Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

PANTHEISM (Gr. 7rav, all, Oeos, god)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V20, Page 683 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

PANTHEISM (Gr. 7rav, all, Oeos, See also:god)  , the See also:doctrine which identifies the universe with See also:God, or God with the universe ? The See also:term " pantheist " was apparently first used by See also:John See also:Toland in 1705, and it was at once adcpted by See also:French and See also:English writers . Though the term is thus of See also:recent origin, the See also:system of thought or attitude of mind for which it stands may be traced back both in See also:European and in Eastern See also:philosophy to a very See also:early See also:stage . At the same See also:time See also:pantheism almost necessarily presupposes a more See also:concrete and less sophisticated conception of God and the universe . It presents itself historically as an intellectual revolt against the difficulties involved in the presupposition of theistic and polytheistic systems, and in philosophy as an See also:attempt to solve the See also:dualism of the one and the many, unity and difference, thought and See also:extension . Thus the pious See also:Hindu, confronted by the impossibility of obtaining perfect knowledge by the senses or by See also:reason, finds his See also:sole perfection in the contemplation of tie See also:infinite (Brahma) . In See also:Greece the See also:idea of a fundamental unity behind the See also:plurality of phenomena was See also:present, though vaguely, in the minds of the early physicists (see IONIAN SCHOOL), but the first thinker who focussed the problem clearly was See also:Xenophanes . Unlike the Hindu, Xenophanes inclined to pantheism as a protest against the anthropomorphic polytheism of the time, which seemed to him improperly to exalt one of the many modes of finite existence into the See also:place of the Infinite . Thus Xenophanes for the first time postulates a supreme God whose 2 Strictly, pantheism is to identify the universe with God, while the term " pancosmism" (See also:trap, Kbo).tos, the universe) has frequently been used for the See also:identification of God with the universe . For See also:practical purposes this refinement is of small value, the two ideas being aspects of the same thing; cf . A . M .

See also:

Fairbairn, Studies in Philos . Relig . Hist . (1877), p . 392 . Both " See also:Atheism " (q.v.) and " Acosmism " are used as contradictories . characteristic is primarily the negation of the Finite . A similar metaphysic from a different starting-point is found in Heraclitus, ,who postulates behind the perpetually changing universe of phenomena a One which remains . This attitude towards existence, expressing itself in different phraseology, has been prominent to a greater or less degree since Xenophanes and Heraclitus . Thus the metaphysic of See also:Plato finds reality only in the " Idea," of which all phenomena are merely imperfect copies . See also:Neoplatonism (and especially See also:Plotinus) adopted a similar attitude . The See also:Stoics, with the supreme See also:object of giving to human See also:life a definite unity and purpose, made the individual a See also:part of the universe and sought to obliterate all See also:differences .

The universe to them is a manifestation of divine reason, while all things come from and return to (the 6&'H avw KaTw) the srvei a &airvpov, the ultimate See also:

matter . The same problems in a different context confronted the monotheistic religions of Judaism and See also:Christianity . We find See also:Philo Judaeus endeavouring to See also:free the concept of the Old Testament Yahweh from anthropomorphic characteristics and finite determinations . But though Philo See also:sees the difficulties of the orthodox Judaism he cannot accept pantheism or See also:mysticism so far as to give up the See also:personality of God (see Locos) . With Neoplatonism we enter upon a somewhat different though closely allied attitude of mind . To Plotinus God lies beyond sense and See also:imagination: all the theologian can do is to point the way in which the thinker must travel . Though the spirit and the See also:language of Plotinus is closely allied to that of pantheism, the result of his thinking is not pantheism but mysticism . This may be briefly illustrated by a comparison with the greatest of See also:modern pantheists, See also:Spinoza . To him God is the immanent principle of the universe—" See also:Deus sive Natura." On the principle that everything which is determined (finite) is " negated " (" determinatio est negatio "), God, the ultimate reality must be entirely undetermined . To explain the universe Spinoza proceeds to argue that God, though undetermined ab extra, is capable of infinite self-determination . Thus God, the causa sui, manifests himself in an infinite multiplicity of particular modes . Spinoza is, therefore, both pantheist and pancosmist: God exists only as realized in the cosmos: the cosmos exists only as a manifestation of God .

Plotinus, on the other See also:

hand, cannot admit any realization or manifestation of the Infinite: God is necessarily above the See also:world—he has no attributes, and is unthinkable . Such a view is not pantheism but mysticism (q.v.), and should be compared with the See also:theology of See also:Oriental races . The semi-Oriental mysticism of the Neoplatonists and the See also:Logos doctrines of the Stoics alike See also:influence early See also:Christian doctrine, and the pantheistic view is found frequently in See also:medieval theology (e.g. in See also:Erigena, Meister Eckhardt, See also:Jakob See also:Boehme) . The Arabic See also:scholar See also:Averroes gave See also:Aristotle to western See also:Europe in a pantheistic garb, and thus influenced medieval scientists . So See also:Bruno constructed a personified nature, and the scientific and humanistic era began . The pantheism of Spinoza, combining as it did the religious and the scientific points of view, had a wide influence upon thought and culture . See also:Schelling (in his Identity-philosophy) and See also:Hegel both carried on the pantheistic tradition, which after Hegel See also:broke up into two lines of thought, the one pantheistic the other atheistic . From the religious point of view there are two See also:main problems . The first is to establish any real relation between the individual and God without destroying personality and with it the whole idea of human responsibility and free will: the second is to explain the infinity of God without destroying his personality . In what sense can God be outside the world (see See also:DEISM): in what sense in it (pantheism) ? The See also:great objection to pantheism is that, though ostensibly it magnifies the Creator and gets rid of the difficult dualism of Creator and Creation, it tends practically to deny his existence in any practical intelligible sense . See, further, See also:THEISM; DEISM; ATHEISM; See also:ABSOLUTE .

End of Article: PANTHEISM (Gr. 7rav, all, Oeos, god)
[back]
PANTELLERIA, or PANTALARIA (ancient Cossyra1)
[next]
PANTHEON (Lat. pantheum or pantheon; Gr. srav& ov, ...

Additional information and Comments

A Dialectic on Spiritualism: Six basic theories make the wheel that defines what kind of God exists: Theism - God is transcendant rather than immanent, and intervenes in the universe; God created the universe and guides the universe. Deism - God is transcendant rather than immanent, and does not intervene in the universe; God created the universe but does not guide the universe. Pantheism - God is immanent rather than transcendant, and does intervene in the universe; God did not create the universe because God has always been the universe. Pandeism - God is immanent rather than transcendant, and does not intervene in the universe; God created the universe from itself (the universe is all of God) but does not guide the universe . Panentheism - God is both transcendant and immanent, and intervenes in the universe; God created the universe from itself (the universe is part of, but not all of, God) and guides the universe. Panendeism - God is both transcendant and immanent, and does not intervene in the universe; God created the universe from itself (the universe is part of, but not all of, God) but does not guide the universe. Note that atheism, in denying God exists, speaks to the character of the universe itself as a universe without God - although some atheists would not exclude positions such as deism, pantheism or pandeism as each excludes the theistic God. Note that agnosticism is no theory of God at all, but rather of human knowledge about God. Polytheism or polydeism effectively denies the existence of God by claiming that the power of God is divided among different beings, none of which is holds a portion sufficient to wrest such power from the others; such may follow however from a single God who has chosen to divide his power in this way.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.