See also:PARNASSUS PLAYS
, a See also:series of three scholastic entertainments performed at St See also:John's See also:College, See also:Cambridge, between 1597 and 1603
.
They are satirical in See also:character and aim at setting forth the wretched See also:state of scholars and the small respect paid to learning by the See also:world at large, as exemplified in the adventures of two university men, Philomusus and Studioso
.
The first See also:part, The-See also:Pilgrimage to See also:Parnassus, describes allegorically their four See also:year's See also:journey to Parnassus, i.e. their progress through the university course of See also:logic, See also:rhetoric, &c., and the temptations set before them by their See also:- MEETING (from " to meet," to come together, assemble, 0. Eng. metals ; cf. Du. moeten, Swed. mota, Goth. gamotjan, &c., derivatives of the Teut. word for a meeting, seen in O. Eng. Wit, moot, an assembly of the people; cf. witanagemot)
meeting with Madido, a drunkard, Stupido, a puritan who hates learning, Amoretto, a See also:lover, and Ingenioso, a disappointed student
.
The See also:play was doubtless originally intended to stand alone, but the favour with which it was received led to the See also:writing of a sequel, The Return from Parnassus, which deals with the adventures of the two students after the completion of their studies at the university, and shows them discovering by See also:bitter experience of how little pecuniary value their learning is
.
They again meet Ingenioso, who is making a scanty living by the See also:press, but is on the See also:search for a See also:patron, as well as a new character, Luxurioso
.
All four now leave the university for See also:London, while a See also:draper, a tailor and a tapster lament their unpaid bills
.
Philomusus and Studioso find See also:work respectively as a See also:sexton and a See also:tutor in a See also:merchant's See also:family, while Luxurioso becomes a writer and See also:singer of See also:ballads
.
In the meanwhile Ingenioso has met with a patron, a coxcombical See also:fellow named Gullio, for whom he composes amorous verses in the See also:style of See also:Chaucer, See also:Spenser and See also:Shakespeare, the last alone being to the patron's See also:satisfaction
.
Gullio is indeed a See also:great admirer of Shakespeare, and in his conversations with Ingenioso we have some of the most interesting of the See also:early allusions to him
.
A further sequel, The Second Part of the Return from Parnassus, or the See also:Scourge of See also:Simony, is a more ambitious, and from every point of view more interesting, See also:production than the two earlier pieces
.
In it we again meet with Ingenioso, now become a satirist, who on pretence of discussing a recently-published collection of extracts from contemporary See also:poetry, John Bodenham's See also:Belvedere, briefly criticizes, or rather characterizes, a number of writers of the See also:day, among them being Spenser, See also:- CONSTABLE (0. Fr. connestable, Fr. connetable, Med. Lat. comestabilis, conestabilis, constabularius, from the Lat. comes stabuli, count of the stable)
- CONSTABLE, ARCHIBALD (1774-1827)
- CONSTABLE, HENRY (1562-1613)
- CONSTABLE, JOHN (1776-1837)
- CONSTABLE, SIR MARMADUKE (c. 1455-1518)
Constable, See also:Drayton, John See also:Davies, See also:Marston, See also:Marlowe, See also:Jonson, Shakespeare and See also:Nashe—the last of whom is referred to as dead
.
It is impossible here to detail the See also:plot of the play, and it can only be said that Philomusus and Studioso, having tried all means of earning a living, abandon any further See also:attempt to turn their learning to See also:account and determine to become shepherds
.
Severalnew characters are introduced in this part, real persons sucfr as Danter, the printer, See also:Richard See also:Burbage and See also:- WILLIAM
- WILLIAM (1143-1214)
- WILLIAM (1227-1256)
- WILLIAM (1J33-1584)
- WILLIAM (A.S. Wilhelm, O. Norse Vilhidlmr; O. H. Ger. Willahelm, Willahalm, M. H. Ger. Willehelm, Willehalm, Mod.Ger. Wilhelm; Du. Willem; O. Fr. Villalme, Mod. Fr. Guillaume; from " will," Goth. vilja, and " helm," Goth. hilms, Old Norse hidlmr, meaning
- WILLIAM (c. 1130-C. 1190)
- WILLIAM, 13TH
William See also:Kemp, the actors, as well as such abstractions as Furor Poeticus and Phantasma
.
The second See also:title of the piece, " The Scourge of Simony," is justified by a sub-plot dealing with the attempts of one, Academico, to obtain a living from an ignorant See also:country patron, See also:Sir See also:Roderick, who, however, presents it, on the recommendation of his son Amoretto, who has been bribed, to a non-university See also:man Immerito
.
