also:day, earned by copying See also:manuscripts, sufficed for his bodily sustenance . A rash resolve led him to mutilate himself that he might See also:escape from the lusts of the flesh, and work unhindered in the instruction of the See also:female See also:sex . This step he afterwards regretted . As the attendance at his classes continually increased—pagans thronging to him as well as Christians—he handed over the beginners to his friend Heracles, and took See also:charge of the more advanced pupils himself . Meanwhile the See also:literary activity of Origen was increasing year by year . He commenced his great work on the textual criticism of the Scriptures; and at the instigation of his friend Ambrosius, who provided him with the necessary amanuenses, he published his commentaries on the Old Testament and his dogmatic investigations . In this manner he laboured at Alexandria for twenty-eight years (till 231-232) .
This See also:period, however, was broken by many journeys, undertaken partly for scientific and partly for ecclesiastical See also:objects
.
We know that he was in Rome in the time of See also:Zephyrinus, again in See also:Arabia, where a See also:Roman See also:official wanted to hear his lectures, and in See also:Antioch, in response to a most flattering invitation from Julia Mammaea (See also:mother of See also: This decision was communicated to the See also:foreign churches, and seems to have been justified by referring to the self-See also:mutilation of Origen and adducing objectionable doctrines which he was said to have promulgated . The details of the incident are, however, unfortunately very obscure . No formal See also:excommunication of Origen appears to have been decreed; it was considered sufficient to have him degraded to the position of a layman . The See also:sentence was approved by most of the churches, in particular by that of Rome . 'At a later period Origen sought to vindicate his teaching in a See also:letter to the Roman bishop See also:Fabian, but, it would seem, without success . Even Heracles, his former friend and sharer of his views, took part against him; and by this means he procured his own See also:election shortly afterwards as successor to Demetrius . In these circumstances Origen thought it best voluntarily to retire from Alexandria (231-232) . He betook himself to Palestine, where his condemnation had not been acknowledged by the churches any more than it had been in See also:Phoenicia, Arabia and See also:Achaea . He settled in Caesarea, and very shortly he had a flourishing school there, whose reputation rivalled that of Alexandria . His literary work, too, was prosecuted with unabated vigour . Enthusiastic pupils sat at his feet (see the See also:Panegyric of See also:Gregory Thaumaturgus), and the methodical instruction which he imparted in all branches of knowledge was famous all over the East . Here again his activity as a teacher was interrupted by frequent journeys .
Thus he was for two years together at Caesarea in See also:Cappadocia, where he was over-taken by the Maximinian persecution; here he worked at his recension of the See also:Bible
.
We find him again in See also:Nicomedia, in See also:Athens, and twice in Arabia
.
He was called there to combat the unitarian christology of Beryllus, bishop of Bostra, and to clear up certain eschatological questions
.
As he had formerly had dealings with the See also:house of Alexander Severus, so now he entered into a See also:correspondence with the emperor See also: Origen's real See also:opinion, however, may frequently be gathered from the Philocalia—a sort of See also:anthology from his works prepared by See also:Basil the Great and Gregory Nazianzenus . The fragments in See also:Photius and in the See also:Apology of See also:Pamphilus servefor comparison . The writings of Origen consist of letters, and of works in textual criticism, exegesis, See also:apologetics, dogmatic and practical theology . 1 . See also:Eusebius (to whom we owe our full knowledge of his life) collected more than a See also:hundred of Origen's letters, arranged them in books, and deposited them in the library at Caesarea (H . E. vi . 36) . In the church library at Jerusalem (founded by the bishop Alexander) there were also numerous letters of this father (Euseb . H . E. vi . 20) . But unfortunately they have all been lost except two—one to See also:Julius See also:Africanus (about the See also:history of Susanna) and one to Gregory Thaumaturgus .
There are, besides, a couple of fragments
.
2
.
Origen's textual studies on the Old Testament were under-taken partly in order to improve the See also:manuscript tradition, and partly for apologetic reasons, to clear up the relation between the LXX and the original Hebrew See also:text
.
The results of more than twenty years' labour were set forth in his See also:Hexapla and Tetrapla, in which he placed the Hebrew text See also:side by side with the various Greek versions, examined their mutual relations in detail, and tried to find the basis for a more reliable text of the LXX
.
The Hexapla was probably never fully written out, but excerpts were made from it by various scholars at Caesarea in the 4th century; and thus large sections of it have been saved.' Origen worked also at the text of the New Testament, although he produced no recension of his own
.
3
.
The exegetical labours of Origen extend over the whole of the Old and New Testaments
.
They are divided into Scholia (0-7]l1ELWQELS, See also:short annotations, mostly grammatical), Homilies (edifying expositions grounded on exegesis), and Commentaries (roµot)
.
In the Greek original only a very small portion has been preserved; in Latin See also:translations, however, a See also:good See also:deal
.
The most important parts are the homilies on See also:Jeremiah, the books of See also:Moses, See also:Joshua and See also:Luke, and the commentaries on See also:Matthew, See also:
He thus set up a formal theory of allegorical exegesis, which is not quite See also:extinct in the churches even yet, but in his own system was of fundamental importance
.
On this method the sacred writings are regarded as an inexhaustible mine of philosophical and dogmatic See also:wisdom; in reality the exegete reads his own ideas into any passage he chooses
.
The commentaries are of course' intolerably diffuse and tedious, a great deal of them is now quite unreadable; yet, on the other See also:hand, one has not unfrequently occasion to admire the See also:sound linguistic See also:perception and the critical See also:talent of the author
?
4
.
The See also:principal apologetic work of Origen is his See also:book rcara KEXaov (eight books), written at Caesarea in the time of Philip the Arabian
.
It has been completely preserved in the original
.
This work is invaluable as a source for the history and situation of the church in the 2nd century; for it contains nearly the whole of the famous work of See also:Celsus (Aoyos auuOic) against Christianity
.
What makes Origen's See also:answer so instructive is that it shows how See also:close an See also:affinity existed between Celsus and himself in their fundamental philosophical and theological presuppositions
.
The real See also:state of the case is certainly unsuspected by Origen himself; but many of his opponent's arguments he is unable to meet except by a speculative reconstruction of the church See also:doctrine in question
.
Origen's apologetic is most effective when he appeals to the spirit and See also:power of Christianity as an evidence of its truth
.
In details his See also:argument is not free from sophistical subterfuges and superficial reasoning.'
1 See also: Schriften d . N.T . (5th ed.), § 511 . Kelm, Celsus (1873) ; See also:Aube, Hist. See also:des persecut. de l'eglise, vol. ii . (1875) ; Ornsby, Origen against Celsus," See also:Dublin See also:Review (See also:July 1879), p . 58; Pelagaud, Etude sur Celse (1878) ; Lebedeff, Origen's Book against Celsus (See also:Moscow, 1878) (See also:Russian) ; See also:Overbeck in the Theolog . Lit . Zeitung (1878), No . 22 (1879), No . 9; Orig. c . Cels., ed . See also:Selwyn (1876) . 5 . Of the dogmatic writings we possess only one in its integrity, and that only in the translation of Rufinus,' Hepl apXiov (On the Fundamental Doctrines) . This work, which was composed before 228, is the first See also:attempt at a dogmatic at once scientific and accommodated to the needs of the church . The material is drawn from Scripture, but in such a way that the propositions of the See also:regula fidei are respected . This material is then formed into a system by all the resources of the See also:intellect and of See also:speculation . Origen thus solved, after his own fashion, a problem which his predecessor Clement had not even ventured to grapple with . The first three books treat of See also:God, the world, the fall of See also:spirits, See also:anthropology and See also:ethics . " Each of these three books really embraces, although not in a strictly comprehensive way, the whole See also:scheme of the Christian view of the world, from different points of view, and with different contents." The See also:fourth book explains the divinity of the Scriptures, and deduces rules for their interpretation . It ought properly to stand as first book at the beginning . The ten books of Stromata (in which Origen compared the teaching of the Christians with that of the philosophers, and corroborated all the Christian dogmas from Plato, See also:Aristotle, Numenius and See also:Cornutus) have all perished, with the exception of small fragments; so have the tractates on the resurrection and on freewill ? 6 . Of practical theological works we have still the HporpeanKds fis ,uaprbptov and the EGirayµa srepl eOxiis . For a knowledge of Origen's Christian estimate of life and his relation to the faith of the church these two See also:treatises are of great importance . The first was written during the persecution of Maximinus Thrax, and was dedicated to his friends Ambrosius and Protoctetus . The other also See also:dates from the Caesarean period; it mentions many interesting details, and concludes with a See also:fine exposition of the See also:Lord's See also:Prayer . 7 . In his own lifetime Origen had to complain of falsifications of his works and forgeries under his name . Many pieces still in existence are wrongly ascribed to him; yet it is doubtful whether a single one of them was composed on purpose to deceive . The most noteworthy are the Dialogues of a certain Adamantius "de recta in Deum fide," which seem to have been erroneously attributed to Origen so early as the 4th century, one reason being the fact that Origen himself also See also:bore that name . (Eusebius, H.E. vi . 14.) Outline of Origen's View of the Universe and of Life.—The system of Origen was formulated in opposition to the Greek philosophers on the one hand, and the Christian Gnostics on the other ? But the science of faith, as expounded by him, bears unmistakably the stamp both of Neo-See also:Platonism and of See also:Gnosticism . As a theologian, in fact, Origen' is not merely an orthodox traditionalist and believing exegete, but a speculative philosopher of Neo-Platonic tendencies . He is, moreover, a judicious critic . The See also:union of these four elements gives character to his theology, and in a certain degree to all subsequent theology . It is this See also:combination which has determined the See also:peculiar and varying relations in which theology and the faith of the church have stood to each other since the time of Origen . That relation depends on the predominance of one or other of the four factors embraced in his theology . As an orthodox traditionalist Origen holds that Christianity is a practical and religious saving principle, that it has unfolded itself in an See also:historical See also:series of revealing facts, that the church has accurately embodied the substance of her faith in the regula fidei, and that See also:simple faith is sufficient for the renewal and salvation of man . As a philosophical idealist, however, he transmutes the whole contents of the faith of the church into ideas which See also:bear the See also:mark of Neo-Platonism, and were accordingly recognized by the later Neo-Platonists as Hellenic.' In Origen, however, ' There are, however, extensive fragments of the original in existence . 2 See Redepenning, Origenis de principiis, first sep. ed . (See also:Leipzig, 1836) ; Schnitzer, Orig. fiber See also:die Grundlehren des Glaubens, an attempt at reconstruction (1835) . 3 The opposition to the unitarians within the church must also be kept in mind . 4 See also:Porphyry says of Origen, Kara -sets irepl rpayµhrwv Kai roi Oelov (Was 'EXX,~vilwv (Euseb . H.E. vi . 19).the mystic and ecstatic See also:element is held in See also:abeyance . The ethico-religious ideal is the sorrowless See also:condition, the state of superiority to all evils, the state of order and of See also:rest . In this condition man enters into likeness to God and blessedness; and it is reached through contemplative See also:isolation and self-knowledge, which is divine wisdom . " The soul is trained as it were to behold itself in a See also:mirror, it shows the divine spirit, if it should be found worthy of such fellowship, as in a mirror, and thus discovers the traces of a See also:secret path to participation in the divine nature." As a means to the realization of this ideal, Origen introduces the whole ethics of Stoicism . But the See also:link that connects him with churchly See also:realism, as well as with the Neo-Platonic See also:mysticism, is the conviction that See also:complete and certain knowledge rests wholly on divine See also:revelation, i.e. on oracles . Consequently his theology is cosmological speculation and ethical reflection based on the sacred Scriptures . The -Scriptures, however, are treated by Origen on the basis of a matured theory of inspiration in such a way that all their facts appear as the vehicles of ideas, and have their highest value only in this aspect . That is to say, his gnosis neutralizes all that is empirical and historical, if not always as to its actuality, at least absolutely in respect of its value . The most convincing See also:proof of this is that Origen (r) takes the See also:idea of the immutability of God as the regulating idea of his system, and (2) deprives the historical " Word made flesh " of all significance for the true Gnostic . To him See also:Christ appears simply as the See also:Logos who is with the Father from eternity, and works from all eternity, to whom alone the instructed Christian directs his thoughts, requiring nothing more than a perfect—i.e. divine—teacher . In such propositions historical Christianity is stripped off as a See also:mere husk . The objects of religious knowledge are beyond the See also:plane of history, or rather—in a thoroughly Gnostic and Neo-Platonic spirit—they are regarded as belonging to a supra-mundane history . On this view contact with the faith of the church could only be maintained by distinguishing an exoteric and an See also:esoteric See also:form of Christianity . This distinction was already current in the catechetical school of Alexandria, but Origen gave it its boldest expression, and justified it on the ground of the incapacity of the Christian masses to grasp the deeper sense of Scripture, or unravel the difficulties of exegesis . On the other hand, in dealing with the problem of bringing his heterodox system into conformity with the regula fidei he evinced a high degree of technical skill . An See also:external conformity was possible, inasmuch as speculation, proceeding from the higher to the See also:lower, could keep by the stages of the regula fidei, which had been developed into a history of salvation . The system itself aims in principle at being thoroughly monistic; but, since See also:matter, although created by God out of nothing, was regarded merely as the See also:sphere in which souls are punished and purified, the system is pervaded by a strongly dualistic element . The immutability of God requires the eternity of the Logos and of the world . At this point Origen succeeded in avoiding the heretical Gnostic idea of God by assigning to the Godhead the attributes of goodness and righteousness . The pre-existence of souls is another inference from the immutability of God, although Origen also deduced it from the nature of the soul, which as a spiritual potency must be eternal . Indeed this is the fundamental idea of Origen—" the original and indestructible unity of God and all spiritual essences." From this follows the See also:necessity for the created spirit, after See also:apostasy, See also:error and See also:sin, to return always to its origin in God . The actual sinfulness of all men Origen was able to explain by the theological See also:hypothesis of pre-existence and the premundane fall of each individual soul . He holds that freedom is the inalienable See also:prerogative of the finite spirit; and this is the second point that distinguishes his theology from the heretical Gnosticism . The system unfolds itself like a See also:drama, of which the successive stages are as follows: the transcendental fall, the creation of the material world, inaugurating the history of See also:punishment and redemption, the clothing of fallen souls in flesh, the dominion of sin, evil and the demons on See also:earth, the appearing of the Logos, His union with a pure human soul, His esoteric See also:preaching of salvation, and His See also:death in the flesh, then the imparting of the Spirit, and the ultimate restoration of all things . The doctrine of the restoration appeared necessary because the spirit, in spite of its inherent freedom, cannot lose its true nature, and because the final purposes of God cannot be foiled . The end, however, is only relative, for spirits are continually falling, and God remains through eternity the creator of the world . Moreover the end is not conceived as a transfiguration of the world, but as a liberation of the spirit from its unnatural union with the sensual . Here the Gnostic and philosophical character of the system is particularly See also:manifest . The old Christian See also:eschatology is set aside; no one has dealt such deadly blows to See also:Chiliasm and Christian apocalypticism as Origen . It need hardly be said that he spiritualized the church doctrine of the resurrection of the flesh . But, while in all these doctrines he appears in the character of a Platonic philosopher, traces of rational criticism are not wanting . Where his fundamental conception admits of it, he tries to solve historical problems by historical methods . Even in the christology, where he is treating of the historical Christ, he entertains critical considerations; hence it is not altogether without reason that in after times he was suspected of " Ebionitic " views of the See also:Person of Christ . Not unfrequently he represents the unity of the Father and the Son as a unity of agreement and harmony and " identity of will." Although the theology of Origen exerted a considerable See also:influence as a whole in the two following centuries, it certainly lost nothing by the circumstance that several important See also:pro-positions were capable of being torn from their original setting and placed in new connexions . It is in fact one of the peculiarities of this theology, which professed to be at once churchly and philosophical, that most of its formulae could be interpreted and appreciated in utramque partem . By arbitrary divisions and rearrangements the doctrinal statements of this " science of faith " could be made to serve the most diverse dogmatic tendencies . This is seen especially in the doctrine of the Logos . On the basis of his idea of God Origen was obliged to insist in the strongest manner on the See also:personality, the eternity (eternal See also:generation) and the essential divinity of the Logos .l On the other hand, when he turned to consider the origin of the Logos he did not hesitate to speak of Him as a KTL?µa, and to include Him amongst the rest of God's spiritual creatures . A via-pa, which is at the same time ii oovacop rco Sew, was no See also:contradiction to him, simply because he held the immutability, the pure know-ledge and the blessedness which constituted the divine nature to be communicable attributes . In later times both the orthodox and the Arians appealed to his teaching, both with a certain plausibility; but the inference of See also:Arius, that an imparted divinity must be divinity in the second degree, Origen did not draw . With respect to other doctrines also, such as those of the Holy Spirit and the incarnation of Christ, &c., Origen prepared the way for the later dogmas . The technical terms See also:round which such See also:bitter controversies raged in the 4th and 5th centuries are often found in Origen lying peacefully side by side . But this is just where his epoch-making importance lies, that all the later parties in the church learned from him . And this is true not only of the dogmatic parties; solitary monks and ambitious priests, hard-headed critical exegetes,2 allegorists, mystics, all found something congenial in his writings . The only man who tried to shake off the theological influence of Origen was See also:Marcellus of See also:Ancyra, who did not succeed in producing any lasting effect on theology . The attacks on Origen, which had begun in his lifetime, did not cease for centuries, and only subsided during the time of the fierce Arian controversy . It was not so much the relation between pistis and gnosis—faith and knowledge—as defined by Origen that gave offence, but rather isolated propositions, such as his doctrines of the pre-existence of souls, of the soul and See also:body of Christ, of the resurrection of the flesh, of the final restoration, " Communis substantiae est filio cum patre; &ir6ppota enim bµootvLos videtur, i.e. unius substantiae cum illo corpore ex quo est tlaroppouz." 'E .g . See also:Dionysius of Alexandria; compare his judicious See also:verdict on the See also:Apocalypse.and of the See also:plurality of worlds . Even in the 3rd century Origen's view of the Trinity and of the Person of Christ was called in question, and that from various points of view . It was not till the 5th century, however, that objections of this See also:kind became frequent . In the 4th century Pamphilus, Eusebius of Caesarea, See also:Athanasius, the Cappadocians, See also:Didymus, and Rufinus were on the side of Origen against the attacks of See also:Methodius and many others . But, when the zeal of See also:Epiphanius was kindled against him, when Jerome, alarmed about his own reputation, and in See also:defiance of his past attitude, turned against his once honoured teacher, and See also:Theophilus, See also:patriarch of Alexandria, found it prudent, for See also:political reasons, and out of See also:consideration for the uneducated monks, to condemn Origen—then his authority received a See also:shock from which it never recovered . There were, doubtless, in the 5th century church historians and theologians who still spoke of him with reverence, but such men became fewer and fewer . In the West See also: |