The three pieces have but small See also:literary and dramatic value, their importance consisting almost wholly in the allusions to, and criticisms of contemporary literature
.
Their author is unknown, but it is fairly certain, from the See also:evidence of See also:general style, as well as some peculiarities of See also:language, that they are the work of the same writer
.
The only name which has been put forward with any reasonable See also:probability is that of John Day, whose claim has been supported with much ingenuity by See also:Professor I
.
Gollancz (see full discussion in Dr A
.
W
.
See also:- WARD
- WARD, ADOLPHUS WILLIAM (1837- )
- WARD, ARTEMUS
- WARD, EDWARD MATTHEW (1816-1879)
- WARD, ELIZABETH STUART PHELPS (1844-1911)
- WARD, JAMES (1769--1859)
- WARD, JAMES (1843– )
- WARD, JOHN QUINCY ADAMS (1830-1910)
- WARD, LESTER FRANK (1841– )
- WARD, MARY AUGUSTA [MRS HUMPHRY WARD]
- WARD, WILLIAM (1766-1826)
- WARD, WILLIAM GEORGE (1812-1882)
Ward's Eng
.
Dram
.
Lit. ii
.
640, See also:note 2), but the question still awaits definitive See also:solution
.
As to the date there is more evidence
.
The three pieces were evidently performed at See also:Christmas of different years, the last being not later than Christmas 1602, as is shown by the references to See also:Queen See also:Elizabeth, while the Pilgrimage mentions books not printed until 1598, and hence can hardly have been earlier than that year
.
The See also:prologue of 2 Return states that that play had been written for the preceding year, and also, in a passage of which the See also:reading is somewhat doubtful, implies that the whole series had extended over four years
.
Thus we arrive at either 1599, 1600 and 1602, or 1598, 1599 and 16oi, as, on the whole, the most likely See also:dates of performance
.
Mr Fleay, on grounds which do not seem conclusive, dates them 1598, 16oi and 1602
.
The question of how far the characters are meant to represent actual persons has been much discussed
.
Mr Fleay maintains that the whole is a See also:personal See also:satire, his identifications of the See also:chief characters in 2 Return being (I) Ingenioso, See also:- THOMAS
- THOMAS (c. 1654-1720)
- THOMAS (d. 110o)
- THOMAS, ARTHUR GORING (1850-1892)
- THOMAS, CHARLES LOUIS AMBROISE (1811-1896)
- THOMAS, GEORGE (c. 1756-1802)
- THOMAS, GEORGE HENRY (1816-187o)
- THOMAS, ISAIAH (1749-1831)
- THOMAS, PIERRE (1634-1698)
- THOMAS, SIDNEY GILCHRIST (1850-1885)
- THOMAS, ST
- THOMAS, THEODORE (1835-1905)
- THOMAS, WILLIAM (d. 1554)
Thomas Nashe, (2) Furor Poeticus, J
.
Marston, (3) Phantasma, Sir John Davies, (4) Philomusus, T
.
See also:Lodge, (5) Studioso, Drayton
.
Professor Gollancz identifies Judicio with See also:- HENRY
- HENRY (1129-1195)
- HENRY (c. 1108-1139)
- HENRY (c. 1174–1216)
- HENRY (Fr. Henri; Span. Enrique; Ger. Heinrich; Mid. H. Ger. Heinrich and Heimrich; O.H.G. Haimi- or Heimirih, i.e. " prince, or chief of the house," from O.H.G. heim, the Eng. home, and rih, Goth. reiks; compare Lat. rex " king "—" rich," therefore " mig
- HENRY, EDWARD LAMSON (1841– )
- HENRY, JAMES (1798-1876)
- HENRY, JOSEPH (1797-1878)
- HENRY, MATTHEW (1662-1714)
- HENRY, PATRICK (1736–1799)
- HENRY, PRINCE OF BATTENBERG (1858-1896)
- HENRY, ROBERT (1718-1790)
- HENRY, VICTOR (1850– )
- HENRY, WILLIAM (1795-1836)
Henry See also:Chettle (Prot. of Brit
.
Acad., 1903-1904, p
.
202)
.
Dr Ward, while rejecting Mr Fleay's identifications as a whole, considers that by the See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time the final part was written the author may have more or less identified Ingenioso with Nashe, though the character was not originally conceived with this intention
.
This is of course possible, and the fact that Ingenioso himself speaks in praise of Nashe, who is regarded as dead, is not an insuperable objection
.
We must not, however, overlook the fact that the author was evidently very See also:familiar with Nashe's See also:works, and that all three parts, not only in the speeches of Ingenioso, but throughout, are full of reminiscences of his writings
.
End of Article: